The Communist Party of Greece on homosexuality

*neo-marxist

No identity politics, no white guilt, no oppression olympics, no tranny-acceptance, no faggot-sugarcoating. They are 1940s communists, they arent Apple I-cuck communists. Still oven worthy though

But whining over gays IS identity politics.

they meant that they are retards who have an irrational hatred of homosexuals
this is another reason why most communist parties suck
they are stuck in the past

Reminder that Stalinists are only popular in eastern Europe where there is a legacy of Orthodox Christianity and strong conservatism

Agreed, they do not even acknowlege faggots. Actually they loathe sexual orientation. The true communist man fucks a woman FOR PROCREATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. Fucking for recreation is burgeoise asfuck for these guys.

And i am not making this shit up, they legitimately believe this

Human reproduction is necessary for everybody. Even people who don't have kids themselves benefit from the fact that when they get older and too frail to be active workers anymore, there are younger people who produce stuff, some of which the people who can't work anymore will consume. So it makes sense to tax childless people to financially support parents and their kids.

The KKE is absolutely right that it is nonsense to pretend that a childless homosexual couple is anything like a father and mother. What about adopting kids? I don't know if it is good for a child to grow up without both a male and female adult. I don't think that statement makes me a person who is on par with somebody who violently assaults homosexuals. Many children live in a weird pseudo-lesbian universe. By that I mean, the mother is straight, but has to raise the child without the father, and at kindergarten and early school the adults are overwhelmingly female as well. I say I think that's kinda weird. Sue me for hate crimes.

I think a straight couple without children should be treated the same as a childless homosexual couple, as they have the same relation to society. I propose that childless couples of any sexual orientation should be referred to as fagots.

giving a shit about what fags do in the bedroom literally reactionary idpol

Ceausescu you have to go back.

pick one

To clarify, I don't mean that as any sort of insult, I just want to have a handy word for childless couples. No hate is implied here. They can also have their anniversary celebrations like

It is pretty normal that parents don't bear all the costs of child-raising. Think about school funding.

I don't think people realise just how shitty an upbringing children get from the state. People who were brought up in care have horrific rates of criminality, substance abuse, unemployment and pretty much every other negative indicator. Having same-sex adoptive parents may not be ideal but it's a million times better than not being adopted. Tbh it really pisses me off when people say same-sex couples shouldn't be allowed to adopt because they fall short of the ideal, as if there were a ready supply of perfect nuclear families for these children to slot into.

Well fags are the ones that stir shit up. They can't just suck cocks and take cocks up their ass in their privacy of their bedrooms. No, they NEED to SHOUT IT OUT, they need to be vocal about it, they need to build an identity out of their sexual orientation, because they have litteraly no other defining trait about their person.

That's why they are oven-worthy.

this

Nah, not even going to do this.

what

If you're an open fag (that is, walking/talking like a fag) then into the gulag you go. End of story. It's harmful for a society to let fags roam free.

Don't be so hard on yourself stalinfags.

I am aware, but that can be funded out of the general taxation pool rather than singling out and discriminating against the childless. Decreasing spending on the military and corporate welfare could easily fund all necessary social services to an excellent level.

This is the most politically awful thing I've read on Holla Forums for a long time.

And this is supposed to be a socialist board?

It's true though. Stalinists are the reason why liberals believe in the horseshoe theory. You guys are the counterrevolution.

They're right to do so. Homosexuality is bourgeois. Throw it in the trash along with all the other "tolerance" bullshit that the LIBsuccs have forced on us. True communism comes from a strong state, ethnonationalism and faggot policing but that's not something a dumbass anarkiddie like you would understand. Proles aren't focussed on this idpol bullshit. You know why? Because they understand the moral necessity of strong borders, traditional values, and a centralized workers' government. If you don't see the absolute necessity of being willing to live and die for the vanguard then real proles will understand that it is you who will be the first to die in the name of the vanguard.

Perhaps they shout it out because they are not in fact allowed to suck cocks and take it up the ass with the same legal status that heterosexuals do?

Though I don't expect you to be able to comprehend the concept.

tankie pls go

This has to be shitposting satire right?

