Holla Forums worries about their internet rights and fears being censored

Remember that there is always a third option that (((they))) never want you to talk about. Government control of the internet FCC style is a shit. (((Corporations))) who act with government sanctioned monopolistic power aren't much better.

But trust busting, breaking up corporations when favorable anti-competition regulations let them get too big, or adjusting those regulations to reincentivise natural competition, is generally a win win for everyone, even for the internet providers as competition keeps them from stagnating. The only ones who lose are jews, who require centralized authority, be it corrupted government regulations or corrupted mega corporations, to run their schemes.

Internet companies and government can't fuck over your internet if you force competition. Free market is a meme, but competition is an excellent force as long as your government does one thing consistently, breaks up the monopolies that it inevitably accidentally (or (((accidentally)))) helps create now and then.

/thread

You're right, OP. There is a concentrated effort put into making people think net neutrality and the FCC Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet rule are the same thing so that people will either accept kiked laws to protect net neutrality or discard net neutrality to get rid of the laws.

The real answer, the third way, is to keep net neutrality going as it has for twenty years and avoid regulation as long as possible. We want neither the govt or the ISPs to put their greasy kike fingers on the issue of data routing as far as it's possible.

but this decision doesn't get rid of the net neutrality guidelines just the obama era enforcement of them that started in 2015 what's currently happening is basically the third option you described

No, it has been in place since the dawn of the internet, FCC rules are something completely different. Stop believing/spreading kike disinformation.

We ground this disinformation to dust in the last two threads. What makes you think you'll get away with it this time?

and that net neutrality is still in place, what this pajeet killed is only what obama introduced which isn't net neutrality itself but FCC enforcement and regulation of it which started in 2015. How much is Soros paying you torfags? you've already lost why keep shilling?

See

Correct, but there is a massive effort for make people think ISPs should get rid of net neutrality altogether, like

Great projection there, kike shill. Did you forget you wanted to get rid of real net neutrality as well here>>11046717 ? Perhaps it was one of your colleges sharing your office connection.

youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I

Your criminal legislation is dead, your criminal ideology is dying, and you will never steal from me again.

Go back to fucking Reddit.

...

1 shekel per post is not enough for a real vpn ;__;
1. because you're wrong
2. people who know their shit on how the internet works tend to be more paranoid and less supportive of vpn jews* than others. I guess that's the group of people you're arguing with.

* vpn business is pure shekel grabbing jewry. It's not a useless service, but it's still shady and jewy.

ISPs blocking Holla Forums would be the best thing to ever happen to this site since hot wheels died.

The true solution involves rope and lots of it.

NN isn't protection from monopolies you fool, all it did was give Ajit Pai veto over any expansion of any ISP that doesn't bribe him enough.

Government regulation is what CREATED this fucking problem. Comcast didn't just spring out of the ground and get a monopoly by offering shitty service, local and state governments GAVE it to them and the Fed fucking helped.

...

Uh huh. That's why NN protected DS. Even the based Pajeet used it as an example of NN being complete bullshit and he's right. Them taking down DS was the biggest mistake of their lives, it fueled the death of NN the FCC themselves cited it as a main reason. This is all their fault, not ours.

...

There's no reason why a customer should pay more for a gigabyte of youtube than a gigabyte of chink cartoon porn. Degeneracy argument is a strawman

DS has nothing to do with NN.

Tell those SJWs and plebbtors that the FCCman is a "PoC" they love so much so he is never wrong and they shouldn't attempt to "whiteplain" against his decision.

Theres no reason for me to pay the same amount of money for using a small amount of bandwidth, as the soyboys who binge watch shitflix and HD porn.

Is this the best you can do?

Net neutrality has nothing to do with domain name registrars and never did. Stop being stupid.

That's clearly wrong if you actually fucking read the FCC report. The ISPs themselves not just the registars colluded to shut them down like the kikes they are. I just find the whole argument against censorship and promoting free speech by these SJW and plebbitor faggots ironic as well since they are the #1 promoter of censorship and enemy against free speech. NN is just fuck Soros faggots and fuck kikeflix and fuck you reprobate pornography. You should be thanking the Indian man for saving society.

Then get the cheaper, slower service and stop whining.

shut your fucking mouth soyboy nn is as stupid as me subsidizing niggers who cannot pay their water and electric bills. you pay what you fuck up and im not going to pay for your bs so you can watch your cuckporn like the soyboy you are. porn has done horrible damage to society all it created is a bunch of retards who believe all manner of stereotypes of the fakest industry in the world that fuels countless insecurities of white men. you deserve death if you watch porn.

