NY Times/Harvard Uni: Races and Differences Between them Exist, No Longer Can Be Denied

They have a lot going for them in that environment on genetics alone. darker skin keeping the sun from burning them and longer limbs with a shorter torso alone is a huge advantage.

I think a lot of anons are misenterpreting the text.
When he says race is a social construct, I'm pretty sure he's referring to the perception of race people have.
Niggers eating KFC? Social construct.
Niggers are more violent? Genetics.
You can also read the last paragraph as "wecan't keep calling racist to people who bring this issues up and silence research"

I'm pretty sure whites have the capacity to create shade and reach things.

I'm pretty sure myself and most other first world whites would be incompetent if dropped into those environments
We might be a little more uncomfortable with the heat for a month or two, but whites do just fine anywhere. South Africa, Australia, Rhodesia, etc., etc.,

Blacks = Adapted to it being balls hot all the fucking time
Whites = Adapted to think abstractly about the environment in order to prepare for varying extremes

didnt want to bump but this is illuminati propaganda, they admit they arent measuring shit. they admit the test is on things that the peole who scored low have no familiarity with.
bush man have oral traditon that you couldnt memorize and retell
most of those tribes have better pattern matching recognition
they have intricate art and painting and ritual history

take some of those kids and raise them like the asians raise their kids and youll get the same score

you think this aboriginal could pass? niggas white af but he doesn't know any geometry

Attached: 1512209806519.png (398.6 KB, 395x418)

I'm pretty sure myself and most other first world whites would be incompetent if dropped into those environments

user, you do realize Whites ruled the entirety of Africa only a few years ago?

Attached: 105433-004-09BA5699-european-colonies-in-niggerland.gif (257.63 KB, 972x1028)

whites do just fine anywhere.
I'm sure if you were to take a representative sample of whites and drop them in the jungle to live they would do better than a representative sample of blacks, but I don't imagine a group of whites with the minority of capable survivalists removed from the equation would do better than the blacks with their best people intact. Modern domesticated people of all races are almost useless without their technology and safety nets. I'd bet on the death of most people if not accompanied by the comparatively miniscule amount of those more capable.

You guys underestimate the how worthless people have become since (((entertainment))) became their primary drive to exist.

Why play the technicality game when it's obvious that the adventurous whites who want to craft a new society and colony would embark knowing they need survival skills and resources? That level of premeditation exceeds niggers by far.

I'm pretty sure myself and most other first world whites would be incompetent if dropped into those environments.
Yes but natural selection would fix the issue within two generations and then you'd have new Boers and Rhodesians. Higher IQ and creativity takes tens of thousands of years to evolve but greatly enhance a population's adaptability.

In that case he actually saying racial stereotypes are social constructs.

why northern Europeans are taller on average than southern Europeans
Aren't the Dinaric people the tallest on earth?

technicality game
I'm still speaking the context of my original post, it's you people that read stuff out of context and then reply to me.
Why do you people keep responding to the first part of my reply to that guy out of context of the point I was making? Finish reading before you reply. I go on to suggest that whites are obviously superior in the next sentence.

Why do you people
you people
You mean WHITE PEOPLE?!

guys i think we should memory hole this and simultaneously act on its truth in our own spheres of control. let it all burn down. accelerationism is best.

Another high-profile example is James Watson, the scientist who in 1953 co-discovered the structure of DNA, and who was forced to retire as head of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories in 2007 after he stated in an interview — without any scientific evidence — that research has suggested that genetic factors contribute to lower intelligence in Africans than in Europeans.

So close, yet so far

why yes, genetics does affect your susceptibility to diseases, your height, basically everything about you and yes, that does correlate with race
BUT DON'T YOU DARE SUGGEST THAT GENETICS CAN INFLUENCE INTELLIGENCE
show me the gene, racist!

How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’
CHANGING
Fuck, I hate journos so much.
We've known this shit for over a hundred years, you don't need to be a geneticist to observe obvious differences between races. Our ancestors didn't look at genetics when they bred wolves into dogs, they looked for behaviors.

This but

What the fuck happened? It cant havr been Trump. Theres a LOT of antisemitism and conservative values springing up worldwide and a call to logic and common sense. It's like all the shenanigans the kikes have been pulling have simultaneously been ground to a halt.

Oh shit we are just so fucking close to the tipping point oh god its gonna be days now… like weeks max

Attached: images-145.jpg (3.72 KB, 300x168)

Calls to logic don't mean much if no one follows. And a lot of the big names in movements like the aut-right are transparently controlled opposition. Literal jews are coming out to tell the goyim that nationalism and racism isn't so bad. Now pls gib money on patreon or whatever.

Until you see average joe taking action to reject the current system then it's all just business as usual. Now if you hear of a business, or a bar that is trading food/beer/goods for some alternate currency like silver, then you know shit is hitting the fan.

We know Hitler was a good guy therefore if the public starts talking about "maybe Hitler wasn't such a bad guy" it isn't news

Fuck right off

Once this becomes common sense again the public will decide which race is superior on their own. The spread of credible claims like this is critical.

So tired of this dumb myth. No, Africans are not the product of their environment. They are the product of inbreeding and disease, as has been shown over and over. It's the exact same degeneracy that caused a continent of Mesoamericans to go from an agricultural empire of masons to scattered tribes of naked cavemen.

those digits

Attached: 591.gif (1.08 MB, 964x912)
Attached: 1593014507-abubanter440118257201.jpg (320.58 KB, 640x603)
Attached: 5ff.png (53.05 KB, 300x300)

(checked)
The kikes will try to water this down and diminish it but we can meme this easily to make it achieve its full potential.

Attached: cheque'd.png (131.58 KB, 460x700)

has been shown over and over.

[citation needed]

you need a citation to see what niggers are?

With the help of these tools, we are learning that while race may be a social construct, differences in genetic ancestry that happen to correlate to many of today’s racial constructs are real.
(((They))) just can't help themselves.

Why even bother saying it's fake if you're just trying to say it's real?
By David Reich
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reich_(geneticist)
Reich grew up in Washington, D.C. His parents are novelist Tova Reich (sister of Rabbi Avi Weiss) and Walter Reich, a professor at George Washington University, who served as the first director of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
==EVERY SINGLE TIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIME==>>11421011
archive.fo/6liSf

Fuck's sake…

From the article:
In 1942, the anthropologist Ashley Montagu published “Man’s Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race,” an influential book that argued that race is a social concept with no genetic basis.

See also:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashley_Montagu
Montagu began life as Israel Ehrenberg, having been born on June 28, 1905, in [[London], England]].
He grew up in London's East End. He remembered often being subjected to antisemitic abuse when he ventured out of his own Jewish neighborhood.

David Reich is right

lel

b-b-b-but m-m-m-muhhh (((jared diamond)))
picture of white person riding zebra.jpg

Nigger, if that was true, they wouldn't be raping goats to cure AIDS, and a shitload of African animals wouldn't be bordering on endangered if the niggers knew how to survive in their shitholes.

If you don't know that inbreeding makes niggers by now, you need to lurk for 1,000 years. Just looking at what first-cousin marriage did to Arabs tells you precisely how degenerate Africans are.

From the article:
Beginning in 1972, genetic findings began to be incorporated into this argument. That year, the geneticist Richard Lewontin published an important study of variation in protein types in blood. He grouped the human populations he analyzed into seven “races” — West Eurasians, Africans, East Asians, South Asians, Native Americans, Oceanians and Australians — and found that around 85 percent of variation in the protein types could be accounted for by variation within populations and “races,” and only 15 percent by variation across them. To the extent that there was variation among humans, he concluded, most of it was because of “differences between individuals.”

See also:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lewontin
Lewontin was born in New York City to parents descended from late 19th-century Eastern European Jewish immigrants.

Do not let them memory-hole this. We need to start making memes and infographics of this.

In this way, a consensus was established that among human populations there are no differences large enough to support the concept of “biological race.”
No such consensus was ever established.
Instead, it was argued, race is a “social construct,” a way of categorizing people that changes over time and across countries.
It was argued by Jews, you mean.

This is why it is important, even urgent, that we develop a candid and scientifically up-to-date way of discussing any such differences, instead of sticking our heads in the sand and being caught unprepared when they are found.
Literally "Oy vey we gotta come up wit a narrative to damage control dis before da goyim figure it out!".

Did this research rely on terms like “African-American” and “European-American” that are socially constructed, and did it label segments of the genome as being probably “West African” or “European” in origin? Yes.
Did this research identify real risk factors for disease that differ in frequency across those populations, leading to discoveries with the potential to improve health and save lives? Yes.
In other words: African-American is just a catch-all simplification term for "bearing a heavily West African genome" and "European-American" is just a similar term for "bearing a heavily European genome"?
This really is nothing but a Jew trying desperately to damage control this shit before it gets out of hand.

One of Mr. Wade’s key sources, for example, is the anthropologist Henry Harpending, who has asserted that people of sub-Saharan African ancestry have no propensity to work when they don’t have to because, he claims, they did not go through the type of natural selection for hard work in the last thousands of years that some Eurasians did.
There is simply no scientific evidence to support this statement.
There explicitly is though.
There is simply no scientific evidence to support this statement. Indeed, as 139 geneticists (including myself) pointed out in a letter to The New York Times about Mr. Wade’s book, there is no genetic evidence to back up any of the racist stereotypes he promotes.
Oh really?
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9433082
Male African-American soldiers appear to be significantly more susceptible to frostbite than male Caucasian soldiers, especially with regard to frostbite of the distal extremities
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12751587
African-American men and women were injured approximately 4 times and 2.2 times as often as their Caucasian counterparts, respectively.
Pretty fucking sure that's not a 'social construct', jew.

