Why is anarcho-fascism never mentioned in this board?

Why is anarcho-fascism never mentioned in this board?
I've seen members of CasaPound often embracing the concept behind it.

Other urls found in this thread:

amerika.org/tag/anarcho-fascism/
hooktube.com/watch?v=gWu-k25eCd4
duckduckgo.com/?q=anarcho fascism&t=brave&ia=web
panarchy.org/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Shit thread. Can you at least explain what Anarcho Fascism is?

I don't know a definition of fascism which is compatible with anarchy without being hopelessly vague.

back to 4cuck

You're fucking retarded, order is necessary to have a prosperous society.

Surprise. Anarcho-Fascist here. :)

It isn't mentioned here much for a number of reasons, one of which it being a mainly fringe idea. It is legitamate though, thing is, depends on your definition of it. But as first post said, perhaps a proper introduction would have made a better starting point of discussion.

To me, I think there's a few versions.

Having seperate states, one Fascist and the other Anarchist, although the anarcho one should probably be smaller, but basically just functions as a place to send people who are banned from the state of order. Don't like order? Well then we'll get to show you want disorder looks like. As a lot of people know, order becomes much more popular during times of chaos. Open people up to a little chaos and they'll become a little more appreciative to having some order.

Another is employing anarchic tactics in order to bring about a fascist state.

Another is, sort of a anarcho-traditionalist society where say, people live in a traditionalist society under common decency, maybe there are some rules, but some unwritten. And if you're an asshole, you can end up being bannished for something that isn't on the books. (Say being a non-desirable of some sort).

Another version I think would be analogous to The Purge movies. It's basically a corporatist state that utilizes occasional anarchism.

Because it's a fucking oxymoron perhaps?

So basically a private property society, in which each man can create his own "state" if you will, as proposed by (among others) Hoppe?


pick one

Blow your brains out.

You show me anarcho-fascism, and I'll show you a juden frei world.

You dont belong here, this is a National Socialist board and anarcho fascism, which is an oxymoron, has nothing to offer whites. This is a shitpost cancer thread with a lefty/pol/ subversive subject and I seriously hope you dont get let off like all those IE spencer faggots who have been shilling blatantly lately.

Any ideology containing "anarcho" is a load of half-baked bullshit that is only upheld by retards.

I'm guessing what that means is accelerationism to archieve fascism. Not permanent anarchy.

...

Kek.

I just want everybody to die except for me. What is that system called?

Good goy.

The only system we need is 40k imperium system but with National Socialism (and hence race) as the foundation and creed.

(((anarcho)))

That's why. 'anarchy' anything is a (((commie))) kike ideology and belongs on >>>/plebbit/

Misanthrocracy.

I am watching The purge: anarchy now.

The name alone is a contradiction. Fascism relies on strong structures and an ordered society, anarchism is the exact opposite.

Because you're a kike.

Well, OP?

Anarchism isn't disorder. Anarchism is orderly the way a churchyard is orderly. There is no master but god in the churchyard, and god gives no orders to his servants, yet people still discipline themselves in honor of what's right.


See, that's just a witchpit. That's the chans. You're saying "fascism would be great if it had chans!" Congratulations, that's… almost coherent here. Almost. You're already an order-rejecter clustered into the city of disorder and you can't even tell.

Samefag + apology
This is basically the only bit of your post I replied to. Other details indicate you're more aware than I cast you. I basically didn't touch any of the other variants in my comment.

Because it's just as gay as you are

Maybe it would be brought up more if it was gayer than OP.

There's your answer.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Have fun sucking a cop's dick daily as you go to massa for orders. Where do you find such quality direction, anyways? Who has the time to make your life not anarchic for you?

You should try peacefully self-directing in a society vastly more efficient for its disuse of slavery. That's why anarchism is orderly. People are orderly. People have their interests, and they pursue them.

If you show me a functional anarcho-fascist society, I might take it serious

Yes, Jhamal may have the interests to rob and rape two and a half neighborhoods a day and Mr Shlomo will want to enslave everyone with his Ponzi schemes and debt-based money

What happens if order beaks out in the Anarchist state? Will the Fascist state step into to impose Anarchy?

