Paul Nehlen, Candidate for Speaker of the House, Proposes a Bill to End Censorship on Social Media

twitter.com/pnehlen/status/941370447278440448

>For purposes of this legislation, "censorship" includes:

Other urls found in this thread:

mobile.twitter.com/pnehlen/status/940943150331424768
twitter.com/pnehlen/status/942908297287471105
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_parentheses
archive.is/d6nFj
twitter.com/pnehlen/status/942904935770976256
twitter.com/pnehlen/status/943325218642300928
archive.is/LibzJ)
forward.com/fast-forward/390430/making-bid-for-congress-paul-nehlen-flirts-with-anti-semitic-alt-right/
archive.is/pQQiM
archive.is/8Rdfi
archive.org/details/DefensiveRacismAnUnapologeticExaminationOfRacialDifferences2005EdgarJ.Steele
twitter.com/pnehlen/status/944380902179852289
archive.is/cWYh8
archive.is/FnNb7
archive.is/tYCrc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

This is exactly what is needed no more skirting the first amendment under the guise of being a "private" company, if you provide a mass communication platform/api that operates domestically or through our pipes you cannot fucking censor speech.

No he isn't. Unseating Paul Ryan wouldn't make Nehlen the Speaker of the House.

Sage because you're a faggot who's either being deliberately deceitful or is just an idiot.

Then I'm an idiot and I'll gas myself later. That said, this suggested bill is still the real deal, and he should be given a chance.

Speaker of the House is an appointed position, OP. Good on Paul though.

True, but Nehlen has also expressed interest in the past in running against Ryan for Speaker of the House. Speaker of the House doesn't technically have to be a member of Congress. That being said, I haven't seen anything proving that Ryan will actually vacate the position prior to the 2018 mid-terms or that Nehlen is actually seriously pursuing the position.

Nobody who goes on White Nationalists podcasts, not even the fake ones run Peinovich and his gaggle of sexual deviants, will ever be elected in today's judaic system.

Meh. Stranger things have happened.

I'm from Paul Ryan's district, and I am going to do absolutely everything I possibly can do get that kike out of office. Volunteering for the Nehlen campaign is the best way to do that at this point.

There's 0 chance of him getting elected. The campaign's a shekel grab, like Ron Paul's.

This is possibly the most important thread this month. It's damn near a silver bullet, because soft-censorship has been our greatest hobble in spreading ideas, not the MSM.

If we can push an operation to get this bill to pass, I think it's only a matter of time until we come out on top.

Good thread, so it'll probably be taken down

That bill will not get passed. It makes way too much sense for it to get passed.

Mason dubs of truth checked

The social media giants have been getting away with this for far to long, it's time they understand that there are reprocussions for their behavior

Well this is an unlikely scenario but no reason whatsoever to not spread this around and at least get it in the normieverse, they may even latch onto this in response to NN ending thinking it will make their digital safe spaces safer.

Do it, Nehlen is one of the only pro-white political figures out there. We need more like him.

Life is a shekel grab, son but that's beside the point.
Nehlan ran in '16, he lost but he did have a decent turnout considering he went up against boomers favorite baby face, Paul Ryan. Guess what, campaigns costs money, just like everything thing else. You don't want to invest in a risk? No one is going to stop you.

Exactly. The new Hegelian dialectic being rolled out by Big Tech (can't debate the homosexual agenda, can't criticize Religion of Cuck™) has the consent of the congresscritters.

literally /our guy/, meme it

Isn't Ryan not running again? Nehlen did well enough that he should be the front runner without Ryan in the race.

The government shouldn't be telling citizens on how they should run a website.

Don't get complacent.

in addition people should have the rite to ban anyone they want from their own site.

How is he candidate for speaker of the house? user I don't think you know how this works

Paul Ryan is reportedly probably not going to run again (according to his inner circle). Basically he's a two-issue guy and he got half his agenda through with tax reform. He's interested in shrinking or eliminating the welfare state, but that might render him unelectable in his own district (and will fuck the Republican Party nationally), so seriously wanting to pursue it could be why he doesn't want to run again. It's also possible(/probable) that he intends to cuck by bringing DACA to the House floor which could be good news for us if it fails (helps us assemble a list of traitors), but if it passes and gets through the Senate, it's potentially very bad news.

(Checked for Devine intervention from KEK)

It's speculation at this point in time. Politico said he was considering stepping down, another paper said he laughed and said no to the idea.

If such a thing was to pass under any circumstances the current world order would collapse fast

NEHLEN MUST WIN

bumpity

If there is enough exposure through word-of-mouth and enough public support, then someone will be forced to report on it. If it ever reaches the public sphere of knowledge through mainstream reporting, then its failure to pass will be a real sign for the regular people that something drastically needs to change in Washington. Even if it doesn't pass, this bill is proof that one more person in the political landscape understands that things are fucky with the way liberal tech companies are running their business. When people finally start getting tired enough of the way bullshit is run in Washington, when all of the swamp creatures and traitors drain themselves, die off, or get forcibly removed, then all of this anger building up against ISPs and tech companies and ideological invasion will need to be addressed by the people fresh to the debate.

The more that people in power bring it up, the more that people will see it. The worse things get for the regular people who are slowly tilting more and more conservative, the louder they will get. Eventually, you'll get another massive outpouring of support despite any and all attempts to censor support for it; why do you think Trump's victory was such an upset for the left, when it was entirely obvious that he was likely to win?


Numerous people interviewed have stated that they do not expect Ryan to run again, but there is no official word from his camp as to whether or not he is running again. They don't expect him to be in office by 2020.

Ideally, the marketplace should be self-correcting. Nobody should be telling media organizations how to do their job, but they are consistently failing to do so in a fair and unbiased manner.

Social media has become the Lingua Franca of the modern age. Corporate interest in stifling free expression, even in the face of their legal right to moderate as they see fit, corrupts open communication in a time when trafficking of news and opinion in any other fashion has become insignificant. In the modern day, this type of censorship allows large corporations such as Facebook and Google to lead public conversation in the direction they see fit, rather than allowing public discourse to branch naturally.