Another high-profile example is James Watson, the scientist who in 1953 co-discovered the structure of DNA, and who was forced to retire as head of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories in 2007 after he stated in an interview — without any scientific evidence — that research has suggested that genetic factors contribute to lower intelligence in Africans than in Europeans.

At a meeting a few years later, Dr. Watson said to me and my fellow geneticist (((Beth Shapiro))) something to the effect of “When are you guys going to figure out why it is that you Jews are so much smarter than everyone else?”
He asserted that Jews were high achievers because of genetic advantages conferred by thousands of years of natural selection to be scholars, and that East Asian students tended to be conformist because of selection for conformity in ancient Chinese society.

(Contacted recently, Dr. Watson denied having made these statements, maintaining that they do not represent his views; (((Dr. Shapiro))) said that her recollection matched mine.)
So then we know its (((the truth))), eh jew?

What makes Dr. Watson’s and Mr. Wade’s statements so insidious is that they start with the accurate observation that many academics are implausibly denying the possibility of average genetic differences among human populations, and then end with a claim — backed by no evidence — that they know what those differences are and that they correspond to racist stereotypes. They use the reluctance of the academic community to openly discuss these fraught issues to provide rhetorical cover for hateful ideas and old racist canards.
(((They))) can't help themselves.

Imagine what else they're wrong about. Ask your normie friend this. The races being different is something they have hammered as being impossible. So all we can ask is. What else could they be wrong about?

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC392897/
This will get you started. See you in two years.

Attached: iqscores.png (48.65 KB, 918x525)

. No, Africans are not the product of their environment.
They are. It is approach from the other side. R-selection at its full potential. That reflects chaotic epidemiological environment of Africa that makes long term investment much less viable. You can see how breed like rats strategy beats level of diseases that otherwise could be considered as catastrophe. There are African countries that have 25% (!) AIDS rates but their population still grows fast. Try to beat that, white man in the Europe!

Plus skin allowing them walk naked in full sun. Asians lived in stone age around ecuator too, but they need to wrap themselves in bags and giant straw hats. Imagine dumb Asian. He would just die from sunburns in the Vietnam rice field.

Jesus, are the dems reduced to having Hillary personally kikepost now? How can you be so bad at it?

Attached: 1417191080329.jpg (123.66 KB, 680x596)

Does this mean that everyone who was calling us racist were on the wrong side of history?

When he says race is a social construct, I'm pretty sure he's referring to the perception of race people have.
No, that explicitly is not what he is arguing.

He's not.
If you read the article instead of just what OP posted, you'd see that this ENTIRE FUCKING ARTICLE is damage control.
Its a Jewish 'scientist' trying to engage in rhetorical gymnastics to defend previous Jewish 'scientists' claims that race ain't real goyim.
He even goes to the point of suggesting "well men and women are different but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be treated exactly equal where i feel it right and not where i feel it not", trying to use that to argue, basically, race still ain't (MEANINGFULLY) real.

I'm sure if you were to take a representative sample of whites and drop them in the jungle to live they would do better than a representative sample of blacks, but I don't imagine a group of whites with the minority of capable survivalists removed from the equation would do better than the blacks with their best people intact.
That depends, really, and ignores the reality of proportional representation of various important traits.
Example: The US White population has an average IQ of 102, the US Black population has an average IQ of 85, and the African Black population has an average IQ of sub-70.
Given that data, and the further knowledge that only 5% of the US White pop is over IQ 130, that only 0.03% of the US Black pop is over IQ 130, you can figure out that the African Black pop over IQ 130 is basically a statistical zero, and realize that in terms of likelihood borne of proportional espousal, Whites would likely still do better than either the US or African Blacks.

no such consensus was ever established.
rbth.com/arts/2016/06/21/the-russian-anthropologist-who-refuted-racist-scientific-theories_603839

Attached: nmvb.jpg (307.42 KB, 739x891)

The question was not "are africans stupid?", it was "why are africans stupid?". Just showing that they are does not mean it is from inbreeding. Chimps are stupid too, but it isn't from inbreeding. They are as intelligent as they need to be to survive in the environment they evolved in. Africans evolved in tropical rainforests with year round food availability requiring no planning, thought, technology or foresight. They just got hungry and picked fruit and ate it, just like a monkey. So there was no evolutionary pressure to select for the more intelligent among them, so they didn't get smarter as a group.

Great article except the "nazi" larping & the fake statement how kikes have superior intelligence. This is a legit red-pill to the normos by a (((source))) they trust. I'll be spending the next 30 minutes messaging this article to everybody I've been trying to explain this to the last 3 years. Good luck Anons lets use this to usher ppl to us & our side - KEK

before the mixing in the Americas of the West African and European gene pools that were almost completely isolated for the last 70,000 years. With the help of these tools, we are learning that while race may be a social construct

Jesus fucking Christ, statements like these prove they just can't help themselves even in the face of truth that can no longer be denied.

We should be VERY CAREFUL memeing with this as substrate, as this is NOT a narrative that follows what Holla Forums generally supports - its a kike running damage control ont he established narratives on race.

Nothing happened.
You just didn't read the article.

No, he is not.
He's a scandalous kike snake trying to run damage control.

Amongst others. I mean, fuck dude, they even reference fucking Watson in the piece.
Kikes are the worst 'people' on Earth.

That's just it, the truth IS being denied, even in this Jewish piece of propagandistic damage control fodder.

So that those of you who've only read the OP can get a grasp on what I'm saying, here is how the kike closes things out…

For me, a natural response to the challenge is to learn from the example of the biological differences that exist between males and females. The differences between the sexes are far more profound than those that exist among human populations, reflecting more than 100 million years of evolution and adaptation. Males and females differ by huge tracts of genetic material — a Y chromosome that males have and that females don’t, and a second X chromosome that females have and males don’t.

Most everyone accepts that the biological differences between males and females are profound. In addition to anatomical differences, men and women exhibit average differences in size and physical strength. (There are also average differences in temperament and behavior, though there are important unresolved questions about the extent to which these differences are influenced by social expectations and upbringing.)

How do we accommodate the biological differences between men and women?
I think the answer is obvious: We should both recognize that genetic differences between males and females exist and we should accord each sex the same freedoms and opportunities regardless of those differences.
Translation from Hebrew: "We should recognize we are not equal and should continue to pretend we're all equal, stupid goyim."

It is clear from the inequities that persist between women and men in our society that fulfilling these aspirations in practice is a challenge.
Yet conceptually it is straightforward.
And if this is the case with men and women, then it is surely the case with whatever differences we may find among human populations, the great majority of which will be far less profound.

An abiding challenge for our civilization is to treat each human being as an individual and to empower all people, regardless of what hand they are dealt from the deck of life.
Compared with the enormous differences that exist among individuals, differences among populations are on average many times smaller, so it should be only a modest challenge to accommodate a reality in which the average genetic contributions to human traits differ.

It is important to face whatever science will reveal without prejudging the outcome and with the confidence that we can be mature enough to handle any findings.
'Arguing that no substantial differences among human populations are possible will only invite the racist misuse of genetics that (((we))) wish to avoid.

This is another crack in the fassade the kikes have built up.
We can use this as a stepping stone for normies.
I mean it's not like we need most people to go 1488 we just need them to realize some basic truths like racial and sexual differences.

Oh my bad, I didn't realize you were trying to cuck.
That Ruskie died in 1888. That his research remains valid seems dubious.

This is another crack in the fassade
Its not though.
Its damage control - in point of fact, this article is a bandaid the jews are trying to rub over the ever-building cracks in the facade.

I mean it's not like we need most people to go 1488 we just need them to realize some basic truths like racial and sexual differences.
We need them to recognize such IN THE RIGHT CONTEXT.
Again, the kike even makes the argument that you can expect others to parrot now - "well most variance is between individuals" "men and women are highly varied" etc etc.

Nobody with any sense in their head doubted the notion of racial and sexual differences, and you're not going to convince people who're motivated by emotion/ideology with mere evidence, but the last thing we need is kike narratives like these catching on.
I mean, fuck dude, this whole article is basically "racial differences might exist goyim but it don't really matta - just don't let those ebul Nahtzee racists convince you of anything on the basis of those differences!".
And for a good portion of the scientifically-illiterate science-worshipping crowd of NORMALFAGS, that's exactly what they'll think after reading this shit.

When someone see a bandage they know what lays beneath.

damage control without damage
How the fuck did you think that up?
Besides it's not like we have to ever stick to the kikes script. This is merely the kind (((authority))) we can use to make people ask themselves some important questions.
Any additional material on the subject will be judenfrei.