They are massive cucks. Who cares if they don't like sodomite """marriage"""

prove it

Castro and Stalin opposed LGBT, why shouldn't the Greeks?

What are you talking about?

Cuz homosexuality is a greek tradition :^)

...

Why so negative? Are you having your unbearable fagots anniversary soon, perhaps?

What part do you disagree with? Do you think that people who think gay marriage is a weird idea are all for violence against homosexuals? Do you think you will find gay marriage as a really big topic in the publications of gay-righs groups from the 50s and 60s on par with stories of violent threats and career risks? Do you have any idea how recent the gay marriage push is? Do you think gays who don't see themselves ever aping a straight couple and adopting kids are super-rare? Do you want somebody who is openly gay telling you the same stuff I just said, so you aren't offended? This stuff is not an exotic opinion once you go outside of liberal American entertainment.

I see. Instead of taking one euro from A and giving one euro to B, you want to take one euro from A and B each and then give B two euros. Your distinction is voodoo economics. Your flag suits you.

Not sure about this specific phrase, but there are reports of homosexual marriages had being recognized by state in early 1920s.

Stalin didn't care. The only reason crackdown happened is that male homosexual organizations got infiltrated by British agents.

I was referring to Fidel Castro, not the street in San Francisco, dummy

castro legalized LGBT you autistic tankie LOL

...

Stalinists are all just closet statists they really don't want to admit they just want to suck Putin's state-capitalist cock over and over again.

pls
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/george-soros-the-money-behind-the-transgender-move/

Color me shocked

Homosexuality still predates capitalism by several millennia

Ayy lmao

Here's a concept that is difficult for you to understand: YOU DON'T NEED TO ADVERTISE YOUR SEXUAL ORIENTATION, AS IT DOES NOT CONCERNS ANYONE BUT YOURSELF AND YOUR PARTNER

And another concept that is difficult for you to understand: IF THE MOST IMPORTANT AND DEFINING ASPECT OF YOUR CHARACTER IS THE COCKS THAT YOU SUCK AND TAKE UP YOUR ASS, DON'T BE SURPRISED THAT EVERYONE THINKS YOU ARE WORTHLESS FAGGOT

If you don't advertise your sexual orientation, how do you find a partner?

Checkmate satanfag

do you seriously imply that ONLY flaming faggots get laid? Are you this stupid?

Strawman.

Answer the question, satanfag.

you don't have to publicly "advertise" your sexual interests in order to find partners. that's just nonsense

This guy has a point

Obviously I don't like the pridefagging thing, but marching through the street with a rainbow flag in a pink thong is a thoroughly political and altogether different thing than simply "being gay"

You can separate the sexuality from the ostentatious behavior. Almost all of us do.

yeah right. when you find someone you like you just slip 'em the dick while their not paying attention.

The world isn't the US or Europe, faggot.

In many "3rd world" countries there are laws like that. In mine, just being gay is practically asking to be beaten, ostracized, public shunned, without even the need to be "openly" gay - if you even just "hint" you are, you will be targeted.

My question is answering yours, you disingenuous faggot. You can be a faggot and be subtle about it. How do you think faggots behaved during antiquity, middle ages and up till now? They were being subtle about it.

I don't think persecution is justifiable.

But "gay culture" is entirely an artificial product, and I'm not implying it was caused by the KGB/CIA/Jews/etc, simply that it has nothing to do with being gay. It's an entirely artificial Western thing which should not be forced on other countries for the sake of "tolerance". I am 100% you can achieve civil rights without parading as a drag queen or deviant exposing clothing.

I don't care if some community or country likes having fag parades, but it's indecent, you don't see any other parade with those aspects of fag parade.

no, you're right. people in nightclubs, speed dating, online dating, or any social environment in general, are often seen wearing shirts or waving signs that read "I AM INTERESTED IN SUCKING COCKS/LICKING ANUSES; APPLY WITHIN." that's how most people find romantic partners

You Leftists are so fucking stupid, it's hilarious. You're so entirely incapable of critical and original thought that you inject those two words into every single thing you say. Those old, outdated terms that no one uses anymore. Brain-dead fools…

It really doesn't, sorry.

wow ur so rite that really made me think :🍀🍀🍀

fuck off. no one cares what you think

How is going to a gay bar not advertising your sexual orientation by default?

