Jason Tankruhe doing AMA

youtube.com/watch?v=HY7ZcHCUa0I

What do you want to ask him, Holla Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

my.mixtape.moe/bkiqmy.m4a
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/wage-labour/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

if he'll pound my ass in his sexy gulag while calling me a filthy first worldist labour aristocrat and

1. Is he still living with his mom?

2. Is he still addicted to refined sugars and Burger King?

3. Does he realize the LLCO are highly suspicious?

Ask him what his favorite book is.

How much money do you spend on alcohol every month?

Give me your questions and I will make a G+ sock account to ask them.

Why do you (Jason) keep making videos attacking the "bad behaviors" of so-called "first worldists" if you don't even believe there will be a revolution in the first world to begin with? Why not make videos specifically addressing issues in the third world?

Is he aware his "theory" doesn't have the slightest resemblance to Marx's?

This. MTW is anti-Marxist because it prioritizes the nation ahead of class. It's not even rooted in Mao but Lin Biao and Mirza Sultan-Galiyev (who opposed both Lenin and Stalin and was the first victim of Stalin's purges).

Did anyone else notice the sudden and ridiculous price increase for Hennesy XO? It actually jumped by almost $200 per fifth. XO is good, but it nowhere near that good. Hell Courvoisier XO is still the same price that it was before, and it is better than Hennesy XO if you ask me.

Of course, Jason is just drinking cheapo Hennesy VS here.

Jason doesn't see the irony in him liking expensive drinks, when he bitches and moans about "first worldists" being too self-indulgent for communism.

Apparently, Jason also exploits trust laws and whatnot in order to make loads of money off Youtube.

Does anyone know how to make a Google account without a phone verification? I need that.

whats cum taste like?

Is his sister still going after Holla Forums and Marxist Memes for the alleged death threats?

Salty lemon water.

...

...

This is by far the worst excuse he's made for folding on positions.

...

That's… awful.

Isn't it pretty in line with the early 20's Comintern line regarding China (the chinese communist have to support the Kuomintang to stage a national revolution, cleansing the country of imperialist influences, before a proletarian revolution can be enacted)?

According to my wife salt and Clorox.

Most "national liberation" struggles lead to semi-fascism and neocolonialism. Socialism doesn't exist when half the country's government is made up of national bourgeoisie and petite-bourgeoisie given that the whole existence of the bourgeoisie rests on the subjugation of the proletariat.

why do leftypol get so triggered over maoism thirdworldism?

It's anti-Marxist.

wow…rally maks u dink

It's literally anti-Marxist and makes no fucking sense.

In reality it's just edgy poverty and "revolutionary potential" fetishism. They believe that the developing world has the most potential for revolution because it's still stuck in the 1800s, but this makes no sense from a Marxist analysis, because we base our views on material conditions and Capitalism has to meet certain conditions for it to actually falter and crumble as a system. Falling rate of profit, Organic Consumption of Capital/Automation, mass unemployment etc etc.

Pretty sure all of those things are currently present in most of the third world.

Maoist third worldists are also dogmaticists, which is ironic given Unruhe's video against "Hoxhaist dogmaticism."

Their version of communist revolution is stuck in the 1960s whereby proletarian revolution can only come through armed struggle. That hasn't happened anywhere in the first world so they of course believe only the third world can be revolutionary. What they don't see is socialism is alive and well in Latin America NOT due to guerrilla groups running around in the jungle but to large-scale grassroots movements usually centered around far-left political candidates. One major reason the FARC is giving up its guns is due to the success Chavez and Maduro had running in democratic elections, for example.

Not really, they do not have the technological nor social conditions to make a transition into Socialism.

They certainly have the social conditions.

Not really, shit poor third world countries where most of the people are uneducated peasants who are massively actually reactionary and tribalsit. Not really the social conditions that would allow a Socialist utopia to thrive.
Most people don't have access to electricity, again not a place exactly for a Socialist utopia.

I am firmly of the belief that Socialism can only come about in advanced countries with all the technology and science we have behind us. It is us in the first world who will eventually get behind the idea of using technology to ELIMINATE labour not be slaves too it and we have the technological might to feed and produce for ourselves using cybernetics.

Capitalism will always reassert itself in these shit poor third world countries because they are still basically in the 1800s in regards to Capitalism, it hasn't played it's full part in their development yet, the first world is different we are seriously facing late-stage Capitalism in the coming decades, I just cannot see how Capitalism will save itself even with UBI.

Also, we can look and see every single socialist revolution that's happened only occurred in countries that were still backwards.