As long as the bill is written properly, this is a good thing. The law itself should not be written with any partisan politics, but from the standpoint of ensuring neutrality and the protection of free expression.

And when a site gets big enough to serve as a major source of communication between people, and they start blocking right-wing communication?
Sure, in an ideal society we wouldn't need these laws, but these sites have become primary forms of communication, and perhaps it's time to consider the first amendment applying to them.

Well this would make the internet far more interesting, that's for sure. Maybe we could go back when the internet was at its golden age during the early 2000s or even earlier, that wild west and adventure. It was so beautiful, even if searching for things was a pain but it forced you to explore the internet more. On that note, I would just like to say that normalfags ruined the internet and deserve gas.

I'd sure hate to see rules like these applied to chans.

Also, Paul Ryan isn't running for reelection so looks like Nehlen is going to get his chance.

I wholeheartedly agree, but we also need to be aware that if and when we come out on top, we'll have to justify ourselves against it for crushing Marxists. Always consider the collateral, no matter how excellent the opportunity.

Technically nominated and elected by the House of Representatives. However there is normally only one candidate from each party and the vote is along party lines.

Then stop using that site. You can communicate directly with the people you want to talk to by just sending an email to their machine. Additionally the free speech thing doesn't just apply about politics. What if a bunch of gaymers came to this board and started making threads about video games. Don't you think we should be able to ban those people? If we under the affect of this, then we would be prohibited since we are blocking their "free speech."
No one is forcing you to communicate over these platforms, nor is their a drawback to doing it in alternative methods such as GNU/Social, IRC, or email.

The First Amendment of the Constitution should not require legislation to enforce. This is the job of the executive and judicial branches. Legislating on the subject will just end up with hundreds of exceptions added in committee and shitty pork riders added in to buy votes. SCOTUS needs to act on this.

I am, however, quite pleased that a Republican is going on the record in favor of this idea.

An enforcement mechanism probably does need to be legislated, but yes, judicial precedent is preferable to make these anti-American tech companies respect the First Ammendment

It does when you’re violating the freedom of association clause.

Tentatively, I wish Nehlen a good fight. He will have to control the room, to prevent his enemies from labeling him. Ex White Nationalist (a jewish linguistic machination, a cannibalistic convienience, a form of the very censorship he campaigns against, etc).

However,

This bill is novice. It ignores the transactional nature of accounting. It attempts to rule like the cuck judges do, casting frame-changing rules, always-has-been-rather-this-haha rules, all attempts to pre-preempt the last preemption of the prior rules in the childlike ways. This is not governance. And this ignores that the very language of the bill will, like White and Nationalist and White-Nationalist, be turned against itself in schizophrenic asian cannibalistic madness. To which the arch-kikes will take a shekel or two for assisting, of course.

See the framework of DMCA. The tools for challenge and response transactions were outlined in common-law language. This turned hollyjew's golden egg into an eggface laugh against them, provided that the accused content bearer actually weighted their content.

If you wish to impose fines, it must be done so that the court that has the right to hear it, has all the tools necessary to provide the first-pass attempt on ruling it, and that the court itself is not an adjudicated FCC hearing pseudo-court exempt from reporting, exempt from actual hearing of any.

(1) If Nehlen is "to get the job done," (2) where "others have not gotten the job done," (3) then he must amend the framework of tools so as to redress the unwritten unspoken too-cheap-to-be-individually-numized-to-dollars structure-engine of the common room, (4) both in common room business between platform-provider.v.content-curator, and in common room of business between court-plea-hearing of provider.v.curator, and in common room of business between providers found in violation of the common framework of literally-natural-commons-law.

If Nehlen does not understand, he will be shown to not have enough might. If he has the capability to yet understand this, then he will be permitted to repeat anew, after he demonstrates payment for his lessons.

hmm…

Hmm…

Yeah, it needs to allow for communities that want to keep their culture their own. It's ironic that that's an issue here, given what this is about.

Instead of having the entire internet be your oyster, like it was in the old days, you want to remain here. Is that right?

I wish he was in my district. I would vote for him. It would be an easy choice over Ryan.

So government stooges can do something worthwhile? I find this hard to believe.


Speaking of, what has Ryan ever done?

STOP POL CENSORSHIP
Remove the Holla Forums mod
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL

Did he delete that first tweet?

STOP POL CENSORSHIP
Remove the Holla Forums mod
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
FIX POL
POL POL

A little effort, user. Here’s a direct link.
mobile.twitter.com/pnehlen/status/940943150331424768

No, but a board should be able to ban people who are fagging it up for any reason. In the event that such a site were counted as "social media".

There's little stopping such a bill from being applied to a place such as this, as well as other forums. The internet would become a hellish sea of unyielding shitposting without end and without direction with the only true workaround being paywalls. That sounds fairly terrible. In the end, this probably won't pass and if it did, (((they))) would go all out with the shilling, knowing they can't be banned. It honestly feels one claiming that they can't be bothered to create their own platforms so they will try and have the government step in and deal with the current ones. The problem is that now you're creating yet another example of the government intervening in private business. Not trying to sound like a libertarian but at some point this will backfire.

Not that I use those platforms, but I hope he can pull it off.

WEW
Can you smell the freedom?

Since social media has become a major tool for speech used by practically everyone daily, it only makes sense that the 1st amendment applies to it as well.

nobody good is winning any more elections because dems will just bus thousands of niggers to wherever is needed and get away with it because we live in a fucked up clown world

Cuck.

Now that is being cucked.

WHY AREN'T THE MODS BANNING THIS SAGE SAGE PIECE OF SHIT THAT ALWAYS TROLLS ON THE FIRST COMMENT?

Where was he wrong?

Bump for genuinely based Nehlen

No, kike. Not even reading the rest of your shitpost.

...

I was thinking the same thing.
WERE YOU user?

Quit your cucky black-pilling. They will never go after small sites, and if they did, so what? We will adapt and overcome. We are antifragile. However the false consensus built by tech giants is fragile.

