Jews complain about Russian revival of monarchist sympathies

Since toppling statues of Joseph Stalin, post-Soviet Russians have taken to building monuments to a different national hero in recent years: Tsar Nicholas II, the last emperor of the Russian Empire.

More than 25 shrines honoring Nicholas II have been erected since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991.

Declared a saint and a martyr by the Russian Orthodox Church seven years ago, the tsar has been depicted in stone embraced by an angel; descending the steps of the execution room; in the company of his beloved wife and children; or just standing tall in full military regalia, sword in his hand.

But for Russia’s Jews, Tsar Nicholas II was far from a beloved ruler.

During his reign, pogroms broke out throughout the Russian empire resulting in the murder of approximately 300,000 Jews, according to Joshua Rubenstein, an Associate of the Harvard University’s Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies. Nicholas II did nothing to stop the bloodshed, he said but rather gave troops orders to protect those carrying out the pogroms.

“It’s very hard for us to accept this deification of Nicholas II. It’s unfathomable,” said Rubenstein, adding that even the tsar’s execution by the Bolsheviks does not make him a saint. “It does not justify his elevation to sainthood.”

In addition to letting the perpetrators of the pogroms murder Jews, the Russian tsar also stubbornly refused to accept democratic reforms, such as the abolition of the Pale of Settlement, Rubenstein added. The Pale of Settlement was a law which forbade Jews to move outside of set areas within the Russian Empire, mainly in the Polish territories.

“There were ministers advocating for the abolition of the Pale, but [the tsar] did not abide by that,” he said.

The refusal of Nicholas II to implement reforms is one of the factors that led to the Communist Revolution, Rubenstein added.

timesofisrael.com/in-the-former-soviet-union-statues-and-hero-worship-for-leaders-of-pogroms/

archive.is/VG2Zh

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicut_Judaeis
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostra_aetate
inclibuql666c5c4.onion.link/?document=view&id=1214
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars
khazaria.com/khazar-history.html
rt.com/news/408990-romanovs-execution-russian-royal/
archive.fo/B13GW
knowyourmeme.com/memes/press-f-to-pay-respects
express.co.uk/news/world/586470/Russia-royal-family-Vladimir-Putin-reinstate-Tsar-Nicholas-Second-Romanov
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Jewish_pogroms_in_the_Russian_Empire#1903–1906
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Natanson
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Rysakov
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Yemelyanov
dailymail.
telegraph
rbc.ru/politics/15/02/2017/58a33b919a79472a55281e2a
russian-faith.com/people/rasputin-was-great-and-good-man-cruelly-murdered-and-slandered-evil-british-spies-n967
archive.is/uPe0a
sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/russian_revolution.htm
theendofzion.com/a-real-case-against-the-jews-marcus-eli-ravage/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants
tertullian.org/fathers/chrysostom_adversus_judaeos_01_homily1.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Medici
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oldest_banks
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banca_Monte_dei_Paschi_di_Siena
inathos.gr/
gutenberg.org/files/16769/16769-h/16769-h.htm
rassias.gr/9011.html
8ch.net/polmeta/res/28806.html
archive.is/cdyCI
archive.is/H6Q6e
archive.is/SeJ8O
archive.is/GTWOO
archive.is/FfPFp
archive.is/rPIj1
archive.is/LEhxc
russia-insider.com/en/300000-russian-priests-were-given-choice-they-all-chose-death/ri22038
writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/argument/
yourlogicalfallacyis.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

No peace on earth until every kike is exterminated.

Is Monarchy returning?

The absolute, brazen audacity of these kikes.

Sweet. Yes I'm great with this

RIP Csar and fam

Hard to tell, it's been an entire century now since the downfall. And choosing the next monarch from the bloodline is also difficult due to the family rules and many candidates fighting for the right to represent.

F

F

F

It seems like if anything Russia is leaning more towards theocracy than monarchy which I think is a great thing. Nothing is more Jewish than hating Christianity and a strong foundation in religion keeps a nation grounded and out of degeneracy which inevitably leads to chaos.
Godspeed Ruski bros.

Yes

F

It always makes me feel happy inside when I read about this. Revering Tsar Nicholas II is one of the biggest, most beautiful fuck yous imaginable to the (((people))) responsible for the Soviet nightmare. They tried so very hard to destroy everything that made Europe great. In their arrogance, they thought that killing the Tsar meant killing the ideas he represented. They kept on killing anyone that threatened their vision of a soulless, enslaved world and ridiculed and discredited anyone who dared to speak out against it.

The Germans were raped into submission. The old European empires broke apart, and the few newly "liberated" colonial states that had the gall to cling to civilization were isolated and choked into oblivion. Like termites, they consumed the United States from within until nothing was left but a hollow, decadent facade.

And yet, the spirit will not die. No amount of bullets and bombs can kill it. No amount of vicious slanders and outright lies can deter it from the truth. Despite all of their efforts, history books will view the 20th century as one of the greatest mistakes in human history. If we have the courage to keep fighting, the 21st century will be the one where the world was set right again.

All hail the Tsar.

May his spirit support us all on the DOTR

F

One is enough. We don't need another

Can shills be any more obvious?

F, he's the monarch of my heart.

I was reading up some Russian history and they’ve had numerous occasions where common people have impersonated blood royalty too so that might also complicate things.

No amount of bullets could kill the Tsar, his wife, and children either. The kikes as of recent have been claiming it's because the Tsar and family lived such a lifestyle that their clothes were literally made of diamonds in the threads to make them bulletproof - hence the need for a room full of 12+ men emptying entire pistols on the family only to have to ritually stab them until nothing recognizable remained.
Similar thing happened to Rasputin, Nicholas' advisor and mystic, who came from the wilderness much like the Magi, to assist the Tsar. They poisoned, shot, drowned, stabbed, burned, and eventually buried Rasputin before calling it quits.
Or so the stories go.

F

forgot the first part of my post:
Sholomo is right, it makes him a saint. But for the reasons outlined in qualify him for sainthood.

F

The murder of the Romanovs was the one thing I refused to defend when I was still a commie. Looking back it was a gateway to the redpill. It can probably be that for a lot of others

Yeah what a despot Nick certainly is at fault not hooknosed kikes who were openly bombing trains filled with food to try and start a revolution.

Kikes are worse than christians because christianity is their golem, just like Religion of Cuck™. Regardless if it's mutated and turned on its master for some time, it's still overwhelmingly a net negative and dead weight.

306: The church Synod of Elvira banned marriages, sexual intercourse and community contacts between Christians and Jews.
315: Constantine published the Edict of Milan which extended religious tolerance to Christians. Jews lost many rights with this edict. They were no longer permitted to live in Jerusalem, or to proselytize.
325: The Council of Nicea decided to separate the celebration of Easter from the Jewish Passover. They stated: "For it is unbecoming beyond measure that on this holiest of festivals we should follow the customs of the Jews. Henceforth let us have nothing in common with this odious people…We ought not, therefore, to have anything in common with the Jews…our worship follows a…more convenient course…we desire dearest brethren, to separate ourselves from the detestable company of the Jews…How, then, could we follow these Jews, who are almost certainly blinded."
337: Christian Emperor Constantius created a law which made the marriage of a Jewish man to a Christian punishable by death.
339: Converting to Judaism became a criminal offense.
343-381: The Laodicean Synod approved Cannon XXXVIII: "It is not lawful [for Christians] to receive unleavened bread from the Jews, nor to be partakers of their impiety."
367 - 376: St. Hilary of Poitiers referred to Jews as a perverse people who God has cursed forever. St. Ephroem refers to synagogues as brothels.
379-395: Emperor Theodosius the Great permitted the destruction of synagogues if it served a religious purpose. Christianity became the state religion of the Roman Empire at this time.
380: The bishop of Milan was responsible for the burning of a synagogue; he referred to it as "an act pleasing to God."
415: The Bishop of Alexandria, St. Cyril, expelled the Jews from that Egyptian city.
415: St. Augustine wrote "The true image of the Hebrew is Judas Iscariot, who sells the Lord for silver. The Jew can never understand the Scriptures and forever will bear the guilt for the death of Jesus."
418: St. Jerome, who created the Vulgate translation of the Bible wrote of a synagogue: "If you call it a brothel, a den of vice, the Devil's refuge, Satan's fortress, a place to deprave the soul, an abyss of every conceivable disaster or whatever you will, you are still saying less than it deserves."

Your shit DnC isn't even worth a bumping the thread.

Keep going until you get to the part where christians start sucking the farts out of dead rabbi's assholes. You can cherry pick all you want, christians especially modern ones, support jews.
The only reason we continue to have problems with jews is because of christians. Without them, the jews would be utterly annihilated.

wanna know how we know you don't belong here

F

Sounds about right.

...

Why do Jews think they can tell every country what to do?

It's almost like the Holocause was justified

If that was true, how would there be enough jews left to lead the bolshevik revolution? And the mensheviks?

There were millions of them in the Russian Empire, because Poland invited them in when they were attacked in other parts of Europe, then the Russian empire annexed Poland.

F

But seriously, wanna know why your argument sucks? Here's an analogy- you have healthy body for your entire life, but during last year a cancer develops; would you not remove the cancerous tissue just because it served you well before? History shouldn't be forgotten, but the cancer must be removed.

It was Whites that were the archenemy of Kikes and not Christianity per say. Jews love those based Christian niggers. Especially when God fearing Nogs marry White girls. There is no racial component to Christianity. Everyone can be baptized and saved. Spic in Paraguay is just as good as a Christian as a Hans in Sweden. For centuries Christian Monarch shielded Jews and allowed them to roam freely around Europe. Yids are people of the book nonetheless.

Reminder, Kikes and Commies come together.

Wow, it's almost like the church has changed its position from time to time.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicut_Judaeis
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostra_aetate

[F]

5 star post

Do you actively try to ignore what other posters say or are you actually this stupid?

Kikes never cared about whites untill Rome became Christian, in their books they always specify christians as their enemy, without any mention of whites. Pagans were never unified and always fought over petty tribal bullshit, or simply because ooga tribe was stronger than booga tribe. Monarchs varied in quality and allegiance throughout time and were ultimately a secular force. To claim that all monarchs everywhere placed jews under their protection is pure demagogery, as is typical of all anti-christian posters. However whenever a monarch would attack the kikes infesting his country his motivation was always Christianity, not to mention it was often the clergy that advocated their explusion.
Only mohomo'd the pedo goatfucker believes that. Christians, as pointed out always considered kikes to be disgusting vermin.

Canonization is not deification, nor is veneration you filthy kike.

F

Here's an analogy - you're a faggot
If a man has lung cancer you don't rip out both lungs. You first try to bring the cancer into remission through various therapies and allow the organ to heal itself. It's only as a last resort that surgery is used, and retaining as much of the healthy tissue as possible is always of utmost importance. If you read the chain of comments you'll see that the initial d&c came from

F
Tsar Nicky was too pure for this world.

F

...

What a great man.

I said only cancerous tissue. Since you're trying to weasel your way out, here's another analogy, more appropriate to who you are. If a wife cheats on you, you're the type of person that would do nothing. You'd forgive her because she has been faithful before, taking up the ass from a stranger doesn't mean you have to get rid of her, right christcuck?

fixed

Imagine a world in which family actually meant something and Britain came to the Czar’s aid in the Russian Revolution.

Or if Kaiser Wilhelm actually helped Tsar Nicholas like he said he would?

I disagree. You have only to look at modern America to see how "grounded" Christianity has kept Americans. The most ardent Christians in America are more willing to die for Israel, a foreign country, than they are willing to lift a finger in support of their race. In fact, ask any Christian and 9 times out of 10 they'll tell you that Jesus hates racism.

Please try again (on a different site).

Inactivity really doomed the world in that generation. Rising the occasion is an absolute requirement.

So Putin = Cromwell?

You forgot hating National Socialism. Jews can tolerate Christians. They hate Christians but they can use them. Jews are outright in bed with Christians in the USA.

Jews cannot tolerate or coexist with National Socialism.

Stabbed in the back by your own (((family))).
F.

F

Yeah, how he not bea good goy puppet and let us exploit the Russians as cattle, like we wanted, so we murdered him and then killed millions of his people he had a g-d sworn duty to protect.

Explain soros

Natalia shows where her affections lie

I know one of his direct descendants living in the U.S. and probably flying around in a starship from time to time. I wouldn't worry that he isn't recreated or not making a reappearance in this timeline or the next, but truth be told. This all is one ridiculous charade.

Hey you motherfucker, it happens more than you know.

Oh yeah and one more thing. Here yah go. Talk about backstabbing…… Get a real good solid look.

IT IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY THAT THE BOARD OWNER AND MODS ON Holla Forums AND SIMILARLY NAMED BOARDS ON SIMILAR CHAN SITES ARE NOT WORKING FOR SHAREBLUE/ANOTHER SHILL AGENCY LINKED TO THE DNC AND THE UN/EU/GLOBALISTS

Holla Forums mods are compromised globalist shills who censor you if you get too close to the truth. if you post anything they disagree with, even if it's a commonly accepted opinion on Holla Forums or anything else that gets them assblasted (((like calling out shills that are literally in every single thread))), or for no real reason at all just to piss you off, they will delete all your posts and all your threads and then ban you.

question everyone until you find out who you are not allowed to question.

if it's the same for (((them))) then the Holla Forums mods are (((them))). eventually you will post something or start a thread and you will be censored and banned even if you did not break a single rule on Holla Forums. the ban reason will always be some fake fucking reason like "spam" or "unspecified reason". if you are in doubt, it isn't because this can't happen to you. it only means that it has not yet happened to you.

I am one of you, so don't bitch that you're being raided. all it takes is a look at /polmeta/ and /sudo/ to see just how many of us are being censored and banned every day by corrupt mods. the very founding reasons for Holla Forums "politically incorrect" "freedom of speech" are being torn down from above by the corrupt moderators and undermined from below by shills. because of our corrupt mods who are the biggest censorship loving sellouts in the entire world, Holla Forums is being ruined.

all that has been struggled for will be lost as Holla Forums can not function the way things are.

/polk/ is the same mods pretending to be different people. past migration efforts have all failed because we don't have the hivemind and the unity to make the move all at once. I don't care what new Holla Forums type board we all choose to migrate to but we need to make a good choice and then just make the move all together. the reason why everyone is getting banned all the time is because we have been subverted and manipulated.

who would have guessed that the very mods in charge of the board with the most freedom of speech on the entire internet that gives NO SHITS about political correctness would be some of the most CUCKED mods we have ever experienced?

this bullshit-banning has to fucking stop. we need the freedom to post the truth without being punished.

Impeach the cucked Holla Forums mods.

God bless donald trump. God bless america.

George V had an option to save the Romanovs from the threat and he was aware of the possible outcome if he didn't.
Only thing was that he was such a massive pussy for being afraid of the parliament punishing him or getting a negative approval from the public.

lol

Listen Motherfucker, you and I know what kind of stakes and games can be run on persons, EVEN if they happen to be high up in Monarchy or "Democratic" institutions. All of this shit could have been solved IF(!) there was open dialogue without these fucking happenings of interference. Oh and let's not forget the tangible things let unsaid that cause all of this bullshit in the first place!

All Jewtin propaganda. Pic related.

Picture related

top lel

Tsar getting executed by kikes is Putin propaganda?

So then tell me what are the results if Wilhelm had stepped out for the CZAR? Tell me since you know so much about the afterlife…

Nice cherry picking asshole. Now tell me where do I find a nation with sound stock, that isn't loaded with "Jews"? Do you always enjoy lying through your fucking teeth?

You're a real backstabbing bitch you know? Who crossed the road first?

looks like christianity has made a semite out of you afterall.

Ukrainian here. Tell me, what jew-free country do you hail from?

The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you

Unlike your rulers, I didn't backstab anyone, eternal anglo.

Oh and before you cry more, who back then was complaining about the Lend Lease? Mannerheim? Lol. GO FUCK OFF.

Lets push this hard. If we make the Tsar popular, the kikes will reveal themselves more until everyone knows they murdred his fucking children, and then kike blood will flow!

Africa? Or are you going to change the direction towards that there are "good Jews" like Ukrainians for example?

The jew so he could take over another country.

Sure thing SLAVO COP. You had all the fucking opportunity NOT to take it this route. But you did then, and you are doing it again. Oh and remind me again how loyal your Women are? Nothing like a good fucking beating to keep them in line huh? Trust me It sounds like a good idea, but I thought you hated Semitics and harems and shit, right? I mean (((Russia))) of today is a very happy place today right? Who's in charge btw, LOL.

So you're claiming there are no Jews in charge of Russia then?

Here's a thing. Have you, or ANYONE else ever clearly defined who is a Jew and who is not? Netanyahu says it's the Judeans. But he is Israeli. So again, who are the Jews smart guy?

Oh, I just wonder. A lying scum who crawl to unwanted places to gain wealth and power and then fool the people to do his bidding?

Reminder that communism in Russia was entirely controlled and founded by jews

We are now in The Return of the King, Who’s ready for Tsar Putin first of his name?

Ok well did you want to join forces and do something about "Africa"? I missed that invitation. In fact, I just got tossed right in the middle of it all, like so many others. Now fuck off.

Assuming this isn't more kikery, what did the jews do to the Russians to cause such a backlash?

Nobody kills that many people without good reason.

What does F mean?

F

That's one interpretation. So then tell me what all inclusive club o success do you belong to that doesn't ever find itself possibly being labeled as such and still ride a high horse in this life and know with confidence after death that all is great and even better? Got a super secret club bud?

Oh yes, if you're so interested. It's called "Having a life and not bitching at everyone like some attention wanting drama whore" club.

Oh well then I guess it would be a real shame if somebody busted that prestine life of yours up huh?

Beneath this fabolus facial hair there's more than flesh. Behind this fabolus mustache there is an idea mr. jew - and ideas are bulletproof!"

- Tsar Nicholas II

Gotta do it.

F

Back in those times, there were the mediteranean civilizations+persia and india with violent snowniggers up north, violent horseniggers in the eastern steppes, and violent desert niggers to the south. There was no such thing as "Europe" in the modern sense of the word, which was entirely created due to Christianity being a thing. Jews and Romans of the time had much more common ground than say Romans and Gauls.

Oh yeah, it sure would. Like being frustrated by getting replied by someone and actively waste my entire energy on removing one single user. Oh wait.

Jewtin needs to boost Civic Nationalism. Therefore the creation of an icon plebs can attribute to the Civic Nationalist state of Russia – thus the appropriation of the Tsar's image.

I'm not (((Ukrainian.))) In fact, I'd not even care if Putin would take over that shitty (((country))), it would probably be better for everyone.

Back to Jewtin. His best friend (((Arkady Rotenberg))) becomes an overnight billionaire because of Jewtin. How can Jewtin be against the Jew if his best friend is a Jew?

Jewtin is a practical CivNat. Thus, the sainthood bestowed upon the Tsar's by the FSB controlled Russian Orthodox Church. All in all, it's a great influence program, however, Jewtin is pro-kike.

So, away with the Ukraine strawman and focus on why Jewtin claims to be pro-Russian, when the largest construction contracts in Russia go to a kike?

Come on SVRniggers. You can do better. Your field operatives are first class, but the online propaganda as of late has been lagging.

I look forward to seeing your next influence operation online, and then seeing how shitty or good it was.

Also, in my case, you have to discredit me and the information in my post to other lurkers on this board. Two of you sitting next to each other in St. Petersburg can easily use your proxies to discredit this post.

But, think about it – SVRnigger – you're doing the best you can in a rigged game in Russia run by a powerful few KGBfags, like Jewtin. I don't blame you for shilling, you make more money this way than your average Russian.

Just know, you have no hope of succeeding in the rigged power game in Russia. If I were you, I'd get a job at the Kremlin and work my way up from the inside. Build trust and loyalty, then cash in on some side contracts to become a millionaire.

Shilling won't help. I respect why you do it, and have no ill will towards you as Russian people. If I was stuck in Russia, I'd work in the SVR too if I didn't have other ways of making a good living.

Well You sound like you have a high place to fall from. And soon I bet.

No, wait a second. The kikes didn't kill Rasputin, some men of higher standing, the Tsar's own cousins, set a trap for him. They saw the brute's hidden charm, his drinking and lusting and hunger for power, and fulfilled demands to do something about this outrageous man. Their influence in court waned to the extent that he was the man to please in all affairs of state. As the lover of the Russian Queen, he was even on the cusp of cucking dear ole Nick the Second himself! For her, he was no wheeler dealer, she really did believe he was a holy man who would heal her son. Rasputin gave the court Jews a run for their money and so his enemies rightly declared that this man's just got to go. And so they shot him till he was dead. Oh those Russians…

Anti-christian shitposting check.