That is why they failed.

...

read parenti

Probably no one cares but Jason was on Taleeb Starkes' show Safe Space where he debated Aaron Clarey aka "Captain Capitalism". Needless to say, Unruhe schooled him.

The debate:
my.mixtape.moe/bkiqmy.m4a

The third world isn't poor?

The third world was made poor

Obviously, but I thought you were saying it wasn't poor at all.

The ruling class forces the narrative that the third world is, as a state of being, poor, as being third world is to be poor

This is false, the third world has been made poor

Is that his argument? I thought Unruhe just thinks the revolution has to happen in third world countries first to cut off the imperialist countries' ability to buy the complacency of their workers.

Why is he wearing two ties?

The LLCO doesn't care about communism. Take one look at their proposals and it's pretty fucking obvious they're just a bunch of angry white boys who fetishize violence and bloodshed, no different than neo-nazis who dream of a racial-holy-war scenario.

The fact that the LLCO admire jihadis and even go so far as to call their organization a "communist al-Qaeda" should prove this. They're not socialist revolutionaries but a fucking *death cult*.

Now, violence is an inevitable part of revolution, but there's a right way and a terrible way to use violence. Running around blowing random people up in the name of third world liberation is a horrible thing to do.

I won't go so far as to claim they're cops, but this comes off as serious pig tactics.

Tell that to the our national porkies. They would probably laugh at this statement.

Damn it.

Damn Jason Unrhue fucking BTFOed Aaron Clarey!

...

I'm not kidding.

Prairie Fire is also rumored to be a drug dealer, which should further the idea the LLCO are informants.

Answer this.

why would farc give a shit about the president of venezuela

Because they see it as an inspiration, how a socialist was able to take power without violence and create a massive following behind him. Chavez (RIP) cut poverty in Venezuela in half. IN HALF. The members of the FARC wish they could do something like that in Colombia, hence why they're looking to negotiate with the government and run electoral campaigns.

What about the other countries in south america with socialist governments?

Are they different because they weren't in the military and didn't participate in a failed coup d'etat before their presidency?

socialist presidents*

Go to bed, Jason. You're grounded.
Mom.

That's easy:
Fascist promotion of ethnic communities out of defeatist impotence to organize workers in the imperialist nations using moralism to slander the working class and split it across "revolutionary and "non-revolutionary nations".

His analysis is retarded shit and can be equated to a nazi doing a flip.

Claiming yourself to be a "third worldist" is admitting to have failed basic marxism.

"To say that the interests of capital and the interests of the workers are identical, signifies only this: that capital and wage-labour are two sides of one and the same relation. The one conditions the other in the same way that the usurer and the borrower condition each other.

As long as the wage-labourer remains a wage-labourer, his lot is dependent upon capital. That is what the boasted community of interests between worker and capitalists amounts to.

If capital grows, the mass of wage-labour grows, the number of wage-workers increases; in a word, the sway of capital extends over a greater mass of individuals.

Let us suppose the most favorable case: if productive capital grows, the demand for labour grows. It therefore increases the price of labour-power, wages.

A house may be large or small; as long as the neighboring houses are likewise small, it satisfies all social requirement for a residence. But let there arise next to the little house a palace, and the little house shrinks to a hut. The little house now makes it clear that its inmate has no social position at all to maintain, or but a very insignificant one; and however high it may shoot up in the course of civilization, if the neighboring palace rises in equal or even in greater measure, the occupant of the relatively little house will always find himself more uncomfortable, more dissatisfied, more cramped within his four walls.

An appreciable rise in wages presupposes a rapid growth of productive capital. Rapid growth of productive capital calls forth just as rapid a growth of wealth, of luxury, of social needs and social pleasures. Therefore, although the pleasures of the labourer have increased, the social gratification which they afford has fallen in comparison with the increased pleasures of the capitalist, which are inaccessible to the worker, in comparison with the stage of development of society in general. Our wants and pleasures have their origin in society; we therefore measure them in relation to society; we do not measure them in relation to the objects which serve for their gratification. Since they are of a social nature, they are of a relative nature."
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/wage-labour/

To be fair, Althusser, Poulantzas, and other Marxists from the 1960s onward did this too.

Leave it to a so-called "champion of the third world" to use racist terms like "reds***".

"Marxists"

welp i premptivly lost any respect i may had gain for him at some point in the future

kek

what

...

Jason claims he "found out" he was Sami after a Native American shaman told him. He's never taken a DNA test or looked up his genealogy.

t. someone who knows one of Jason's ex friends