HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH

Or the wall.

Or jailing Clinton.

Or anything.

good that works in our favor actually. their ideology requires a boogeyman to work, porky would make for an easy substitute in their current vulnerable state.

Kek!

True. Sartre made the point that the anti-Semite seeks out the Jewish boogeyman because he wishes to be unassailable. If the enemy is clear and simple, you can easily pose as a righteous figure and dismiss all condemnation. But if you compromise even slightly, suddenly you've admitted weakness. You can no longer preach the faith, you have to convince by reasoned argument. And on that level they will lose.

Was it Sartre that was an unrepentant Stalinist, or Camus?

It's a memes and shitposting board

Sartre. Camus excoriated the Stalinist regime. Read The Rebel.

Sartre. Camus was on the libertarian left and a bit of a moralist.

Good. Full accelerationism.

Accelerationism would be if he was an actual fascist that brought up concentration camps and sent all the muslims to them and then started wwIII and lowered taxes to an extent that America defaults and ceases to be a nation.

What hes instead going to do is nothing but shill for his business.

...

Sartre wasn't really a Stalinist.

he sounds more like Reagan 2.0 every day

I told you guys he was like Reagan.

Which, I guess, means that Republicans will hail him as their new Jesus.

But this is so much better, slow harvested salt.

It'll be even better if Romney becomes the secretary of state

"no"

WHO KNEW

They've already talked about it.

And how many people have been floated for that position so far?

He won't get it because he spent Trump's entire campaign undermining him wherever possible - beyond the usual "Well, he is the party nominee, I guess" heel dragging

Then again I was assuming Trump would lose (in a close race) so what do I know ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

...