Friendly reminder that Mao had amazing theory and that...

Friendly reminder that Mao had amazing theory and that, despite all the atrocities committed under his rule and the cancer that is modern Maoism, had amazing theory, if there's one thing the Chinese revolution showed is an example of how universalist human emancipation can be.

marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_16.htm
marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_17.htm
marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-2/mswv2_03.htm

Other urls found in this thread:

lacan.com/zizmaozedong.htm
marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-2/mswv2_26.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Democracy
marxists.org/subject/art/literature/children/ref/excerpt/krop.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

bump

Hmmmmmmmm

...

Go away pls.

Delicious Holla Forumsyp asshurt

Mao was a shitter

Assessing Stirner's status as little more than a meme philosopher is not something exclusively Holla Forumsyps do, nerd.

Now leave my thread and let the big boys talk theory pls ty.

Hahaha property rights are a spook!! Its my thread now faggot

Gulags are too humane for your types.

That being said, some of the rationale behind the Cultural Revolution actually was sound, even if the execution left a lot to be desired.

No it's my thread

?


Yeah no idea where that post came from tbh. Reminder to hide and report both tankies and smashies alike, especially the Stalinists and Stirnerites who literally have nothing to contribute ever and just shitpost with their ebin meme macros.

The way Mao approached the peasantry was very different from Stalin who forced them to become modern workers while Mao had them emancipate themselves as workers. In this sense Mao was much more of a universalist than Stalin.

...

Yes, universalism. Mao, in spite of his failures, was a universalist who consistently believed in the universality of theory. He would have rejected post-Maoism (Dengism) that would claim the Chinese cannot have democracy because democracy is supposedly a western-developed thing and thus only fit for the west, which would be an example of particularism (ironically coming very close to liberal identity politics). Read about it.

I'm not an ML or Maoist but I don't just readily accept gorrilions of murders when the people coming up with this shit are neo-nazis


not gonna happen

not gonna happen

I love his new democracy and democratic dictatorship tbh.

On the gorillions matter, I like to roll with what Zizek says in Marxist Lord of Misrule: lacan.com/zizmaozedong.htm (ctrl+F "mao" and start reading around where he first mentions him).


Nah, the anarchist tradition definitely has good theory and thinkers but that one guy ITT is definitely not really honoring that. I mean he can legitimately not keep himself from accompanying his every shitpost with at least one funny jpeg of a meme philosopher whenever he posts and he puts himself in this thread just to derail it.

a bummer he didn't put into practice while he ruled china for 30 years then

The cultural revolution was anti-materialist nonsense. Third world scum need to stop appropriating marxism since they are incapable of appreciating it.

He did. One could argue that he in fact went too far in his universalism; completely discarding all human subjectivity and grief (see text: ).

ITT

bump for good thread.

it's like xexizy was his ghostwriter

keep eating up that bourgie propaganda

Did he really die from a bee sting? How low T was this nerd?

...

I like Mao and the universality of his theory and that one can apply maoism to their particular conditions.


Stirnerism or nihilist communism/anarcho-nihilism is for middle class edgelords who are barely learning how to leftist philosophy. If morality, society, ideology, and anything else that doesn't exist in the material world are just spooks, then the sense of self, the ego and individuality are also simply spooks for they can not be proven to exist outside of a subjective existence. Just as class, nation, and state have no meaning without a society or some other contradiction, the self, the ego and the individual has no meaning or existence without a collective or some other contradiction. Also, language is a spook.

tl;dr If you just skipped to the tl;dr then you have proven yourself to be a lvl 50 dumbfuck who can't or won't learn more leftist philosophy. Lurk moar.

It's a shitposter. I fell for the bait.

Yes, and the only one to attend his funeral was Bruno Bauer, an equally irrelevant meme philosopher from the young Hegelians clique.

Holla Forums here, I know two fifths of bugger all about leftist philosophy. Where do I begin?

Mao was a bourgeois class collaborationist and his followers are all tumblr freaks

marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-2/mswv2_26.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Democracy

INTO THE TRASH IT GOES

1/4

Fugg uploaded the same book twice

Have the link bevause my internet is too slow

marxists.org/subject/art/literature/children/ref/excerpt/krop.html

His only crime was ignoring Marx.

Surely if his theory is so amazing you'll be able to describe it so even an idiot can understand. What is "Maoism" exactly?

shigged and digged

Why does just about every major self-proclaimed commie leader of the last century seem to have had their own special snowflake theory? Is it because they're all the despotic dictators who need a reason to justify their rule?

Max looked like the nostalgiacritic?

Because they adapted socialist ideas to their current time ands place.

power corrupts

Yes.

Stirner was so autistic that the best he's managed to do with his work is attract DeviantArt spergs to his intellectual legacy. Let that sink in.

I thought that was a central part of being an egoist. Y'all are basically just right-libertarians who realized capitalism is shit but still wanna fuck little girls right?

shit I realized you were posting those ironically after. sorry I'm like really autistic.

...

What's her website? I want to subscribe to her newsletter.

wtf she goes on leftypol