Tell me again how anarchy can work.
A country's people dismantle the government
god she had nice feet
Hestia really was bestia
Well no, Anarchy can't work. That's why i'm a simple marxist with some egoist attributes. Anarchkiddies are almost as autistic as you nazbols.
fucking degenerate
No such thing
I would ask you to stop being stupid, but you area nazbol
how many times do we have to teach you this lesson fag
Okay, so we abolish the state.
Me and my next door neighbor, John, decide to gather arms and occupy our houses. We persuade people to join our movement, and eventually build a militia. Buy you have to feed a militia, so some members farm, while others protect them. Eventually, we decide we are large enough to forcibly occupy areas against their will. So we annex neighborhood after neighborhood, until we occupy a large area.
Congratulations, you have a state.
that implies that if the state was dismantled, everyone would immediately go into some post-apocalyptic mindset
life would most likely go on normally, people would probably organize militias to fend off violent criminals but that's it
Okay, but what would stop 1 / 7,000,000,000 people from forming their own government and then taking over?
That's not a state. If it was every form of human organization would be classified as a state. A state is a hierarchical structure that enforces class divisions and private property rights.
people would still function in councils, if someone managed to organize lets say 50 people and started being aggressive the local self-organized council would just dispose of them by forming a self-defense militia
Incas had an empire and they were still conquered.
In fact they had the biggest empire on earth when the spanish made contact with them.
Having a government didn't save them.
...
That axiom is flawed, pls stop being stupid
Holy shit I didn't think there were actually people who thought Anarchy could ever work.
Name one succesful state, ever
communism will eventually happen.
unlike anarchists though, I don't actually believe in a world where nationalism and religion still exist even in the slightest form. i think there must pass several years of global socialism before people are ready for the state to be abolished
...
what's the difference?
106% government debt.
top kek meme master
honestly can't even begin to point out how flawed that state is
i'll be watching this thread for pics of hestia's feet
The USSR went into space, America went to the moon using a government funded socialised space program.
I'd consider that pretty successful.
Well unfortunately for you there are lots of other measures of success beyond the space race.
oh wow its literally fucking nothing!
It's an example.
The state isn't inherently evil.
You are just an ancap who doesn't like the label.
no it isn't, you are started with the axiom of space travel being inherently good to begin with
what's wrong with colonizing inferior ayys?
You're imply that these required a state in order to be accomplished.
To get to the moon all you really need are the right materials and skills– none of which require a state.
nothing 2bh, I always keke at how mad Holla Forumsyps get at muzzies cucking europe again
...
funny because the airplane was cretaed by an individual, not by the goverment
...
feel free to prove they wouldn't be able to
OwO what's this
Anarchy can work assuming you have the manpower. The reason the UFT fell for example was because they were underarmed.
Having a government doesn't magically make you superior to some other society without one. The society is only as good as its denizens and equipment are.
imo space travel is a massive waste of money, there's nothing out there we can use. Wouldn;t that money be better spent on education or agriculture or something?
???????
Are labor camps acceptable in an anarchist commune?
Sovereignty cannot be eliminated, caged, or controlled. Anarcho-communist utopias can never condense out of science fiction, divided powers flow back together like a shattered Terminator, and constitutions have exactly as much real authority as a sovereign interpretative power allows them to have. The state isn’t going anywhere because — to those who run it — it’s worth far too much to give up, and as the concentrated instantiation of sovereignty in society, nobody can make it do anything.
Not an anarchist but there's nothing about anarchism that says they can't have a military
You might want a little dressing with that salad.
Seriously, what the fuck, OP?
That's why anarchy must be either world wide, or small scaled enough so that people leave you alone. I personally advocate for the second option.
Wow, you insulted the second most unseccessful ideology of all time and then pledged allegiance to the first.
Cringe thread?
Did you seriously not understand that?
The 8 hour day would not have been won if it had been just one country trying to get it. You simply can't have socialism in one country, it's less effective than co-ops.
...
a federal republic, you stupid faggot
Are you telling me it is absolutely impossible for people to form armed groups without a state?
Are you completely fucking retarded