"the site is compromised" spambot check.


Jewtin shills check.

I think we have the full collection of the most popular shilling tactics right here in this thread boys.

This is getting more entertaining. Now it turns into that some creep doesn't know how to let go.

I've heard enough from the likes of (((you))).

The last date you reference is AD 418, which was sixteen centuries ago. One thousand, six hundred years. Perhaps Christianity was /ourreligion/ but now its just another golem.
The kike hate of Christianity has little to do with our own strategic calculations. Christianity in its present form is incompatible with the future we imagine. Rosenberg recognized this decades ago.

Yes, we all remember the great WHITE civilizations of antiquity that were all proud national socialists working to advance the white race as a happy united family. All they wanted to do was fug their pure aryan blonde gf's in wheat fields and jump over bonfires, and they never fought or hated each other, no, not at all, they were all united by their whiteness. Everything was perfect untill those damn ignorant bigoted homophobic christcucks came along and killed all the priests and shamans and plunged all of europe into the dark ages. Thank Odin for breaking us free from their clutches by inspiring free independent thinkers such as nietze, freud and marx!

You guys NEED to read Two Hundred Years Together.
inclibuql666c5c4.onion.link/?document=view&id=1214

In the first few chapters, you learn that Alexander II (Nikolai's Father) was actually trying to help the jews. He started a homestead program exclusively for jews!
But what did the Czar Alexander II ask in return?

Validating their own garbage, as if they were somehow right in revolting. The pogroms were a reaction to the mass starvation and cancer from what is now Ukraine, where kikels were the leading force, the population rebelled and took forcefull action and the monarch dared not to use military force against his own people or face removal. Then the international jews from the US funded the bolshevik revolution under false pretense, it was always intended to mass slaughter 70 million Russian Christians during their communist cancer. Give it time kikes, a cleansing is coming. We remember.

That's a big strawman you've got there. I wonder (((who))) else likes to spew bullshit to such a degree?

Since I've shot down all your shit tier arguments, there is really nothing else to say other than mock you.

(((violent horseniggers in the eastern steppes)))
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars
khazaria.com/khazar-history.html

F

Strawman "expert" fullchan user "checking" all people disagreeing with the post narrative.

:^) Check.

Remember, if your pro-kike, you're anti-white.

rt.com/news/408990-romanovs-execution-russian-royal/

archive.fo/B13GW

"Snowniggers" that caused the Roman fucking Empire a headache that spanned centuries and eventually brought upon its downfall, in its stead erecting kingdoms of their own.
Your anti-European bias is showing there Shlomo, better make the christcuck shilling a little more subtle.

Actually, you have yet to tackle any of my posts directly, instead opting to tangent off into pathetic strawmans. Of course, your seemingly worthless ramblings do help to illustrate the point that christianity does indeed have a pervasive semitic element to it.

Hmmm, i wonder who would shill for a happy-go-lucky forest niggery with no codified law, no sense of private property, monogamy or at least polygamy for males
It feels like someone has done this before in warsaw pact countries I think it was the Bolsheviks and the Soviets, but who were they?
Truly a mystery!

...

...

...

...

Funny that you and the other christian have a propensity for creating absurd strawman arguments. Really makes you think.

...

You know, it feels like Return of the King from LOTR - the people are looking back at the times where monarchs ruled the land and the times were simpler, before the demagogues destroyed it.

I think most Europeans are dreaming of a return to simpler times, or at least to times when their nations as whole were sanctified through monarchic order. It is the abominations like French Republic that have opened the way to godless dictatorships of later times.

...

WHAT DOES F MEAN
H
A
T

D
O
E
S

F

M
E
A
N
?

Still shames me as a Bong that Lord Grey and the British monarchy decided to let the Tsar's immediate family go hang rather than offer them asylum.

hownew.ru

FFFFFFF
F
FFFFF
F
F
F

Bro, you've got a lot worse to feel bad about.

...

Yeah I know you.

...

I don't care where you go, but you can't stay here.

nice id

Daily reminder that the kikes slaughtered these innocent girls because they were "traitors to the People."

Why doe sit omit the part about the rise of Communism?

I also have the uncut version, but it's without subtitles- goes on about how the Rothschild's influenced modern russia aswell

No shit.

So what's the Soros connection to the Rotchschilds?

How many days of Auschwitz is that?

Come on user. Can you not just even?

...

What is…
…the connection…
…between Soros and the Rothschilds?

This is an exceptional question. kikes are very hierarchical - do you know nothing of kikes?

I've been on Holla Forums since 2013, and came to 8/pol/ in December 2014. I have no idea what it means.

What does it mean?

F you glorious Tsar. F for your wife and children too.

Unless they were cucks. Then fuck 'em.

You are correctly denied this information. You demand it as though you view everyone here as inferior to you.
THAT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE AN AGENT!

...

Can someone please tell me what it means?

I truly am an everyday Holla Forums browser. What does it mean?

It's quite funny how basically nothing has changed about commie trash.

It means you're a faggot.

U FAG U DIE

I'm going to be a kind soul and spoon-feed you.

knowyourmeme.com/memes/press-f-to-pay-respects

That's what he said;


/s

Fucking CIAnigger enabler.

Hey, user may not be exposed to the video-jew, can't be hard on him for that.

He should have to figure shit out on his own, you're helping him feed his entire herd of niggercattle right now.

Really? If you're really want a revolution to have a chance at success you have to kill the entire royal family/PM/President whatever so there are no more valid claimants to the throne who can form a government in exile and hire a bunch of mercenaries or foreign governments to retake the country in return for the promise of future taxes from the people once the original government is back in place.
This is how it was done in the ancient times as well. If some king or lord took over a neighboring land, then he killed the entire family of previous ruling class, so that none would remain to reclaim the throne.
If you want to have a successful revolution you have to be willing and prepared to execute the current government, or don't even bother. Otherwise you're just going to damn your people to more death and suffering as the previous rulers escape and return with an army to take you out.

F
I hope you are in valhalla giving jews free helicopter rides

diaf jew lover

Thread theme.

If it wasn't clear, this principal goes for any revolution whatsoever. Communist or otherwise. UNLESS you are in a sort of colonial position where you just declare independence and don't care to risk shit like 1812 where the fuckers come back and burn down your capitol. If you're an extension of an empire you are sort of safe declaring independence so long as the empire you were a part of also goes on the decline and doesn't come back and erase you.
But if you replace the government of your homeland, say you want to have a revolution in England itself or Germany or wherever else you have to kill the leaders so they can't form a government in exile. If you leave them alive in prison chances are they escape, as was the case in Yemen.
In Yemen you see the Houthis fucked up letting Hadi escape to the Saudis. They didn't make the same mistake with Saleh though when he tried to turncoat, killed that fucker dead.
Remember that the other side won't show you any fucking sympathy as revolutionaries. Remember how the allies had no problem executing all the Nazis, and are still hunting them down to this day.
If you want to be the king you have to kill the king. That's just the way it always has been. Either kill them or don't bother, because you're just going to get yourself killed eventually.

These days you have mostly idiots who think they'll become free just because it would be fair for them to be free. Example: "We speak a totally different language. We've been here for as long as the other guys. We should have our own country." - these inevitably will laugh at you when you ask them about their opsec. They believe that opsec is something only Americans have to worry about.

Well, with Assange's help, Catalonia has changed this rule. This may be the single most influential thing he's ever done - help the masses develop strategies for combating the unjustly meddling state.

WHAT DOES F MEAN?

Press F to pay respect.

FUCK YEAH

It means Fuck Off, CIAnigger.

Fuck you, faggot.

It's a letter in the alphabet.

this

...

...

Explain what it means.
Explain the meme.

It means lurk moar

Re-F to post awesome music dedicated to you noble Tsar.

Lel literal gangster talk

No.

checked

scroll up, nigger

the more i learn. the more i hate.

F

F

That guy is literally retarded.

F

And anther F to all the White martyrs in the army, the Church and society at large who stood up to the Reds.

nice get, but this music is (a lot) better:

Why we aren't doing this to any and all Government officials in the U.S. is shocking. It's time to line them up and shoot.

I have lurked for years, yet I don't know what it is.

Please explain it.

Alright you newfag I'll explain it lurk 2 more years before posting again

It's a troll. He was here yesterday.

It's the first time I've seen "F," and I am not a newfag.


Use the IDs to see that the first time I posted in this thread was today.

Great line. 10/10

Oh fuck off. Nobody cares who you are.

F
The Cossacks don't forget.

You're a newfag.

F

The Tsar was unironically a good man. He opened his own personal pantry for the peasants while the kikes misled and lied to them then walked them to their deaths under the Jewish Bolsheviks. The Jews will learn we Russians are a vengeful people as well soon enough.

No, I am most certainly not. Why not just explain what it means? What do you gain from not explaining it to me?

F

You're a newfag. That meme is fucking ancient and everyone who's not a newfag knows what it means. Or you might be one of those faggots who hates video games in which case do us all a favour and put a bullet in your own skull you waste of flesh.

What the fuck are the scissors for.

trauma shears, cutting off clothing and shiet

I don't hate videogames, m8, but I don't engage in Judaic videogames (ie anything mainstream).

Anywho, I found out what it means after google-searching, and yes, I had not heard about "press F to pay respects" until today, m8.

A good man, but extremely foolish. He should never have liberalized his nation. He should never have taken command of the army directly, thus allowing his army's failures (and his) to be magnified. He should never have abolished vodka (an idiotic decision). And he shouldn't have suffered jews or communists to live. He was too nice and that is what got him and his family killed.

Hitler was the same way, sparing the British countless times such as at Dunkirk and always wanting alliances or peace with them because of his dream. The lesson here is never be too nice and nice guys are finished last. No mercy.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
As a city-dwelling burger I can only imagine what I'd do with 100 acres of free fucking land all set and ready to go with a built house, livestock and tools.
I bet the kikes that used this program sold the tools, ate the livestock, shit in the cabin, let the land get overgrown and went crying to the nearest village when they got hungry.
And then I finished reading the rest of the post.
Fucking kikes.

/K/ HERE WITH A SPECIAL HOLIDAY MESSAGE OF GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU NOGUNS FAGGOT

You'd be familiar with it if you browsed Holla Forums and weren't a fucking newfag, newfag.

I've never once browsed Holla Forums, but I've browsed Holla Forums and Holla Forums for a years, m8.

express.co.uk/news/world/586470/Russia-royal-family-Vladimir-Putin-reinstate-Tsar-Nicholas-Second-Romanov


Fucking kikes.

Israel is loaded with Russians, the non-jewish sort. You all shall find out why soon enough. The jews will pay DEARLY.

That would be great, but probably not dearly enough.

And that's how you out yourself as a faggot who doesn't play vidya.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Jewish_pogroms_in_the_Russian_Empire#1903–1906

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Natanson
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Rysakov
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Yemelyanov

Back to those pogroms:

Typical tricks.

You fucking traitorous kike-enabling scum.

We are not "Kind souls" who will show compassion to the "humble merchants" who will stab us and our people in the back. We are Hitler's Vengeance incarnate. If you are here to be a "kind soul" to the kikes, niggers, and shills who are destroying civilization, you are less welcome than they are.

Why would I waste my time playing video games?

To be honest, Neverball is all I need for satisfacion.

It's a reference to the Fallujah Massacre.

It's time to go back, Holla Forums

They deserve so much worse than death for what they've done, we're all very nice people to only want to completely remove them from existence. That said yeah, spoonfeed user is kind of a huge faggot.

F may God save your soul

...

Ow the edge

Hahaha holy shit if this is shitposting you are absolutely killing it

There is some truth to this. Peter the Great was great because he instituted reforms and Westernize Russia.

The Orthodoxy took the native (almost Celtic) Salvic culture and turned them into a mixed dis-eugenic slave race. By the time of the Russian "revolution" the people were so fucked up and battered down that black slaves in America were treated better.
Partly because the monarchy gobbled up all the forests, and whatever forest land was left over they used for hunting grounds, pushing the forest people onto farms which they abused and robbed and Jewed.

Russia is a shit country and Nicholas II was a shit ruler. If you don't believe me look into this guy.

Christian monarchy was always a cancer and it has almost killed the Aryan race. Modernism is just Rothchild monarchy.

What the hell? I'm seeing a lot of 'CIAnigger' posts here, that's not cool.
The CIA are good people who would be killing Commie sympatbisers right now if they could! Be a little more open minded Anons.

...

This also stuck out the most to me too.
Slight slip of the tongue or pure ego kvetch?

Take off a one and two zeros from that number, maybe 2000 Jews died.

Also…
==Nicholas did this because Zionist Jews literally kept throwing bombs at his dad until one killed him.–

Nicholas II father getting blown up by Jews is "Jewtin propaganda"? Why would Jews paint Jews badly?

Twelve guys and you found four Jews, it's a bit of an improvement over 100% of the Bolsheviks being Jewish.

>dailymail. co.uk/news/article-5125545/Russia-investigates-tsar-killed-Jewish-ritual.html

>telegraph .co.uk/news/2017/11/28/russian-orthodox-church-suggests-tsars-death-jewish-ritual-murder/

even mainstream kike sources report on the ritual murder of the tsar by the jews

Holla Forums, not even once.

Even cuckchan knows this is bullshit.

Okay, retard. I've said it before and I've said it again: to condemn Christianity because of modern Christians means you must condemn National Socialism because of Neo-Nazis. Do you condemn paganism because of all the pozzed pagans? The concept of government because all our governments are infiltrated and corrupt?


Hilariously wrong.


It's not much more of a strawman than the anti-Christian shills around here use.

I WILL AVENGE YOU. THE TALMUDIC MARXISTS WILL DIE SCREAMING
F

Rasputin's "influence" is nothing but rumors spread by (((them.))) (((They))) needed him dead in order to kill the Romanov family.

YOU ARE NOT REDPILLED

I don't care about your 2000 years of "anti-semitic" history. Christian theology, theosophy and philosophy is thoroughly jewish, anti-life and anti-white. It is a foreign element that first needed to destroy everything that was at odds with it in order to be fully instated. I value KNOWLEDGE. Christianity only exists because of a GREAT LOSS OF KNOWLEDGE and it is a tool that brought a great dark age to the entirety of the continent. It is merely a tool of systematic control and genocide of all native Europeans. I want to expunge all foreign elements including traitor christians.
Here are some examples of the murder and destruction of white people, white culture and heritage that christianity is responsible for:

314 AD
Immediately after its full legalisation, the Christian Church attacks the Gentiles: The Council of Ancyra denounces the worship of Goddess Artemis.

324 AD
Emperor Constantine declares Christianity as the only official religion of the Roman Empire. At Dydima, Asia Minor, he sacks the Oracle of God Apollo and tortures its Pagan priests to death. He also evicts the Gentiles from Mt. Athos and destroys all local Hellenic Temples.

326 AD
Emperor Constantine, following the instructions of his mother Helen, destroys the Temple of God Asclepius in Aigeai of Cilicia and many Temples of Goddess Aphrodite in Jerusalem, Aphaca, Mambre, Phoenice, Baalbek, etc.

330 AD
Constantine steals the treasures and statues of the Pagan Temples in Greece to decorate Nova Roma (Constantinople), the new capital of his Empire.

335 AD
Constantine sacks many Pagan Temples of Asia Minor and Palestine and orders the execution by crucifixion of "all magicians and soothsayers". Martyrdom of the neoplatonist philosopher Sopatros.

341 AD
Emperor Constas, son of Constantinus, persecutes "all the soothsayers and the Hellenists". Many Gentile Hellenes are either imprisoned or executed.

346 AD
New large - scale persecutions against the Gentiles in Constantinople. Banishment of the famous orator Libanius accused as… "magician".

353 AD
An edict of Constantius orders the death penalty for all kind of worship through sacrifices and "idols".

354 AD
A new edict of Constantius orders the closing of all Pagan Temples. Some of them are profaned and turned into brothels or gambling rooms. Executions of Pagan priests. First burning of libraries in various cities of the Empire. The first lime factories are built next to closed Pagan Temples. A large part of Sacred Gentile architecture is turned into lime.

356 AD
A new edict of Constantius orders the destruction of the Pagan Temples and the execution of all "idolaters".

357 AD
Constantius outlaws all methods of Divination (Astrology not excluded).

359 AD
In Skythopolis, Syria, christians organise the first death camps for the torture and execution of arrested Gentiles from all around the Empire.

361 to 363 AD
Religious tolerance and restoration of Pagan cults declared in Constantinople (11th December 361) by the Pagan Emperor Flavius Claudius Julianus.

363 AD
Assassination of Emperor Julianus (26th June).

364 AD
Emperor Flavius Jovianus orders the burning of the Library of Antioch. An Imperial edict (11th September) orders the death penalty for all Gentiles that worship their ancestral Gods or practice Divination ("sileat omnibus perpetuo divinandi uriositas"). Three different edicts (4th February, 9th September, 23rd December) order the confiscation of all properties of Pagan Temples and the death penalty for participation in Pagan rituals, even private ones.

365 AD
An Imperial edict (17th November) forbids Gentile officers of the army to command christian soldiers.

370 AD
Emperor Valens orders a tremendous persecution of Gentiles throughout the Eastern Empire. In Antioch, among many other Pagans, the ex-governor Fidustius and the priests Hilarius and Patricius are executed. Tons of books are burnt in the squares of cities of the Eastern Empire. All friends of Julianus are persecuted (Orebasius, Sallustius, Pegasius etc.), the philosopher Simonides is burned alive and the philosopher Maximus is decapitated.

372 AD
Emperor Valens orders the governor of Asia Minor to exterminate the Hellenes and all documents of their wisdom.

373 AD
New prohibition of all methods of Divination. The term "Pagan" (pagani, villagers) is introduced by the christians to lessen the Gentiles.

375 AD
The Temple of God Asclepius in Epidaurus, Greece, is closed down.

380 AD
On 27th February, Christianity becomes the exclusive religion of the Roman Empire by an edict of Emperor Flavius Theodosius, requiring that "all the various nations, which are subject to our clemency and moderation should continue in the profession of that religion, which was delivered to the Romans by the divine Apostle Peter". Non-christians are called "loathsome, heretics, stupid and blind". In another edict Theodosius calls "insane" those that do not believe in the christian god and outlaws all disagreements with the Church dogmas. Ambrosius, bishop of Milan, starts destroying all the Pagan Temples of his area. Christian priests lead the mob against the Temple of Goddess Demeter in Eleusis and try to lynch the hierophants Nestorius and Priskus. The 95 year-old hierophant Nestorius, ends the Eleusinian Mysteries and announces the predominance of mental darkness over the human race.

381 AD
On 2nd May, Theodosius deprives all rights of christians that return to the Pagan Religion. Throughout the Eastern Empire, Pagan Temples and Libraries are looted or burned down. On 21st December, Theodosius outlaws even simple visits to the Temples of the Hellenes. In Constantinople, the Temple of Goddess Aphrodite is turned into a brothel and the Temples of Sun and Artemis into stables.

382 AD
"Hellelu-jah" (Glory to Yahweh) is imposed in the christian mass.

384 AD
Emperor Theodosius orders the Praetorian Prefect, Maternus Cynegius, a dedicated christian, to cooperate with the local bishops and destroy the Temples of the Gentiles in Northern Greece and Asia Minor.

385 to 388 AD
Maternus Cynegius, encouraged by his fanatic wife, and bishop, "Saint" Marcellus with his gangs scour the countryside, sack and destroy hundreds of Hellenic Temples, shrines and altars. Amongst others they destroy the Temple of Edessa, the Cabeireion of Imbros, the Temple of Zeus in Apamea, the Temple of Apollo in Dydima and all the Temples of Palmyra. Thousands of innocent Gentiles from all sides of the Empire suffer martyrdom in the notorious death camps of Skythopolis.

386 AD
Emperor Theodosius outlaws (16th June) the care of sacked Pagan Temples.

388 AD
Public talks on religious subjects are also outlawed by Theodosius. The old orator Libanius sends his famous Epistle "Pro Templis" to Theodosius, with a hope that the few remaining Hellenic Temples will be respected and spared.