No more blackpilling! Its about time a right-wing politician went on the offensive.

re

This is partially correct, OP's bill is attempting to rule on the fight, instead of on the fighting of the fights. I covered parts of this here , which can be explained by tyler durden fighting all fights to end fights (end, failure) vs tyler durden setting the rules of the fight club (non-antifa-midpoint of the film, where success was actually attained and adopted).

The bill is novice. It will have problems, and it will cause us to have more problems than solutions. To that effect, you are correct, but please don't use the retarded child's term of anti-fragile. Everyone has to fight; the Alt-Kike needs to stop asking to be released from the terms of the club.

I'm sorry but is English not your first language? I'm not following anything you're saying.

This is fucking amazing. Even if it doesn't pass, it's great because it formally denounces the bad practices of the tech giants. Also it shows a Republican legislator actually striking a blow against the enemy instead of cowering in a fetal position. Trump said he would teach them to win, maybe this is it.

Two actual problems I see: "giving notice" of ranking algorithms is meaningless; need something with more teeth there. Any smart lawyer can write some obfuscated drivel that basically means "we do whatever we want." Also, Nehlen didn't address content bubbles - what if Twitter basically creates two bubbles, left and right, and prevents pissing into the other bubble?

But all you blackpillers and cucks need a major attitude adjustment. The left won and won for decades because they eagerly pursued power while the right had a distaste for power. I don't give a fuck if the bill is fair, constitutional, workable, etc. I can tell it's a major grenade thrown into the enemy bunker and that rocks. Also put your libertarian notions aside for now. We are in a total war with an enemy that controls the FBI, mainstream media and universities; this enemy came very close to flooding the US with mud races to permanently seize power. If we lose this war there will be no libertarian stuff anywhere.

When I think of an American, I think of a man like Paul Nehlen. A self made, god fearing, patriot.

Would you mind listing the specific changes that the bill needs?

And why do you object to anti-fragile? Because it's trendy? I think Taleb is onto something with that phrase.

| Please re-read.
| Using legislation as shitposting is funny. Fleeting, but funny.
| Please paraphrase first.

Don't take it personally, but any sufficiently advanced shilling is indistinguishable from . Thus, I ask for proof of cares. Rephrase / repeat my words to me, to prove what you internalized and what you didn't, instead of doing low-energy saturday pseudo-following but not (ex: ).

Speaker is an expensive position. Paul Ryan pays out a possible 200,000 a year for that spot. Congress members all pay to keep their spots. It's a nice little heiarchy.

He's got brass balls. We need to keep him safe. Eyes on Nehlen at all times. They fear this man a lot more than Roy Moore.

In partial answer,

First, terms and definitions: Writing of legal text has in itself elements of address, and elements of term, and elements of common. Ex: A company has an address, which determines its USPS postal address of facility, or address of how it is to receive messages, or address of ownership/name? In the prior sentence to this one, 'address' has both address, term, and common use.

Second, it is the absence of -using- terms and definitions components, which betrays the adolescent understanding of law, that the bill's writer posses. In the legislation, it gets lost in its own museum. Thus, it can be a funny shitpost that just keks up the global media room - always at least a yes-fun-allowed plan. But, it has no mechanisms, offers no mechanisms, views media in static terms (even though static terms are not what got us here), and attempts to do what activist judges prefer: re-declaring and reversioning all law simultaneously. Actions like these ignore time, sequence, process, and accounting thereof - all for the sake of redressing some actual/real/action that wasn't what some commune council likes. This failure leads to more shitflinging, broken businesses, grand amounts of it-never-ends-this-shit that halts commerce - a result, certainly, but a result that is used for destroying businesses and infrastructure (not a bad plan, but let us just be clear on the plan: it will succeed effectively by child-like accident, not by intent, and its effectiveness will be limited).

I've read your post about three times now. Not to be a dick but your stringing-words-together and references to Fight Club are throwing me off, and I don't have good reading comprehension as it is.

You are much more clear in

When are we getting voter ID laws? Every sane country has them, Republicans have the congress but absolutely no push for such a beneficial bill?

Made himself a laughingstock, acted like a complete and utter cuckservative, and made multiple attempts to disavow Trump. In short, he showed his hand.

RE: Fight Club references


Alright, departing for a moment, from OP, to this.

Fight Club is just a film, which demonstrates success at times, and failure at times. Unfortunately, it couldn't mange its success, got lost in failure, and ended the story there. The success of Tyler Durden was not in blowing up his apartment, nor burning his hand, nor fucking whores, nor even kiking-out-for-a-higher-purpose his boss/work. The success was in creating the room; The fighting of 'fight clubs' was the adopted, agreed, meaningful part. The rest of the parts don't matter. Unfortunately, Tyler went from defining how fights are to be fought, to actually trying to steer each and every fight, the former is not the latter. When he did this, he needed to be sure he was right in natural absolution - but he didn't, and he wasns't, and he was, well, a half-kike too. So instead, Tyler places himself first as natural, destroys success, can't recover, and the film simply ends there as all the creditor buildings fall. Now, if it was all for keks, I'll laugh and even cheer, but only to a point.

When Fight Club sought return to natural, from the unnatural and putrid world it was born/started in: How Fight Club started to attain success (mechanism, process, amending the rules of the fight) –vs– Where shit went wrong and killed itself, even though its very complaint was self-killing in the first place (abandonment of mechanism, attempting to fight all fights, supplanting unnatural back after all that work).

/offtopicsage

OK, that makes it clearer, and so what you're saying is this bill doesn't provide the "who, what, and how." For example, it doesn't properly define "shadowbanning" or "normal use of platfrom" and such.

I think I get what you're trying to say, but it should be noted that this is just a short letter outlining what Nehlen intends to do if he wins an election a year from now, most likely to win over voters. I wouldn't think this is how it would actually be manifested into law once it goes to committee, would it?

Sending my love.


That's still racist, man.

>

Why so low? These are companies worth tens/hundreds of billions. Why not make it proportional to if I were to break a law and get fined $25,000?

