Theory from the other side

Perhaps Heidegger if you are well philosophically well trained, I heard Joseph De Maistre is good as well. It might be good to read De Maistre before Schmitt as De Maistre influenced Schmitt

Don't forget Claude Leforts book as well, do you have a pdf copy of it?

John Locke's 2nd Treatise of Government is a pretty good overview of lolbert theory.

NEETzsche? Ebola? Mises? Rothbard? Just go for all the names you hear them throw around.

I've read Mein Kampf and one of Peter Hitches books, that just about covers the spectrum of right wing thought outside of libertarian economic writing.

He's still a bit of a trot, isn't he?

1.start from the Greeks
2. read up to Enlightenment philosophers
3. right wing thoughts begins to kinda pick up from there

Depends which right wing, economic or cultural/political?

If economic then just head to /liberty/ and check out their stickies. I've actually made a thread asking about it, here's a good answer I received that might help you too: 8ch.net/liberty/res/38993.html#39023

If about the other stuff then you might as well just look up fanfiction.com

thanks comrade

Libertarianism is not right-wing.

I thought by right wing OP meant any sort of aspect (economical, political, etc) that is considered/viewed to be on the right.

Isn't libertarianism considered right wing politics?

economics*

This is what I have so far, keep them coming.

You're thinking of Christopher Hitchens who has been dead for several years.

Yes, reactionism: mindless flailing at things which you do not understand.

Nietzsche can be imagined as an anarchist, of an anarchy that is not to the left but outside the poverty of left-right thinking.

The fuck? Those guys are not rightists. Proudhon was even one of the early socialists.

I agree on Proudhon and Rousseau but the others OP should definitely read since they paved the way for, if not whole theories, then at least aspects in right wing thought.

And besides, OP should read Rousseau regardless.

I wrote down proudhon on there because I forgot to on my leftist reading list. I think Rousseau I put on there from the thread linked by I honestly know very little of these two Which is why I have them on my list.
Nietzsche and Machiavelli I feel could be interpreted as left or right depending on how you look at it.

Read Locke, then read Rousseau.

Peter Hitchens used to be a trot too.

Unless you have a degree in physics, when you seek shelter in a lightning storm, you are hiding from what you do not understand.

I met a person that believed ayn rand's ideas worked better when connected with stirner's egoism rather than Nietzsche's work despite Nietzsche ultimately being influenced from him. anyone have thoughts on this? to me, it seems that ultimately stirner could be compatible with anything

Jean Jaques "Civilization was a mistake" Rousseau is basically a founding father of Western Socialism, he was based as fuck.

Yeah, but the guy who knows a bit of theory about the subject knows that hiding under a tree like a reactionary is not a good iddea.

Anything by Veronica Clark (Revisionism on Holocaust and Nazi racial policy), Mosley (either pre or post war), Spengler (for foundational purposes), Yockey (for intro to 3P), or Ramos.

...

Honestly, don't even both reading Rand. Not only is her philosophy really boring, rudimentary and ill-informed, but she is also a terrible fucking writer. There's a reason no dignified Philosophy dept (or English dept) even acknowledge her

It's technically an art manifesto, but Marinetti's 'Futurist Manifesto' is a great read. It's really short and surprisingly palatable to a contemporary reader