389 to 390 AD
All non-christian calenders are outlawed. Hordes of fanatic hermits from the desert flood into Middle Eastern and Egyptian cities, destroying statues, altars, Libraries and Pagan Temples, whilst Gentiles are lynched. Theophilus, Patriarch of Alexandria, starts heavy persecutions against the Gentiles, turns the Temple of Dionysos into a church, burns down the Mithraeum of the city, destroys the Temple of Zeus and burlesques the Pagan priests before they are killed by stoning. The christian mob profanes the cult images.

391 AD
On 24th February, a new edict of Theodosius prohibits not only visits to Pagan Temples but also looking at vandalised statues. New heavy persecutions all around the Empire. In Alexandria, Egypt, the Gentiles, led by the philosopher Olympius, revolt and after some street fights, finally lock themselves inside the fortified Temple of God Serapis (The Serapeion). After a violent siege, the christians occupy the building, demolish it, burn its famous Library and profane the cult images.

392 AD
On 8th November, the Emperor Theodosius outlaws all non-christian rituals and names them "superstitions of the Gentiles" ("gentilicia superstitio"). New full scale persecutions against the Gentiles. The Mysteries of Samothrace are ended and priests slaughtered. In Cyprus the local bishop, "Saints" Epiphanius and Tychon destroy almost all the Temples of the island and exterminate thousands of Gentiles. The local Mysteries of Goddess Aphrodite are ended. Theodosius' edict declares: "the ones that won't obey pater Epiphanius have no right to keep living on the island". The Gentiles revolt against the Emperor and the Church in Petra, Aeropolis, Rafia, Gaza, Baalbek and other cities of the Middle East.

393 AD
The Pythian, Aktia and Olympic Games are outlawed as part of the Hellenic "idolatry". Christians sack the Temples of Olympia.

395 AD
Two new edicts (22nd July and 7th August) lead to new persecutions against the Gentiles. Rufinus, the eunuch Prime Minister of Emperor Flavius Arcadius directs the hordes of the baptised Goths (led by Alaric) to the country of the Hellenes. Encouraged by christian monks, the barbarians sack and burn many cities (Dion, Delphi, Megara, Corinth, Pheneos, Argos, Nemea, Lycosoura, Sparta, Messene, Phigaleia, Olympia, etc.), slaughter or enslave innumerable Hellenes and burn the Temples. Among others, they burn down the Eleusinian Sanctuary and burn alive all of its priests (including the hierophant of Mithras Hilarius).

396 AD
On 7th December, a new edict by Emperor Arcadius orders that Paganism be treated as high treason. Imprisonment of the few remaining Pagan priests and hierophants.

397 AD
"Demolish them!" Emperor Flavius Arcadius orders all the still erect Pagan Temples demolished.

398 AD
The Fourth Church Council of Carthage prohibits to all, including its bishops, the study of Gentile books. Porphyrius, bishop of Gaza, demolishes almost all the Pagan Temples of his city (except nine of them that remain active).

399 AD
With a new edict (13th July) Emperor Flavius Arcadius orders all remaining Temples, mainly in the countryside, to be immediately demolished: «Si qua in agris templa sunt, sine turba ac tumultu diruantur. His enim deiectis atque sublatis omnis superstitioni materia consumetur»

400 AD
Bishop Nicetas destroys the Oracle of God Dionysus in Vesai and baptises all the Gentiles of this area.

401 AD
The christian mob of Carthage lynches Gentiles and destroys Temples and "idols". In Gaza too, the local bishop, also a..,"Saint", Porphyrius sends his followers to lynch Gentiles and demolish the remaining nine still active Temples of the city. The 15th Council of Chalkedon orders all christians that still keep good relations with their gentile relatives to be excommunicated (even after their death).

405 AD
John Chrysostom sends his hordes of gray-clad monks armed with clubs and iron bars to destroy the "idols" in all the cities of Palestine.

406 AD
John Chrysostom collects funds from rich christian women to financially support the demolition of the Hellenic Temples. In Ephessus, he orders the destruction of the famous Temple of Goddess Artemis. In Salamis, Cyprus, "Saints" Epiphanius and Eutychius continue persecutions of the Gentiles and the total destruction of their Temples and sanctuaries.

407 AD
A new edict outlaws once more all non-christian acts of worship.

408 AD
The Emperor of the Western Empire Honorius and the Emperor of the Eastern Empire Arcadius, order together that all sculptures of the Pagan Temples be either destroyed or confiscated. Private ownership of Pagan sculpture is also outlawed. The local bishops lead new heavy persecutions against Gentiles and new book burning. Judges showing pity for Gentiles are also persecuted.

409 AD
Once again, an edict orders Astrology and all methods of Divination to be punished by death.

415 AD
In Alexandria, Egypt, the mob urged by the bishop Cyrillus, attacks a few days before the judaeo-christian Pascha (Pesach-Easter) and hacks to pieces the famous and beautiful philosopher Hypatia. Pieces of her body are paraded by the christian mob through the streets of Alexandria, and are finally burned together with her books in a place called Cynaron. On 30th August, new persecutions start against all the Pagan priests of North Africa, who end their lives either crucified or burned alive.

416 AD
The inquisitor Hypatius, alias "The Sword of God", exterminates the last Gentiles of Bithynia. In Constantinople (7th December), all non-christian army officers, public employees and judges are dismissed.

423 AD
Emperor Theodosius II, declares (8th June) that the Religion of the Gentiles is nothing more than "demon worship" and orders all those who persist in practicing it to be punished by imprisonment and tortured.

429 AD
The Temple of Goddess Athena (Parthenon) on the Acropolis of Athens is sacked. Athenian Pagans are persecuted.

435 AD
On 14th November, a new edict by Theodosius II orders the death penalty for all "heretics" and "pagans" of the Empire. Only Judaism is considered a legal non-christian Religion

438 AD
Theodosius II issues an new edict (31st January) against the Gentiles, incriminating their "idolatry" as the reason for a recent
plague!

440 to 450 AD
The christians demolish all the monuments, altars and Temples of Athens, Olympia, and other Greek cities.

448 AD
Theodosius II orders all non-christian books burned.

450 AD
All the Temples of Aphrodisias (City of Goddess Aphrodite) are demolished and its Libraries burned down. The city is renamed Stauroupolis (City of the Cross).

451 AD
A new edict by Theodosius II (4th November) emphasises that "idolatry" is to be punished by death.

457 to 491 AD
Sporadic persecutions against Gentiles of the Eastern Empire. Among others, the physician Jacobus and the philosopher Gessius are executed. Severianus, Herestios, Zosimus, Isidorus and others are tortured and imprisoned. The proselytiser Conon and his followers exterminate the last Gentiles of the island of Imbros, in the northeast Aegean. The last worshippers of Lavranius Zeus are exterminated in Cyprus.

482 to 488 AD
The majority of the Gentiles of Asia Minor are exterminated, after a desperate revolt against the Emperor and the Church.

486 AD
More "underground" Pagan priests are discovered, arrested, burlesqued, tortured and executed in Alexandria, Egypt.

515 AD
Baptism becomes obligatory, even for those that already say they are christian. The Emperor of Constantinople, Anastasius orders the massacre of the Gentiles in the Arabian city Zoara and the demolition of the Temple of local God Theandrites.

528 AD
Emperor Jutprada (Justinianus) outlaws the "alternative" Olympian Games of Antioch. He also orders the execution (by fire, crucifixion, tearing to pieces by wild beasts, or cutting by iron nails) of all who practice "sorcery, divination, magic or idolatry" and prohibits all teachings by the Gentiles ("..the ones suffering from the blasphemous insanity of the Hellenes").

529 AD
Emperor Justinianus outlaws the Athenian Philosophical Academy, which has its property confiscated.

532 AD
The inquisitor Ioannis Asiacus, a fanatical monk, leads a crusade against the Gentiles of Asia Minor.

542 AD
Emperor Justinianus allows the inquisitor Ioannis Asiacus to convert the Gentiles of Phrygia, Caria and Lydia in Asia Minor. Within 35 years of this crusade, 99 churches and 12 monasteries are built on the sites of demolished Pagan Temples.

546 AD
Hundreds of Gentiles are put to death in Constantinople by the inquisitor Ioannis Asiacus.

556 AD
Justinianus orders the notorious inquisitor Amantius to go to Antioch, to find, arrest, torture and exterminate the last Gentiles of the city and burn all the private libraries down.

562 AD
Mass arrests, burlesquing, tortures, imprisonments and executions of Gentile Hellenes in Athens, Antioch, Palmyra and Constantinople.

578 to 582 AD
Christians torture and crucify Gentile Hellenes all around the Eastern Empire, and exterminate the last Gentiles of Heliopolis
(Baalbek).

580 AD
Christian inquisitors attack a secret Temple of Zeus in Antioch. The priest commits suicide, but the other Gentiles are arrested. All the prisoners, the Vice Governor Anatolius included, are tortured and sent to Constantinople to face trial. Sentenced to death they are thrown to the lions. The wild animals are unwilling to tear them to pieces and they end up crucified. Their corpses are dragged through the streets by the christian mob and afterwards thrown unburied in the city dump.

583 AD
New persecutions against the Gentile Hellenes by the Emperor Mauricius.

590 AD
Throughout the Eastern Empire, christian accusers "discover" Pagan conspiracies. A new wave of torture and executions erupts.

692 AD
The "Penthekte" Council of Constantinople prohibits the remains of Calends, Brumalia, Anthesteria, and other Pagan / Dionysian festivals.

804 AD
The Gentile Hellenes of Laconia, Greece, resist successfully the attempt of Tarasius, Patriarch of Constantinople, to convert them to Christianity.

950 to 988 AD
Violent conversion of the last Gentile Hellenes of Laconia by the Armenian "Saint" Nikon.

Instantly dropped.

Nigger, your entire history is a dark age. Get on my level.

Why would I want to be on the level of a nigger? Your intellectual peers are at >>>/r/atheism

This. Jews accelerated it. They replaced a bad system with another bad system. The Czar system was going to go away regardless. It was just the Jews who organized better and made it happen.

You have not attacked a single one of my arguments. You misunderstood and misquoted me. Instead you attack me because that's easier than confronting your own cognitive dissonance. Wanting whites to survive while perpetuating a semitic death cult. You might want to consider getting on my level

Heil Romanov!
No more brothers wars!

The Jew destroyed France look up the reign of terror, when the Jews took control of France from the royalty and the French, the same way they have done to the following
The Jew destroyed Russia.
The Jew destroyed Prussia.
The Jew destroyed Germany
The Jew destroyed China
The Jew destroyed Japan
Just as the Jew is destroying Europe and now America.
I've probably forgotten to list a few dozen countries they've destroyed

There is no single greater a threat, or enemy to our peoples. Never forget their transgressions. History must always fly the standard of truth.

Completely this
Reminder that Russia was the very first victim of Communism

For all time the 1900s will be remembered just like the 1300s, as being a time of incalculable death destruction and suffering, with the worst of it being in Europe but that impacted the entire world

Just like the 1400s saw a great rebirth, so too will the first hundred years of the new millennium

Also Germany never submitted, the entire country fought to the death and everyone who wasn't killed and didn't kill themselves went into hiding to live another day and keep the flame alive

Arguments? What arguments? You posted a list of historical grievances (unsubstantiated ones, it must be pointed out) and then left them to stand alone as if that is all that is required to condemn Christianity.

Worse still, 95% of your examples are simply "abloo abloo bloo Christians attacked paganism," which is entirely irrelevant. Some whites attacked other whites because of their religion. Big deal. It (A) has been happening since time immemorial, and (B) was also done by the pagans against the Christians in particular.

Your lack of substantiation for your claims (such as literal death camps, which is literally Jewish "muh Holocaust"-tier) is made especially worse given that you have proven your historical illiteracy multiple times, most obviously with your reference to the fictitious "Dark Ages" in your very first post. With such a knowledge you have more in common with the (very leftist) French Revolutionaries than any serious right-winger.

What you have not done is this:

Now where were those "arguments" you were talking about?

>Mr. Alpha Wolf getting so triggered about no-one taking his shitty "loli pill" thread seriously that he started to spam, necrobump old threads and bury all the new ones away.
3 years of buffalo

Get to writing a book sir/10

Those "grievances" are enough to condemn christianity.

You are not arguing in good faith. There is no comparison in the magnitude of the attacks. At first, ALL CHRISTIANS WERE SEMITE SCUM FROM THE LEVANT.

Perhaps. I haven't seen the archeological proof for the "death camp" of Skythopolis. But it is based on the historical writings of Ammianus Marcellinus


Both christian and jewish theology have the abrahamic god regarded as the only and highest god.


Creation is a test, not a thing in and of itself, encompassing all things. The most important part of life in christianity, is death.


Anti-racist is anti-white


Theosophy is the act of explaining theosophy and christian philosophy is jewish philosophy


Hurr fucking durr, what is conversion


What? Just because a certain amount of syncretism and individual development occured, it doesn't make christianity not an imported kike religion.


I don't need to. I only care about what it replaced. European religion was replaced.


It is when the religion you're replacing them with is a semitic death cult


We forget who we are, we are instead all as slaves under Yahweh(just like all muslims are slaves under Allah).


They're not per se, but someone that chooses to remain christian when they have understood the entirety of the truth, is a traitor. Those are the people I want to expunge. You're not one of them.

You think that a jewish cult worshipping a jewish rabbi man-god from a jewish culture and community and a jewish war god YHWH, with jewish apostles who spoke a semitic language, rooted in jewish covenants from a jewish religious text accepting a jewish cosmology and an evolution of jewish morality and conception of sin has absolutely, positively nothing to do with the jews or ancient Judaism?

Christianity and Judaism is a squabble amongst rabbis. At some point in your intellectual and philosophical journey you will realize that Christianity and Occidentalism fundamentally conflict and are mutually exclusive, and that the dissonance you feel is due entirely to this innate contradiction. Most of the ills we fight today (de-racination, the inherent equality of all humans, radical egalitarianism) are deeply rooted in Christian theology and philosophy dating back to the Church Fathers and the New Testament itself.

The story of Christianity is not a black and white affair, it has offered at least nominal unity in places throughout history but in total has had a crippling effect on European man and his psyche, morality and self-esteem; its glaring weaknesses and intrinsic pathological equality only growing more insidious and choking over the ages, resulting in its utterly retrograde force on white causes in the present era. To adopt the Christian worldview is to inevitably force yourself to become an intellectual and theological contortionist in order to justify pro-white, Eurocentric political causes at the expense of other races.

The fuck does this retard come from?

Do you really have to ask? cuckchan or the_zionist (they're the same)

"Since toppling statues of Joseph Stalin."

Julie Masis is a retard: Status of Stalin were removed already back in the 50s.

"adding that even the tsar’s execution by the Bolsheviks does not make him a saint. “It does not justify his elevation to sainthood.” "

The irony!

"The refusal of Nicholas II to implement reforms is one of the factors that led to the Communist Revolution, Rubenstein added."
If he had gased all the kikes, he would have lived!

"Since toppling statues of Joseph Stalin."
Julie Masis is a retard: Status of Stalin were removed already back in the 50s.

"adding that even the tsar’s execution by the Bolsheviks does not make him a saint. “It does not justify his elevation to sainthood.” "
The irony!

"The refusal of Nicholas II to implement reforms is one of the factors that led to the Communist Revolution, Rubenstein added."
If he had properly purged them, he would have lived and deserved sainthood!

...

...

There's a lesson to be learned here


Saved

How quickly they adopted SJW language when the tide turned against them.

Nice one. Saved.

Reminder that the kikes literally had fun killing Russian white goyim. It was like a sport to them.

Pic related, the kike ringleader.

Theology is the act of explaining theosophy*

Can someone save these for posterity?

Saved the 1st one for sure.

I thought having read Evola, at the very least Revolt Against the Modern World, was a requirement to post here…

Christianity is a semite, feminine and pathetic religion completely foreign to our core culture. Keep imploring your (((god))), giving the other cheek and loving your ennemy, fag.

And theocracy is also retarded. You need to have a ruler cast and a priestly cast, and the ruler cast must completely dominate the priestly cast. Learn to absolute monarchy of divine right.

February revolution: US entered WW1 within 2 months of it. UK supported it after its intelligence services killed Rasputin in late 16. Do the math.

Archived all of them.

Fam I'd like to significantly reduce my time on vidyas for the next current year.
Too much video games is unhealthy.

You need to have a highly regimented program and minimal time for recreation. It all starts with having an actual schedule for everything you do, though, regardless of what you are doing. Go ahead and be autistic about it too. It won't hurt you to act like a German

if something you do makes kikes angry, you're probably doing the right thing

The SS uniform cap had a skull on it. Do you know what that skull symbolised?

At any rate this is all just kike D&C, this is supposed to be a thread about a monarch the kikes absolutely despise living on in the memories of the Russian peoples despite all their best attempts.

jews destroyed the British empire.
had their kike puppet (((church)))hill go to war for kikery against the will of the rest of the country

This 100x.

I will the Tsar to return and his family rule for a thousand years.
Maybe Putin, if he is not a puppet, will become the new Tsar.

Siimple truth.

The divine right to rule is inextricably tied to the ability to see the will of the creator and work towards its completion. An emperor is worth a thousand kings and the ruler who goes against god is no ruler at all, but a tyrant who is to be disposed of.

Even today jews are salty that trotsky didn´t take over after Lenin.

Reminder that (((the US))) imprisoned the real leader of the Ukraine and replaced the government with one of its (((own))).
That is what led the people of crimes to want independence, and they must be incredibly thankful that they achieved it.
Otherwise they might just have been wiped out by now.

Christianity was the state religion of every single european nation as well as the roman, the holy roman empire, the dutch and the french empire. European nations in their prime were ruled by christian kings and emperors and one has to completely ignore european history to pretend that christianity and imperialism are at odds with each other.

F.

The Roman empire was thoroughly pagan during its greatest extent.

< The jews wants you to believe jews executed the Tsar! Russians have never been against jews in all of history because they are asiatic subhumans, only us Ukrainians have ever been antisemitic and has a jew-free governement today!


The irony.


Checked.

I hope you're joking.

Depends of who is more at fault, the (((EU))) or the (((US)))

52 dubs checked. Holla Forums savages mocked Nicholas II and his children.

I don't think that is the fairest interpretation of or comparison to what I said. But, loyalty till death, death march, the death god etc. are core elements of european religions too. That's why you can see so many things from pagan tradition co-opted by christianity. The people were literally loyal till death, even if forcefully converted. As for the Totenkopf, I'll admit I don't know what it is beyond the dead man's symbol whoever wears it is already dead?.

You are right though, this is all off-topic and I apologize for sperging out like this I am starting however to have some suspicion that calling all critics of christianity D&Q to defend christianity is also another kind of shilling. Yes it is the perfect vector for a shill to attack from because it's such a divisive topic, but understand that my intent is not to divide. My intent is to make Holla Forums more knowledgeable and authentic to its cause and if part of that is abandoning christianity, so be it.

War is not just a game.

How autistic are we talking?

No, they really aren't. Even if you proved they happened (you haven't) they condemn particular Christians. In order to condemn Christianity you would have to provide a sound argument that Christianity somehow caused these (that, for example, the perpetrators would not have committed such acts were they not Christian). You have failed on both these accounts. Moreover, you would most likely end up condemning not Christianity but religion in general. Considering you are using identical talking points to the (ahem) fine gentlemen of /r/atheism it wouldn't be very surprising.

You're not arguing at all.

Per capita? Because it's much easier to commit more and larger attacks on a larger religion.

In the Roman Empire? Unlikely. Moreover, "Semite" is not a race. Prove that the Christians persecuting your beloved pagans were nonwhite.

This is what you consider theology? Are you begging me to call you a nigger again?

I suppose by your reasoning the Stoics were anti-life as well then.

As if I needed more proof of your retardation after "muh Dark Ages," "muh Hypatia," "muh book burnings," "muh Platonic school."

More proof you do not know what you are talking about.

Hurr durr, what is an argument?

You just can't even, apparently.

And this is the important part of your whole retarded post. You accuse me of not arguing in good faith when you neglect to provide any argument and then provide a circular one when prompted. You have presupposed that Christianity is evil in your "argument" about why Christianity is bad. You are an intellectual nigger.

More proof you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

I could say the same about the peddlers of lies and fictions who pretend to know what they argue against.

The fact of the matter is that you have not come into this arena in good faith. You have barely provided any arguments at all — the fact that you think you can provide a one fucking sentence answer to the argumentative-frameworks I gave you is sheer travesty of intellectual debate. You share half your talking points and most of your side with the likes of historically illiterate Reddit atheists and frothing Jews. Do you not look around you and realize what company you intellectually keep? Does it not disquiet you to parrot the same nonsense as the average lefty atheist?

