Hi Holla Forums

I'm a national syndicalist. With that said I heavily identify with Communists even if I myself am not a Marxist. With that said, I am a diehard socialist.

The bourgeois are parasites on our society. They do nothing but sit on their asses and profit from the exploitation of the working class. They hijack our governments and bring misery upon the everyday working man. Their greed is endless.

I believe that worker controlled cooperatives should form syndicates which which elect party leaders on a democratic basis. The leaders of local syndicates would form a great council which would advise the national leader.

The national leader would be elected by all working citizens of the nation. His decision would would be 33% of a given vote. The leaders of the syndicates and the workers would get 67% of a given vote.

With that said, I truly don't understand why the left has clung on to the idea of internationalism. Internationalism has been hijacked by the bourgeois.

Nationalism is the future.

Mods pls no ban. I'm genuinely trying to contribute the community.

Serious question, in what ways does your ideology differ from say, national bolshevism?

In right wing politic the aesthetic of the political myth sometime is more important than the real economical and political structure of the system itself.

You see this problem with both right and left Nietzschians "i am beyond the political spectrum" but in reality you will have either capitalism, socialism, syndicalism, turd position etc..

Don't you think you should help other countries establish socialist economies and systems so you have allies, and then later merge together to improve efficiency and your geopolitical power?

Also if I may ask, why are you not a marxist?

You have class conscience but you lack dialectics

Lets hear him out first. So far he hasn't said shit other than
without explaining why.

Nationalism is a tool used to divide the working class across fictional lines. How has internationalism been hijacked exactly and if you say "globalism" just get out now.

NazBols believe in more of a planned economy. National Bolshevism is also a very Russia-Centric ideology. It also leans heavier towards totalitarianism.

Yes because socialism works better in a world of socialist nations.
No because efficiency =/= happiness. The needs of a national/local population are often dismissed under internationalism.

The nation isn't just made up by borders, it's made up by family, culture and tradition. These values are strong with the proletariat because there's a real meaning behind them. The needs of a smaller population cannot be satisfied under internationalism.

No, really it isnt. You can have people with a very similar culture, similar family structure and traditions and not reside within the national boundaries of your supposed nation.
And with the bourgeoisie and the capitalists who will use a 'nation's cultural traditions to reinforce old forms of social order to try and keep their muh privileged position in society. They will pray on the most depraved part's of traditions and cultures for their own gains, but they are all a part of the nation state, so why would these go away under the system you've purposed? And Lets for a moment suppose that you've been successful, that the revolution has come at the hand of people within one nation and stays within that nation, what is to stop outside capitalists forces in other neighboring nation states from simple overpowering your nation bit by bit until the old order is restored? You can revive international aid, that would destroy the very premise of what you were attempting to do.
As opposed to the fake meaning of what exactly?
ok, Explain why.