OP's image shows a press release, not an actual bill. You should not expect the same level of formality and completeness.

Become wealthy, help donors become wealthier, make contacts with donors so that he he will have his choice of meaningless but high paying positions after his time in Congress. Like they all do. To be fair, why should we expect any one person to be able to get anything done in a congress of 435 people?

To anyone who thinks Nehlen is /ourguy/, please see

...

Those are different things. You arent banning them on politics but on not respecting the topic of discussion. Also 8ch is never gonna be big enough to be included in this

Because by now these companies have probably banned hundreds of thousands if not million of people for expressing wrongthink. Think if the fine applied to each and every one of these. They would quickly go bankrpt if they continue their current practices.

Typical kike tactic right there.

...

I would hope not, but have seen far worse go far further. Akin to "I was only acting retarded, to make fun of X" ending up being just retarded. If campaign or advertising, presenting in the format of a bill is ill-advised.

Very close to being correct. A business engages in specific contract. The general contract, for the common room, still exists. The bill must seek to amend law to the ends of (1) explicitly stating commons, explicitly stating procedures of (2) normal sub-small-claims court resolution, then (3) claims court resolution, then (4) district court resolution, then if need be furthers. Only after doing so, should it (5) propose amendments to the commons of each room: specifically, violations of commons, their procedures to note (invoice work, time, action) to account (receipt of invoice with time stamp, signature, and to/from/ownership parties) to report (plea and court/fine action). In the aims of commons "this contract part is always here, let's state it" and commons resolution "this is now what we do to violators," the bill should (6) arrange its text to provide mechanism definitions and (7) account-works to gather, accrue, and settle, thereby facilitating work obtained and future remaining work of contest/disagreement -outside- commons. This is how to literally redress: Platform providers are violating the common room, seeking to advance their own under the guise of platform (amending silently the rules, when ever they want, to whom every they selectively want, in retroactive and incomplete and inconsistent fashion, all of which isn't stated in contract, and is actively suggested otherwise by false-openness).

Stated another way, violence is turning white hot, infrastructure is being destroyed, wealth is being lost and stolen and inappropriately rewarded, these meek impostors are leading to poverty for all beings and futures, and the law is complicit in driving all this outside of the law and thus advancing pointless violence and loss. If the State wishes to avoid all this, it must draw back in natural state, and expel uncommon unnatural impostors, facilitating work and wealth, ignoring what can't be determined, not fighting each fight but rather facilitating might and power, and thus reserving violence for it and itself alone. Violence which will have the agreement of the mightful, because it knew when, and when not, and how much, to levy involvement of compulsion of might for the rightful.

In abridged summary, natural law says "fight appropriately." To get to appropriate, accounting must be made (mechanism and work, noted to redress, with addressment and ownership). It only then permits a fight, to each fight, afforded where best literally afforded/resolved. If natural, the day-to-day frivolity is defined, accounted, and resolved, before ever reaching mgmt, let alone legal, let alone reaching legal settlement, let alone claims nor district nor supreme court. And in doing so, violations and fines are levied against the proof of misconduct via testaments of accounting and testaments of accounting violation under proven lossful losses.

Violence resolved, and appropriated.

Voting itself must be held accountable, otherwise its account will be spammed, and as spam discarded.

just get your info from whitepages and it'll be legal. but honestly, we know that if they can't track you when you post nonpublic dox, the restriction becomes pointless.

this isn't a bad thing

Don't talk shit about mai waifu

If the government is going to require you to have voter ID to vote, then it becomes their job to automatically supply you an ID with which to vote when you register to vote.

Or, since you need your Social Security card and Birth Certificate to get a driver's license or other photo ID, why can't you use a Social Security card and Birth Certificate to vote? They're the validating force behind the photo ID, so why shouldn't they be as valid as the photo ID itself?

They are the signing force, but that's using a signature from one transaction-class to a different transaction-class, where the former pre-existing signature itself had a different terms of inspection and intent. An economic optimization, or yet another Obama birth certificate for President?

Paul is based AF man

Truly /ourguy/

This is the future of politics, people. The boomers don't stand a chance against the meme magician generation.

Morons get dubs too. Do you think soft censorship is the thing keeping Jews out of the ovens and niggers out of nooses?


So Holla Forumsmods can't censor 'BLACKED' threads?


It's just more interference. Do you want congress micro managing the internet? It's good that we have indonesian ice sculpting forums, where alert and engaged adherents can refine their ideas. Steel sharpens steel.


this faggot gets it.

This.

Minus the overt homophobia, of course. #FCKH8

This should have happened ages ago. We all know there is already legal precedent for this

Suppression of speech in academia should be addressed as well.

Holla Forums is a forum dedicated to a specific interest. anything that falls outside of that interest is considered off topic. off topic discussions can be taken to different areas of the site. its not censorship, its standard moderation. if you wanna have discussions about BLACKED and other shit that isnt politics, then you can take that shit to a board with no topic like Holla Forums.

Anyone from Wisconsin know if this guy is anything to worry about?

Here is his platform.

Forget their mods. Our mods can't even get rid of maddow avatarfagging.

what kind of backwards ass logic are you working off of? voter id laws only affect non-citizens, who shouldnt be voting regardless. if you are a citizen, you will be allowed to vote, should you provide sufficient proof of your citizenship and identity.
you missed something there fucko

I love it how "racism" is no part of the limitations in he "lawful speech" section.

This. Every single Holla Forumsack should jump on this and do everything they can to help push this bill trough.
DO IT!!!!

…user I

bump

...

+

It's unconstitutional for private entities to deny constitutional rights, even on their private property. Based on 3 SCOTUS rulings in the past.
So if you go to goybook and post all day about kikes and get banned, you are free to sue them under the current existing laws and receive a settlement.

Any private business is a subject to the constitution. If they don't like they, they should stop operating in the country.

Nice try, but websites don't have private property as they are not physical locations.