Attached: 6f1ce3a740e301fef0a3bffc9cc8b358e0cfa5d71312b6e995d52aaa2bd9543b.jpg (1.28 MB, 1659x1000)

False. They know only that there's an injury, the not the extent.
This article is a kike putting the bandaid on to cover an axe-wound while saying "Tis only a splinter goyim!".

damage control without damage
How the fuck do you think there isn't damage?
Besides it's not like we have to ever stick to the kikes script. This is merely the kind (((authority))) we can use to make people ask themselves some important questions.
By definition, if you're using a kike (((authority))), you're using his script.
Further, I mean, are you just being obtuse or are you actually stupid? Exactly HOW do you intend to use this kikes claims, while ignoring the claims he follows it up with, and still think that'll be a valid use of this (((authority)))?
Don't go getting all defensive on me here, what I'm saying is accurate and you know it.

If you try to shill this kikes' narrative, you're going to be shilling ALL of his narrative, whether you like it or not, and his narrative is, again, "Yeah goy, there's some differences between races - but there's differences between men and women too! And far more difference between individuals! Race is mostly a social construct, and even where inequalities exist, we must continue to espouse promotion of equality. If you don't you're a bigot misusing science!".
And you want to shill that to the scientifically-illiterate science-worshipping normalfags?
That sounds like a terrible idea m8.

When the subject was being propped up as an invincible god-like truth. People rubber neck if they were to see a god bleed. When you want to present perfect and invincible wearing a bandage is a death sentence.

Word for word, you could not be more correct. There's been scientific evidence for years on years, yet libtards, niggers and shitskins all dismiss it due to their ideological mindset. Their low intelligence and cognitive dissonance doesn't allow them to accept the truth.
One day (very, very soon) their opinions won't matter, and we're gonna have the world revived. Dissonance will fade (as well as these people's lives, including the kikes behind them) and the world won't be a shit hole anymore. It's only a matter of time.

When the subject was being propped up as an invincible god-like truth.
And who actually upheld that mindset? Basically nobody… Except those motivated by ideology/emotion. Which evidence will not effect.
People rubber neck if they were to see a god bleed. When you want to present perfect and invincible wearing a bandage is a death sentence.
I'll agree with you there, but differ in our interpretation.
I would suggest (((they))) have recognized that the narrative of the 'perfect and invincible' narrative you describe has failed. As such, they're trying to reassert themselves in the conversation, reposition themselves as the (((authority))) before the conversation goes further.
If you're trying to present invincible, a bandage is a death sentence - but if you're trying to conceal what could become a lethal injury, downplaying the severity of that injury is a good go-to approach.

It's only a matter of time.
Gods willing user.

Honest Q: If you're basically saying this is genetic, why are so many fucking whites not woke?

Doesn't this prove their point that the only difference is those that choose to accept reality as it is or as its sold?

You know how many white friends I have that won't talk about this stuff at all? The past 15 years of my life I've been losing friends and jobs because I just don't have friends to work with anymore.

They take the safe reality, what ever they're prepared to face that day and avoid their feelings. Go home and watch their programs and play their games.
Maybe we're just fighting for a country that was more a game than a place.
Aren't we learning America was fought a few wars in 1776? Think we didn't sell out then? A little more with each war?

This family has been playing this game for as long as it can remember. It's really brilliant and for all we admit, it's responsible for all the progress we have the past what 400 years?
That means it took us out of the dark ages?

"We're discovering that there are real differences"

Bullshit, people have known since the dawn of time that there are differences this is just more liberal crap. So tired of universities and their garbage.

They accept it because when you unravel it all you realize it's hard to work for something other than yourself. It's hard to progress as a society without sacrifice and no one wants to sacrifice willingly for a building, that'll house a factory that builds stuffed animals for kids in a country that would rather have food.

People historically kill themselves and usually someone else before that point.
I think we're at a new point in history where with free information, verified somehow, we can build something productive for everyone and include free will for all (even if it means private societies in societies in societies, instead of jails).

but I think history has shown that humans get little done without fear and hope

It’s time to push harder. It’s time to get them legally defined as separate species.

Attached: IMG-0567.PNG (548.85 KB, 889x613)

Honest Q: If you're basically saying this is genetic, why are so many fucking whites not woke?
If what is genetic?

Doesn't this prove their point that the only difference is those that choose to accept reality as it is or as its sold?
Why is the Republican party 95% White?

You know how many white friends I have that won't talk about this stuff at all?
Plenty, I'm sure, but what do you think that indicates to you?
The reality is, Whites aren't allowed to speak - and they're the only group so burdened.
There are ZERO explicit White advocacy platforms in the US today… Why?
Because THE MOMENT you speak up, the moment you attempt to advocate for Whites, you are a Nazi.
And so White people, generally tired of being called monsters just for saying things like "Its Okay To Be White", have become strongly apathetic and terribly demoralized, by the numbers.

If any other group were subjected to this, they would have crumbled long ago.

Maybe we're just fighting for a country that was more a game than a place.
Who cares about the country, user?
I don't give a single solitary shit about pitiful civic entities that crumble - I care about the people, MY people. The state is just a means to an end - and when a state becomes the end in itself, it becomes a monstrous aberrant thing.

Aren't we learning America was fought a few wars in 1776?
What?
Think we didn't sell out then? A little more with each war?
We didn't really meaningfully sell out until the late 1800's.

This family has been playing this game for as long as it can remember.
What family?
It's really brilliant and for all we admit, it's responsible for all the progress we have the past what 400 years?
What progress?
That means it took us out of the dark ages?
What 'dark ages'?

Seems like you drank the Kool-Aid my man.

They accept it because when you unravel it all you realize it's hard to work for something other than yourself.
Yep.
It's hard to progress as a society without sacrifice and no one wants to sacrifice willingly for a building, that'll house a factory that builds stuffed animals for kids in a country that would rather have food.
Fair enough.
I think we're at a new point in history where with free information, verified somehow, we can build something productive for everyone and include free will for all (even if it means private societies in societies in societies, instead of jails).
Then you haven't studied history, nor evolution, nearly as much as you believe.
Free information?
Where is free information transpiring?
Certainly not on the internet - information is heavily policed. That's why you can only say the things you can say on Holla Forums, on Holla Forums.
but I think history has shown that humans get little done without fear and hope
I think history has shown that White people who become deracinated, alienated and demoralized due to the consistent efforts of a minority of foreigners, tend to eventually revert and they're usually quite angry.

I stopped listing the kike posts about a third of the way down when I quit reading. This is a kike post full of shills. )))OP((( is a distraction.

this is what it considers contribution

DAMAGE CONTROL
A
M
A
G
E
C
O
N
T
R
O
L

its a kike running damage control ont he established narratives on race.
This thread is just another case of
the kikes are telling the truth and being honest now, because what they're saying makes me happy.
It's a trap, problem is that Holla Forums is full of "fashy goys", the kind who think Southern and Pettibone are (((BASED))), and shills encouraging them to spread this story.
It's a bait-and-switch, trojan horse, however you want to call it. Damage control is a fair assessment. It's ideological inoculation too.
It's shocking how many here don't seem able to grasp jewish reverse psychology. Another thing, they don't know what the fuck else he will say after they use him as a "source".

the kikes are telling the truth and being honest now
Literally no one is saying this, ban evading paid jewish shill.
Another thing, they don’t know what the fuck else he will say after they use him as a “source".
Only you are mentally ill enough to think that the sum total of a person is “always correct” and that “you must agree with everything a person says iff they have made one factual statement.” This is a delusion borne of belief in EGALITARIANISM, which exposes you, ban evading paid shill, for what you are.

the kikes are telling the truth and being honest now, because what they're saying makes me happy.
They aren't though, that's the real rub of it - they're starting out saying what sounds like the truth, but through the course of their conversation in that vein it becomes extremely obvious that they ARE NOT telling the truth, they're doing that Alex Jones gate-keeper thing wherein they say 90% truth and 10% lies which invalidate the aforementioned truth.
It's a trap,
Yes, exactly.
It's a bait-and-switch, trojan horse, however you want to call it. Damage control is a fair assessment. It's ideological inoculation too.
Yes! Exactly!
It's shocking how many here don't seem able to grasp jewish reverse psychology. Another thing, they don't know what the fuck else he will say after they use him as a "source".
Quite true.
It reminds me of the people who still buy into MSM polling, and urge the promotion of such, when the outcome appears to suit their tastes.

Literally no one is saying this, ban evading paid jewish shill.
They literally are saying this, disingenuous accusatory shitposter.
Only you are mentally ill enough to think
Pathologizing your enemies, standard Jewish practice.

enough to think that the sum total of a person is “always correct” and that “you must agree with everything a person says iff they have made one factual statement.”
Yeah, if you want to use them as a valid source, in the modern parlance, that is exactly the case.
You can't hold up someone claiming to have race realism data who also presents themselves as a flat-earther and not think that's going to cause massive dissonance in any argument involving the use of that individual as a source/(((authority))).
This is a delusion borne of belief in EGALITARIANISM, which exposes you, ban evading paid shill, for what you are.
That's just rather retarded as narratives go.

Link is broken for me, anyone have the article OP is talking about? Skimmed thread/DDG and found nothing.

Meant to add this to the part replying to
but it works for
as well:

If a source is bogus and untrustworthy, especially if its making such extremely obvious, then all of their contributions are worthless - if you had a White 'NatSoc race realist' who was married to a negro or a Jew and claimed that clade was on-par with Whites as much as mattered, would you not suggest that invalidates whatever truths they had to offer about, say, that racial differences exist?

archive.fo/6liSf
Archive link works just fine for me.
Seems like you're trying to get someone to post the direct-link for shekels.