No, I'm actually not an order rejector neccesarily, I just enjoy anarcho-fascism as much as I enjoy anarcho-capitalism, merely for the novelty of it as it exists as a conception of abstract political theory.

Personally, I would prefer a natsoc social-corporatist sort of international federalism / neo-reaction. I would only employee these ideas into practice by setting aside land, say about the size of Texas, just for the mere experiment of doing so, and partly because I think it would be entertaining. Pic related.

amerika.org/tag/anarcho-fascism/
hooktube.com/watch?v=gWu-k25eCd4
duckduckgo.com/?q=anarcho fascism&t=brave&ia=web


Add panarchy and possibly some elements of transhumanism and you'll be on the right track. I'll leave that for the thread to discuss as I think this really can be an interesting discussion.

panarchy.org/

^ very interesting site, reminds me of a lot of what Trump was saying in his UN speech, if you note how much he was emphasizing a return to respecting the idea of "Self-Determination", which fits nicely within the ideas of pan-nationalism, which legitimatizes creating ethno-states.

because people here have actually read some books

True anarcho-fascism has never been tried.

yeah, I'll try that one right after I get around to pantheism and pansexualism.

isn't anarchy and fascism directly opposing ideals?

translation: does not, cannot and will not ever exist.

"What happens if order beaks out in the Anarchist state? Will the Fascist state step into to impose Anarchy?"

Glad you asked, I've thought about this quite a bit too. I imagine they would step in as needed if there's a reason to do it. One would probably say "Oh, but that's contradictory!" and it is, if you're an ideologue. I like to think of Dugin's idea of the Fourth Political Theory as a rejection of modernity, especially if part of that means strict adherence to an ideology. I think taking an adaptive / organic approach, much like an organism adapts to it's environment would be a type of state that would last longer.

...

Where do you think you are lad?

Eat shit and die. We’re not children.

Whole board is flooded with cuckchan trash, TRS, IE SpencerIDF etc… mods apparently are in a coma.

I think you are onto something big here. I suggest you take a couple of weeks off and compose "The Anarcho-Fascist Manifesto." Post your results.

You should try thinking outside the box.

it's not contradictory it is just anarchism with no proudhonism and nationalism with no nations due to the anarchism part

Thank you, I already am working on something similar to that, although I would only consider Anarcho-Fascism as more of a sub-component.

nigga you don't even have a box to get out of.


wtf did I just read.

Hes done this in 2 threads now, the cancer is spreading would you fucking gas these cunts already.

All flavors/forms of Anarchism are for Marxist faggots. They may or may not know it yet though.

Anarchism is impossible. The moment you start setting rules and enforcing them you have destroyed anarchy.

"Everyone is anarchic; this is precisely what is normal about us. Of course, one is hemmed in from the first day by father and mother, by state and society. Those are prunings, tappings of the primordial strength, and nobody escapes them. One has to resign oneself. But the anarchic remains, at the very bottom, as a mystery, usually unknown even to its bearer. It can erupt from him as lava, can destroy him, liberate him. Distinctions must be made here: love is anarchic, marriage is not. The warrior is anarchic, the soldier is not. Manslaughter is anarchic, murder is not. Christ is anarchic, Saint Paul is not. Since, of course, the anarchic is normal, it is also present in Saint Paul, and sometimes it erupts mightily from him. Those are not antitheses but degrees. The history of the world is moved by anarchy. In sum: the free human being is anarchic, the anarchist is not.”

^^

The amount of spergs and nu/pol/-redditspacing-fags is outrageous.
>>11052770
I haven't because I knew that if I tried to bring docs and explanations myself, I would have been called a shill, therefore preferred not to.
But apparently the mongrels here need to be spoon-fed.


You miss the point of anarcho-fascism.
Anarcho in this case indicates the rebellious tendency towards current forms of authorities (this group includes cops and politicians), for the simple reason that they're globally corrupted.
The status of revolution should cease once order has been made (call it hygiene if you want), contrary to anarchists who believe it should be something continuous.
There is also the belief that races can co-exist (as in fact happens in nature), but everyone has it's given place. This means: Europe for Europeans, Alaska for Eskimos, and so on.
The rest is identical to the classic fascism.