Look, since you seem more reasonable than the usual anti-Christian retard around here I'll simply tell you to go and read some Thomas Aquinas (at least) before you start talking about how two thousand years of philosophical development and work is identical to "Jewish philosophy."

And please, at least pretend to approach those questions with some amount of cognitive function. Single sentences? Really?

Complete disregard for unpunctual plebs.
24 hours and 7 days of regimented life.
Your toaster does not finish toasting your bread when you don't want it to.

That seems a little too autistic for my liking.

Maybe you realize these things if you're a fucking nigger in the same way the average nigger realizes that if he builds an airport food will come from the sky. The fact that you think you can paint these things with a brush so broad it could cover the North American continent shows how little thought you've actually given this. You've seen some of the anti-Christian posts on Holla Forums, said "At last I truly see," and then put no more thought into it.

This is funny considering Europeans obtained far more power and underwent far more development under Christianity than under paganism. At best this is merely baseless speculation about "what could have been."

Gee, what a substantiated claim.

The only legitimate point I have ever seen an anti-Christian make is that Christianity fosters an attitude of pacifism, but I have yet to see any of them substantiate the rest of their boilerplate or go beyond magical thinking ("the Bible made them do it").


Wow, more boilerplate. It's so much more convincing this time, unlike the last nine-hundred and ninety-nine times.


Are you Roman?


Half the time I suspect anti-Christians are here to make pagans look retarded.

rbc.ru/politics/15/02/2017/58a33b919a79472a55281e2a

When duty calls, no man is spared.


F

Based Christianity, safeguard of the snowniggers, without which Europeans never would have achieved anything of note.

Not an argument. The question was whether Christianity has hindered Europeans or not. What you said is irrelevant.

Honestly, are anti-Christians really just here to make themselves look retarded? This is some fucking Poe's Law shit because I legitimately cannot tell whether you are actually retarded or just pretending.

...

I hope you realize that you're making yourself look bad. How are you supposed to convince people that Christianity is bad when all you do is act like an evasive, dribbling nigger?

So do you think that Rasputin was truly a fraud who had his way with the queen, or was he real since he healed her son? If not then what was up with the supply situation in the first world war? I thought they didn't have bullets and socks and stuff because Rasputin appointed his incompetent friends? Is that just communist propaganda? Any books on it?

Top kek, Russia. Jew exterminating was pretty based, sure, but he practically let the Japanese invade Russia, lost every land battle of Russo-Japanese war, and lost almost his entire navy to Japan while only taking out three torpedo boats, and then basically refused to surrender. His absolute worthlessness and stupidity is what caused the revolution.

Hey there, Lt. Commander of Army Memes.

...

You keep intentionally misquoting or omitting things I've said. You act like you don't understand or demand arguments of "higher quality" than what I've stated already, yet you don't always explain why I'm wrong on these. That's why I'm saying you're not arguing in good faith. I know exactly what I'm saying. Words have meaning. This is eerily similar with pulpil or whatever it's called.

The timeline of events I've listed are from Vlasis Rassias' book "DEMOLISH THEM..", published in Greek, Athens 2000 (2nd edition), Anichti Poli Editions, ISBN 960-7748-20-4

These do condemn christianity, along with christians. The formal body of christianity is the church. is it not? If the white christians weren't christians, but instead were pagans, they would not have committed these acts.

Wrong on all accounts

That's what you like to think.

There is no comparison to be made at all. Pagans first killed jews. Then persecuted christians. That's fine. Because at first christians were just another kind of KIKE.
Do you think I give a shit if the entire middle east gets glassed tomorrow? I wouldn't bat an eye at the amount of death and destruction. I do care if MY civilization is harmed, however. Hence my concern with christianity causing so much destruction on european heritage as it spread throughout the continent.

No. Europeans had their own religions. They were forced to convert to a new religion. In order for that religion to be accepted as the new norm, BOOKS HAD TO BE BURNED, PRIESTS HAD TO BE MURDERED, POLITICAL OPPONENTS HAD TO BE KILLED, TEMPLES HAD TO BE DESTROYED, INSTITUTIONS HAD TO BE DESTROYED, POPULATIONS HAD TO BE MASSACRED. KNOWLEDGE HAD TO BE LOST. Kikes and Christians are responsible for all those. So is christianity.

Please, enlighten me on the eugenic and racial policies of christianity, will you?


I don't care about "intellectual debate". I care about honest, truthful debate.

Wrong on all accounts.

Wrong on all accounts.


Will certainly do.

Why would I need anything more to prove a point? Do you want me to write a novel? Surely I would if it was necessary.

(2/2)

also

I can't prove something that isn't true.

To cut the clothes to search them. Some people make their clothes hard to tear on the purpose so they can use the excuses to make police or military look bad.

Ayyyy I love how you fags always assume that people who make fun of your LARPing are new. I'm well aware of what you autists believe and the more I've thought about it, the funnier it gets

Get lost kike.

...

Oy vey they found out! Did my nose give away my identity!?

Why are you posting here? Just for the (you)s? Ridiculing someone that has already lost everything wont work.

What have you lost? Most people here are just well off tits complaining about asinine things

fuck off back to cuck/a/ faggot

his 'hurr muh spoonfeed fuck off and die11' shitposting meme came from cuckchan /a/

lurk more

Lying semitic nigger spotted.

I asked you for what YOU lost

An un-kiked life, in an un-kiked world.

Look I'm not saying they were cowards but anybody who has studied warfare in antiquity can find very few instances of "bravery". Looking at Roman wars in Europe one is assaulted with records of ambushes, backstabbing, lying, and one-sided battles committed to only after long maneuvering. Hell the battle which defines Germany as an independent polity was an ambush of Roman forces in the woods after the commander/governor was played like a fiddle for months and betrayed by a local warlord he thought was his friend.

Honour is an accord which regulates and constrains violence within a society. And while some like the Crusaders under King Phillip II did accord honor to mudslimes and other foreigners at first they quickly got over their naivety and just started slaughtering them. Though really mudslimes are utter trash so any deal with them is like stabbing yourself in the back preemptively and letting them twist the knife at their leisure.

Eat shit that word has a distinct meaning.
"A period during which extant records are sparse". That could be due to a civilizatonal collapse like in the Greek/Near East Dark Ages in which the urban life declined and written languages were lost, hence why the Iliad was originally an oral history. Or it can be a simple lack of records in our hands, for example for the Dark Ages(470-750AD) stopping being called that because we collected more sources to the point that we know more about it than about Antiquity, mostly because they used vellum which is a much more resilient medium of notation than papyrus an much cheaper than stone combine with a vast spread in lay-literacy and a courtly structure that was litigious with regards to inheriting property.

The Stoic philosophy was directly absorbed by Christianity, indeed you could argue that it was critical to the synthesis which Christianity is and was for centuries. Meanwhile the philosophy of the Gauls or Nordics was more Hedonistic in the Greek sense of the word, ie they valued happiness rather than the abstract ideals epitomized by Stoicism.
So no they really don't share a world-view.

Words have meaning, you cannot simply change definitions to suit your arbitrary whims.

Rome had a civil war every 20 years for its entire history, even during Caesar's early campaigns he put down several rebellions in Itally itself. Rome was not some united cultural front but a tithe empire held together by the blood shed by the legions. To believe otherwise it not only naive but also ahistorical. Rome "collapsed" several times between 200BC and 1400AD. And the nature of rule and the culture changed often through the pagan eras.

There were none that I know of, that is more of a Chinese and Mudslime thing. There were several libraries destroyed when they were sacked during the fall of various cities or riots but none of these appear to be deliberate and indeed many were perpetrated by pagans. Also the oral histories of the Celts, Gauls, Germanics, and Norse were explicitly recorded by Christians despite exemplifying pagan culture so the idea that there was some systematic effacement is nonsensical since in Europe we have one of the most complete historical records in the world, indeed attributable to the odd litigiousness and respect for history displayed both in pagan and christian European societies through the ages. It could be argued that this is a racial characteristic which sets us apart form other races. History and hero worship is endemic to the European character.

I think it's all part of a Jewish d&c. Take this thread as a prime example.
Jews look bad in news story. Piss on Christians play the pagan card to create division.

Alright you seem very reassured that things would have been objectively better in that hypothetical world

I'm not demanding arguments of higher quality. I'm demanding arguments. Period. Saying "Christianity did X" is not an argument. At best it is a statement of fact and in your case oftentimes not even that.

How can I prove wrong what doesn't exist? I can't refute what you do not provide. All I can do is call into question the supposed facts you have presented as well as point out many of your talking points are exactly the same as those of literal Jews and Reddit-tier atheists.

In that case the whole timeline and list of facts is suspect because he uses as examples several ridiculous favorites of anti-Christians such as the "murder of Hypatia." If he's using this as a strike against Christianity he cannot be considered a serious scholar on the matter. Given that he has a horse in the race (he's an ardent advocate of Hellenic paganism; haven't had time to check his Jew status) I'll take his arguments about as seriously as I take Jewish books on the Holocaust.

Notice how there is no chain of reasoning leading to this conclusion but merely a statement as if this is self-evident? That's called "not having an argument." Given that the pagans would execute Christians happily and destroy churches I doubt you can seriously contend that Christianity is unique in that its followers persecute nonbelievers. Not that you've attempted to.

You'd do well to at least acknowledge easy truths instead of denying every truth you come across. Your fictions might be more believable otherwise. Your talking points are generally found amongst the /r/atheism crowd. The "murder of Hypatia" is a favorite of theirs. Or did you not read the list you yourself posted?

Literally "it's okay when I do it." This is why you are intellectually dishonest.

Great to know you're okay with destroying history and being a hypocrite. Kill the people there, sure, but destroy the region out of spite? You're a fucking kike.

And yet I doubt you would bat an eye at other European heritage being destroyed so long as the label "Christian" was slapped on it.

Call me when I give a shit what kikes say. "Semites" are a linguistic group.

Fitting, since you don't much seem to care about any other kind of intellectual consistency. Grouping everyone east of the Bosphorus into the same racial group because of linguistic similarities is retarded, just FYI.

Another lack of an argument. "Christianity has to go because it has to go. No questions!"

Because you can't? The fact that this is what you consider theology is evidence enough of your lack of intellect.

At this point I've lost track of the number of points you've accumulated on the retard scale. Your take on philosophy and much else is childish and utterly bereft of nuance or accuracy. I'd get a better picture of history watching the fucking History Channel.

Again, you're a historical illiterate. Nice job parroting fucking Gibbon. Another shared point of yours with Reddit atheists and leftist retards.

Wow, congratulations! Babies' first chain of reasoning. Now make it an argument by actually proving that Christianity is anti-racist.

lmao

You clearly do not since you have indicated no awareness of actual Christian philosophy. Again, read Thomas Aquinas at the very least before even typing the words "Christian philosophy" again. Reading a TL;DR anti-Christian post on Halfcuck doesn't count.

And you still haven't actually established the concept of a foreign religion, thus making your entire point null.

Why bother when anybody with a knowledge of religious history beyond a Reddit post can see how retarded you are? The truth will out and I certainly don't need to make great effort when you can't even be bothered putting the slightest research into things.

Wow so like all of history then? Again, all you do is make presuppositions and pretend those suffice for arguments. Europeans have been forcibly converting and killing each other since time immemorial. That's just what humans do.

Because one buttblasted Greek anti-Christian said so it must be true? This is Jew behavior, down to the point you even have literal pagan death camps. "Oy vey, they were so evil, those Nazis! They had death camps and everything! They burned books! They massacred populations! How do we know its true? Well, of course it is! Schlomo Greenfeld published a book on it!"

Lack of something is no proof for containing something else. This is basic logic. It's a religion, not a fucking party leaflet. What next, you want it to spell out how to win the 2020 election? What the best way to win a battle is?

And since we're already past the point of absolute retardation, perhaps you could recite to me the passages of pagan texts detailing their exact racial policies? I imagine it'll be hard since they have no written texts nor a concept of race at the time but I'll ask you regardless, since you seem to think this is a valid question to ask of Christianity.

Play more with words, kike. Your sheer audacity claiming to care about truth whilst spouting obvious lies like your intellectual similarity with leftist and Jewish anti-Christians is proof enough that if you're not a Jew you're certainly kin.

That's right; Jewish and Reddit anti-Christians have never once complained about Christian book burnings, temple destructions, or the murders of particular people. How silly of me. Fuck off.

Because these are literally some of the most intensely debated questions by the brightest minds Europe has ever produced over the last two thousand years or more? The fact that you think you can answer them definitively, let alone in the space of a single sentence, makes you either an arrogant nigger or a simpleton too cognitively lost to realize into what intellectual waters he has strayed. If you actually understood the discussion you wouldn't be taking these questions so lightly.

Some of the greatest minds of Europe have so it wouldn't go amiss. Maybe then you'll finally be able to prove that anti-Christianity is the way to go instead of eternally acting like kikes on Holla Forums.


Okay, so your point becomes irrelevant. White Christians persecuted white pagans just as white pagans had persecuted white Christians. Boo hoo.

I just find it difficult to believe that any self-respecting pagan on Holla Forums would want to be represented by the likes of supposedly pro-pagan anti-Christian posters on Holla Forums. Paganism is generally much more rich than frothing posters screaming about "Semitic death cults," "foreign religion," "kike on a stick," and other such tired nonsense make it seem. Who honestly wants to be represented by the likes of ?

I love how dumb niggers like you claim to want to "save the Aryan race" while rejecting all the things its people hold dear. Lemme guess what's next: you'll kill the Christian whites because you love them more than themselves?

F
why did the germans allow Lenin go to russia?

Yeah, reported for intl.

SLAV MENTALITY = SLAVE MENTALITY
never change, gopniks

Ah, that was no mistake. That's just a meme.
Think about it, in strategy the goal is never to corner an enemy and then kill them all. That's tactics and bad tactics at that. You never want to give an enemy no option except fighting to the death.
Rundstedt's goal was to split the British and French forces and take Paris. He already ad accomplished the former. So attacking the cornered British at this point would not accomplish anything other than tying up desperately needed German forces AND I should probably add that these forces were already stretched to the limit and the Panzer brigades were out of fuel. And I should also add that, again, attacking the British now would have given them no other option but to fight to the death. Thus causing incalculable casualties to the German attackers.
Better to attack Paris and knock them out of the war before they regrouped. Hitler did nothing wrong here.

And to continue my defense of Hitler is giving peace offers to Britain after Dunkirk instead of launching operation Seelowe. Everyone overestimates just how effective that would have been. Everyone that is except Hitler! Hitler never wanted to go through with that not because he was soft on the British but because he foresaw that such a plan would have been a disaster. Think about it, Germany had no real navy and even the combined might of the British and Americans barely managed to win at Normandy. The Germans had no chance. Churchill was already planning to use illegal poison gas if the Germans landed. And with no navy, the Germans would be out of supply in no time. Essentially, a real life Seelowe would have ended in a reverse Dunkirk and the early defeat for Germany.
Hitler did nothing wrong again.

If you want to know where Hitler fucked up, look no further to his conduct during Operation Barbarossa. Not the surprise attack itself. No, that was necessary as the USSR was planning its own preemptive strike. But Hitler's constant "shit on all Slavs all the time and rub their faces in oppression even if they wanted to help you" policy was what did him in.
Slavs like the Ukrainians and even the Russians wanted liberation from communism. Had Hitler simply restrained his men from brutalizing Ukrainians and issued an ultimatum that he was going to liberate Russia rather than conquer it and add it to his lebensraum, then instead of a patriotic war against a conquering enemy, many Russians who would have fought for the defense of Russia could have revolted in the liberation of Russia. But no, instead he had a "shit on all Slavs all the time and give them no other option but to fight to the death" policy. Hitler learned nothing from Dunkirk. If you give an enemy no option other than fighting to the last man, that is exactly what they will do.
Had Hitler issued an ultimatum of liberation from communism, Stalin would have been petrified by fear that any one of his generals might betray him or that every act of sabotage would be the sign of an impending revolt. Stalin would then be fighting a war against his own people and he would need to station garrisons in all the problem areas. Garrisons that he couldn't even trust. The entire regime might have crumbled, just as Hitler believed that it would. Like a rotten house.

That was Hitler's greatest mistake. His second mistake was declaring war against America. That was stupid pointless and stupid. He should have denounced the Japanese and assured America that he did not want war.
If you aren't a naval power, don't go to war with naval powers across the world. That's just common sense.

His third mistake was issuing random "no retreat" orders, often times over islands that held no strategic significance or in areas that guaranteed the loss of irreplaceable troops.

In short, in war it is best not to try to destroy the enemy directly but indirectly. If many of his subjects want to revolt, help them. If you can draw him into overextending himself, entice him. If defending or attacking a certain target will not give you an advantage that makes up for your expected losses, do not attack it. Abandon it. Like Harper's Fiery in the US civil war. Men are precious and wasting them is a crime… unless you're Stalin or Mao. Then men are cheap and 1 million deaths is acceptable losses.

I'm not familiar with what lefty anti-christians say about pagan persecution by christians. All I know is that they don't actually care about "paganism" or Hypatia or whatever and just want to put down christians at every opportunity they can because of their own hatred of whites. I acknowledge that my arguments wouldn't convince anyone intelligent right now. I haven't given much proof for my statements at all or substantiated my arguments. I'm just pandering to emotional, complex of persecution individuals and those that are "already in on it". I still believe that anyone that understands christianity, paganism and how their ancestors were converted and still chooses to be a christian, is a traitor.

D&C point? Just to spite the retard reporting me for intl, I'D PUT PAST MY PERSONAL GRIEVANCES TO WORK WITH OTHER WHITES FOR THE SURVIVAL OF WHITES AND THE INSTALLATION OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM, BE IT CHRISTIAN OR NOT. I WOULD ADVISE EVERY OTHER PAGAN TO DO THE SAME. EVERYTHING IS BETTER WITHOUT KIKES.

Boy you said it. Really feel like strangling a kike right now. These fuckers MURDERED the guy. This really boils my blood as a Slav of aristocratic stock.

thank you for the quality post user

F ;__;7

=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=
=F=

F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F

Just to make things clear on that last part, the absence of racial policy in christianity is exactly my point. I'm not asking whether christianity has a racial policy or not. It has no beneficial views on race whatsoever, while pagan traditions gave emphasis on blood and heritage. Pagans venerated their ancestors and had rituals and celebrations attributed to them.

I'll look into what you said about christian philosophy because you raise some good points.

F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F

Exactly. 100%

F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F

Russia is going to be communist again

F

F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F

Kill yourself.

Nah. More like state controlled economy for big companies and socially conservative laws for the individuals

F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F

Because contrary to what the American autists on this board may believe, Europe wasn't a place of happiness and sunshine. It was lead by groups of power-tripping individuals trying to backstab other power-tripping individuals for power. In this case, the German state didn't mind fucking over the Russian Empire for political power, even if it meant releasing the outright evil known as communism on the world

What's wrong with chaos

The more D&C shilling Kikes engage in (LARPing as "Pagans", etc.), the more I'm convinced that they are scared of the coming Eastern European Nationalism.
THE JEW FEARS THE ROMANOV

The philosophy of Marx is informed almost completely by the teachings of Yeshua, they also share an ethnicity.

The spiritual Semite cries out in pain as he strikes you

Saved

This should be posted in every pagan/christian thread on 4ch

(((BRAVISSIMI)))

...

Thanks for outing what your next copypasta will be, intl.

F
3/15 was an inside job

Christianity is a globalist religion you fucking race traitor.

F

There are hundreds of different types of Christianity. Painting them all as race treachery when that is a new phenomenon isn't really very smart.

Unless you are a kike trying to D&C, of course.

Say, you're not a kike, are you?

There no pagan progression?

Pagans are the most cringe shit in the world.

Not as cringe as following a Jewish cult of shame and guilt that exploits people’s fear of death in order to control them.

When, exactly, does "new" start for you? Was it after WWII, when the Jews cemented their death grip on the west? Was it in the 1800s, when colonial powers aggressively pursued Christianization? Was it in 1737 when a Moravian minister set out to convert the literal niggers of nigger Africa to Christianity? Was it in 1492 when the Spanish brought Catholicism to the new world and started converting (and fucking) the hordes of indios? Was it in the 12th century when Nestorians converted a significant chunk of Mongolia? Or perhaps it was in the 1st century, when Thomas the Apostle himself arrived in Kerala to spread the word of YHWH to the Dravidians and their mastes?