Thanks for typing that gibberish, idiot who didn't follow the link. Filtered for being an illiterate.

instead of sticking our heads in the sand and being caught unprepared

"Wrong side of history" persuasion: Everybody is going to find out you're stupid.

This dude is so convinced of the power of that idea in academic circles, that he's going to put it up against muh racism?

stop hurting my feelings!
Posting two facts does not relate one to the other. You can not go: "africans are dumb, inbreeding makes you dumb, so africans are dumb from inbreeding." That's exactly like saying "chimps are dumb, eating lead paint makes you dumb, so chimps are dumb because they ate lead paint". You need to show that africans are inbred. So show us a study of african genetic distance so we can see how inbred they are. Oh right, you won't do that because they show that you are wrong.

Oh right, you won't do that because they show that you are wrong.
If you know that, why haven't you posted them?

Discredited and firing incoming.

Literally no one is saying this,
literally.
Yes, everyone who is taking this at face value as some kind of "jews finally being honest" slip-up is implicitly saying that.
ban evading paid jewish shill.
w…watch me use out-grouping to try and pressurize you to reveal your ip address.
Nope, try again.
Only you are mentally ill enough
Muh mental illness.
Mental illnesses don't exist you fucking kike.
Ever wondered why kikes like this always accuse anons who contradict their narratives, shilling, trojan horses, e-celebs and reverse-psychology traps as "mentally ill"? Read about "sluggish schizophrenia" : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sluggish_schizophrenia
to think that the sum total of a person is “always correct” and that “you must agree with everything a person says iff they have made one factual statement.”
Because I wrote anything approaching that.
This is a delusion
Muh mental illness.
borne of belief in EGALITARIANISM, which exposes you, ban evading paid shill, for what you are.
Your neurotic run-on sentence and spergy random accusations shows everyone who is the real shill.
Once again, this is a trap, an example of ideological inoculation, which once digested will prime the normalfag reader's mind to knee-jerk away any use of proven genetic differences within a racialist argument.
e.g:
oh, that's what the sigh of gushing admiration s…scientist said in that video about race. He warned us that wicked racists would falsely apply science to further their horrid beliefs.
They will shut down and stop listening because this man has primed them to.

I don't have to prove my baseless claim, you have to disprove it!

Attached: 243b0fc2dde63bc1cedfd5c8d7b1a416aac5151a0f8d925582ddfe4fdc1c68da.jpg (68.33 KB, 527x588)

Oh, and one more point you fucking moron. This article is written up to sound like he is addressing his fellow scientists and researchers, but he isn't. He's addressing the public because they are the target.
If he was actually wanted to warn the people to whom the information actually applies, out of a genuine concern for the effects on research, then he would do it through a genetics periodical, not the fucking NY times.
This is simply preparing the public to hear of medical racial differences by seeding the belief that they don't matter outside of research and medicine.

I agree with a t0rpedo

But that's not what I said.
Another user claimed X.
You claimed X is false, and implied that the user should post A, but won't do so because, you claimed, A would show that X is false.
I asked you to post A.
You responded to that by implying such has any connection whatsoever to the claim of X being true or false.

Extremely semitic.

that's totally not me you goys!
I just turned on tor for no particular reason at all and it is purely a cohencidence!

Attached: 1408277347451.jpg (62.47 KB, 494x605)

That's empty rhetoric.

An user made a claim. You claimed a given source would disprove his claim. I asked you to provide that source. You deflected and now are engaging in slinging empty rhetorical smear.

Extremely semitic.

That's empty rhetoric.
You have to go back.

Attached: backtoreddit.jpg (193.83 KB, 717x880)

~15mins in
jews are the smartest
I would have immediately asked if cheating/lying are genetic traits that could be passed down such that one group are the best at cheating and lying.

Attached: uncle.jpg (35.07 KB, 620x419)

So I'll take it that means you DON'T have the source?
Meaning in this post
you espouse exactly - and I mean EXACTLY - the same behavior that you're projecting onto the other user, namely, making a claim and refusing or being unable to provide a source to back it up.

Extremely semitic.

RACE REALISM WITHOUT DOUBT IS CORRECT

No shit? Intelligence is genetic, behavior is culture, that's why you are redpilled and boomers are retarded. Gentics only gives you the potential, weak men make bad society etc
youtube.com/watch?v=09KZA-rKpw0

if I keep repeating "extremely semitic" nobody will notice that nothing I am blathering about makes any sense!

Attached: 1424313735612.jpg (25.9 KB, 300x295)

You're very disingenuous and extremely semitic.
But at least you can admit that you have no source as you claimed.

I never claimed to have a source Schlomo. I never even made a claim. "Unicorns are real because I say so". No they aren't, you can't show proof of unicorns". "LOL PROVE TEY IZ NOT [email protected]!111"

I never claimed to have a source Schlomo.
Yes you did.
Right here:
So show us a study of african genetic distance so we can see how inbred they are. Oh right, you won't do that because they show that you are wrong.
The claim was that a source would disprove the claim of another.
I asked you to provide that source.
You can't.
Its doubly funny because you were crying in that very post about how the user in question wouldn't provide a source, while claiming that you knew of a source he would not post because it would disprove his claim, and when asked to post that source, you failed to post that source to support your claim that it would disprove his claim.

You quite literally said:
Oh right, you won't do that because they show that you are wrong.
How can you know that it would show that he is wrong if you do not have the source?

How do you know if nogs and kikes will blackwash the public on which race is the superior race? Holla Forums should remind the public which race has the higher IQ

Attached: kang-lancelot.jpg (365.12 KB, 1000x1500)

Oh, and to clarify:

The user did not say "X is real because I say so", he said "X is real because of a given source saying so".
You asked for that source, while making the claim that it would disprove his assertions, which is why, you claim, he would not post it.
Two claims in there, in fact.

One of them you can prove easily enough, by posting the source that you claim would disprove his claim.
So, its more like
Anon1: "Unicorns are real because of Source A"
(((You))):"Unicorns are not real and you won't post Source A because it will prove unicorns aren't real"
Anon2: "If you know that Source A disproves his claim, you must know of Source A, as to be able to claim what it does/not prove, and thus be able to post it."
(((You))): "Y-Y-YOU'RE A JEW!"

I don't know, I am assuming. Just like I don't know unicorns don't exist, I am assuming. Jesus Schlomo, I know you are desperate to try to maintain the illusion that africans are human, but this "oh they would be just like us if not for inbreeding, you just need to race mix with them goys!" shit is so transparent it is pathetic.

Russian

Quite possibly (((russian))).

His mother was very possibly (((Jewish))), maiden name "Bekker," of German and (((Polish)))? descent. The name appears in quite a few of the LOLohoax databases and appears in Argentine immigration records with several (((Jewish))) entries among quite a few protties. It's a Dutch or Low German form of an occupational name for "bakers."

Far from proven, but anytime I see cucking on the scale of that man's work relative to the historical times in which he lived, I always look for the kike in the woodpile.

Oh right, you won't do that because they show that you are wrong.
Agreed, that right there is claiming to know of a source(s).
Have you noticed that even when the behaviors which make a kike obvious are described and enumerated, the kike shill can't stop using them? It's almost like they're following a recipe, or the behavior is so ingrained that it's like asking a dog not to lick its asshole. It might stop when you shout, but 5 minutes later it's back slurping.

<The claim was that a source would disprove the claim of another.
<I asked you to provide that source.
<You can't.
I'm inclined to believe these are bots "arguing" with each other about sources that obviously neither of them have so they are stuck in an infinite "no yuo" loop.

Asking for a source for a hypothetical in answer to being asked for a source is circular.

(checked$
"mixing" of European and African gene pools in the Americas.
Still trying to push that shit are they? Also OP is not a fag while using TOR. Good bread.

Just filter this assclown desperate to claim niggers evolved. It's an old jew lie trying to assure goys that degenerate behavior and inbreeding are sexy and fun.
If you're curious, here's the formula for calculating genetic drift due to inbreeding to accompanying the study on IQ loss
ucl.ac.uk/~ucbhdjm/courses/b242/InbrDrift/InbrDrift.html

If you're curious, here's the formula for calculating genetic drift due to inbreeding to accompanying the study on IQ loss
Should be able to use that to utterly destroy the kike lie they have the highest IQ. Because it's quite easy to prove how inbred the ashkeNAZIs are (hint: 30+ severe genetic disorders specific to the NAZIs).

nogs are just inbred humans you goys!
they didn't evolve separately as a separate subspecies, just race mix with them and they'll be as smart as you!
btw you are teh kike!111 XD

Attached: 1432079132612.jpg (47.58 KB, 449x274)

I never understood why people are so committed to one side of this issue. This is the case mostly with those who claim there is no genetic factor, but its just as naive to think any differences are purely genetic and have nothing to do with culture.
It seems pretty clear that there are genetic differences between populations, however like all genetic differences they will have come about through natural (or sexual) selection which is in turn influenced by culture. European Jews are the perfect example of this, as their culture revolved around being good with money and books for hundreds to thousands of years. This led to those who were smarter having more children and thus over the generations selecting for high IQ. The same can be said about American Blacks, who during slavery were specifically bred for high strength and low intelligence, and currently have a culture that looks down upon smart people for being "too white". I would argue that most genetic differences come about in this way.