The Marsh v. Alabama route is probably the best way to go about this. Sneak in words in some bill that labels websites as open to the public, vital, etc. Maybe even put it in a bill that's supposed to be a concession to democrats over Net Neutrality, so that THEY will vote it into law. Next have a bill that cites Marsh v. Alabama and the previous law, it will have websites with over 500k users a day be forced to respect the 1st amendment, and tell other websites that they must state their bias clearly on the front page and terms of service in order to restrict any speech.

Yes, they are. It has been regulated in 1997. The server space is legally viewed as a physical space.
Nice try tho, yid. Reported for shilling.

He has a lot of grounded positions that resonate with the community, but are ineffective when put into practice. Point out how Obama failed with his renewable energy bill by investing millions into corporations that shut down (see: 60 minutes clean tech piece), point out how the healthcare bill is just mandatory health insurance with an non-fixed rate that would be problematic for americans, how a higher minimum wage prompts corporations to automate to save costs, and state that illegal immigration exploits US citizens and illegals more than it helps them.

You have a lot of sources that support you.

...

NEHLEN JUST NAMED THE JEW ON TWITTER
NEHLEN JUST NAMED THE JEW ON TWITTER
THIS MAN NEEDS TO WIN
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
twitter.com/pnehlen/status/942908297287471105

HE JUST CALLED A JEW ON DOING A FELLOW WHITE PEOPLE

I WANT TO WORK FOR /OURGUY/

lol, can they fuck him for that?
I knew lefties had some fun with the parentheses but they always say they were just being ironic.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_parentheses
PD: Tweet has been archived for all eternity: archive.is/d6nFj

On the day of the Twitter holocaust! Mans a lion.

Anons. I have something horrible to admit.
My state caused Nehlen to lose to that supreme faggot Paul Ryan.

Remember when some said Trump was a stepping stone for something bigger? Well, Nehlen may be a stepping stone to literally Hitler reincarnated. We have to get this man elected.

...

Maybe I don’t recall correctly, but he didn’t have this level of bantz last time did he? Paul has the kikes squealin‘ Nehlen needs the support we gave Trump during the debates.

Nehlen already went over this. He isn't even mad instead he has the victory mindset. He made that faggot Paul Ryan nervous and have to spend tens of millions of dollars to campaign in what should have been a free gibsmedat seat, against someone from his own "party".

Guy is a savage no fucks given kind of person. Able to see, and TAKE, a small victory and run with it. Build up the small ones until you take the larger ones. As he grows more confident so does his power.

hes basically like a 18 year old 'kekistani' or whatever on twitter. definitely browses 4pol.
It was always pretty funny to see. Past tense because I got killed in the twitter holocaust today.

Guaranteed to never win now. His corpse will be found with a gun, a hooker, bullet holes in both of them, and he’ll be pumped full of cocaine.

...

Do you think he's /oneofus/?

So POTUS eventually?

Build Nehlan's wall

BASED NEHLEN NAMES THE JEW
HEEBS BTFO
CALLS A BLACK GUY "TYRONE"
IT'S HAPPENING
Goddamnit we need more of this in our nation. If you are an user with extra talmudbux, send some to this glorious man's campaign. Help him get elected however you can.
ONE OF US close enough anyway

My gut instinct is that I don't agree with his censorship bill at all. It seems antithetical to the wild-west ideals of all my preferred shitposting media to impose regulation on private comms systems.
But after reading through it, it seems to carve out a very specific (though large) niche of a target: the normieverse. And I can understand the argument that since these shitholes, Facebook and Twitter and etc, have become the defacto creators of reality in the lives of the voting masses, we should take action against their creeping manipulations.
I just wish we could somehow remove der normie and the zuccs and then not need to bother with this. It would be cleaner.

...

If rachposter shares your sentiments, it might be time to get >>>/out/.

>

Bumping for visibility.

His naming the jew in epic style deserves its own thread. It would be a good whitepill morale boost for Holla Forumsacks and could help get this mad man elected imagine THE SALT if that happened.

boner.exe

You replied to the wrong person. Please remember to global report the dyke every time you see it.

White identity politics becoming mainstream

...

if you imbly

DELET THIS

In other news about paul
twitter.com/pnehlen/status/942904935770976256
He definitely skims Holla Forums, at the very least.

nevermind, fuck I'm late to the party

But it's not, as you said, a "censorship" bill. It's a forced free speech bill.
I have wanted this bill quite desperately for the past several years.

if they can't censor or shadow ban the social media moguls will simply create a rank system that burys the results. it's not technically censorship, just speech is now harder to find.

Nehlen better cover all bases in that bill.

He spoke about it on Fash the Nation #100 saying shadowbans, boosting content and similar tricks should also be included. But will you still need judges who follow the spirit or letter of the law and not the (((spirit))) of the law.

>twitter.com/pnehlen/status/943325218642300928

>twitter.com/pnehlen/status/942908297287471105

So is this thread what the kikes have been sliding lately?

Probably. See for confirmation.

He’s a fucking shill. For jews. He has absolutely no fucking chance of ever being elected now. All this shit is designed to get money and support to him and OFF of actual candidates. Are you fucking kidding me?

It's like how Trump 'couldn't be elected'. No one gives a fuck about the manufactured scandals of the Jew media that supposedly make people unelectable, if they whine about this all he has to do is Trump them by doubling down and shitting on them publicly in an entertaining fashion. Their only recourse against someone that doesn't cuck to their bitching is to bitch more to no effect.

...

Really makes you think.

Gee.

It's nice to see that it took about 2 seconds for Holla Forums to identify a4618e as JIDF.

Sort yourself out.

By the way,

Back to reddit with you newfags, holy shit.

Sure thing, Avignor.

It's nice to see that Israel not only employs mentally-ill children but actual retards now too. It must give you a sense of self-esteem to pretend that you're contributing! Too bad you aren't intelligent.

Fucking kill yourself, disinformation shill.

...

Great job, moishe.

Thanks for repeating something you were called out on misusing. I can see that playbook they gave you doesn’t do any good.
Yes, you’re really going to get a lot done with those tactics.

...

Here you go, moishe. Blown the fuck out.

So summarize your argument like a regular White Man so I can pick it apart bit by bit.
You claim Nehlen is a shill.
Where are the proofs?