Christian race traitors is an American invention and surprise surprise Boomer Neocons whipped it all up. Oh booh hoo let's care more for niggers than our own flesh and blood with 120 IQ who each have doctorates and 3 children their own!

God save the tsar F

What about all the things that he listed ?

Well, now that we know the real death toll from (((the Shoah))) was something like 180,000 and only as a result of Allied bombing of supply lines, we can do a little math to get (((muh 300,000 pogromed grandmamas))) down to a more realistic number.

Divide 180k by 6 gorillion, multiply by 300k and you get … 9,000 dead kikes. As a result of the Tsar. Assuming even that death toll isn't a baldfaced lie and the truth isn't that they're kvetching over a single Jewish hangnail.

How possible is it that Rasputin being the Russian Queen's lover was jewish slander too?

Very.

russian-faith.com/people/rasputin-was-great-and-good-man-cruelly-murdered-and-slandered-evil-british-spies-n967

arch:

archive.is/uPe0a

Literally the other way around. Also Klitchko is best goy level of a puppet, that's why it can be confusing.

...

The romanovs didn't deserve to die at the hands of kikes for being christians.
I'm not sure about whatever legacy the Russians have to uphold from their pagan ancestors. Perhaps they are too far gone now. Perhaps they are meant to be positive christians. I do not know.

But this isn't the case for many other white nations. For example, my own. They weren't meant to and shouldn't be christians. Thus everyone understanding the reasons they shouldn't be christians, knows they can without harm to their people whatsoever let go of the religion and approach a pagan revival, yet perpetuates christianity, knowing it is going to harm their people, deserves to die by virtue of being a knowing traitor both to their ancestors' legacy and for harming the nation with their choice. Now, I haven't substantiated the reasons why christianity is harmful properly, because there would otherwise be no disagreement by virtue of the facts speaking for themselves. Considering that anyone can be a christian regardless of race or ethnicity, I would consider that enough to be harmful. Christians apparently think that it doesn't matter if their religion does not discriminate.

lol I notice how it's always the anti-Christians claiming that the Christians came and started stuff first. Why do you act like kikes? You lie when anyone can go see the truth easily.

It's this sort of stuff that makes me think anti-Christians here are just falseflaggers. Are you literally just here to discredit paganism?


See embed.


I think you've mixed religion too heavily into politics.

F


This.


Are you saying that modern Christians and their clergy are just larping as Christians despite not knowing anything about Christianity? Because unlike Christians of old, modern Christians can actually read it's holy texts.

Christians are supposed to save fallen women anyway, it was considered virtuous.


Few whites would hold Christianity dear anymore. Christendom is Africa and South America.

Which is retarded because Christians back then where based on the JQ. Only modern Christians should be decried.

One thing that's kind of funny to bring up and pretend to be confused about is the whole "Hey, check this out, it's weird. It turns out that the Czar was murdered by Yakov Yurovsky, on the direct order of Yakov Sverdlov, which had to ultimately come from the order of Vladimir Lenin. It turns out that, despite being a tiny percentage of the Russian population, all three men were full or part Jews! That's like a 1 in a million chance. That's a crazy, zany coincidence there, huh!?
Even afterward, a Jew named Fanya Kaplan tried to kill Lenin, while the Jew Moisei Uritsky was assassinated, and Lenin had the Jew Leon Trotsky institute the Red Terror in response. It's craaazy how busy they were, isn't it!?"

Rather than outright telling people about the Jewish problem, I've found that pretending to be confused while laying all the facts out gets them thinking, while outright telling them makes them start thinking about you and your motives rather than the Jews and the things they've done.

By the way, this is a pretty good writeup on the Jewish role in the "Russian" revolution, written in 1920 I believe. The guy even got a Jew, Oskar Levy, to basically admit the Jews were behind the revolution and were nation-wrecking assholes.

sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/russian_revolution.htm

Both sides in the pro/anti-Christian dispute going on would probably be interested to read this, if they haven't.

theendofzion.com/a-real-case-against-the-jews-marcus-eli-ravage/

Marcus Eli Ravage is certainly a slimy, lying kike, but he does nevertheless raise an interesting point. He claims that Saul of Tarsus (aka Saint Paul) deliberately took on early "Jewish" Christianity, and intentionally foisted it upon Romans and their garrison in particular.

I see some pretty strong reasoning here. In the modern age, Jews preach everything to gentile Whites that would weaken us, in terms of going against the family, against tradition, gender roles, masculinity, demographic integrity, etc., while in Israel they have the very chauvinist Likkud party in power, expel people, build walls, etc. It does seem to me that ancient Jews holding up themselves as the chosen people, having their record of conquests in the Old Testament, an androcentric society, unabashed wealth accumulation, etc., WHILE telling the gentiles to turn the other cheek, take no thought for the morrow, abandon their families, wait for the eschaton, etc., would fit perfectly into "you do things that weaken you, I'll do things that strengthen me" Jewish perfidy.

On the other hand, perhaps Mr. Ravage simply saw Christianity as a source of strength for the West, and wanted Jews to get the credit for it while sowing distrust between Christians and their religion. Either way, I think it's a very interesting read for either side of the argument.

You've never lived chaos fucking faggot. Not knowing when your next meal comes, if at all. Fuck you. Russia and her people have been way more than you'll ever understand.

Actually this should become the norm again, she should even have a weapon if she is a virgin and thus has some worth to her family. In a way I guess, through weakness, life must become again what was given up because it could be.

That beastly Germans!

Just because the Russians did kill the heir to the throne and his wife and wage war against Germany, there is no reason to grant safe passage to some Russian intellectuals from Switzerland to Sweden! What a bunch of backstabbing, scheming as holes!

Klitchko is a jew he admited to it.

The most evident part of the Dark Ages being brought about by abrahamic religions is the suppression of knowledge and wisdom due to non-christian origin (sacking temples, non-christian priests, and burning libraries) and then muslim armies arriving and enslaving those that were left. On one hand you have european people doing it themselves in the name of their faith and muslims doing the same thing because they're muslims. The only reason the dark ages stopped being the dark ages is because once Europe was conquered, the christian clergy began a salvage operation of the wealth of wisdom and knowledge pagan thinkers had, but then giving their stamp of ownership. One big example of this is Thomas Aquinas. Then after the crusades, generations of slaves left over from under muslim rule managed to preserve more wisdom and knowledge that the church took ownership of.

Most accounts by christians of pagan traditions were used as propaganda to justify their methods of conversion.


Christianity is not European and is used as a method of control by the jews. Jews sell what weakens non-jews so it makes controlling non-jews easier. Theology does include history, poor theology removes context and focuses on conjecture. Any legitimate theologian focuses on the time period, author, and context of a writing. Just a simple theology course on early christianity is extremely redpilling because early christianity is evidently jewish in both origin and application.

You're not a very honest poster. You are more knowledgeable than other posters in threads that devolve into christian shitflinging but the user you were bitching at was citing actual points in history while you were complaining and passing that off as a rebuttal. The fact that you even went as far as namedropping Thomas Aquinas shows how far the farce goes because his own sources of philosophy was ancient greek thinkers. It's the same with the rest; conquer and destroy non-christian culture, salvage what's left, repackage as your own. It sounds very muslim but the reality is that it's actually just very abrahamic.

user you're too nice for your own good. That other user didn't actually argue in good faith. All of his rebuttals were mockery and not actual true rebuttals. This is because he had no information to counter with.

There is nothing to christian philosophy - christian philosophy is a scam and a farce. As someone who studied christian theology and hoping that would enrich my faith, I not only came up empty-handed and primed for truth. From Thomas Aquinas to Kierkegaard, they all sought to add philosophy to an abrahamic religion and only revealed that its true essence possesses none. Christian philosophy is the act of taking philosophy from the greeks and other sources and adding it to christianity as a stamp-on. It does not change the religion, it's a big addendum. While Thomas Aquinas is just intellectually dishonest, Kierkegaard is a sad fool who tried so honestly and pathetically hard to add something that wasn't there.

You're on the right track. Don't let christian apologizers fool you. If they can't provide substantial counterpoints and fall back on mockery, they are not being honest and their mockery does not dismiss what you brought. You were in the right. Stay right.


This is exactly what I'm talking about. Jews when comfortable are very open about their true intentions. Christianity is a device to weaken non-jews and those that allowed it to spread were the kind of corrupt the jews relied on.

Do you think we are reedit-retards who buy into Hollywood jews lies?

There were no dark ages, which officially ended with “enlightenment” when jews started to tear down the fabric of western civilization. Enlightenment so the fairy-tale goes was when suddenly wisdom and knowledge did fall from the sky were there before was just ignorance and superstition.

If there were local dark ages, than it was the fault of pagan barbarians. While the church protected the antique heritage and started to (re-) civilize Europe in the spirit of the Roman empire. That is not even disputed anymore among knowledgeable people, scholars.

Just an example each and every university, not only in Europe but in the world, does own its existence the church, if not direct so by extension.

F

Germans and Russians should be best friends, along with Britain and anyone else betrayed by kikes.

It was awful but German troops are complely vilified, man.

The Wehrmacht kinda shafted him, but yes, that shouldn't have happened but it was inevitable if you look beyond WW2.

Before that, kikes hated the Tzar and cozied up with Germany and supported Germany as much as they could while not giving Germanies enemies anything, but then Britain was seen as the ticket to palestine.
Then Germany became the babyeaters, etc. Balfour.
Etc.

Anyway, This Tzar thing, the German Kaiser fled the country for a while because he thought the commies would take over the Reichstag and co (Rosa Luxemburg, etc) and he would meet a similar fate as the Tzar.

This double play made war inevitable from both sides.

Anyway, we should be friends, we really should be.

Давайте выпьем за то, чтобы мы испытали столько горя, сколько капель вина останется в наших бокалах!
No more wars between family for jewish benefit ever again.

I agree. Rusbro knows what must be done.

Yeah we should all queue to suck uncle Joe Stalin’s dick.

Not; even as a conquered people the Russians would have fared better under Hitler then being under the joke of communism for 70 years.

If RIDF is so keen to spread good will to actual whites, they could start by returning their occupied fucking territory. To begin with, why the fuck should Germany even talk to you steppeniggers when you're still occupying stolen Prussia?

What is this excerpt from?

Actually no it's very simple. The enlightenment period began after the influence of the church deteriorated in Europe and the ideas of ancient egypt, greece, and the roman empire were now no longer exclusive to the vaults of church archives. While many christians insist that the church-dominated middle ages was somehow a time of thriving development, they have an exceedingly tough time explaining how the period right after that many call the enlightenment was a true time of rapid advancement and its most distinct characteristic was the crippled influence of the church and how the works of ancient European people were on the minds of the greatest thinkers of that time. In their desperation they try to claim that the church's overbearing influence set the stage for that, but that in itself is a contradiction because that is both admitting the church had overbearing influence and if it was positive influence then why would positive influence be stifling in nature?

Amazing portrait you're trying to draft. The church was trying to preserve the culture it destroyed - somehow that seems like another contradiction. Whilst it was killing entire populations of people, destroying all signs they existed, outlawing facets of their culture, it was actually saving them from themselves - not a contradiction.

So let's get this straight. Just to summarize your post: The same scholars that had a Dark Ages timeframe now say that there wasn't one, but if there was one it was the pesky pagans' fault, but that didn't happen either because literally every university in the world says there was no Dark Ages.

You want to be taken seriously, right?

Tacitus' Germania.

Do you know that Irish joke:

“I’m an Atheist”
“Catholic or Protestant?”

One trope of protestant believes is that there are archives were the Vatican hides all the evidence for conspiracies they have no evidence for.

“Ancient knowledge recently uncovered from secret archives the church wanted to bury” is exactly the rubbish anti-clerical, anti-Christ hacks like Dan Brown, Umberto Eco peddle.


Clueless people are usual surprised that medieval Europe was technological more advanced then the antique.

Wasn’t it Newton who popularized the expression of “standing on the shoulder of giants”?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants

For you it is axiomatic that „the Church destroyed ancient wisdom“, which is a falsehood but part of your believe-system that was created during the 18th century “enlightenment”, French revolution, anti-clerical anti-Christ massacres (Vende), large scale destruction of archives, libraries, art and human life, scientists like Antoine Lavoisier were murdered. Along came perverted fantasies about the clerics, published by a clinical pervert sex criminal and murderer (de Sade). He wasn’t the only one, during the reign of French terror sweeping through Europe the French produced pamphlets about the total invented “crimes of the church”, “blasphemous torture and execution method of the Inquisition” reflecting the mind of the authors (the French had “revolutionary marriages” were they chained together nuns and priests and dumped and drowned them into the river).
Later then it was invented that in medieval times the people believed in flat earth (the most famous illustration in fake medieval style was created in the 19th century), that it were the “Dark Ages” of unbelievable cruelty (dungeons exhibiting “medieval” torture equipment became popular and were total fake, not one piece is known to be of medieval origin).

Of course that was also the time were jews started to deeply worm into Europe's societies and take control of them.

I recall we had a thread some months ago about the execution.
I think the general consensus was that.. it's a pity that he died because of those commies, but he wasn't really an effective leader and that he could partly blame himself for his demise?
Is this correct?

If things could just be made reality like restored borders and co then we wouldn't have the struggle against the kikes anymore because we would have exterminated every single one of them years ago.

You were born just in time to see Russia return to the Monarchy that made them fearsome and respectable in the past.

Obviously the Middle Ages were not a time of ignorance and primitive barbarism as depicted in (((Hollywood))). No one argues that this is the case.
However, the idea that the Enlightenment was somehow opposed to the ideas of Western civilization is equally false. Remember, the Enlightenment was a time when our race rediscovered its past and abandoned feudalism I'll get back to this later
Many of our greatest achievements happened in this period and everywhere across Europe, culture bloomed.
In addition, the era of clerical domination of our race is neither healthy for our development nor was it conducive to our racial survival. Christianity, like any internationalist religion, must never be placed on a pedestal over race. Race is real and if you soil it by mating with a negro or a jew, there are real consequences forever. Not so according to Christianity. To a Christian, we're all equal in heaven and all that matters is shoveling souls to Jesus. Race mixing and White genocide be damned. So long as priests can evangelize over a bunch of negro "Christians" who pay lipservice to Jesus, that is all that matters.

Which brings me back to the Enlightenment and feudalism. The single greatest thing that was born out of the Enlightenment was a stronger sense of national identity. Now, I in no way deny the fact that before the Enlightenment, loyalty to one's ethnic group was the norm. However feudalism coupled with an internationalist religion created insane "countries" (not nations) that did not reflect the cultures and nationalities of the people that lived there. Within many so called states, the only things people had in common was religion. And that's not even all true considering that Christianity, like paganism, tends to develop localized cults resembling the patchwork of religions that predated it. According to the logic of the time, multiculturalism is a good thing and culture, heritage, language, and race can all be sacrificed into the blender of Christianity so long as it served the interests of the church.
The Enlightenment put an end to this. Henceforth, the nation once again became the dominant idea that states were built around. That is a much more natural and healthy idea to base a state around.
As for jews being involved in the Enlightenment, I do not deny that jews began to creep into positions of power at this time. However they already had held positions of power before hand. And ALL of the great accomplishments of our race in architecture, philosophy, science, and literature were the result of indigenous Europeans, not jews.

In short, any ism, any ideology, any religion that places some abstraction (be it going to a utopia after death or creating one before death) must be secondary to the reality of race. Race is real and it matters. It matters that we maintain our culture and heritage for our posterity. It matters that we preserve our People so that our children can live in societies where they need not fear attack by hostile foreigners in the nations that their forefathers built.
These things are real and abstractions must come second, if at all. Nothing is more paramount than preserving our posterity.

RIDF at it's finest. Calling for peace with the blood of it's neighbours dripping from it's hands. Truly, the very vision of brotherhood, while you continue to this day to illegally occupy our territories.

Nobody is swayed by your empty slogans.

Hör auf zu projizieren, du dummer spaltender Nigger.
Territorialfragen werden später beantwortet.

F

Hellas did fall to the pagan Romans (if the Macedonians don‘t count).
After that Greece was just a provincial backwater (similar happened to it’s colonies like Alexandria). The Romans poked fun about their Greek slaves as “little Greeks”, Graeculus.
Christian Rome survived pagan Rome by nearly 1000 years, which in itself is a pretty long time, but also significant longer than pagan Rome existed before.

Not even culturally or ethnically roman, try again
please don't tell me you're talking about the HRE either

If anyone has better res screenshots, feel free to upload

I don't know, you tell me.

Enlightenment is foremost a catchy slogan, by some politicians and philosophers who wanted to sell the achievements of others as their own, or better wanted to gain a moral advantage by claiming them for their own camp.

Strange you bring that up because one of the enlightenment's slogans were that men are created equal, regardless if you are a jew, moor or a nigger you are as worthy as any good Christian (European).
Medieval Europa discussed if negros are human they came to the conclusion yes, regretful but then science wasn’t as developed as today

Ok, now we talking about spiritual matters. God possible giving salvation to nigger is in no way related to fucking other races.

Christianity is actually pretty racist (dogs getting the crumbs), no wonder by its jewish origin. So Christianity doesn’t deny the existence of races, nor does it mandate race mixing.
Actually trying to creating a single mixed united in one culture and language (NWO) humanity is totally heretic, because God created and divided the races and languages.

„Alle Menschen werden Brüder“ Beethoven (Schiller) in „Ode to joy“
The „noble Savage“ Rouseau, etc.

Yeah, like the French revolution and Napoleon?
“Insane” were were those countries only in the sense that their existence wasn’t liked by certain powers, who then made sure that enough bloodsheed happened minorities could carve out their own shitty unviable countries. The situation we are now in.


No, you dumb ass, the French revolution emancipated the jews in France who were banned before by the monarchy and church.

Napoleon then made sure the jews were forced onto everyone in Europe

...

This is true to some extent as the Enlightenment began simply when pagan achievements in art, architecture, philosophy, and science were no longer suppressed by the Catholic church.

While it is true that "equality" was one of the principles of the time, it is inaccurate to say that this development is the work of the jews (not accusing you of doing so). Our race is naturally drawn to concepts of equality and empathy because we are the most empathetic race on the planet. This works both ways. Our empathy allows us to pull together or outsmart others, but it also can be used against us. Just like any other trait.
However I should also point out that this equality you mention was not the insane, false equality of marxism. Enlightenment thinkers did not claim that "we're all Eeeequal so we should marry negros and have no borders." This was explicitly a political equality expressly linked to republicanist ideals.

According to Christian doctrine, it doesn't matter. If a half negro, half Swede prays to Yahweh, he gets to the Christian utopia, according to Christian doctrine. Thus, race mixing is a secondary issue at best.
Placing your racial survival secondary to teh pursuit of a mythical utopia is hugely destructve. And I am not just talking about Christianity. Any utopian ideal placed above the science of race is destructive. Enlightenment ideals included.

News to me. If Christianity is anti-race mixing, why does Jesus never say, "Don't have sex with non-Aryans"

That's exactly what Christians want. Everyone to pray to Yahweh. A globalist religion. Sick.
And the Christian utopia is not segregated. So presumably it's a multicultural hellhole with negros kneeling side by side with Swedes. Sick.

Not an argument.

I never once defended the French Revolution. I am defending the White scientists, philosophers, historians, architects, authors, and statesmen or the Enlightenment. And thus by extension, I am defending the achievements of Europeans before Christianity replaced the native cultures.

Also, while I am not attacking Napoleon, I am also not defending him or holding him up as a perfect leader. I never said anything like that. Napoleon was as flawed as the pre-enlightenment leaders who allowed jews to infest their countries in exchange for money and power. You forget that jews wouldn't have been kicked out of places had they not been allowed in by greedy Christian leaders and feudal lords looking to make money.

It ends with her reverting to her natural hair color and having six kids.

F

He looks so like my father, it's kind of unsettling. I have no shared lineage I think though.

It isn‘t good but in their attempt to harm us they did us a favor.
Germany has the first time in several hundred years no border with Russia and is only tangential affected from eastern Europe. What the business is between Russia, Poland, Balts, Ukraine or Romania doesn’t affect us much, it is several hundred kilometers away.
Germany doesn’t need to give a dam. We should keep out of it and the pan-slavic brotherhood should make it out without us. No German soldier, military and most important no money. They are old enough and grown up, the could and should care for themselves.