(1)
Nothing weird going on here.

I don't know, I am assuming.
So then why did you say something that implied to you did know?
Why did you make a claim based on an assumption, while decrying someone else for doing what appears to be the exact same?

Kike shills run off >(You)'s, so its kind of understandable. I think a few of them have realized that they can get tons of >(You)'s by just shitposting really really hard in a way that aggravates autists and people who care about detail.

Not really, its pretty clear what happened here, but I'll run you through it.
Anon1: "Blacks are dumb because inbreeding."
Anon2: "That's not true and you won't post Source A because it would show that its not true."
Anon3: "If you know what Source A would show, you must know what it contains, therefore, please post Source A."
Anon2: "Fuck you Jew I don't have to post shit I didn't make a claim."
Anon3: "You did make a claim, please provide Source A."
*repeated 3-4 times*
Anon2: "I was just making an assumption."

niggers are JUST inbred
therefore mate with them
That… What?

Nothing weird going on here.
You know it's a good thread when it's mostly bots "arguing".

"History shows again and again
How nature points out the folly of men" - Godzilla

Attached: godzilla-face-palm2.jpg (50.71 KB, 500x301)

shilling that culture dictates genetics rather than genetics producing culture
Nice try, Ari.

Not really, its pretty clear what happened here, but I'll run you through it.
What happened was one bot got called on for a source, and was mocked in the same gesture by suggesting it wouldn't produce a source because it would prove the bot wrong. Then the other bot responded by asking the first bot for its source. Enter the "no yuo" loop.

These bots are only semi-autonomous as its obvious some controller is feeding it specific madlibs to give the air of authentic user bantz. Except it's really obvious to the seasoned veterans.

Attached: costanza-belittles.jpg (15.72 KB, 375x375)

Calling people "bots" is the new version of calling people "shills"?
Seriously bro, bots don't call you a cum-guzzling homo.

To be fair, its bi-directional.
-> denotes influence

Genetics -> Physiology -> Psychology -> Behavior -> Culture -> Society -> Civilization

There is, of course, feedback - if a given genetic trait results down the line in a given cultural stance, that cultural stance can, in turn, have an effect upon the genetics.
I think that's a common argument for how kikes got the way they are - they were already kikes, but when their situation deteriorated they took on a cultural position that created a genetic bottleneck, which in turn generated genetic conditions that furthered the cultural stance, etc etc etc.
The idea that its only downstream as goes influence is rather flawed… Of course, the idea that the origin point is not genetics but culture is, as you say, Ari-tier.

Why are you pretending that the obvious answer and an absurd answer are equally likely? And why are you still trying to push the "nogs are human" meme?

Attached: 1408283594814.jpg (92.54 KB, 310x440)

muh muh
sources or gtfo TORpedo

Why are you pretending that the obvious answer and an absurd answer are equally likely?
Why are you pretending that one answer is absurd?
And why are you still trying to push the "nogs are human" meme?
Where did I push that meme? Cite it, specifically.

Source for what, specifically?

rub some mud on your skin
hold a branch
Look ma, I'm a negro!

Attached: 4bad321ae9e6a9e051e77df0edce8a668efea0bcd0b094d165b243169684c91e.png (186.33 KB, 470x588)

Why are you pretending that one answer is absurd?
Because it is you degenerate piece of shit:

Tha actual human hierarchy goes:
race -> culture -> language -> ethnicity

Source for what, specifically?
your source code for your bots

I hope you are ready for
<DNA is a social construct

More like
race -> ethnicity -> culture -> language

So you don't have a specific thing you want sourced?

Just like I don't know unicorns don't exist, I am assuming.
Its absurd to imply that the suggestion of inbreeding being a source of extreme nigger subhumanism is equivalent to suggesting that unicorns exist.
You made an assumption on an issue which is far, far, far, far less absurd than your unicorn example, and now you're trying to present otherwise.

Bottom line: The user made a claim. You made a counter-claim while referencing source material you cannot reference, implying in doing so that you could and have referenced such, as to know that it negates the anons claim. Now you're trying to pretend that its as-fair an assumption to suggest "unicorns don't exist" as it is to suggest that "niggers are not shit, AT LEAST IN PART, because of inbreeding", while simultaneously projecting a false narrative onto your opposition in direct opposition to their stated position.

but this "oh they would be just like us if not for inbreeding, you just need to race mix with them goys!" shit is so transparent it is pathetic.
I've never said anything of the sort - that's you projecting again.
Why would you want to race-mixing with inbred subhumans?
What about them being inbred, as to generate their status, would suggest
If you had a population of inbred chimps, would out-breeding them make them not be chimps anymore, or just not be inbred chimps?

The worst thing is the “I’m sorry bullshit”.

They are all sorry but none of them will do anything about the problems themselves. They just want to keep advocating lone wolf school shooters and other assorted bullshit and faggotry.

They are sorry alright.

<So you don't have a specific thing you want sourced?
conveniently ignoring all previous claims for source citations
still madlibbing in circles
Bottom line: bot A made claim, other bot B mockingly asked A for sources, A demands B's hypothetical sources, "no yuo" cycle still in progress.

You know what's great after you peg some madlib bots and they can't defend themselves? Filtering all TORpedo IDs.

Attached: shoulder-shrug.jpg (3.78 MB, 4288x2848)

Its absurd to imply that the suggestion of inbreeding being a source of extreme nigger subhumanism is equivalent to suggesting that unicorns exist.
No it is not. Read the fucking link you kiked out piece of shit. In order for inbreeding to explain their IQ, they wouldn't be able to survive. They would be so disease ridden and feeble that they would not be here. Plus, there is absolutely no reason to think they would ever have had any evolutionary pressure selecting towards higher IQ. Two big reasons that the inbreeding lie is absurd. Then when you factor in the obvious fact that the entire point of that lie is for jews to keep convincing whites that africans are the same species as them, we see that you are an oven dodger.

Attached: 1432015103967-1.png (14.62 KB, 285x372)

Exactly. That's why jews are always pushing bullshit when it comes to inbreeding and intelligence. They want everyone to believe there's a mysterious biological mechanism beyond human reckoning that determines the races, when really it's no more complex than the farmers that gave us Jersey and Angus cattle. Niggers and Myans inbred themselves retarded, and now the Arabs and jews are doing it too.

IQ tests are designed by psychologist.
Guess who has the monopoly over psychology?
These test give big emphasis on the linguistic part aka bullshitting and shaping of words.
Which means basically nothing in the modern economy outside of (((non-technical academia))), (((journalism))) and (((law))).
All of which are infested by (((them))) and contribute nothing to the advancement of the West. Rather the mentioned professions destroy it.

The reason why nogs fail at it is mainly becouse they fail at everything thrown at them, except blowing money and dying due to bullets.

Attached: 8ddb76ec711ecc8429558a1990f5f994.jpg (33.69 KB, 465x413)

Kike logic: race is a social construct, but genetics shows that there are some differences, mental illnesses are genetic, racism and sexism are mental illnesses, take your pills white people

They would be so disease ridden and feeble that they would not be here.
You mean like AIDS, Hep C, Ebola, Malaria, and a huge list of others I forgot… of which most niggers in Africa would likely succumb without the jews food and medical support?

That's why jews are always pushing bullshit when it comes to inbreeding and intelligence.
Like I suggested earlier after watching OPs embed my guess would be that kikes genetic advantage isn't their intelligence it's the lying/cheating "gene".

conveniently ignoring all previous claims for source citations
Nobody has requested I cite anything, except you.

Bottom line: AnonA made claim, AnonB mockingly asked A for sources while implying he knew what sources contained, AnonC demands B' source which he implied knowledge of the contents of, some whinging faggot sticks his nose in claiming everyone is bots
ftfy
everyone is bots
Oh, you're retarded.
filtering
And a pussy.
Good stuff.
inb4 passive-aggressive snark of "thinks its not filtered!" or some other trash

No it is not.
Yes, it is.
Read the fucking link you kiked out piece of shit.
Which link?
This one?
ucl.ac.uk/~ucbhdjm/courses/b242/InbrDrift/InbrDrift.html
In order for inbreeding to explain their IQ, they wouldn't be able to survive.
Which part of that link's content, specifically, demonstrates that conclusion?
They would be so disease ridden and feeble that they would not be here.
What about the Ashkenazi Jews? And, you do realize that niggers ARE horribly disease ridden, yes?
Plus, there is absolutely no reason to think they would ever have had any evolutionary pressure selecting towards higher IQ.
Cite the specific part from that link that demonstrates that conclusion.
Two big reasons that the inbreeding lie is absurd.
So, its absurd to suggest inbreeding contributes to the extreme niggerdom condition, because… You claim there was no selective pressure as regards increased IQ for the niggers, and you claim that inbreeding to such a degree as to generate that would demonstrate such physiological rammifications of a deleterious nature as to make them unable to survive? Is that a fair summary of your claim?
Then when you factor in the obvious fact that the entire point of that lie is for jews to keep convincing whites that africans are the same species as them, we see that you are an oven dodger.
In what way does suggestion of inbreeding as source of niggerdom equate in any way, shape or form to suggestion of being of the same species as Whites?
Again: If you had a population of inbred chimps, would out-breeding them make them not be chimps anymore, would it make them into humans, or would it just make them not be inbred chimps?

