You faggots were right all along:

Every Fascist pretends to be a friend. They'll even call themselves Socialist, if they can get away with it.

If government is not using soft rhetoric and not pretending to be more Communist than Vanguard, it simply isn't desperate enough.

Did Bourgeois February government call itself "Social Revolutionary"?

Yeah we are going to need sauce for this one. It's something you can totally expect from her, not saying you are wrong, but we really need the real sources in order to use this.

...

It is irrelevant what they called themselves, since they did not represent the authoritarian response of Tzar nor the capitalists of Russia that soon followed. Also that notion completely ignores the actions what first soviet of st.petersburg did for "social revolutionary" government.

Holy shit this is real
books.google.com.sg/books?id=lnJVAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA337&lpg=PA337&dq=The Thatcher government never believed for a moment that [monetarism] was the correct way to bring down inflation. They did, however, see that this wo&source=bl&ots=mqQYLIKUbu&sig=IukSaQ5Mznf8nSqfFlM1S1lbypk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjV3vXCutvQAhVFrI8KHcLwAwcQ6AEIGjAA#v=onepage&q=The Thatcher government never believed for a moment that [monetarism] was the correct way to bring down inflation. They did, however, see that this wo&f=false
How did she became such a class traitor?

We tried to warn you.

But all you could say was "cuck".

holy wew lad

...

Typically, when the entire world governments unite to try to even destroy your idea, harder than even they tried to destroy the Nazis willing to kill the world over it in nuclear fire

You did something right/You're close to the truth.

This. And initially they were even happy to surrender Eastern Europe to the Nazis. And they didn't try that hard to destroy them, leaving the Soviets to do most of the fighting and not responding to their pleas for aid.

T-the free m-m-market would have f-fixed it guys.

Her family was petty bourgeois.

Is she the one who started the "I can run a household budget and a small grocery store so I can run a national budget it's basically the same thing lmao" meme?

It wouldn't surprise me, although that might be also the reason why the Left underestimated her, thinking she's a harmless moron like we think of Palin. Hitchens said something along those lines.

Don;t worry some retards will still defend Thatcher.

Two recessions were caused by DELIBERATE policies. Although inflation needed controlling in 1980, arguably the government deflated the economy too much – chasing money supply targets which were unreliable. The cost was large scale unemployment

Hmmmmmmmm?

Go directly to >>>/gulag/

this is KGB defector tier tbh. /liberty/ would call him out on the spot, just like we call le ebin subversive man on the spot.

why didn't the IRA succeed?

Because they didn't have the backing of the 🍀🍀🍀druids🍀🍀🍀.

Yeah I wouldn't strictly be shocked if this was true but equally it's kind of weird that he's just coming out and saying this with no proof.

fyi this interview is in an adam curtis documentary and Budd starts that statement with "sometimes I fear that"

Yeah if you examined her policies and rhetoric deeply she didn't appear to be very good, but she relied on people being shallow easily led morons.
Worked well.

WE FUCKING TOLD YOU BRO

Kalecki predicted this would transpire, and in this way.
I'm not sure why people are surprised she was this blatant about it, she prided herself on not giving a fuck about anything besides her agenda.

What's the source of this?

read the thread.

youtu.be/ZJh0m0E7Ozg

Oh, we love you Mrs. Thatcher
You´re the darling of us all
You’re the curse of the Irish nation
Fianna Fail and Fine Gael
You´ve destroyed me hired purchase
And you put me on the dole
If I could get my hands on you
I´d kick you up the hole

Why would the Chief economic adviser reveal this?

This is well known

the late 70s/early80s were a period of intense class struggle in Britain, the strongest since the 1920s. Union density and employment has never returned to pre-Thatcher levels.

I dunno, why would a member of the Nixon administration admit the drug war was an excuse to imprison Blacks and Hippies?

Still our best PM in recent times. Really says something about the quality of our politicians.

t. Tarquin

Hold on, wasn't this an interview with Adam Curtis? (I forget if it was "The Trap", "The Mayfair set" or such. All are great.)

> Now again, I would not say I believe that story, but when I really worry about all this I worry whether that indeed was really what was going on.

Still, I mean it's broadly true. The wage-productivity link was broken in the UK just as it was in the USA. (Though curiously in the UK it got much worse under Major, with the Thatcher years being comparitively "okay" purely in those terms - possibly just due to lagging productivity.

What do you think this push for nuclear power is for?

Nuclear=less workers=more money for the rich and more unemployed

Abortion

There was a tory mp who said recently that if the poor wouldn't suffer so much they would breed. Have you lived in a rural area full of old people? That's what we need.

Homosexuality

Buggers dont breed

Feminism

We can hire less men (what it was really about) sorry ladies the globalists think in terms of money.

If I remember pic related covers quite a bit on this (in the US), in that the switch from reserve bank policies from "promoting employment" to "keeping inflation down" was pretty much just to weaken the strength of the working classes

...

Reminded me of this.
Which wiki sources to
mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2010/kalecki220510.html

And which would seem to surmise 1970s Britain (and presumably USA) as well, with increasingly powerful trade unions.

Pure fucking evil.

...

Union density in Britain peaked at 51% in 1980. Today it's merely 34%.

But then how did countries like Finland and Sweden accommodate neoliberalism, given their even stronger unions?

Didn't Sweden introduce a bunch of pro-market reforms in the '90s? I haven't looked into it too deeply but quite a few conservatives have mentioned those re: "Scandinavian social democracy" in a CHECKMATE LIEBRULS fashion

socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5630/2528
I remember this being a pretty interesting read on why it failed in Sweden, though I can't remember exactly what it said because I've a poor attention span.

My take-away was essentially "The world went neoliberal and Sweden was forcibly dragged along with it, proving once and for all that neoliberalism ruins literally everything nice."

Wut