Do you not recall Kohl stabbing the Germans in the back over the Konigsberg question, hell anything east of the Oder?

At the time of the enlightenment, European achievements far surpassed that of the antique pagans.

So what, why do you care if a nigger gets salvation, you don‘t believe in it anyway.

Sorry what has the issue if a nigger get into heaven todo with fucking said nigger? That is in no way connected, or do you suggest that if a nigger brings offerings to Jupiter the patricians daughter are obligated to spread their legs for him? Actually pagans did know temple prostitution in the Levant and India. So pagans had race mixing as a religious doctrine.

Jesus said that gentiles are most probably not even worthy of salvation. Jesus didn’t need to mention to not have sex with gentiles, because jews were and still are not allowed to marry gentiles.

For the record, it is heretic for Christians to try to counter God’s plans and intentions.

Yeah how about you eat shit?

That is apocryptical, in fact there is denial of it.

He didn‘t give away what he didn‘t have anyway. His position to Oder-Neisse is not more treasonous than that of other politicians in his position, in fact if an SPD politician would have been in charge there probably would have been no reunification.
Germany was not in the position to get those place back then and still isn’t today. What the future brings, who knows?

Actually, the Romans and Greeks were far more advanced in terms of science and archetecture than Christian Medieval Europe. They had larger cities, more advanced domes, more advanced plumbing, more organized societies, and much more. Ignoring the achievements of our ancestors is intellectually dishonest.

I don't. But Christians do. And that means that they are "brothers in Christ"
That's a problem because it leads to all kinds of insane, backwards decision making.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume you are a Christian. Accoding to your god, what is more important;
Keeping the races pure or worshiping Jesus?
And please be honest with your answer and don't try to weasal out of answering because this is a simple question.
What is more important to your god; keeping the races pure or worshiping Jesus?

Yeah that sounds pretty jewish.

I feel like somehow we accidentally switched positions.
I am the one who should be arguing that Christianity is bad for Europeans/Jewish in origin and you are the one who should be trying to disassociate Christianity from anything jewish.

"Things which never occurred" for 500 Alex. This is fucking bullshit which has been disproven for what 70 years now and is actually a screed started by the "the Enlightenment". Animal husbandry, metallurgy, agriculture, and siege-craft were all far more advanced in 500AD than in antiquity let alone by the early modern era of 1500 AD. What gives the impression of "decline" is that power shifted to successor states in northern Europe with no history of urban civic life and no access to the artistic traditions of the Mediterranean. They kept making art the say way in Byzantium and Italy but the Roman presence in Britain was so fleeting that it never really impacted culture in a permanent manner. Also I'll point out that there was no perspective in painting anywhere until 1200AD, then "painting like sculpture" was developed in Italy. That was a point at which society so vastly surpassed antiquity in terms of aesthetics that there can be no argument about it.

And thats's talking about urban life and public works which didn't mesh with the manoral system. If we look at literacy and capacity for warfare than society vastly surpasses the Roman Empire by 700AD. And incompetent could crush as Roman Legion with 400 nobles of that era due to the advancements in the modes of warfare.

Hell lets be honest here the Celts had better metalurgy than the Romans in 200BC through 100AD, but had no urban culture. Were they "less advanced"? No they had advanced themselves in a certain manner which befit their lifestyle while neglecting other aspects which weren't practical for them given their low population density. Hence why the Romans copied the gladius and mail from the fucking celts.

That is simply not true. The science and architecture of the Greeks and Romans surpassed that of the Medieval era. And I never said that the war technology of the Romans was better than the war technology of the Middle Ages.
I think you misunderstood my basic premise. I am not saying that adopting a dead religion makes us better off. My point is that the Enlightenment is a European creation and that reversing it is not only impossible, but would destroy a large share of our greatest achievements. Some of our most beautiful architecture, literature, and scientific achievements are Enlightenment era. It is the Entitlement era that is bad and jewish in origin.
My other point is that Christianity is an internationalist religion by definition. My point is that placing religion over race is the path to racial suicide. It is unhealthy and destructive.

Your assertion is shit. There was no "science" before the experimental methodology was created in 1100 in Italy. There was dabbling and observation but it wasn't a procedure designed to produce predictive models until then.

Also are you arguing that the Romans had more advanced metallurgy or engineering than Europe in the Middle Ages? When the Mongols attempted to invade Europe they couldn't take a single stone fortification. And during their second attempt they were met by nobles and mercenaries until of levied peasants. They were slaughtered and lost 70,000 men while inflicting a mere 3,000 casualties. Or lets look at the Turks trying to take Constantinople. And army of 200,000 shitskins loses 80,000 men in a siege against a mere 8,000 defenders and only took the city because a fucking kike refugee openly the the fucking gates. If not for that betrayal(which is how every major Spanish city was taken by the Moors as well by the way) they would have failed. We have cases of European armies crushing Saracens who outnumbered them 20 to 1. The Europeans of the middle ages so greatly surpassed all other races in the arts of war that it actually was something of a weakness in that it was difficult to get the rulers to take the incursions by Saracens seriously while they vied for power with local competitors who were far more competent.

You are confusing a results of a shit from urban to manorial social organization with a decline in engineering. We know how that essentially nothing was lost in terms of technical aptitude during the middle ages, as we have excellent records due to their habit of keeping everything on vellum. And the population was actually more literate by 600AD than it was from 300BC to 300AD. Not everybody was a wealthy patrician in antiquity dipshit, you see the very well made homes of the rich and public buildings and compare that to the recordings of daily life of peasants in the middle ages and rage at the apparent "decline" while comparing completely different social strata. The decline in public works is to be expected when the cities shrink in size even if the population remained much the same until the Black Death. Then there was an honest decline in the population and the impetus for urban development all but disappeared for centuries.

This isn't even about Christianity, this is about you being a dumbass and holding views which derive from out fucking opponents, the faggots how contributed to the hot mess we find ourselves in today, those "Enlightenment" philosophers. We now know they were full of shit, we have material evidence in the form of surviving records and archaeological artifacts rather than merely a narrative handed down through time.

It is a creation of libshits. And this is the problem, I like half the white race, the half which is full of brutal hate-filled mother fuckers. The liberals are the problem, they are a fucking disease. They are the kikes of the white race and must be destroyed. This was our mistake, our societies including Christendom compelled these faggots to be adaptive little boys and girls. But now they don't breed while white rightists are the only population of any nation which seems to reject modernity and has an above replacement birthrate(2.7 in the USA). The bread and circuses provided by modernity are poison and they kill everybody else, only those immune to it are enduring, only those who spit it out or refuse to even taste it are having children. If they stopped inporting mudmen into our empires they would soon be facing a population utterly hostile to them. Such a cleansed population would have no problem exterminating kikes or killing billions of shitskins. And remember the Nazis would balk at that sort of behavior, the holohoax didn't real.

That is what I want a purified white race filled with hate not by rhetoric but by natural inclination. They won't have a choice to be weak because their genes won't give that to them, everybody with a propensity for weakness is in effect killing themselves off.

For me the race is a vehicle by which my bloodline is propagated, the other races are shit and I don't think my line could every survive by interbreeding with them. That's why I'm a racialist but lets make no bones here this isn't about saving the white race as a whole is about saving the part that deserves to be saved. The rest are less than worthless. Without them in the way no one could stop us. I've lived with these rural whites for decades. I've seen how their hearts are filled with hate. I've heard them talk about exterminating all the muds without any cajoling. And the are all Christians, so not only does your theses not match observations but since natural inclinations are very much inheritable they are likely to stay that particular sort of Christian indefinitely.

The society, clan, religion, culture, and race can't be given primacy in my mind because they aren't separate they are all derived from the same source and reinforce each other. I see no distinction between them as they are all part of the vehicle which perpetuates my particular line of descent within it.

The main problem of Christianity is its slippery slope ride away from enforcing its own laws and commandments in order to "look good".

The Greeks literally calculated the circumference of the earth with shadows, invented death rays, steam engines, and mechanical computers able to calculate the positions of stars thousands of years in the past or future with staggering accuracy. And that's just what we know of.

I already told you, no.

Also it's interesting that you should point out that the jews are the ones who opened the gates for our enemies. That's funny because one of the premises of your tor using Christian comrade is that before the Enlightenment, we were better protected against the jews. Such is not the case.

I'm even not going to refute the strawmen you created for me. You can refute those on your own.


Maybe so. However that is not going to happen ever. Liberalism, like all isms, is often a religion. It can never be destroyed. Only curtailed.
So I don't concern myself with the impossible. I only concern myself with destroying the jewish oligarchy that is hell bent on exterminating my race. That can be accomplished.

But you are right that "right wingers" (technically we're above the left right paradigm but for simplicity sake) are the only ones having children above the replacement level. And you're correct that if we could somehow remove the traitors at the top, dealing with the shitskins would be relatively easy.

You say that your Christian neighbors are feuled by hatred and I don't disbelieve you.
I'd say that your neighbors have put their religion second and their race first. You'll hear no argument from me against putting your race first.
I hope you help direct their anger at something important. A target of importance. Hone their hatred into a weapon and unleash it upon our racial enemies.

Christianity is about the afterlive not fucking niggers, do you get this? There is no obligation, not even a suggesting of race-mixing in Christian dogma. There were even some influential theologians suggesting not to fuck at all.
Anyone telling you that “racism” is prohibited in Christianity is telling you shit, applying a 20th century political concept to a two millennia old religion. He might tell you that “biology” or “cholesterol” and “global warming” is prohibited in Christianity as well.

So what would Odin do? Is keeping the race pure more important than fucking that fat tited negress?

The Jews murdered the Tsar and whole his family, murdered MILLIONS of people in horrific ways and now these bastards complain. Unbelievable. Just think about that.

For that they needed to be able to calculate a precise calendar, but they weren‘t. A correct calendar was introduced with the Catholic calendar reform by Pope Gregor.

...

Not true. Rome occupied Judea and the Romans and the Jews had many clashes.

Also no true. They refer to their enemies as "goyim".

Do you know the proverb „pearls before swine“?

F

Christianity has died the moment it crawled out of the desert.
The moment it hit European shores was the moment it became paganized to various degrees.
A camel will pass through the eye of a needle before anyone can show me a true Christian with pure Christian faith that is devoid of any and all pagan traditions.

It's impossible because they're everywhere and so ingrained that people don't even think about it anymore.
But I do.
I know.

So if I mix half a glass of deadly poison with good drinking water will you gulp it down, on account of the mix?

F

There is no evidence for the "Dark Ages." Join your Jew friends somewhere else if you want to talk about them. They're an Enlightenment myth.

Prove it.

Prove it.

Prove it.

Eat shit, mate. What about me pointing out holes in arguments and asking for actual arguments instead of mere assertions like "Christianity is for Jewish control XD trust me" is dishonest, exactly?

No, he wasn't. He posted either Jewish myths like the "Dark Ages" or a single list from a single source — that source being a butthurt anti-Christian Greek pagan. There was no evidence for any of these claims, and considering many of them were ones already known to be false (such as the supposed Christian murder of Hypatia for being a pagan philosopher) the entire list becomes suspect. Asking for evidence of anti-Christian claims is not being dishonest. In fact, calling me dishonest for asking for evidence for the literal pagan death camps whose only source is another anti-Christian is maximum kikery, as you are already trying to ignore a valid inquiry into kike-like behavior.

Asking for evidence is neither a complaint nor a rebuttal. Try again.

To pretend the entirety of Thomas Aquinas is Greek is mindbogglingly stupid. Moreover, I did not namedrop him. He is merely the most obvious Christian philosopher, and given that the user was complaining about "Christian philosophy" it is not in bad faith to suggest he actually read some.

Prove it, Gibbon.

You're clearly too stupid to read. I cannot and did not provide rebuttals because the other user did not provide any arguments to rebut. "Christianity is bad" is not an argument.

Prove it. It's existed almost three times as long as Greek philosophy and comes in many flavors so I would be very surprised if it turned out not to have anything to it.

Jewish anecdotes really bolster the argument. "Yeah, I was a National Socialist (totally) but then I came across X, Y, and Z and it totally discredits the whole thing! You guys should stop being National Socialists."

Prove it.

Prove it.

Prove it.

lol prove it.

Prove it.

It's funny how you attack Christianity and Christian times when the things you complain about (like racemixing) didn't exist at all and then defend the Enlightenment (supposedly as a revival of pagan knowledge, which it wasn't) which is the direct reason for most of our poisoned ideas today. The foremost example of the Englightenment, the French Revolution, literally abolished slavery and declared niggers to be equal. Name any Enlightenment philosopher and they're likely to be majorly pozzed in some way.

You cannot possibly conflate the Industrial Revolution and Scientific Revolution with the philosophical Enlightenment.

You know, anti-Christian posting would be more convincing if you did things besides referencing fictions invented by either Jews or by other anti-Christians on this board.

I also can't believe you credit the idea of a nation and its reemergence to the Enlightenment. Fuck's sake.


"Semite" is not a race. Moreover, your examples are poor, for Europe reached its apex under Christianity. Whether it was because of Christianity or not is up for discussion, but you cannot possibly claim that Christianity has hindered Europeans without branching off into unfounded speculation.

Also, I don't see how you count Byzantine scholars fleeing their empire conquered by the Muslims as "knowledge that had to be pilfered from the Arabs."


lol American civnat detected. "It was the right kind of equality!"

Because it's a personal religion about living the good life, not a political doctrine? Moreover, it was the prevailing attitude at the time and there's nothing in there to contradict it.

Does a man wanting everyone to acknowledge the truth that 2+2=4 make mathematics a globalist scheme? You're a retard.

You're defending the Enlightenment. The Enlightenment is epitomized by the French Revolution.

What a Jew move to subtly imply that it was Christianity which made those people allow the Jews in, as if they didn't do it for the exact same reasons the pagans did.


You can't actually be this stupid. They had more power, sure, but they weren't more advanced. Just for a start, European Medieval metal working was far more advanced, allowing for the invention of things like stirrups allowing, for the first time, heavy cavalry. Do you actually know anything about the history of science at all?

In the same way that wanting a nigger to acknowledge that 2+2=4 leads to bad decision-making?

Which is more important in a car: the steering wheel or the engine?

Worshipping a god and not racemixing never come into conflict, meaning you can do both.


Guess we should embrace leftism too, because so many leftist ideas are "white ideas."

That must be why Jews were so much more in control during Christianity's heyday and why we're so much less pozzed now, right?

It's funny how christcucks will swear on christianity being 100% aryan and native to Europe when even the kikes themselves relish such a celebration of their history and land

^

The rampant consensus-cracking and Kike D&C Shill tactics here are proof that we're winning.
God Bless the Czar, and
DEUS VULT!

1. You failed to answer the simple question. What is more important to your god? Keeping the races pure or worshiping Jesus?
2. You believe that because I don't worship a jewish god, I want to LARP as a pagan. That is incorrect. I don't follow any religion.

Name any Christian "philosopher" and he will also be pozzed.

Also, instead of calling me names, debunk my points. You claim that the concept of nationhood and basing the state around the concept of nation is not an Enlightenment thing. To debunk me, you need merely to point out all the Feudalist nation-states.

Sure, but so is everything. So that's not an argument.

That is math. (((Yahweh))) is a jewish tribal god.

I never said any such thing.
I merely point out facts.

There you go with metal working again. Try actually reading what I write instead of angrilly inventing more strawmen. God, you are one thick skulled idiot.

Again, that is math. Math is real. Ancient jewish superstitions are not real.

Are you saying that Yahweh wanted Aryans (not jews) to keep our race pure? Why then is this nowhere in the Torah (aka your Old Testament)
In fact, nowhere in all of the Bible does it say anywhere that Europeans should do anything (except serve the jews as Goyim)

You only view this honest question as difficult to answer because you know it makes your religion look horrible.

Any ism that distracts from race is bad for our race. However not all so called "leftist ideas" are bad. For instance, unmitigated capitalism (often viewed as a "right wing" idea) is not good for our race. National health care is another so called "left wing idea" yet it is good for our race to have it. Environmentalism is another so called "leftist idea" yet conserving our environment is good for our race. So yes, some so called "leftist ideas" are good. Of course, people who view things in the "left vs right" think are still thinking in the way the jews want you to. The left-right paradigm is as much a religion as your semitic one.


Maybe that's why America's Christians are more willing to die for Israel than lift a finger to secure our childrens' future.

I always thought the Tsar was a shitter, but if Jews don't like it, I guess: GOOD LUCK TSAR VLAD

Not here for this bullshit d&c garbage, but

tertullian.org/fathers/chrysostom_adversus_judaeos_01_homily1.htm

have some copy pasta!

Just an aside, but John Chrysostom, who wrote "against the jews" is the one of the most venerated saints in all of Christianity; he wrote our liturgy after all.

Not by intentional extermination, for that only drives those with the propensities for that mode of thought into hiding as the liberals where hidden within our society both by the harsh realities of pre-industrial life and by social coercion. But that isn't happening now, rather they are killing themselves off, this is a case of natural selection and you cannot defeat selective pressure this extreme.

My neighbors care little for the white race as whole, for them it is more about family and their small clans. They simply hate niggers and those who oppose their interests intrinsically. That is the beauty of it they don't distinguish between race and religion or the material concerns of their lives. To them anybody who is even slightly against them in any way is utter scum who must be killed. That's what I want, natural hate. They aren't setting priorities because they aren't going through an intellectual exercise, its all instinct and an instinct so strong it cannot be suppressed even in a society which derides it as the ultimate evil.

I've never seen a christcuck explain this one. They're more than eager to debate with their semitic brand of sophistry but never actual hard facts. They simply have no drive for honest debate and examination of the facts.

>Here, just read this (((Scofield))) version.
>You wouldn't want to be against God's Chosen People (((tm))), would you?

Interesting Connection Between Japanese Nationalism and the Russian Monarchy (specifically Czar Nicholas)

- Saigō Takamori, the 'Last Samurai' of Japan, was an inspirational figure to Nationalists such as:

- Tōyama Mitsuru, founder of the Genyosha society and Kokuryū-Kai (Black Dragon Society) and friend to Chiang Kai-Shek,

- Yukio Mishima (Kimitake Hiraoka), who covers the Shinpuren Rebellion which preceded the Satsuma Rebellion (of samurai disatisfied with the modernisation, globalisation, and 'free trade' being pushed on Japan) in his book 'Runaway Horses', part of the 'Sea of Fertility' series.

- Ikki Kita, Japanese National Socialist (in the early 20th century, even before Mussolini or Hitler came to power) author of "The Theory of Japan's National Polity and Pure Socialism" who was executed as a political martyr in 1936.

- Nisshō Inoue, devotee of the Nationalist Japanese religion Nichiren Mahayana Buddhism, the founder of the Ketsumeidan or "League of Blood", a proponent of the "Showa Restoration" of Japanese Imperial Pride, whose immense popular support prevent the Japanese leftists and even the Allied Occupation government from suppressing his influence fully.

Tsuda Sanzō repressed the Satsuma rebellion on the Southwest Japanese island of Kyūshū, led by Saigō Takamori, who ended up dying on the battlefield via Seppuku.

Saigō Takamori's brother, Saigō Jūdō (Tsugumichi/Ryūkō/Ryūdō), took over for him as the political leader from Satsuma (Western Kyūshū).

Saigō Jūdō travelled to Europe and studied the Prussian military and politics of Otto von Bismarck.

Later, when Tsuda Sanzō attempted to assassinate Nikolai Romanov, the future Czar Nicholas, on his trip to Japan,

Saigō Takamori's brother, Saigō Jūdō, demanded the death penalty for this shameful act.

It's funny how anti-Christians can only wax poetic instead of providing actual arguments. This is no different from militant atheists decrying religion and fantasizing about mythical times when "superstitions" and "prejudices" give way to the blinding light of reason and everyone can live perfectly happily and rationally.

It's especially funny how when it suits you suddenly Jews must be telling the truth. They only lie when it comes to other things, but this time it's totally the truth, guys! Do the anti-Christians never wonder at the fact that their primary ideological company is Jews and leftists?

Eh, no. Any Enlightenment philosopher will be majorly compromised in some way — they'll wax poetic about "freedom," "equality," "the brotherhood of man" and the like. Christian philosophers (who span many different philosophical time periods rather than the singular Enlightenment) I have yet to hear promoting anything close to modern leftism. Where is the Christian John Stuart Mill? The Christian Marx?