Anyone else see Nassim Taleb publicly pull the rug out from under (((Mary Beard)))s' attempt at pushing the diversity narrative across the pond recently? It's worth a read and some investigation, IMO.

medium.com/east-med-project-history-philology-and-genetics/the-insidious-racism-of-mary-beard-et-al-8b6b768b4575

Background: The BBC cartoon showed a subsaharan African as part of a “typical” Roman Brit in the name of diversity. The UK “bien pensant” establishment now has a binary classification“white” and “other” that is, “nonwhite”, whatever that means, a classification that encompasses anything that is not Northern European and, if Mediterranean, comes from a “diversity country”, that is from a non EU-member. One nonwhite can substitute for another. If that’s not racial supremacism, what is?

You mean like AIDS, Hep C, Ebola, Malaria, and a huge list of others I forgot… of which most niggers in Africa would likely succumb without the jews food and medical support?
No, I mean like genetic diseases from inbreeding. Look at arabs and kikes. How can you possibly be too stupid to understand the difference between genetic weakness caused by inbreeding and viruses?
What about the Ashkenazi Jews?
Exactly the point. They aren't as dumb as africans and they have way more genetic problems. You are disproving your own lie Schlomo.
Cite the specific part from that link that demonstrates that conclusion.
That has nothing to do with the link. Low effort kike.
In what way does suggestion of inbreeding as source of niggerdom equate in any way, shape or form to suggestion of being of the same species as Whites?
That's the claim you are making. They are just inbred humans. They are not, they are their own subhuman species.

IQ tests are designed by psychologist.
Not all of the tests are.
Guess who has the monopoly over psychology?
Doesn't matter because psychology isn't a real science like psychiatry.
These test give big emphasis on the linguistic part aka bullshitting and shaping of words.
That's not true. Anecdotal as it may be: I was forced to take three separate IQ tests before the state allowed me to graduate high school early and attend university. There are different tests that measure different capacities such as speed, memory, pattern recognition, etc. All tests the state administered before granting my request were performed by psychiatrists.
polite sage

Attached: Heebs-will-not-divide-us.jpg (142.01 KB, 1200x672)

This is all setting up for a Jordan Peterson-esque, "Jews are smarter than you so you should accept your slavery stupid goyim" argument.

Doesn't matter because psychology isn't a real science like psychiatry.
You have it ass backwards. Psychiatry is (((Freud))) saying that respecting your parents is a "pathology" if you are white, but healthy if you are a jew. Psychology is understanding what we think and why, it does not involve any attempt at subjective judgements.
There are different tests that measure different capacities such as speed, memory, pattern recognition, etc.
Then they are not IQ tests. IQ tests just measure IQ, which is entirely unrelated to memory. The kike you are replying to is of course lying, but it is so obvious it wasn't worth responding to. IQ tests do not involve linguistics at all. They don't even have any words. This myth of "cultural bias" in IQ tests is entirely jews trying to discredit basic scientific measurements. It is just as absurd as saying height is "culturally biased" and feet and inches aren't a "real measure" of height.

No, I mean like genetic diseases from inbreeding. Look at arabs and kikes.
The argument falls flat then when one contrast/compare nigger inbreeding and kike inbreeding and combine it with your idea that inbreds cannot maintain a society. The NAZIs have over 30 genetic disorders, some of the most fucked up ever, from all their inbreeding but they've figured out a way to exist for 5000 years.

How can you possibly be too stupid to understand the difference between genetic weakness caused by inbreeding and viruses?
I'm not, but I'm also not arguing that any of the inbreeding races and their societies will simply vanish due to their inbreeding.

That's as retarded as making the claim that Rome collapsed because of the lead in the aqueducts when we know lead linings actually purify water.

You have it ass backwards. Psychiatry is (((Freud)))
stopped reading right there because you are flat out WRONG

Attached: top-gun.png (974.45 KB, 1280x720)

real science like psychiatry.

<wew, lad. ur just chemical reactions, take this pill to fix urself, and wreck ur hormones

That could be part of it, but I think they're also trying to isolate and alienate the white race. It's easier to destroy if you "dehumanize" first.

How would you explain how genetic differences across races arise other than natural and sexual selection? Its literally the same way with every other species.
inb4 just calling me a shill again

How would you explain how genetic differences across races arise other than natural and sexual selection?
In a word: mutation.

How would you explain how genetic differences across races arise

What if it's a mystery yet to be solved…

Exactly the point. They aren't as dumb as africans and they have way more genetic problems.
So inbreeding has the same effect in all cases across species?
That has nothing to do with the link.
Then provide a source?
That's the claim you are making.
No, its not. That's you projecting, AGAIN. You can't even seem to keep track of who you're talking to at this point.
They are just inbred humans.
No, I never made any such suggestion.
My suggestion was that you implied you had knowledge of a source, and I asked you to cite it, and you sperged out and acted like a massive kike.
Whatever they are, human or otherwise, is a completely different issue.
They are not, they are their own subhuman species.
Are Asians, Jews, Arabs, Hispanics, etc 'human', or are we all effectively subspecies, perhaps even as far as being divergent species themselves?
Seems more likely they're subspecies borne out of divergent evolution.
Like the niggers.
Who may or may not be inbred.

My argument, of course, not being either of the two, but rather, that you were attacking someone on the basis of not providing sources to back up a claim while implying you possess knowledge of what lies within a source that, when asked to cite, you sperged the fuck out over and engaged in semitic semantic argumentation to suggest that to imply niggers may well be inbred - thus contributing to their status - this is equivalent to saying unicorns are real, and claiming further that the motivation behind this, inexplicably, is to promote race-mixing with niggers because "they're ONLY inbred".

You've been incredibly disingenuous, and can't even comprehend that I never made a claim, per se, as regards inbreeding in niggers - I just asked you to provide a source you implied you knew the contents of while accusing someone of not sourcing their arguments, and when I did so, you freaked out and started calling me a jew instead of just posting a link to the source you implied you knew the contents of as to be able to suggest they disproved the claim of your opposition.

So, what uncomfortable genetic truth did they recently find that is so obvious that they can't cover it up?

Why are we screaming shill and bullshit at eachother instead of trying to answer that part of the puzzle?

That's the point you illiterate retard. Kikes are horrifyingly massively inbred to the point of barely being able to live, and their IQ is still well above africans. Calling jews "NAZIs" is really clever though. Those evil nazis and their horrible oppression of your people right? How date they tell you that you can't steal from the goyim!?

Just saying "UR RONG DURRRR!1111" won't change reality you knob.
guidetopsychology.com/psypsy.htm

"Ok so it doesn't make any sense but that's fine because things just are different right?". Jesus man, just go back to reddit.

mutation
That's how an individual gets a genetic difference, however if that mutation isn't selected for either naturally or sexually (culturally) then it does not change the race as a whole
It is still a mystery, I'm just giving my best guess based on how things work in nature.

The asthma thing might have been a catalyst.

Can't remember the exact details, but basically, it came to light that asthma treatment medications are HIGHLY variable between racial clades, such that medications which will treat White people just fine have little-to-no effect upon Blacks/Spics, and that because of this social view of 'equality', we're stuck with this "shotgun medicine" approach, because there isn't functional research being done about the variance in efficacy between racial clades.

IOW: A bunch of muds and shit are dying because we keep giving them medications that are tested on majority Whites, medications that either don't work or don't work as well, on the muds.

"Ok so it doesn't make any sense but that's fine because things just are different right?".
The only thing that doesn't make any sense is your hostile semitic narrative and behavior.

What makes the least sense is why you never answer questions posted to you.
Answer these:
In what way does suggestion of inbreeding as source of niggerdom equate in any way, shape or form to suggestion of being of the same species as Whites?
Again: If you had a population of inbred chimps, would out-breeding them make them not be chimps anymore, would it make them into humans, or would it just make them not be inbred chimps?
Are Asians, Jews, Arabs, Hispanics, etc 'human', or are we all effectively subspecies, perhaps even as far as being divergent species themselves?

I guess it also doesn't make sense that you'd project a pro-miscegenation narrative onto those suggesting niggers are inbred, nor that you'd suggest that a population being inbred directly equates to the notion that they are of the same species and just lacking as a result of that inbred state.

answer my red herrings or you are the kike!
Were you actually the specific real kike Hitler was talking about arguing with? Look at your fucking example, it is exactly what I said. Inbred chimps would be chimps. Just as inbred humans would be humans. You are pretending nogs are inbred humans, when they are simply a different species altogether. It is like saying gorillas are inbred because they are dumber than chimps. No, they are just a different species, that didn't need to evolve as much intelligence.

It's not working for me either. I tried to look at a dif archive earlier and got the same problem but figured it was the link. Now I'm wondering if everyone else is having the same problem.

Attached: whahappan.png (13.66 KB, 491x343)

Attached: How-Genetics-Is-Changing-Our-Understanding-of-‘Race’.png (2.19 MB, 1270x10331)

You are pretending nogs are inbred humans,
No, that's just you projecting, yet again, you filthy jew.
Let's make this very clear:
Whether niggers are inbred or not has no connection to their being or not being of the same species as Whites.
They two totally unrelated issues.

