Anti-zionist

Okay Holla Forums answer me this: how the FUCK aren't Hasidic Jews our greatest religious allies?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_and_Orthodox_Judaism
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

extremely xenophobic and they'd never accept gentiles, they don't even accept anyone outside of their own branch.

This is true of pretty much every religious sect or denomination. Protestants believe Catholics and Eastern Christians are heretics and don't affiliate with them. Muslims believe all non-Muslims must be subordinate to Muslims. Hindus have a caste system.

Not to mention all the sectarianism on the left as it is.

Christianity is nowhere near as insular as it was hundreds of years ago, at least for catholicism and certain protestant denominations. Muslims won't refuse to communicate with you if you're non-Muslim unlike orthodox jews.

Many of the "good" Christian sects that get promoted as proto-socialist or proto-communist were also highly insular and distrusting of others. Gnostics, for instance, were basically proto-Calvinists who rejected anyone outside their sect on the basis of predestination.

That's why their system works. It is precisely because Internationalist Communism is Internationalist that it cannot succeed, it is contingent on what other people do, when all any group can do is decide their own behavior.

Bakunin was right. If you want Communism, form a fucking Commune, do not waste time trying to convince people outside of your in-group to join you.

I never talked about "good," or "bad," and gnostics are fucking dead anyways, why concern yourself with them?

anyways I don't share that belief, and you can't have a highly functioning socialist society with insular communities.

Ah, but here you see the problem: The Christian groups that aren't insular are the ones which are on the decline, whereas those with strong in-group preference (Fundamentalists, Conservatives, Traditional Orthodox) are the ones who reproduce above sustainability.

Every group that succumbs to the culture-death disease of cosmopolitanism starts to die from that moment onwards. Catholicism is basically only holding on by its fingernails because hardline Catholics crank out 12 kids each, the liberalized Catholic Church has a startlingly low retention rate and they barely breed.

It's the same with Jews. The highly conservative Jewish population in the UK makes up something like 1/20th of the Jewish population, but a full third of all births within the Jewish population. With very high retention rates over the course of four or five generations, the population will end up representing their group disproportionately to their original numbers.

In this way we have essentially encouraged the radicalization of all religious groups. By 2100, radical Christians will be MORE radical and MORE numerous, not less, and the same with every other ethnic and religious group. The current system selects for a rejection of modern values.

sources? I also want to see education, and income levels if available for this. Either way, having more children and reproducing over abundantly is not equivalent to having a successful society.

This.

Reproduction is one thing most communists are completely in the dark about. So you've got a nice commune - so what? How do you preserve it for future generations? How do you maintain the communal social structure, especially without state force?

Orthodox Jews and orthodox Muslims succeed in this. Their communities are still here despite numerous hardships because they put so much effort into maintaining them. Both groups have arranged marriages and marry their children off young (17-18ish for girls, 20ish for boys) so they will in turn have many children.

These religious groups also live according to their principles. There is no divorce between theory and practice if you're Hasidic or a deeply religious Muslim: every aspect of your life is done in according to religious doctrine.

...

Since when and why haven't I heard about this?

The Asians said hi

They see the lust for money as a great evil.

Shalom, Holla Forums

All religion is to be crushed

Is being anti-Semitic incompatible with Communism?

If so, does that mean race-blind humanism is inextricably linked with Communism?

Anti racism is

Anti-Racism means what?

Eternally against using only a couple physiological markers to distinguish between different genetic clusters of people?
Eternally against using any physiological markers at all to distinguish?
If the latter, does that mean being against familial identification and preference? (Destruction of the concept of 'family' in any degree) If the latter, to what scale is the identification?

I don't see the difference between race-blind humanism and 'anti-racism', which is why I ask what the distinction is. Being blind to physiological markers means there must be some marker we use to distinguish human from non-human. If even that is encompassed in anti-racism, then what exactly would a positive 'Communist' identity look like? Or is it always negative?

wow user i don't know what to tell you

Eyyyyyy sup cunt

Right, so what are relevant human physiological distinctions for Communism?

It sounds to me you're just answering 'Yes' to my first three questions.

That is, unless you think that people who make those distinctions are not worth correcting or suppressing at all _or_ shouldn't be cared about or regarded in anyway. That is almost to suggest that 'racists' are actually 'specimens', or simply phenomenon that cannot or shouldn't be humanized except as learning material for the 'real humans', which are Communists.

However, what explains a 'racist's' behavior if what determines their non-human status (within Communism) as something not relevant to physiological markers? That is, you say they do not have any relevant physiological differences from you or anyone else, but yet they are not human; not Communist, because they distinguish others on the basis of race. Therefor, you dehumanize them for having 'wrong-think' and tell them that relevant distinctions only reside within intellectual/political behaviors, but simultaneously treat them as nothing more than a 'phenomenon'. You cannot have a physiological explanation for their non-humanness.

Of course, this is the dialectical method. That reduces all words down to referencing purely a dialectical realm instead of a physical one. So, identity becomes a social construct.

Why couldn't someone be Communist in every other way except they're racist? What makes it incompatible?

Chabad and Breslev are not anti-zionist. In fact the bulk of genocidal settlers are from these sects.

REMINDER

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_and_Orthodox_Judaism