...

This is the attention span of your average yid, ladies and gents.

>You have nothing on Nehlen other then your own hurt fweelings that he called out the (((bigot))).
JEWISH POLITICAL POWER IS ERODING AS VOTERS IGNORE THE MEDIA LIES

lol

Did Nehlen actually say "Gas the kikes race war now? Or is that another Strawman?

...

...

wew lad

...

Tell your masters to send in a tier-2 shill. One who can read English, please.

So you don't have any evidence and your argument is

Holy shit, you’re ass blasted.

...

Holy shit, you’re ass blasted.

Please JIDF, we've been telling you for years now that you need to get better at your job. Then again I'm sure you're a new hire because the turnover rate is fantastically high since none of you fucks can actually do your jobs.

As for "evidence" you've presented, literally the only thing I could find was your claim that he's a kike puppet. That's literally it. You showed no proof, you just claimed it. That's not evidence. Fucking gitgud

...

Reminder that this is the best job jews can do.

lol

Please I want your evidence, give it to me.

Isn’t it funny how one sentence from one person totally destroyed your entire narrative? It’s almost as though your control of the world is only pathetically tenuous at best.

I think a4618e is an insult-bot rather than an actual human being.
Apparently the only idea it wants to push is that

Go back to CBTS if that’s how you faggots are going to behave.
>oy vey goyim you can totally be elected by being against kikes

I want the evidence it has against Nehlen too. It's not even making sensible replies. You ask it for evidence and it calls you a kike and claims your narrative has been totally destroyed. It's some kind of poorly-written demoralization bot.

>oy vey goyim you can totally be elected by being against kikes
List one time in the last 50 years. I could go back further, but let’s start with 50. Last 50 years. One politician. Name one.

Report a4681e for being literally Mossad.

>oy vey goyim you can totally be elected by being against kikes
ONE NAME. 50 YEARS.

Im literally asking you to point out the post where the evidence is, or to post it again, link to a website ANYTHING. I want your evidence, please show me where it is. Spoonfeed the fuck out of me, because Im a retard.

Mossad-bot is even robot-posting its red-text typo three times in a row.

Whatever, Moshe. I'm going to love flaying you alive and impale your family with a bayonet when the day of reckoning arrive.

Mhmm. Almost as though that has already been done, or in fact was the first thing done, or something.
No.
That’s evident. One name? Just one?

ONE NAME. 50 YEARS.

ONE NAME. 50 YEARS.

Holy shit, it's a bot indeed. A bot or a more than usual mentally-derranged kike. See

Isn’t it funny how you kikes can’t do it? It’s absolutely hilarious. Not one name. Because NO ONE in the last HALF CENTURY has ever been elected after being openly against the kikes. Nehlen has just permanently ruined any chance he had at getting this bill passed, as well as being elected. Now why would he do that, hmm? The bill looked like it would be pretty important to the right, what with it actually protecting our speech (notice, kikes, that I am right-wing and you, kikes, are not). But now it’s fucked. Will anyone else in congress propose it? Of course not. Could Nehlen have hidden “his power level” (quotes because anyone who has a power level knows to hide it) and THEN said more once elected? Sure. He didn’t, though. He just decided to kill the bill proposal before he was even elected.

It’s funny. You clearly don’t think much of us.

One name.

So that's twice now that ive asked you do something that would support your position and you've refused to do it, when it might just convince me you're right. Instead you just shitting on me for no particular reason. This is absolutely retarded from the perspective of someone who wants to generate support for an arguement. It makes me come to the conclusion that you're literally a disengenuous kike trying to derail.


Which is it kike, is he a jewish shill or is he unelectable nuNazi scum? You can't even keep your own point straight.

It looks like they have some kind of human operator load the bot script with semi-relevant content and then it just spams endlessly repeating until they stop it and give it a new angle to shill. It's also trying to derail the discussion about Nehlen and get us to talk about literally any other politician from the last 50 years.

This is the best shilling money can buy.
False dichotomy. Try again. It’s both.
You’re just shit at shilling. ONE NAME, KIKE.

ONE NAME. 50 YEARS.

I love potatos. Do you like potatos? I'd like to invite you to my house to have dinner, but I don't know if you like potatos. We've got shepherds pie.

ONE NAME. 50 YEARS.

Checked!
The bot is also calling all of us here kikes, interestingly enough. So the bot operators have some idea that we don't like kikes, but then their bot claims that Nehlen is shilling for kikes. And then it claims no one can be elected after being openly against the kikes (which seems to contradict its original position that Nehlen is a fucking shill. for jews.)
So the argument you have against Nehlen is that he's a shill for jews and he's openly against kikes, and we're all a bunch of kikes who can't name one name for 50 years. Is that right?

One name.

How about steak then? My mother makes a mean asparagus and steak dinner.

ONE NAME. 50 YEARS.

And there we have it, If that's not a proof that it's bot then I don't know what is. The reply doesnt even fit what I'm saying.

Going to be hard to have it over to dinner while it endlessly repeats its ONE NAME script.
Can't even shill properly.
NEHLEN CAN WIN PAUL RYANS OLD SEAT

See, if Nehlen wasn’t a shill, you kikes would be the ones against him. And you wouldn’t have anything of substance to say.
You’d go back to his kikepedia page (the deleted one: archive.is/LibzJ) and pull irrelevant information. You’d D&C against him by saying “it’s not his first wife!” and “he’s married to a spic!” and “he won’t talk about abortion, which means he’s in favor of it!” and trivial nonsense like that. You yids LOVE trivial nonsense. Your most popular TV show is predicated on it, after all.

But no, you’re simply shilling for the one thing that US politicians can’t do. When called out on it, you explode into autistic rage. You can’t even answer one question. You’ll do ANYTHING to prevent answering it. Isn’t that funny? Why would that be?

No one openly anti-jew has won an election in the last 50 years. You can’t name a single person.

Spam Trump with it, Fox barely even covered the twitter censorship in the last 2 days and the kikes on both sides are obviously trying to just sweep this whole thing under the rug.