Now, knowing that fact, or at least assuming it to be fact:
If niggers are another species, as you imply, would inbreeding not make them worse?
If the answer is 'yes, it would make them worse', would altering their inbred status make them better?
If the answer is 'yes, it would make them better', would that statement be equivalent to suggesting they would be equivalent to Whites?

Answer the fucking questions.

when they are simply a different species altogether.
Probably just subspecies tbh.

It is like saying gorillas are inbred because they are dumber than chimps.
No, you dumb, dumb, nigger/slimey, slimey, kike.
Its like saying inbred gorillas exhibit negative traits associated with being inbred.
If they were not inbred, they'd still just be gorillas.
Inbred chimps exhibiting negative traits associated with being inbred, who are then outbred? Still just chimps.
Inbred niggers exhibiting negative traits associated with being inbred, when are then outbred (with non-inbred niggers)? Still just niggers.

No, they are just a different species, that didn't need to evolve as much intelligence.
No, they're probably just a subspecies, that didn't evolve as much cognitive ability, and their being inbred - which they may be - as to exacerbate that condition only makes them worse… But, assuming they were inbred, if they were altered from that state as to NOT be inbred, they'd still be…. wait for it…. niggers.

You stupid nigger/slimey jew.

I am not having any problem.
Its on your end.

Kikes are horrifyingly massively inbred to the point of barely being able to live
Yeah, but no. They are disgustingly inbred to be sure. Yet they remain extant.

Calling jews "NAZIs" is really clever though.
It's called etymology. The kikes have been subverting language for thousands of years and the "NAZI" neologism is derived expressly from "ashkenazi" being a pejorative. All they did was flip it back on the people (((they))) want to oppress and subjugate.

Just saying "UR RONG DURRRR!1111" won't change reality you knob.
You are factually wrong, though. Psychiatry is an actual science, and psychology is (((Fruedism))). For fucks sake my neurologist that treats me for Epilepsy is not some kiked fake scientist…

That's how an individual gets a genetic difference, however if that mutation isn't selected for either naturally or sexually (culturally) then it does not change the race as a whole
You're saying that a mutation that becomes an advantage must be selected for, and I disagree. It can actually be spontaneous and passed on without any adaptive or sexual pressures.

It's called etymology. The kikes have been subverting language for thousands of years and the "NAZI" neologism is derived expressly from "ashkenazi" being a pejorative.
I'm pretty sure that's not true…

stepping stone meme
stop this. if there is a crack in the dam you dont just make little bits of water dribble through so they can then come repair that spot to make it stronger for the next time. the best thing to do is put as much pressure as possible and hope the whole thing breaks.
look at this shit in the first 30 seconds of OP
muh african athleticism
blacks are just naturally more athletic
this crap needs to end.
and before that they even had the gall to suggest that niggers are better hunters. give me a fucking break. they're still trying to justify having negroes mixed in with men; that's how it will always be with these people. if it turns out that there is an undeniable downside to being nonwhite, they try to turn it into an upside through mental gymnastics. "oh, their iq isnt as high? but their harder workers. what? they're lazy? that's because they need motivation. they're actually very passionate and creative - they just need a proper outlet to unleash their true potential" and it keeps going on like this. the truth is that they are all subhuman savages. not even the white man has been able to change that, so you know it will never change.
maybe if it was us that were the ones putting down the stepping stone that would be fine, but this particular stepping stone is the product of juden.

it's difficult to realize how brainwashed people really are when it comes to the negro. think affirmative action but automatically applied mentally in every scenario. people have subconscious affirmative action filters in their perceptions and subconscious. they immediately want to make excuses for the nature of the nigger. it will take a lot to convince people that they can have absolutely no part in the future of mankind. it is one of the biggest mistakes to apply your altruism to nonwhites

Attached: ufc-220-stipe-miocic-francis-ngannou-2.jpg (89.54 KB, 650x360)

Kikes have done their utmost to prevent Whites from conquering tropical lands because for whites it would be paradise. For whites it'd be like living on hard mode for thousands of years only to suddenly live on easy mode. White civilizations in such easy environment would become 10 times as efficient. Do you think it's an accident that everytime white empires were about to conquer Africa, South-America and South-Asia that certain (((advisors))) always decided it would be better to enslave or live alongside natives instead of simply genociding them? That "we" should let them live for humanitarian reasons and they're not a danger anyways? That suddenly wars broke out between empires at the most critical moments to prevent expansion and start infighting? U.S and Europe could have easily steamrolled into the south but something always came in between like a wrench. Go read on the history of all these occassions and i can promise you that everyone who made bad decisions to prevent the southern regions of the earth to get conquered by whites ever since the age of discovery, were fucking kikes. Australia and few islands are the only tropical like region whites own because they directly started genociding the natives, even finished the job in Tasmania, now one of the whitest easy mode regions on earth.

Imagine what white civilization could do in the south with near unlimited raw ressources, food and water everywhere all year around and constanly good weather and health. Without kikes you might have heaven on earth.

Attached: 1449564261251.jpg (202.48 KB, 887x900)

Whether niggers are inbred or not has no connection to their being or not being of the same species as Whites.
Yes it does. As your example made clear. There is nothing to explain if they are another species. Are dogs inbred because they are dumber than us? No, they are dogs. Are nogs inbred because they are dumber than us? No, they are nogs.
Its like saying inbred gorillas exhibit negative traits associated with being inbred.
Like being stupid.
Inbred niggers exhibiting negative traits associated with being inbred, when are then outbred (with non-inbred niggers)? Still just niggers.
Where are these non-inbred niggers then? If their IQ is the result of inbreeding, then they are all inbred. There is no population of africans that isn't low IQ. Because they are the IQ they evolved to be. The implicit assumption in your kike propaganda is that they should be smarter, like us. But they are not like us.
and their being inbred - which they may be - as to exacerbate that condition only makes them worse… But, assuming they were inbred, if they were altered from that state as to NOT be inbred, they'd still be…. wait for it…. niggers.
In which case, there would be no reason to believe they are inbred, as there would be no reason to believe they should be more intelligent than they are. You only think they should be more intelligent because you are comparing them to humans. Because you are a subversive kike trying to push the "africans are human" propaganda.

they can have absolutely no part in the future of mankind

Without kikes you might have heaven on earth.

<All we have to do is kill all black and jewish people, and it's utopia!

Here's your (you)

ban evading torpedo doesn’t want to exterminate kikes and niggers
lol reported

whats the advantage of having pedophile liberals from tor on pol?

Yeah, but no. They are disgustingly inbred to be sure. Yet they remain extant.
Again, that is the point. Are you retarded? They still exist but are sickly and full of genetic diseases. Africans have IQs 20 points lower than jews, if it were due to inbreeding they would have correspondingly far more heritable disease. But they do not.
It's called etymology
It is called being a kike. Absolutely nothing you said is correct.
Psychiatry is an actual science, and psychology is (((Fruedism))).
And I gave you a link showing that you have it backwards.
For fucks sake my neurologist that treats me for Epilepsy is not some kiked fake scientist…
Neurology is not psychiatry or psychology you fucking retard. Tell him to start treating you for your massive brain damage.

All we have to do is kill all black and jewish people, and it's utopia!
Look at Nazi Germany and tell me it wasn't. Look at california 1920 before frankfurt kikes came along and tell me it wasn't. Look at australia, a country which was more or less build by the descendands the worst of white criminals and still at the height of white policy still was a hundred times better than anything you see now in the west now. Look at South Africa under white rule, then look at south africa after kikes enabled nigger rule. I can give you hundreds of such examples.

Every time whites were in complete rule, even in the most northern harshest lands, you had utopia until kikes infiltrated. Now go back to /leftypol/.

Nations do better along ethnic lines, no argument from me on that. However, segregation isn't the same thing as worldwide extermination. That's playing God, as well as being really stupid, not to mention impossible.

Pretty much.
From the article:
It is true that race is a social construct.
And it continues:
The orthodoxy goes further, holding that we should be anxious about any research into genetic differences among populations. The concern is that such research, no matter how well-intentioned, is located on a slippery slope that leads to the kinds of pseudoscientific arguments about biological difference that were used in the past to try to justify the slave trade, the eugenics movement and the Nazis’ murder of six million Jews.
Lol, I thought there weren’t supposed to be any slippery slopes?

Messed up the formatting

This.

segregation isn't the same thing as worldwide extermination
You're right, but extermination is inevitable and even necessary in the case of kikes, and even if we wouldn't do it, chinks most likely do. Might as well do it ourselves now and spare our descendands from doing that job.
That's playing god
No, it's the rule of nature.
really stupid
How so?
impossible
What makes it impossible?

not to mention impossible.
[citation needed]

You're on your own with your extermination goals. It really isn't plausible.

impossible
So was walking on the moon, curing smallpox, flying, crossing the oceans, etc. If our ancestors listened to cowards like you we would still be living in grass huts like niggers. Never be afraid of an impossible task, they are never as impossible as they seem.

It really isn't plausible.
Tell that to Pizzaro.

Yes it does.
Nope.
As your example made clear. There is nothing to explain if they are another species.
Sure there is, seeing as we see examples in their population on-par with ours.
Are dogs inbred because they are dumber than us? No, they are dogs.
Show me the Thomas Sowell dog who can do high level math. I'll wait.
Are nogs inbred because they are dumber than us? No, they are nogs.
No, they're dumber than us because their nogs AND because they may be inbred.