Ernst Junger. Nice job not listing who said it. When I googled the quote, I ended up on r/anarchism, and the next post was about how you all share the desire to abolish the fucking state. Heres some history about the man you just quoted, you fucking slimy race traitor weasel.


WHERE
THE
FUCK
ARE
THE
MODS

Oh, there is also an anti-semitic and anti-capitalist element to it, but I didn't entirely grasped on it.

Yes, strictly speaking they are, so treat it as an exercise rather than as a reality. What is the least contradictory state between these ideas?

Anarcho-fags are stupid for one reason.

They forget that when we were created we were in a state of pure anarchy. We very quickly formed tribes alliances and governments for a reason.

A government is just a really big protection gang racket. Saying we should get rid of government is the same thing as saying we should get rid of nukes.

"You first." We all say as we rub our hands like jews.

Viewing it spatially / federally.

As in, Southern California is now the designated free-for-all Battle Royale zone as a matter of difference in state policy, while the rest of the nation is normal. Build a wall around it. Ends up being cheaper than the current prison system.

Nice wikijew summary, did you know he kept correspondence with Heiggeder and Schmitt even after the war? Even refused denazification when allies took over. As if redditkikes could actually appreciate the work in its totality.

From the same book:


This little nugget was inspired by his conversations with Schmitt on Hobbes:

Does this sound like a kike-lover to you?

You mean dry water?
You mean an australia for your british empire?

If you have to link to another source to give even a base definition of an ideology when asked, you shouldn't try to promote said ideology. Absolutely disengenuous.

Check what I wrote, you illiterate faggot.

This lacks some of the more "fringe" flags, such as Anarcho-Transhumanism

bunch of communist.

Exactly. And the ones that our /ourguys/ (e.g. Anarcho-Capitalist, Anarcho-Facist) are buying into lies.

Read KAS rebuttle of Liberterianism. The intenret is Anarcho-Capitalist but we live in the meat world, shummer.


Was it not Marx that first defined Anarchy? Was it not him that first defined Communism? Was it furthermore not him that defined Capitalism, putting people into early D&C concepts that hitherto were not even really in existance?

just rebranding themselves like UBI.

Quit purity-spiraling. Anarcho Capitalism is the purest form of fascism, you LARPer.

Lets change the subject, how do you guys feel about National Syndicalism?

Personally, I'm starting to believe that capitalist problems can be solved without going full socialist. Mussolini was a National Syndicalist. Personally, I don't believe I can really justify Hitlers treatment of Russians during the Lebensraum or how he thought of them in Mein Kampf. I'm fairly sympathetic towards Russians after reading The Gulag Archipelago and think that they have a right towards their home land without German Imperialism. Mussolini afaik didn't have such treatments, even of Ethiopians, and unified a very ethnically (in terms of Italians) diverse country. Not to say I approve of (((diversity))), I'm talking about among the same country, like Welsh and British.

Anarcho Capitalism isn't even Anarchism. Corporations need a large state to protect them from pissed off customers with pitchforks and torches. Target would've been burned to the ground in a free market.

Did you not read what i've written? It's "fascism with a penal colony tangentially attached to main government".


Aren't the red and white stripes/flags contradictory? Or, fuck, red and orange.
Funny, since the red typically stands for violent revolution. This is why you will never truly unite as one without a single rallying point, a greater "enemy" to fight against if you will.

...

The true basis of anarchy is understanding that "Power corrupts". This results in being opposed to any large power structures and arguing for decentralization, none of this commie bullshit.

To add to this, the concentration of power is inherently evil for one simple reason - it allows an imperfect being to make decisions that affect many others. Whether those decisions are evil because of selfishness or incompetence doesn't really matter

Gas. This is a National Socialist board, advocate your ridiculous bullshit on cuckchan with the niggers and kikes etc.

Its simple really. If youre opposed to a state, youre opposed to fascism, which makes you antifa, which makes you enemy #1 of the white race.

Again, read what I wrote, you illiterate mongrel.

Oh, hey lefty/pol/. Your time is coming. No one gives a fuck what you wrote, muh penal colony. Meanwhile:


Gas for you and him. This is a National Socialist board, and go post about anarchy on Reddit.