Nations are not an Enlightenment concept. The entire word comes from Latin, for crying out loud. You think the concept of a group of people bound together by blood only came about 4,800 years after the beginning of civilization? I agree the concept of the "nation-state" came about during the Enlightenment, but nation? No.

No.

>(((Yahweh))) is a jewish tribal god
This is magical thinking. To have this make any sense you must already assume a pagan position, thus making this a circular argument and worthless. If you are a Christian and believe Christianity is the truth then there is nothing pozzed about wanting other people to acknowledge the truth, anymore than it is pozzed to want people to acknowledge 2+2=4.

You implied like a Jew. You behave like a Jew.

Actually, you explicitly wrote:
"The Romans and Greeks were far more advanced in terms of science." My point still stands. Either you are an idiot or an illiterate.

Pagan gods aren't real and yet you're treating them like they are. Do you know how arguments work? Moreover, if he isn't real why do you care about people worshipping a "Jewish tribal god"?

I'm saying that's an irrelevancy when it comes to Christianity, just the same as talking about whether God wants you to butter your toast or simply put jam on it is an irrelevancy. As I said, Christianity is a personal religion, not a set of mandates nor a political doctrine.

For that matter, where is the pagan commandment: thou shalt not racemix?

"Difficult to answer." You can't answer an absurdity. Why did you not answer the explanation I gave? How about you answer this question since you're so fond of dishonest questions: Would you choose being a good person or being a pagan? It's a simple question so I expect you to answer it. Here's another fun question: Is the steering wheel or the engine the more important in a car? And, hell, let's go three for three: Is keeping the race pure more important than paganism?

You were arguing that the Enlightenment ought to be defended and salvaged simply because it was "white." I am saying this is not a basis for anything.

Nice dodging the question like you dodge ovens. Answer the question: are we more or less pozzed now than we were when Christianity was at its height?

I suppose I might as well ask another question: on what basis do you put religions that say nothing of race (such as most European paganisms, Christianity, and others) at odds or conflicting with the preservation of race? This makes no logical sense yet you insist on it. Why? Do you also ask people to choose between the drinking of carbonated beverages and their religion?

But the jews who wrote the bible were?

Considering I am able to evaluate their claims on something other than the sole basis of their authorship (and to the extent I even consider them Jews), yes. The post I responded to was literally arguing that because a Jew said Christianity was bad (a Jewish scheme) it must be true, without any other evidence.

That's called cognitive dissonance and double standards. You want to dismiss the post here on the basis that it refers to a jew gloating about how christianity allowed jews to take over europe and say you can't trust what a jew says because they always lie but then make the bible an exception. The main point you should be relying on if you were an honest person is knowing when jews lie. Jews lie to their enemies and give their enemies a basis for weakening themselves. The jew is honest when they're around allies and are made comfortable, that's when they gloat. The newspaper Times of Israel is a constant daily reminder of this.

The jew referred to in that post is also extremely relevant because he was a biographer for the rothchilds. Anyone redpilled on the jews should recognize how significant that is. Because of the rothchilds' role in trying to achieve One World Government, and the context of that post in how christianity was used to control europe, that connection cannot be dismissed.

It's dishonesty like this that proves how christianity warps your mind and enables the jews to thrive. If everyone on Holla Forums were to follow your line of thinking, that connection would be wholly dismissed. In your vendetta against various people concerned with how christianity is used to subvert whites, you would throw away a redpill like that because it violates your need to protect christianity. Your priority is christianity first, and this is how you act.

Seigō Nakano (中野 正剛) (1886 - 1943) was also inspired by Saigō Takamori.
He was a Japanese politician leader who advocated Fascism in order to complete the Meiji Restoration.
Baron Sadao Araki (荒木 貞夫) (1877-1966)
Was a descendant of the Tokugawa clan who served as an attaché to St. Petersburg, Russia, during the last years of the Czarist era.
He also supported Nisshō Inoue's "League of Blood" and the military takeover in the 1930's.
Shūmei Ōkawa (1886-1957) was known as the 'Japanese Goebbels'. He founded Yūzonsha, a Nationalist philosophical discussion club, along with the aforementioned Ikki Kita.
He described himself as 'Third Position', both Anti-Capitalist and Anti-Communist.
Yūzonsha

The Jews clearly fear Christianity.
They don't promote true Christianity.
They instead attempt to subvert Christianity.
This is because true Christianity outlaws usury, sodomy, pornography, prostitution, opiate drugs, saloons and liquor, degenerate art, etc. …
How would Jews make money in this environment? They would starve!
It's the same with Nationalism. Jews fear Nationalism because they are the eternal parasite. They try to subvert Nationalism by pushing their own brand of 'Kosher Nationalism' as a replacement, just like they promote their own version of 'Christian Zionism' for those who are man enough to reject the nihilistic, communistic atheism that so many Jews ascribe to.
By the way, I have nothing against Pagans. However, that word 'Paganism' has almost as little meaning as 'Christianity' does these days.
Also, I rarely see Christians speaking out against Pagans. It's simply a non-issue.
Historically speaking, the Britons/Celts/Druids converted to Christianity of their own will, without being forced militarily, in almost all instances. Missionaries were specifically told not to interfere with the local cultural traditions.

A claim with evidence vs. a claim without evidence is a double standard. Okay.

vs.

How about you go fuck yourself?

No, I want to dismiss it on the basis it has no evidence. The fact that anti-Christians have to rely on Jews telling the truth to support their evidence-free assertions is merely funny.

Go back and read my post.

Why are anti-Christians incapable of making actual arguments and have to rely on invented fictions? Do you not trust in the truth of your position?

Your assertions are not evidence.

And it still isn't evidence. Wow. Maybe provide an argument regarding how Christianity is bad rather than just "this Jew said so"?

Projection; funny. Why do you all feel the need to lie about history, Christianity, and opponents? Especially when people can check the truth for themselves. Anyone can go back and read my posts and see exactly what I said so why do you feel the need to invent fictions about what I'm saying? Do you not see that it undermines your own position and discredits anti-Christianity?

If everyone on Holla Forums followed my thinking they'd say "Interesting, but where's the evidence?" Your "reasoning" is nothing of the sort. You might as well claim you'll stop breathing because a Jew once told you that breathing is good for you.

More dishonesty and projection. I haven't told anyone they ought to be Christian or even that they ought not to be against Christianity. Nowhere have I claimed that anti-Christianity shouldn't be considered. My "vendetta" is for the truth simply because the anti-Christians that infest this board have a proven and ongoing inclination to lie and lie repeatedly, behaving exactly like kikes. That you consider asking for evidence and asking for actual fucking arguments to be a "vendetta" is more evidence for your maximum fucking kikery. Nice framing too, pretending the frothing tirades against Christianity are merely "concern." Again: why act like Jews when it will merely discredit you?

Unfounded Jewish claims are redpills now?

My priority is truth rather than baseless assertions that happen to fit my particular narrative. You should try it some time instead of acting like an injured rabbi anytime someone asks you for actual evidence for your claims.

The fact that you felt the need to respond with all of that to the simple post about me believing things because they have evidence and not believing things because they don't have evidence is really just the cherry on top.

IDK I think right about now, facing a globalist world order that is literally trying to crush humanity to death; we should be so lucky to have a nation full of 'violent horse lords' sure as shit beats the shit out of violent keyboard lords we have in this day and age.

Disingenuous posting is the hallmark of the christian. Thanks for admitting you're incapable of honest discussion.
He clearly said it was good for the jews.
The bible is not self-evident. For instance books by (((Ben Sira))) are clearly based on the musings of a jew with a vile view of humanity. His attitudes towards non-jews, women, money and so on are basically talmud-lite. To seek advice from the bible is to seek advice from the jew.
I'll take that as a compliment.

You can keep repeating the claim that it has no evidence but it is very substantial even for the sake of being a standard fare Holla Forumslack. The author's connections to the rothchilds cannot be disputed. What you are doing is denying the evidence when you should be proving how it isn't.

Your post here was in response to me asking, "but the jews who wrote the bible were? (telling the truth)." You justified your position by saying how you can ignore the authors being jewish. The context was clearly about the bible. You are clearly lying. I could end my response here. You are not an honest poster.

I mentioned the Times of Israel as one example. Anyone who has been on Holla Forums long enough has seen their articles and how they exhibit jews dropping the charade and being honest about their intentions.

This is the same line of thinking that shills use to say that the people associated with kikes like george soros is not enough evidence. The rothchilds are one of the biggest players in jewish geopolitics. Also, this is not the sole piece of evidence about why christianity is bad, this is one that illustrates how jews truly feel about christianity. But feel free to muddle the context.

"Psychological projection" was invented by jews to elevate the, "I know you are but what am I," trick. In order to prove that the person is actually accusing you of what they're doing you need to make a case.
If you want to be taken seriously you need to not rely on loaded questions.
If they did they would know how christianity is subversion and how once you accept that then everything about it makes sense.
Are you from the msm or tumblr? Your posts are filled with deflection tactics to ignore the person's claims and evidence and then claim the person had neither.
This is your third loaded question in this post. If you have to rely on that then you are not arguing in good faith.

(2/2)
It's not reasoning when this person existed and he has many books that back up that one post bringing it up. An interested person can and should follow up with it to learn more.

You need to establish those.
So when you're mocking posters criticizing christianity that's somehow impartial criticism?
How? Every one of these threads as time has gone on has shown exactly the opposite. Which timeline did you drop out of?
The vendetta I mentioned is based off of your dishonest attempt to dismiss a very valuable piece of evidence that's damning against christianity.
I might have lost track but this is your fourth loaded question and it's not fooling anyone.

It's evidently not unfounded no matter how many times you want to say it is. Your tactics might work on other forums but it won't work here.

Your posturing isn't fooling anyone. To dismiss the way jews actually feel about christianity and your refusal to examine it is revealing enough.

You tried to say something there but your facade broke down in the middle of it. You constantly repeat how what's shown isn't evidence but you can't prove it. When you did try you showed your double standards instead. You haven't fooled a single person reading this thread.

I'm no Christian, but to the best of my knowledge, neither Christ nor his disciples were jews - they were Judeans, citizens of the Roman province of Judea. It was only in the last few hundred years that Christ was referred to as a "jew".

Well this thread got derailed from Russian Monarchy.

But Christianity (Catholic) at the moment is corrupted by Vatican 2. It is certain that the kikes are afraid of Christianity, but reverting to paganism or going to atheism at this point means abandoning a well-established standard and going for an uncertain, new one. I am not sure if the individual protestant churches are as kiked, but I know that Orthodox Christianity is the Christianity Kikes most despise.

Jesus and his disciples were verifiably jewish for several reasons. It's actually only in recent times that people are trying to change that. The most important and biggest example is actually from NSDAP Germany where they created a psyop called Positive Christianity which rewrote and redirected christian teachings to cause christians to support NSDAP from a religious standpoint.

The thesis of Positive Christianity was to tell christians that jesus was aryan so that devout christians would react to the story of jesus as a fight against jewish influence. Within the bible and within christian theology in general, jesus could not have been anything else but jewish because him being jewish was a fulfillment of the biblical prophecies, his lineage is supposed to be significantly jewish as in famous biblical jewish figures are part of his ancestry, and messianic cults were common in that era - more than one group of self-proclaimed messianic cults existed and they were all being run by jews.

Many christians clinging to the jesus was aryan myth go one step further and try to revise the old testament and claim that the major characters in those stories were not jewish. This is dishonest for many reasons and among them the most revealing is that there are multiple stories where one of the central conflicts is that the protagonist character is jewish and he refers to the "others" as gentiles meaning not jewish.

The bible's original written version and subsequent translations preserve this because it is an important context that would drastically change the meaning of the story. One major example of this is that the pharisees are not singled out for being jewish but for being pharisees. The main point of this is that the pharisees which were the progenitors of the talmudists were the rival group of the messianic cults. The messianic cults were there to worship the messiah, while the pharisees/talmudists were for worshiping their demons. Their rivalry was nothing more than that, rival groups.

NSDAP Germany was doing reall well without a dominant christian influence and a revival of ancestral (pagan) reverence. The goal should be to abandon jewish influence in any form. Whites don't need a jew to tell them how to live.

Orthodox is not as compromised as other christian sects but not because it somehow is an exception but because Putin and his men are good at rooting out jewish influence. Similar to how Hitler tolerated (and subverted) the christians, it was a long term campaign that's best fought passively. Christians were one of the biggest oppositions to the NSDAP and the voting records reflect this. It's not wise for a jew-wary politician to rattle the christian cage even though they're a major liability.

A swing and a miss, homo. Find one Ukrainian Jew and someone will find three Russian Jews. You're sinking faster.

The fucking absolute state of the christian mind slaves.

First I wouldn‘t trust a jew writing about Rothschild. Even if he wrote bad things about them, I would suspect he had done so in order to cover up even more damming evidence.

Second the only reason Rothschild came to prominence was Enlightenment, French revolution and the downfall of Catholic Christianity. Before that there were no jews in important financial and economic positions.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Medici

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oldest_banks

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banca_Monte_dei_Paschi_di_Siena


ROFL

Until 1945 Germany was a dominant Christian society, even if Christianity was under massive and sneak attack by jews.
The end for Christianity came with (((allied))) occupation by the (((USA))) and the (((Soviet-Union))) now we are back to Russia*

ROFL

Russian-Orthodox are a tool of Putin.
The Orthodox church in Russia is compromised at least since Stalin, when he installed its head. Since then the Orthodox church in Russia is guided by NKVD/KGB/FSB men.

Murder of 15 year old German girl by an Afghan rapefugee
In a New-Years sermon the president of the Palatine
Lutheran church warns us of inhumanity
No, not the stabbing, murder of little girls he warns us, but of “prejudice”.
Curious “prejudice”, the girl is dead. He probably think her head still attached to her body doesn’t fulfill the “prejudice”.

It is no longer about 'true christianity' anymore. In order to be a 'christian' you have to submit to the jews…no longer acceptable. We must recognize parasitic BEHAVIORS.

Anyone committing Usury (theft). Homosexuals. Pedophiles. Mass and individual murders. Those promoting 'Empire'. Those promoting Envy. Those promoting entropy (destruction). Transgender. Human Traffickers. Enslavers. Rapists. Criminals. Mafia's and Secret Societies. I have a list of parasitic behavior's occurring within society, but it isn't something that anyone in the world couldn't figure out just by thinking about it. People advocating torture or committing torture (so ALL the Semitic religions [male genital mutilation and torture of infant males] and parasitic semitic people have to go as they are a bastion of torture and murder; the 'inquisition', pedophilia etc).

If humanity doesn't learn to recognize parasitic behavior, humanity and human life on Earth is doomed. It is not a question of 'religion' or even 'morals' it is strictly a 'behavioral' question (there are no 'ethical conundrums' or 'religious qualifiers' involved; it is strictly a question of 'beneficial behavior' and 'destructive behavior').

Humanity wants to continue without parasitic predators or they want to die out in a mass extinction.

It can't be the first time an intelligence has chosen extinction over Life in this universe…it won't be the last. People either begin to understand what predatory parasitic behavior and deal with it or they go extinct.

It would be best if we could separate these types of immoral people out of our nation and they could go starve to death in their own nations for lack of a 'host' (Indo-European people which the entire world benefits and uses in a predatory manner).

Parasitism is a death sentence for every society, but when societies are linked in a global economy, it becomes a death sentence for the entire planet.

People will either come to understand that they support parasitism OR the continuance of Life on this planet…the two things can't coexist, they are mutually exclusive. Judgments MUST be made about society and behaviors, or extinction is near, at the door, humanity and all that we know of intelligent life will be extinguished.

It really isn't complicated nor does it need to be complicated…some values bring prosperity, health and well being to a community and some bring poverty, destruction, terror, murder and death. This is a perfect example of a way of being and thinking that is parasitic and deadly to people, community, prosperity and the future health and wellbeing of the 'host' society.

You don't know for sure and conjecture doesn't dispute evidence.

This is extremely inaccurate and dishonest. Pope Leo X got the ball rolling in the early 1500s and Pope Benedict XIV in the mid 1700s expanded the jewish financial influence given by Pope Leo. Saying that catholic influence was bad for jews is a complete inverse of the truth. That's why you have catholic anons playing favorites with popes because they can't deny some popes like those were bad in every way.

This is yet again a complete inverse of the truth. The NSDAP was directly involved in the decline of christianity so much so that they made a complete psyop called Positive Christianity to ensure its downfall. Then there is Kirchenkampf which details the timeline of events where german christians actively resisted national socialism, called for assassinating hitler, and worked to undermine germany during the war.

>The end for Christianity came with (((allied))) occupation by the (((USA))) and the (((Soviet-Union))) now we are back to Russia*
This is an extension of the last inverse of the truth you're relying on.

Do you see any of Soros' organizations gaining a foothold in Russia?

If you quoted my full sentence instead of breaking it up and quoting the last part first, I basically said that. Putin is basically doing the same thing Hitler did which is own the christians so they don't betray you, which German christians tried to do multiple times.

That's a case in point example of how you have to handle christians in countries moving away from jewish influence.

Not what I said.

Not what I said.

Prove it.

And it still doesn't prove what he's saying. You do understand that basing your argument on the authorship of a statement is a logical fallacy, yes? You do understand that his connections were never in question, yes? You do understand that I was asking you to provide more than "This Jew said so", yes? Prove Christianity is a tool of the Jew.

Authorship is not evidence for claims.

No, I said that I was evaluating their claims regardless of their authorship. My point is and was that people who claim Jews can never be trusted and then turn around and use the word of a Jew as evidence for things is funny. I never claimed to automatically assume everything said by Jews is lying. Do you understand how arguments work? Hypotheticals? Words?

And yet did not post anything. Your word is not evidence.

When there is evidence to the contrary no, it isn't enough evidence. Again, do you understand how arguments work? Moreover, do you understand a probable conclusion vs. a certain one?

How about you post some then?

No, it illustrates how one Jew truly feels about Christianity. I could easily pull up numerous kikes kvetching about evil Christians, mainly because anti-Christianity as an intellectual movement is teeming with leftists and Jews.

Prove it.

I have yet to see any evidence at all. I have seen no arguments taking premises and logically proving Christianity is bad. All I have seen is invective against Christianity. Perhaps you could link to some of this evidence? These arguments?

Being dishonest discredits your position. That is fact.

Kike logic. Publishing books on something is not evidence, no matter how many books you publish and especially when there is evidence to the contrary.

I mocked posters not for their anti-Christianity but for their intellectual incompetence and Jew-tier standards of evidence. I dare you to find proof otherwise. Go ahead, cite any of my posts. I cannot critique what doesn't exist.

This is unproductive; my word against yours. Instead I submit that this thread is ample evidence enough of the usual Christianity debate on Holla Forums and that it should suffice to prove anti-Christians can post nothing but misconceptions and vitriol.

Again, no matter how much you pretend "this Jew said X" is not evidence. It's especially laughable considering all he did was wax poetic too. "muh innocent pagans, muh Jewish success, lmao laughing at you goyim."

You clearly don't understand what "damning" means.

Evidently? So there's evidence? Where is it? Link it. Because all I saw was one Jew waxing poetic about paganism.

So post the foundation. Post the evidence. What's stopping you?

You have proven what one (1) Jew feels about Christianity, and even then not totally considering there is a reasonable possibility he is flat out lying. Moreover, how Jews feel about any particular thing is not evidence about the thing itself. Jews love breathing. Do you hate breathing?

What is there to examine? He said Christianity was a tool of the Jew. That's it. He didn't say "Oh, by the way, here's a logical argument about why" or "Oh, have some sources you can go investigate."

Prove that a single Jew talking about Christianity isn't evidence for Christianity being a tool of the Jew? It self-evidently isn't evidence to anyone who's taken a course in basic logic. How can you not understand this?

Link it, buddy.

I'm content with anyone with a >100 IQ watching anti-Christians sperg out like Jews and refuse to post evidence I have repeatedly asked for all while calling me a kike. You guys are hanging yourselves here so no need to pretend I'm trying to do anything.

Post them.

This is not evidence for a man who lived two thousand years beforehand.

This is an unjustified conflation of ancient Hebrews, Israelites, Judeans, and modern Jews.


Prove Christianity is "Jewish influence." Magical thinking since you're talking about an abstract, inanimate thing.

You can dispute the actual guidelines and argue about whether they're good or bad instead of pretending Jesus is still around telling people what to do.

RIDF pls


What do you mean by this?

I think you mean "all nonwhites." We need to strive towards a white world. History has proven that mere expulsion is not enough.