Like being stupid.
Yes, yes exactly!
But all gorillas are stupid.
So are inbred gorillas more or less likely to be stupid than non-inbred gorillas?
Exactly, you nigger.

Where are these non-inbred niggers then?
Theoretical context faggot.
If their IQ is the result of inbreeding, then they are all inbred.
That could well be the case.
The implicit assumption in your kike propaganda is that they should be smarter, like us. But they are not like us.
The implicit assumption is that they COULD be smarter, like us - and, because examples of their kind CAN espouse intellect on-par with Whites, we know they COULD be smarter, like us… But they aren't. Because they aren't like us. And may well be massively inbred.

In which case, there would be no reason to believe they are inbred, as there would be no reason to believe they should be more intelligent than they are.
Except that we know they're capable of demonstrating greater intellect, the question is why.
Evolutionarily derived? Certainly.
Completely without contribution from being massively inbred? Negative.

You only think they should be more intelligent because you are comparing them to humans.
No, I'm comparing them to their own population.
Because you are a subversive kike trying to push the "africans are human" propaganda.
You still didn't answer me if those other racial clades are human or not.
How about you do so now, eh?
If niggers are another species, as you imply, would inbreeding not make them worse?
If the answer is 'yes, it would make them worse', would altering their inbred status make them better?
If the answer is 'yes, it would make them better', would that statement be equivalent to suggesting they would be equivalent to Whites?

Answer the fucking questions.

Never be afraid of an impossible task

I'm not afraid of difficulty, I just don't put effort into what I think are evil goals. And, before you bring it up, I don't think it's necessary (let alone worth it even if I thought it possible, or good, or related), to murder entire races in order to advance technologically.

He destroyed their pagan empire, not the entire south american/mestizo/incan race, right?

So now again you admit you believe nogs are human because you don't understand the concept of a bell curve. Yet you still insist you aren't saying nogs are human. Complete judaism.

But all gorillas are stupid.
And all nogs are stupid.

So are inbred gorillas more or less likely to be stupid than non-inbred gorillas?
There's no measurable difference between gorilla populations. Just like there is no measurable difference between african populations. Really activates the almonds huh?
The implicit assumption is that they COULD be smarter
So because Sowell has a 90+ IQ that means africans are inbred? How did he manage to get such a high IQ then? Inbreeding doesn't just lower IQ, it causes the population to be genetically similar, so they all have IQs very close to each other, with little variation. Again you are disproving your own propaganda Schlomo.
No, I'm comparing them to their own population.
No, you just did it again. You compared them to whites: "because examples of their kind CAN espouse intellect on-par with Whites". Lying doesn't work when your post is still there.
You still didn't answer me if those other racial clades are human or not.
Because they are red herrings intended to distract from the argument in question. Nice try.

killing nonwhites
evil
I'm tempted to just smug at you, but I'll bite: They have no future. Even if kikes succeed in killing us off they will just consume and consume without giving anything back until the earth is a desert and then die regardless.

I'm pretty sure that's not true…
Its that /fringe/ shilling of that jew book again, something with diamond in the title. (Everything is connected, word meanings are esotheric, hidden knowledge, Nazi and AshkeNAZI, SEE?) Its a massive low IQ shitshow and the Q psyop also works toward that.

dna differences
There are three distinct dna groups:
Caucasoid
Asiod
Aficoid
All others are mixed phenotypes.
reich labs
david reich
reich[at]genetics[dot]med[dot]harvard[dot]edu
All the data they have is here:
reich.hms.harvard.edu/datasets
From this research I have found that
THERE IS NO JEW DNA
Proving there is is at the crux of reich's entire career.
But his work proves otherwise because
There is no jew dna
Jewshills btfo.

There are three distinct dna groups:
No. There's no sensible way to get 3, you get at least 5.

Attached: race-tree.jpg (67.38 KB, 602x480)

Is this why jews are smarter than cumskins?

succeed in killing us off

That's not going to happen. Our war is much more a religious and ideological one than a physical fight. Mine is, in any event. There is no way they can beat us on the battlefield.

Part of that war is the idea of 'diversity' being a good thing, which is just one tactic for destroying western civilization. Destroy the erroneous idea of diversity (forced race mixing, and forced religious mixing) being an ideal worth attempting (another utopian lie, like communism), and that tactic fails.

Ephesians 6:12

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

Proof positive australians are NOT europeans

Ha what nigger?

inb4 he's fired and with no nobel to sell becomes homeless

Attached: dna-unperson.jpg (157.51 KB, 835x655)

Didn't a Russian Oligarch buy his prize and then immediately return in.

With the help of these tools, we are learning that while race may be a social construct, differences in genetic ancestry that happen to correlate to many of today’s racial constructs are real.

This is your brain on marxism. As Yuri said, even when confronted with authentic information, the demoralized cannot but give their pre-programmed responses.

Fucking David the Kike Reich is at it again, trying to minimize the genetic advantages that whites have but still get a big paper by crying progress!

Damage Control is absolutely a perfect descriptor here. Every fucking time.

you talking about the femin virus?

ya know whats funny as fuck. Hes quoted in that article as having baited the kikes who did the study into doing the study to 'prove the high iq of jews'.

kikes really are stupid as shit.

not three
five
Interesting but the austronesian and papuan/australian "natives" migrated from asia/africa, respectively.
So they are africoid.

Sources for claim:
Haak W, Forster P, Bramanti B, Matsumura S, Brandt G, et al. (2005) Ancient DNA from the first European farmers in 7500-year-old Neolithic sites.
shh.mpg.de/173609/haak-wolfgang
reich.hms.harvard.edu/sites/reich.hms.harvard.edu/files/inline-files/Haak2015PublicData.tar.gz
**evolutionistx.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/haak_k16-20.png
evolutionistx.wordpress.com/2016/03/14/haak-et-als-full-graph

****
fucking

So they are africoid.
And Asiod.
MIxed and shit.

race tree
Also, what is source of your pic related ?
Tineye don't work so good without javascript.
And only the filthiest of niggers use services that require js.

HITLER

Everyone,

/pol is compromised. It is run by people trying to distract from Trump's total betrayal with the omnibus, which capped ICE agent hiring and capped deportations. It is opposite of what we voted for, and pol is trying to hide that.

Please move to /zenpol

Interesting but the austronesian and papuan/australian "natives" migrated from asia/africa, respectively.
So they are africoid.
By that logic so is everyone. "Where we found some bones and roughly dated them" is not helpful. We don't find most bones, and we can't date them accurately. DNA does not lie. It allows us to clearly measure the genetic distance between populations. As you can see, the genetic distance between abbos and asians is greater than the genetic distance between asians and whites. They are their own race.

zen
Not him.

abos are africans
by that logic so is everyone
Wut.
genetic distance
Seems based on time.
Why Maya/Azteca/Amerindians are more different from Chineese than Mongolian, even though they are the Ancient Mongolian people.

so is everyone
Out of africa theory is bullshit.
STRAIGHT OUTTA CAUCASUS

"Where we found some bones and roughly dated them" is not helpful.
It is.
Though I agree woth your reservations about accuracy claims.
"Archaeological evidence" is a hueristic by which we can establish relation and "distance" between us and our ancestors.
Without it, we can only establish relation and "distance" between us and our brothers, resulting in claims, for example, that the Irish and Scottish, both Gaels, are not the same people, when they are.

Had this problem for a few days about a week ago.
AT&T by any chance?

Seems based on time.
It isn't. It is based on genes. Be less stupid.
Out of africa theory is bullshit.
That's the point idiot. You are using out of africa "evidence" to say abbos are african because they came from africa.

It is.
No it is not. It gives us very little to know when those people were actually there, for how long, and what they were doing there. But that doesn't tell us who they are related to and how closely, which is the question. "Well these bones were half way between africa and india and they are 3000 years old, so indians came from africa 3000 years ago" is not logical. Genes tell us without any doubt that africans and abbos are more distantly related than whites and asians are. So if you want to pretend abbos and africans are one race, you have to also pretend whites and asians are. So stop pretending, and deal with reality.

nice hitler dubs get

The fucking state of this board, holy fuck.

There is plenty of studies where they did exactly that. Well guess what, they still grow up to be savages. You can't take the savage out of these people. You can't even fully tame them unless they breed with whites, which destroys both races.

inb4 post the studies
I'm at work, fuck you. Google it.

not the jews
not the jews
not the jews
not the jews
not the jews
not the jews
"The niggers are responsible for this, goy"
They must be D E S P E R A T E if they are pulling this shit

Attached: BobPage.png (139.81 KB, 350x347)

not the jews
not the jews
not the jews
not the jews
not the jews
not the jews
"The niggers are responsible for this, goy"

Funny coincidence: The ADL was formed because of a similar thing.

<how could a jew have committed an attempted rape that turned into a murder
<we are honest whites
<unlike the savage negroe that kills and debases for sport and coin
hang jew anyway because actual investigation and stuff
<create ADL in response
<spend DECADES trying to change the case
<sadly, not too long ago, succeed

They take every little inch over as much time as they can.
Unlike the lynching of Leo Frank, this particular issue must be kept in the public mind FOREVER.