You're just drawing arbitrary lines in the sand based on what you want to see in society.

then 1st world gay activists should be focused on those countries. not whining about the west from the safety of the west

Depends on what you mean by "advertise"
You have to let some chick know you're interested in some way or you're not gonna hook up
You're generally assumed to be straight, so you need to do things like suggest otherwise or go to a gay bar where you're assumed to be gay

You've clearly misunderstood him

This

It's an improper use of the term
bourgeois = owners of the MoP
proles = not owners of the MoP, must sell labor power to survive

gee i wonder

With your LARPing like it's the 1800s spouting "muh bourgeois muh proletariat," I have to say you play the part convincingly. Your vocabulary does seem to rival that of a modern elementary school child.

Well duh my 3rd worlder faggot friend, we are talking about faggots acting like faggots in US & Europe. Every single thing that you say is IRRELEVANT.

Also do you have the slightest impression that just because faggots act like faggots in 1st world is gonna shame ackbars on 3rd world to be more accepting? GTFO and come back with an actual arguement

Your tears are delicious tbh

FUCK OFF AND KILL YOURSELF CLASSCUCK SCUM

lyl cry harder

l ma o

WEW start living in the real world anytime soon

Fuck off Coelho kid

I've already disavowed pridefagging and ostentatious public displays.
You're literally just bitching about words

good then we agree

u salted satanfag

deal with it

...

Not an arguement. You stupid faggot we are addressing the fact of faggots being faggots in 1st world countries. By definition 3rd world IS irrelevant to the discussion.

So where are you from, 3rd worlder?

Have you wew'd so hard, you lad'd?

i would gas the satanists first :)

notbad.jpg

How about no, Justin? You have no arguement, go suck a cock somewhere, will ya?

...

cry harder classcuck. CLASSCUCK FAGGOT

Gas 'em if you can, see if i care

Ayyyyy

But still, you haven't disclosed your 3rd world homeland. Where are you from?

Not an argument, faggot.

And where can I read about this bullshit excuse? Let me guess, these British agents were found to be collaborating with secret trotskyites to inflitrate these organisations?

I'll try in caps in case you are myopic as fuck:

FIRSTLY, WE ARE DISCUSSING 1ST WORLD FAGGOTS BEING ABSOLUTE FLAMING FAGGOTS IN 1ST WORLD COUNTRIES THAT HAVE NO LAWS PERSECUTING THEM

THE COUNTRIES THAT YOU CLAIM THAT HAVE LAWS LIKE THIS BY DEFINITION DO NOT LET THE FAGGOTS ACT THEIR FAGGOTRY OUT THEREFORE YOU DON'T HAVE AN ARGUEMENT TO BEGIN WITH.

SECONDLY PROVIDE US WITH OTHER RELIGIONS THAT PERSECUTE FAGGOTS OTHER THAN ISLAMISTS

YOU ABSOLUTE FAGGOT

...

Only when I called you out for your shitty argument you retorted to "N-NO IM TALKING ABOUT THE 1ST WORLD".

Which you had never yet mentioned in your posts. Damage control. Lmao.

I thought i was discussing with intelligent people. I do believe that it's a given that we discuss about 1st world because on 3rd world they get thrown out of buildings, so by definition THEY DO NOT ACT THEIR FAGGOTRY OUT IN THE PUBLIC.

Are you this dumb? Do i need to point out the obvious? Is your Autism Level lower than a fucking nigger's?

How is this an argument? Projection, insecurity, damage control.

Typical pollyp behavior tbh

Fuck word filters, * I Q, obviously

No. You have no argument, you are in the same caliber of mental capacity with niggers.

Isn't due time for you to post some of your infographics? You were wrong about the laws, you are wrong about gay not being persecuted.

All you can do is call me a nigger, then maybe a jew or a muslim. The possibilities are endless!

...

No my mentally challenged 3rd worlder. You still have no arguement. You never had. Hell you don't even disclose your 3rd wold shithole for fucks sake

Funny one, you never had an arguement in the first place.

...