Tfw too smart for isms

...

Other urls found in this thread:

spunk.org/texts/intro/faq/sp001547/secG6.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

...

...

Isms are a spook including egoism

...

Yes he was you utter retard, read him

Max would not subscribe himself to any ism, he is mearly just BEEing himself.

Please point to where Max identifies himself as an Egoist or states everyone SHOULD be an Egoist.

The best he does it talk about existing egoists.

You can never be too smart or too dumb for any ideology. For the origin of ideology is more related to our experiences and upbringing rather than pure intellect.

In Stirner's Critics, you dumb idiot.

Apparently not smart enough to draw Stirner with his actual hair colour though.

#rekt

...

He takes pains to stress that egoism isnt really a real -ism
Neither of you read

...

All Things Are Nothing To Me[1]
What is not supposed to be my concern! [Sache] First and foremost, the Good Cause, [Sache] then God’s cause, the cause of mankind, of truth, of freedom, of humanity, of justice; further, the cause of my people, my prince, my fatherland; finally, even the cause of Mind, and a thousand other causes. Only my cause is never to be my concern. “Shame on the egoist who thinks only of himself!”

Let us look and see, then, how they manage their concerns — they for whose cause we are to labor, devote ourselves, and grow enthusiastic.

You have much profound information to give about God, and have for thousands of years “searched the depths of the Godhead,” and looked into its heart, so that you can doubtless tell us how God himself attends to “God’s cause,” which we are called to serve. And you do not conceal the Lord’s doings, either. Now, what is his cause? Has he, as is demanded of us, made an alien cause, the cause of truth or love, his own? You are shocked by this misunderstanding, and you instruct us that God’s cause is indeed the cause of truth and love, but that this cause cannot be called alien to him, because God is himself truth and love; you are shocked by the assumption that God could be like us poor worms in furthering an alien cause as his own. “Should God take up the cause of truth if he were not himself truth?” He cares only for his cause, but, because he is all in all, therefore all is his cause! But we, we are not all in all, and our cause is altogether little and contemptible; therefore we must “serve a higher cause.” — Now it is clear, God cares only for what is his, busies himself only with himself, thinks only of himself, and has only himself before his eyes; woe to all that is not well-pleasing to him. He serves no higher person, and satisfies only himself. His cause is — a purely egoistic cause.

How is it with mankind, whose cause we are to make our own? Is its cause that of another, and does mankind serve a higher cause? No, mankind looks only at itself, mankind will promote the interests of mankind only, mankind is its own cause. That it may develop, it causes nations and individuals to wear themselves out in its service, and, when they have accomplished what mankind needs, it throws them on the dung-heap of history in gratitude. Is not mankind’s cause — a purely egoistic cause?

I have no need to take up each thing that wants to throw its cause on us and show that it is occupied only with itself, not with us, only with its good, not with ours. Look at the rest for yourselves. Do truth, freedom, humanity, justice, desire anything else than that you grow enthusiastic and serve them?

They all have an admirable time of it when they receive zealous homage. Just observe the nation that is defended by devoted patriots. The patriots fall in bloody battle or in the fight with hunger and want; what does the nation care for that? By the manure of their corpses the nation comes to “its bloom”! The individuals have died “for the great cause of the nation,” and the nation sends some words of thanks after them and — has the profit of it. I call that a paying kind of egoism.

But only look at that Sultan who cares so lovingly for his people. Is he not pure unselfishness itself, and does he not hourly sacrifice himself for his people? Oh, yes, for “his people.” Just try it; show yourself not as his, but as your own; for breaking away from his egoism you will take a trip to jail. The Sultan has set his cause on nothing but himself; he is to himself all in all, he is to himself the only one, and tolerates nobody who would dare not to be one of “his people.”

And will you not learn by these brilliant examples that the egoist gets on best? I for my part take a lesson from them, and propose, instead of further unselfishly serving those great egoists, rather to be the egoist myself.

faggot!!!!!

Actually, you lack the spine it takes to be virtuous.

the notion of "spooks" is a spook

...

So are you Rastafarian or something?

BREAK THE CONDITIONING NOW

I've probably been here longer than you user

You've probably sucked a lot more dicks than I have

How many dicks have you sucked?

I have only sucked one female dick

What was that like?

Extremely feminine I'm assuming

well, its like sucking a finger

...

Anyone got a good pdf of the Ego and Its Own?

Here you go user.

you're just anti-ismism

do you mean the book itself or comments on it?

check this one spunk.org/texts/intro/faq/sp001547/secG6.html

...

You're a complete fool, for that is an error-ed quote that children like propagating.
Read the actual scripture!

...

...

Nice one boss

We need this copypasted for believers in radical freedom, true altruism, etc.

...