Probably the most retarded thing its doing (besides endlessly repeating itself) is calling us all kikes and asking for ONE NAME.
The not-too-sharp bot owner seems to really want us to believe him that nobody can get elected if they do what Nehlen did and stand up for themselves when attacked by the lugenpresse.
Open access to social media is going to be the final nail in the coffin of Jewish media control and it scares them into robot-posting.

One name.

forward.com/fast-forward/390430/making-bid-for-congress-paul-nehlen-flirts-with-anti-semitic-alt-right/
archive.is/pQQiM
So now we see why we're getting roboshilled here.
NEHLEN SAYS IT'S OK TO BE WHITE

Yes, we know, yid. You can’t name one person who has been elected while running on an anti-jew policy.

Hitler:^)

One name.

This fucking machine has nearly 40 posts in this thread.

NOW THAT'S WHAT I CALL BUTTHURT

Okay, my Hitler answer was facetious, but it's not a joke entirely. It's not impossible for a politician who is "jew-wise" to get elected, although I would say it'd be difficult to run with a platform where the JQ is front-and-center.

Part of me believes that you're probably just some autist larping as a bot to drum up hysteria, probably in an attempt to hinder discussion and derail threads with paranoia. In any case, friendly reminder to user's to filter this kind of shit, and at least attempt to not respond to low-effort posts. It's the only way to deal with botting and bait.

Confirmed kiked

archive.is/8Rdfi

Unless you're one of those autists who like to imagine Bannon is secretly an Evolion Neo-Reactionry, or whatever, the reality is, Bannon wouldn't be friends with anybody who's really pro-White or anti-kike. This is more controlled opposition, which makes sense, given his ties to the aut-kike.

It is very likely that he will not succeed in the race, however, it is necessary that we not desert what may be the first of many potential candidates that can help in moving the Overton window. Yes I know that this war will not be won by elections. Yet, on the DoTR we would be better served by a populous open to NatSoc and mentally and physically prepared for it. This will assist us allowing to quickly form a new government and begin the process of uniting our people under a new banner.

(((>>11063736)))
the only republican candidate who's running against the incumbent fucking PAUL RYAN and has named the fellow whites, dropped IOTBW, helicopters, and synth-aesthetic art on his TL is somehow a fucking shill?

What did Paul mean by this?

They are the Maddow avatar

How's about you answer some of the questions, moishe. Or name ONE name.

Sounds dank af tbh fam

We'd shitpost the Fourth German Realm into reality in two weeks tops.

How about that.

Is it time for Holla Forums to run for state and federal congress? I think so, now more than ever while we have 3-7 more years with Trump.

THE MAD MAN

Wew and those dubs too
What a fucking boss

Good guy, Nehlen. Calling out the subversive kikery is one of the toughest things to do is a politician. He's doing it with the power of the memes.

only if you're wealthy. good luck

It was time to do that 20 years ago. This book should be as required reading as Mein Kampf.
archive.org/details/DefensiveRacismAnUnapologeticExaminationOfRacialDifferences2005EdgarJ.Steele

He's either an actual Holla Forumsack (because he knows all our shit) or, again, a shill designed to discredit.

If you can, play to win the seat even if you have to do with bowing to marxists at first and then try to fix the system from the inside. For example, call out the bills calling for boycott of Israel products as unconstitutional.

I'd rather Holla Forums get rich af and produce a couple of George Soros equivalents to game the whole system against them from the top by buying/pushing politicians. Or do what Trump did, do both.

you shouldn't have put cute anime girls on there. now i'm associating this raging hardon with immigration, and i'm starting to feel better about it

He is not a shill.
t. user who has met him multiple times

Now, user, how can we believe you–an anonymous faggot on the internet–any more than we can believe him, having not met him either (and given that every politician is great at lying to get the goyim to do what they want)? Think for a second. This isn't the traditional zogbot kind of lying: saying that you'll do X when you have explicit intention of doing Y. This isn't the Trump kind of lying: saying that you'll do X when you just want the status quo. And it's not the standard open kike fellator kind of behavior: saying you'll do Y and then doing it and also demanding Z. This is either genuine (in which case he has zero chance of ever being elected, ever, thanks to what he has publicly admitted, and will probably be killed sometime next year) or it's the newest type of kikery: PURPOSELY making the truth unelectable and painting it as bad for the purpose of discrediting it.

You can't, and I don't care. Just go off of evidence. You have one anonymous faggot saying he's not a shill and his twitter posts and his follow #.

I don't think you read the post correctly.

Fake news.

Yeah, I fucked up the spelling; false alarm.

The previous posts he made that series are him citing several stories which all accusing him of being a white supremacist/nazi,
Paul noted that they are all from Jewish journalists/media outlets (redundant I know).
"He's a nazi!" "He's a nazi!" "He's a nazi!" the articles all said.
So he says fuck you lying Jews and what are they gonna do about it? Call him a Nazi more??
4D chutes and ladders

Not even being subtle. Following is of course the metric he directly controls. Most definitely /ourguy/, zero chance of unseating Ryan, 100% chance of generating salt for us.

Republicans will fight to get it passed while there's still a chance if they know what's good for their future as a party.

The 2018 elections are going to be here before we know it and social media have been gearing up for it and the 2020 presidential election ever since Trump won this past one. The suppression of conservative voices will have a devastating impact on these upcoming elections if we don't nip it now. This is most likely the cause for Roy Moore loosing AL. If censorship on social media continues, 2018 will be a bloodbath for conservatives with 2020 being the icing on the cake for the left.

Twitter

< trend manipulation
< promotion of left-wing content, demotion of right-wing content (just look at the typical 100k-200k likes and rewteets leftist posts get within just 48 hours while conservative content from popular accounts might get 30k all around)
< bans without any clear justification
< repression through "depersoning" (ie, removal of verification status)
< basing disciplinary action on lawful user activity occurring off the Twitter network (total bullshit, this one)

YouTube

< repression through demonitization and/or placing videos behind interstitial

Patreon

< similar to Twitter, monitoring user activity off the Patreon network and using it as a basis to terminate accounts (Lauren Southern)

Google

< manipulating search results

Facebook

< I got rid of my FB account years ago, so I cannot say what their infractions are

STICK THIS BREAD

Are you fucking retarded? They don’t want it passed. They don’t want their party to survive. They don’t give a flying fuck what you think.