Say that out loud to the nearest mirror you can find and then seek a psychiatrist immediately.

A gigabyte is a gigabyte. What's difficult to understand about that?

Okay Torfag, go suck off Gulag's dick somewhere else.

learn English and kys

So get the slower, cheaper service already you dumb fucking nigger.

Don't project your reprobate shit onto me. I don't do any of that and I've been speaking against it for years now. I feel like the only real man left sometimes none of your others have any discipline just obsessed with degeneracy like drug addicts who can't get enough dopamine. Take a good look at society, every single time you be a wanker you become more soyboy than man and this is scientifically proven. You're bleeding your manhood dry and this is why men aren't fighting back defending civilisation anymore. Pornography is Jewish, Kikeflix is Jewish, the whole of NN is Jewish and has Jewish backing out the wazoo Soros style please either correct or kill yourself for the good society.

Its been called out long ago that they will start using reverse psychology on us. I read several hours into NN including many peoples opinions and I still have no fucking idea if its good or bad. All I know is that (((they))) will have serious problems if our ability to communicate online is taken away.

You might as well just say you're Jewish, Chaim.

So the internet is Jewish then, since net neutrality is what allowed the wild west net to exist?

fug, posted in the wrong thread

Can somebody articulate some bad things that were in the nn law that was killed? Trying to argue with some normie and his argument is basically , well why not?

Why does Soros want net neutrality? If corporations run the internet and give preferential treatment to only politically correct websites, doesn't that benefit the Jews?

No, they typically can't. All most of them can do is meme about Soros. It doesn't matter anyways since the rule is dead.

As it stands we are roughly back to where we were before 2015, which means net neutrality is the common practice even though it may not be mandatory, and as we all know Holla Forums existed and wasn't shoad back then. As for net neutrality itself most people here seem to have no fucking clue what it even is despite countless attempts to explain it.

Soros doesn't want net neutrality, he wants kike laws passed in the guise of protecting net neutrality.

I have no idea but anti NN shills say it's so he can feed us his propaganda at less cost.

In one post you claim nobody can cite anything bad about the non legislation but then call them like laws? Please explain how they are kiked . my argument is that it is dirt stupid to want the fcc involved in the internet at all but that's not enough for big government brainlets, they would need specifics because they lack imagination to see how that could be a bad thing

Fucking autocorrect bullshit, hope you can understand me. Non=nn, liked = kiked

One would think that cost doesn't concern Soros. Maybe it's his Jewish nature to pinch pennies even as he spends millions on his political games.

This.

Nothing regulates the tech monopolies and their ever increasing ideological based censorship. We needn’t ponder ‘what if’s’ but rather existing realities. NN didn’t prevent tech monopolies from constantly consolidating their powers. The existing handful of Internet power players such as Alphabet and Facebook have maintained their dominance through acquisition of rivals, you can’t stop people being won over buy being offered the GDP of a small nation for the keys to their business.

One could argue that the repeal of NN will be abused by Government trading favours with ISP’s to restrict assess to wrong thought but NN didn’t prevent TDS from being no-platformed. NN didn’t prevent web giants from shutting down wrong thought from their platforms either.

They typically can't. The most coherent thing that has been claimed so far is that classification of and ISPs to fall under Title II of the Communications Act means the FCC would be obligated to police content for decency or something along those lines. It's typically very vague. As for me I'm not going through the entire 1934 Communications Act and the 1996 Telecommunications Act and all the surrounding legal rulings to determine if this claim holds water for a rule that was certain to get replaced..

If the FCC rule was kiked in itself or if Soros saw the possibility of getting kiked legislation sneaked in later through it I don't know, but I can't see him as so delusional he doesn't clearly see how net neutrality is one of the biggest obstacles to his kiked world order. That leaves some method of getting anti-white laws in place as his motive.

Hm, yeah believe it or not, dailydot had a good summary on it. Basically the NN law doesn't do anything except reclassify internet as title 2 from title 1, which gives FCC authority statutorily. Everyone is convinced they are so scared because they don't know what their ISP is going to do, when the solution should be to get a new ISP. But if the FCC starts doing something you don't like, you can't get a new FCC. And with the political climate the way its going, the internet, via the FCC will become politicized.