At the end of the day, this is getting nowhere. I ask you only this simple question: would you not be more convincing if you actually provided firm, irrefutable evidence against Christianity? Would you not be more convincing if you constructed an argument logically proving that Christianity is detrimental?

Why do you rely on such "evidence" as the word of a single Jew, a list of grievances without proof from an anti-Christian Greek pagan, and assertions you don't bother to back up? How does "Christianity is a tool of the Jew" prove anything? How does "Christianity is a device to weaken non-Jews"? How does "There is nothing to Christian philosophy"? "Christianity is evidently Jewish"? "Christianity is a globalist religion"? "Christcuckoldry"? "Marxism is just Christianity"? You get my point. None of these statements posted in this very thread have been back up either by an argument, evidence, or both.

This isn't for my benefit; it's for yours. I'm daring you to strengthen your own intellectual side and actually prove Christianity is bad. This does not benefit me; in fact, I am most benefitted by the anti-Christians on this board continuing to act like the kikes they supposedly despise. This thread has been fantastic for proving the behavior of anti-Christians is identical to that of Jews. Surely this is not what you want to do?

At any rate, further engagement with you is not only a waste of my time but also a waste of a thread. Any time I have asked for evidence and arguments you have deflected and squirmed, calling me a kike for not taking the word of a Jew and a self-interested Greek anti-Christian as overwhelming proof and "damning evidence" against Christianity. I am sure you will continue to do so rather than actually reinforcing your positions.

So, in the interests of better discussion on this board, I challenge you to actually prove what you say about Christianity rather than acting like kikes.

Calling "Positive Christianity" a Psyop is itself a "Psyop".
The Greek Orthodox monks on Mt. Athos had a picture honouring Adolf Hitler, who they saw as a saint and a protector of their domain, at the place where they prayed.

inathos.gr/


This.
Orthodox Christians in Syria support Hezbollah and the Assad regime, which remains the ONLY National Socialist government other than the possible exception of North Korea (Juche is tought to classify though).

Putin isn't 'rooting out Jewish influence'. He might be a useful ally, but he's still compromised. Even Dugin is Jewish.
Putin is somewhat enigmatic.

This.
Anyone interested should read "Proof of the Illuminati" by Rev. Seth Payton, which details the memoirs of Abbe Barruel and the way in which Voltaire and D'Alembert attempted to subvert the church in order to pursue their degeneracy.
Of course Adam Weishaupt, the Crypto-Jew, was the eventual founder.

The instincts required TO DO THAT (recognise parasitic behaviours) ARE CHRISTIANITY.
Maybe not exclusively–State Shintoism in Japan; Sikhism or Jainism in India might serve a similar purpose–but a core tenet of Christianity is that if you're not practically living your faith, it doesn't exist!
So, saying that Christianity is equivalent to submitting to the Jews is incorrect.
You should read "Orthodoxy" by G. K. Chesterton, at least the Preface, to understand what he's talking about.

I'm not even Catholic, but I think he makes a lot of good points when he talks about how he took a long time studying and devising a coherent and useful philosophy for himself–only to discover that what he arrived at was not at all 'new', but as a matter of fact 'orthodox' (he was Catholic).

He was also an 'anti-semite', and his cousin A. K. Chesterton was a South African Fascist and comrade of Oswald Mosley.

gutenberg.org/files/16769/16769-h/16769-h.htm

What the bollocks has happened to this thread. Ultimate sperg fighting?

...

F

What does the yidspeak on that card say, and why is the Czar's head on a bird?

It means fuck you

It's a button you pressed in a Call of Duty game during a funeral scene. It was nearly a completely pointless interaction which could've been done entirely in cutscene. For a while around the game's release it was used in a mocking way, but for whatever reason Holla Forums uses it to unironically show respects.

so much dnc in this thread
russia was better off without commie ideologies

A Jew telling me I've been jewed by Christianity! Oy vey how thoughtful of him! He must really have my best interest in mind

The brits did aid russia in the revolution. They fought alongside the white russians in the civil war.

Only a Jew would preach the death of redpilled whites who are working together to deal with the Jews.
"The enemy of my enemy is not my friend, but what is BAD FOR MY ENEMY is GOOD FOR ME." -(If you don't know the author then gas yourself)

The eternal Christian is incompatible with the survival of Europe

Then they shipped out all the stuff they brought in when they realized they'd actually have to fight and in later years stabbed the Cossacks in the back.

...

Jews don't forget because they wrote it all down from their own perspective, added in their own narratives and embellishments and turned it into part of the religion.
The religion requires that every jew memorizes it, studies it and can copy it from memory without error, ensuring that every jew knows the "correct" narrative.
Jews remember exactly what happened when they lost control of the Christian sect
Jews remember exactly what happened when the white races turned on them
Jews had already infiltrated the western world and were already fucking with shit, Christianity was intended to be "a jewish thing". This much was obvious.
Pharisees had already fucked up shit in the Levant to a degree that the wandering jews had already started wandering looking for ways to avoid the kikery, looking for an excuse to jump ship.
The Jesus narrative was that excuse. There was massive conversion in empire because it meant the Pharisees no longer held power over them and the temple no longer mattered. It was indeed "good news", It was indeed liberation.
The kikes, of course, being kikes, were never satisfied with their lot. The "christian martyrs" were all kikes, running around being terrorists, emboldened with the idea that they could do whatever they wanted now. Crying and kvetching whenever one of them was punished for their crimes and going out of their way to BE punished so they too could "be like Jesus".
Then it got dumped on the goyim in a massive effort. Kikes didn't bother subverting the masses, they corrupted the rulers who then imposed it on the masses.
It began as a jewish tool. What sweet revenge, rendering unto Caesar for the destruction of the temple.
Complete with "pagan", that high verbal IQ showing itself even then, to attack normal people. See the timeline? It was entirely possible to have been born and raised in a normal society, hit 30-40 and suddenly it's all being torn down and on fire with your beliefs now punishable by death.

Sound familiar goy?

The problem was that their Christian golem got away from them, it named the jew. In order to spread and destroy traditional society it had to absorb much of it. Enough so that Jesus became European, European values supplanted "Christian" values, and enough of the old culture bled through. Enough that the Jews were still "the other", enough that our own critical thinking still saw the kikes for what they were.

Christianity started out VERY jewish and it was pure kikery for the first few hundred years. It was imposed in a jewish way, it was celebrated in a jewish way. The destruction of Europe was conducted in a jewish way. It was SPREAD in a jewish way, looking to subvert tradition with talmudic arguments. It dumbed down the population and reduced them in a way that took over a thousand years to recover from. From an era of roman soldiers leaving graffiti on buildings to illiteracy for all but the noble class. Latin splintering into many languages, all corruptions of the mother tongue. The Kikes were unable to build their tower of Babel without God punishing them, they'll be damned if the goyim dare to organize without them.

Christianity is a weakening force for us. We should be highly critical of it and realize that the core values of it that we hold dear only exist because they already existed in the culture it destroyed. The problem however, is the Jew. What did pagan culture do to insulate itself from the jew? Nothing.

amen

I concur.

It's like they don't understand that religion is the biggest unifying force there is.

any anons know any good biography or historical books about Tsar Nicholas II that is not riddled with jewish lies

Yeah, a century after Russia's slaughter was started. That makes a big fucking difference.


Its dead, only the jewish mafia remains with Putin as the head figure for it.

The Last Days of the Romanovs by Robert Wilton isn't strictly about Nicholas II but covers many things, its on Ostara Publications.

rassias.gr/9011.html
You can have the source, that is far better.

thanks and any more?

Germans had a warrior tradition of duels for honor. Within their own culture they were very honorable, and many of the tactics you described would be looked down upon if done to other Germans. In a culture where reputation was the only way to get supporters, the dishonorable man would lose supporters and thus lose the war. Naturally, this doesn't apply to foreign cultures like the Romans, and also naturally, most other cultures follow the same rules (honor for my people, no honor for aliens). It is a sign of a dying culture if they either drop all honor amongst their in-group (like the total war tactics of Napoleon, WW1 & WW2), or accord entirely too much honor upon the outgroup (like the current cuckoldry of the west in favor of third-worlders).

suuuuuuuuure

Ad hominem is not an argument. You fucking nigger.

This is how you would argue your side if you were intellectually capable of it.

Filtered.

F

...

t. le 56% American

>(((evil-british-spies)))
THE ETERNAL ANGLO STRIKES AGAIN!

This.

Samefag detected.

You sure aren't…

I don't think liberal arts courses platitude spouters deserve anything more than that.

How hypocritical
there are statues to the jew Lenin

Yeah. So much worse than abandoning global domination for the shake of secular egalitarianism.

Thats the first valid argument you (((anti-Christians))) made in this thread.

Spreading Christianity to shitskins is as anti-White as selling televisions to them. which I admit depending on the conditions can be pretty anti-White

Where can I find these quotes in formats that are not rejected by normiecattle?

F

F

What was it called and how'd it operate?

Why would the Jewish owner and the Muslim mod of Holla Forums put a swastika in the page?

Why do White Nationalists want to kill White people who wish to meet up without them?
8ch.net/polmeta/res/28806.html

Why would Holla Forums ban a White meet up?

Why are Whites the only ethnic group that do not meet up and network?

Jewish networking
archive.is/cdyCI

Black networking
archive.is/H6Q6e

Hispanic Networking
archive.is/SeJ8O

Asian Networking
archive.is/GTWOO

Indian Networking
archive.is/FfPFp

Muslim Networking
archive.is/rPIj1

vs.

White Networking
archive.is/LEhxc


STOP-POL-CENSORSHIP
Remove the Holla Forums mod
Censorship on/pol/ is worse than any of the social media sites.
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL
FISH BOL

There is a war against Whites being currently waged. It's time to start fighting back.

White Nationalism is the cause of "White Genocide"

“The Times’ accounts of what took place at each of those places contains the greatest exaggerations, and the account of what took place at some of those places is absolutely untrue.” British Consul-General Stanley on the Russian ‘pogroms,’ January 1882.

"During a British parliamentary consultation on the ‘pogroms’ in 1905, a Rabbi Michelson claimed that “the atrocities had been so fiendish that they could find no parallel even in the most barbarous annals of the most barbarous peoples.” The New York Times reported that during the 1903 Kishinev pogrom: “Babies were literally torn to pieces by the frenzied and bloodthirsty mob.”[15] A common theme in most contemporary atrocity stories was the brutal rape of Jewish women, with most reports including mention of breasts being hacked off and mothers were raped alongside their daughters."

Klier pointed out that the pogrom hoax gained momentum in the West mainly because the then-influential British Daily Telegraph was at that time Jewish-owned, and was particularly “severe” in its reports on Russian treatment of Jews prior to 1881. According to Klier, one of its specialities was the spreading of “sensationalized accounts of mass rape.”[17] Other influential reporting came from a “Special Correspondent” for the Jewish World. Klier remarked that the alleged itinerary of this ‘journalist’ around Russia “raises intriguing problems for the historian.”[18] While his itinerary of travel is described as “plausible,” most of his accounts are “flatly contradicted by the archival record.” His claim that twenty rioters were killed during a pogrom in Kishinev in 1881 was proven to be a fabrication by records which show that in that city, at that time, “there were no significant pogroms and no fatalities.”

"The most notable aspect of the independent inquiry was the outright denial of mass rape. In January 1882, Consul-General Stanley objected to all of the details contained within reports published by the media, mentioning in particular the unfounded “accounts of the violation of women.” He further stated that his own investigations revealed that there had been no incidences of rape during the Berezovka pogrom, that violence was rare, and that much of the disturbance was restricted to property damage.

Vice-Consul Law, another independent investigator, reported that he had visited Kiev and Odessa, and could only conclude that “I should be disinclined to believe in any stories of women having been outraged in those towns.” Another investigator, Colonel Francis Maude, visited Warsaw and said that he could “not attach any importance” to atrocity reports emanating from that city. When these reports were made public, states Klier, they represented “a serious setback for the protest activities” of Jewish organizations.” The Times of London was one of the foremost propaganda merchants during this period, a fact that is hardly surprising given that it was populated by influential Jewish journalists like Lucien Wolf, the anti-Russian foreign affairs ‘expert’ operating behind the scenes of several major newspapers. The Times was forced to backtrack on many of its claims, but responded spitefully by stating that the indignation of the country was still justified even if the atrocities were “the creations of popular fancy” — a retort that is more than a little reminiscent of the ADL’s response to the exposure of the recent bomb threat hoax."

"Enraged by Judenscherz circulating in Britain and America, Stanley “went right to the top,” interviewing state rabbis and asking for evidence and touring pogrom sites. In Odessa, where a wealth of atrocity stories had originated, he was able to confirm “one death, but no looting of synagogues or victims set alight.” There was no evidence that a single rape had taken place."

Not only were the "pogroms" 99% bullshit, whatever did happen was deserved a thousand fold more. The Jews acted as "arendators," rent-collectors, for the Polish szlachta in Ukraine, and absolutely bled the people dry with bullshit "debts" accumulated by them. Jews had a massive stake in the tavern business, and constant complaints emerged about peasants being drugged, waking up to learn that they had accumulated a massive bill. Jews were heavily involved in Narodnaya Valya, "the People's Will," an anarchic revolutionary organization which attempted and perpetrated several murders of high Tsarist officials (including Lenin's older brother).

Late 19th/early 20th century Russia is hardly the only time Jews have exaggerated like crazy about their "victimization," all the while holding holidays for every massacre they perpetrated. What a sickening bunch of vermin, those people.

All this bullshit is why the Zionist Jewess Emma Lazarus wrote her shitty "New Colossus" poem, by the way. The "huddled masses" she was referring to were in response to these same "pogrom atrocity" stories which portrayed the Jews as poverty-stricken and powerless victims, while many of these pogrom investigations found a massive amount of proto-JDL style violence being perpetrated by Litvaks against Lithuanians and Latvians. Odessa was a vile den of Jewish gangsterism, these people were able to extract one concession after another from the Tsar after Alexander II freed the serfs.

Jacob Schiff of the Jewish firm Kuhn, Loeb, & Co., in response to the Kishinev "pogrom," funded Japan to the tune of 250 million in order to beat Russia and severely weaken the government, all while Trotsky and other Jews set up Soviet councils in St. Petersburg and elsewhere in 1905.

In the film "Battleship Potemkin" by the Jew Sergei Eisenstein, a scene occurs on the Odessa Docks whereby a man shouts "Kill the Jews!" to a mob of rebels, but is instead beaten by the mob, which is the Jews' way of saying that all the "anti-semitism" of the period was a trick by pro-Tsarist forces to deflect blame from Tsarist mismanagement of the country.

It really is amazing to see what Herzl and the Zionists, Martov and the Mensheviks, Schiff and the bankers, and etc. a million other Jews, were doing during that period. Those people are nothing if not busy little bees in their nation-wrecking, coming from every angle possible but all with the same goals in mind.

Do you even know what an ad hominem is? You clearly don't since you simultaneously accuse me of not having arguments; so which is it? Am I presenting fallacious arguments based on the character of my opponent or am I not presenting arguments at all? You can't have both.

At any rate, no, those aren't arguments. All my posts have been pointing out the flaws in the supposed "arguments" of anti-Christians in this thread, an activity that does not require arguments from me. Moreover, I have no interest on definitively proving wrong points that are already known to be wrong around these parts anymore than I have an interest in debunking the claims of flat-Earthers. Anti-Christians can prove their retarded dark ages and pagan holocaust memes are real like they've been trying to for the past two centuries.

Why do all the anti-Christians in this thread ignore someone pointing out the holes and flaws in their "arguments"? Really makes you think.

TL;DR: Actually prove your fucking points, mongoloid. "Oy vey, another ad-hom!"

Oh, and, by the way, suggesting an anti-Christian actually read Christian philosophy before claiming it to have no substance is not equivalent to asking him to actually provide evidence for claims of pagan death camps in a book from an anti-Christian. Thanks for proving you have a sub-120 IQ.

How do you point out the flaw in an argument while not "definitely" proving wrong (certain) points? That sounds contradictory, bro.

The Dark Ages is a label that's often misused but is typically characterized by two things:
1. The obscure and lack of information following the fall of the roman empire, making the dark ages a brief but frighteningly scary period because of scarce records - like if someone was actively trying to remove them.
2. The lack of development that shows Europe experienced an impeding force following the fall of the roman empire and the rise of christianity.
It's indisputable that both of these characterize a period of The Middle Ages, a term used by enlightenment thinkers, so understanding its significance is a worthy exploration in history. That said, I think it would be pretty damning if it could be definitively proven that christianity was the main cause of The Dark Ages in both respects. As someone on Holla Forums that's interested in the truth no matter what it is, you should be open to that possibility and its implications and less hostile to people entertaining that thought. All that remaining hostile to them does is embolden them to search under that parameter; i.e. relation between christianity and "the dark ages."

This just sounds silly. You're implying neo-pagans have been trying to make that a thing for the last two centuries? Since NSDAP Germany was the last great attempt to revive paganism, at least they would have been the ones trying to make that a "pagan holocaust" a thing.

But that's what you and a few other christian posters have been doing in this thread. You would only have been in the right if you could definitively prove your critics' arguments wrong. All it takes is someone to keep track of the exchanges to see that christian posters are literally doing what you're accusing the opposition of doing. It's one thing to paint your opposition as doing something, but it's another to literally be doing what you're accusing them of doing and thinking no one will call you out on it. I think it goes without saying that you must have been monitoring it for some time just in case someone bumped it to come back and defend your posts on a new IP. More people are catching onto this, dude. If your lot had noble intentions, you wouldn't resort to this.

So… you're not an Holla Forums user?
Congrats, you outed yourself as a shill.

However, in reality
300,000 Russian Priests Were Given a Choice - They All Chose Death
russia-insider.com/en/300000-russian-priests-were-given-choice-they-all-chose-death/ri22038

Jews accuse others of what they've done.

Didn't mean to sage.

This. Hitler was too kind to them. Now we know that to mercy must be given.

F

Like pottery.

Why the fuck was a nearly month old thread fucking bumped?


Oh that fucking explains it, the d&c Pagan vs Christian LARP shit is back. Fucking joy, I am so glad that you had to push back another thread just so you could have your autistic screeching back.>>11108099

Have an example, since apparently your mind is limited:
An "argument" fraught with baseless assertions (really, most of it is nothing but assertions) and logical fallacies proves nothing, ergo the rightness or wrongness of the conclusion is irrelevant because it too ends up being an unsupported assertion.

And this is why people call you historical illiterates. No such thing happened.

That lasted a century or two? That's not a dark age. If you want a real dark age look for the Greek Dark Ages that occurred more than a thousand years beforehand.

I am interested in the truth, but the implications of a fiction peddled by "Enlightenment" know-nothings interest me as much as the implications of the Holocaust do. What implications can there be from a retardation of development that never happened?

Search away, considering that the Dark Ages never existed. Still, searching for anything related to the "Dark Ages" is only going to bring up baseless polemic, same way searching for anything related to the Holocaust does.

No, I'm implying anti-Christians have been making up fictions about Christianity for two centuries (or more). Paganism and anti-Christianity are not synonymous.

Literal pagan death camps were claimed in this thread. Here >>11087594 They have yet to actually be proved to exist.

How can someone point out flaws in arguments I have not presented? Again, you can't have it both ways. Either I am not presenting arguments or I am ignoring flaws pointed out in my arguments.

Again, what arguments? How is "Christianity is a tool of the Jew" an argument?

No need to lie about this. Anyone can read the thread, after all.

Lurking a thread is suspicious behavior now? Are you retarded?

Given that no anti-Christian has yet responded to any challenges I have posed (such as proving any of their claims) I am confident in anyone reading the thread being able to use their brains and figure out who is interested in truth. Moreover, I can't control what IP my ISP gives me nor the occasional changing of that IP. And I wouldn't go throwing stones in glass houses, buddy, to use a cliché.


I'm not against pagans. I'm against anti-Christians who have the intellectual honesty of a Jewish Holocaust scholar.

I've realized I'm wasting my time again, addressing the same points over and over, so instead I'll give you this:

writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/argument/


To give you a head start, you might structure yours like this:

Tips:
>Don't use logical fallacies (a beginner's list is here: yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ )

What not to do:

These are all unsupported assertions. They do not prove anything because they have no evidence. Some are even magical thinking and thereby doubly prove nothing because they are also illogical (on top of having no evidence).

I await the definitive wall of text proving that Christianity is bad.