You realize he’s purposely torpedoing his campaign, right? He just fucking posted this image.

Good. Now that's a term that needs to be used more in legislation.
There needs to be far more significant threasholds of evidence to establish a "credible threat" rather than a mere "threat" or "expected threat". The problem is how courts will interpret it… likely to "reasonable person's expectation"… which can be rather bullshit of an interpretation.

Not good, that means it doesn't stop much. Copyright is such a bullshit broadly construed piece of intellectual property, especially as it doesn't require registration of it, unlike trademarks and patents.

Eh, I've talked that much shit before. :^)

But yes, I wouldn't expect too much from this.

Seems fishy, and goes on TRS fed podcasts…

Please don't post the shad without necessary precautions to prevent dick trauma.

I think the amount of posts purely in support are a bit sus.
But I do think we need to stop Youtube and Google from making youtubers the bitch of advertisers.
Otherwise our precious gay faggots like Idubbbz will not get their precious cancer producing shekels.

Look at this twitter thread.
twitter.com/pnehlen/status/944380902179852289

NEXT YEAR THE JQ GOES MAINSTREAM!

I'd say it already is to a degree. At any rate I think the Fire Cock still as a good few strokes left in it.

If they dont whack him early, it will naturally come out. Its Ryan's seat. High profile.

Sooner or later he will be asked to explain himself and if he has his facts straight it will become the national conversation. Perhaps they will use him to hurt Trump. Doesnt matter. Once people start looking into it….

this is fucking stupid, this will just posit leftards as "opressed martrys" while at the sametime reinforcing their unsustainable business model through government legislation and not allowing its inevitable decline, If their blatant manipulation continues, businesses will eventually find out (many already have) that all their advertisement models are actually made up bull shit, either manipulating vectors to pad data and outcomes or outright corruption like using bots to facilitate fake data, this shits a facade of a facade of a facade of fake vulnerability and empty marketing, this law does nothing but legitimizes it as if it were actually protecting something of real value

You realize that kikes own all the businesses doing the advertising, right? No one is pulling out of anything. Their narrative is hard as bedrock. The bill positions leftists as oppressors.

He's clearly building up a case for the bill by intentionally throwing out the bantz and acquiring evidence to prove his assertion. It's obvious we need a bill to combat censored walled gardens.

Wore the Red White & Blue #Trump hat to the Western Wall in Jerusalem today. #MAGA

Seriously-Super-Bad-Based-Muthafucka!

Now that's what I call a semetic schnozz.

I was in that bread, kek

Based!!

no, it legislates a fleeting business model into life support when its only seconds away from dying by itself

If he was really an enemy jewry, they'd never let him in Israel after appearing on supposed WN podcasts.

That's 100% confirmation that he's controlled.

Government shouldn't be involved in any of this. Period. You start some government oversight of social media, and create some office for it, and it's the first thing that will be subverted by leftists and turned against you. At least with corporations you can stop using their shitty platforms and go somewhere else on the web. Can't do that when government is regulating all social media.

The problem is that he’s a Christian who explicitly calls out kikes. There isn’t a single jewish puppet who does that, or ever will. Nehlen is extremely strange. He’s doing everything the jews hate, but he’s ostensibly trying to run for Congress when he knows that he now has a 0.0000000000000000000…infinity% chance of being elected, because he was open about the JQ before getting into office.

Pic 1: calls out a kike using echoes
Pic 2: the image he originally posted
Pic 3: proof that he posted it and another of his gems
Pic 4: the other gem

Lots infiltrators pretend to be Christians, like Hal Turner and Bill Wilkinson. If he was really a Christian anti-Semite, he wouldn't have made it into Kikestan.

This is a chance for us to replace Soros cocksleeve Ryan and get somebody to represent us in the House. I'm trying to get the word out.


So a candidate is controlled unless he is openly supporting Hitler and genocide of the Moloch worshippers? Jerusalem is for Christians too..
Learn to shill.

Good meme. Can you fix the spelling error?

...

Seems legit. We need this.

people who browse cuckchan and other sites are supplying him with the memes. I think he acts like a cringey faggot. I find him to be both fraudulent and homosexual.
t. guy who knows the guys giving him the memes

Well yeah. He's a boomer. By definition both flippitant and gowarscht. It belongs in a cringe thread. But if foxy grandpa wants what's best then I'm still down.

twf the overton window is shifting this far

he's 48, late gen x…. reminds of of a 30 year old at a college party trying way too hard
archive.is/cWYh8

Top fucking kek. Reminds me of the Republican here in Texas that posted about YUGE anime titties and just shitposted on twitter all day.

yea, this is heading in a great direction
archive.is/FnNb7
archive.is/tYCrc

Sad how people think because they have no free speech, that Nehlen is somehow a bad candidate.

Never seen a proper refutation of any of his points besides

Why bump a week old thread when there are six other to fellate him on?

because nehlen got exposed in the other threads and they don't Holla Forums to see it

A lot of people hate kikes man. Maybe the time to put a known jew hater in office is now?

...

That's as good of an excuse as any to post these.

Im wrong. Jew exposer would be better word.

(I shamefully didnt finish the thread at that point)

these are good i saved them

There was an interview, I think with AnCap the Nation, where Nehlen said that Bannon called him their (the faux populist wing of the noe-cohens) "kamikaze". What if that's what he's doing now, sacrificing his political career to hijack White Nationalism on behalf of Bannon, and his jewish masters?

...

Those are so fucking normie I could literally smell the Schwarma while reading them. You obviously don't belong here. You don't speak as we do. You don't act as we do.
Reddit now has a suicide hotline. Go there and don't fucking use it before you pull the trigger.

Thanks for the hearty laugh

its happening.