Stephen Bannon: ‘I’m Proud to be a Christian Zionist’

Stephen Bannon: ‘I’m Proud to be a Christian Zionist’
jta.org/2017/11/13/news-opinion/united-states/stephen-bannon-says-im-proud-to-be-a-christian-zionist

By Ben Sales | November 13, 2017 1:34am

NEW YORK (JTA) — Stephen Bannon, the former chief strategist for President Donald Trump, called himself a “Christian Zionist” at the Zionist Organization of America’s annual dinner.

He also praised Republican Jewish megadonor Sheldon Adelson for his help in guiding Trump through a sexual assault scandal.

Bannon, at what may have been his first speech at a Jewish event since becoming associated with Trump last year, received a standing ovation and loud applause throughout his speech on Sunday in New York. He was one of many current and former Trump administration officials to attend the event, including Ambassador to Israel David Friedman, who also spoke, former press secretary Sean Spicer and Sebastian Gorka, a former adviser to Trump who has ties to the Hungarian far right.

“I am not a moderate, I’m a fighter,” Bannon said. “And that’s why I’m proud to stand with the State of Israel. That’s why I’m proud to be a Christian Zionist. ”

The ZOA, which takes hawkish positions on Israel, has been outspoken in its support of Trump, as compared to other large Jewish organizations. Its lineup of speakers Sunday included several Republicans, including Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton, and a couple of centrists: legal scholar Alan Dershowitz and former Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut.

Bannon shepherded the final months of Trump’s presidential campaign and served as one of his chief advisers until August. He supports what he calls “economic nationalist” policies, including limits on immigration and wariness of international agreements. He is the chairman of Breitbart News, a hardline right-wing publication.

Speaking to the ZOA, Bannon said Trump’s election victory “would not have come without one other person besides Donald Trump — Sheldon Adelson.”

In particular, he said Adelson’s advice helped Trump overcome the release of the “Access Hollywood” tape in which Trump boasted about sexually assaulting a woman.

“Sheldon Adelson didn’t cut and run,” Bannon said, regarding the time after the scandal broke. “Sheldon Adelson had Donald Trump’s back. Sheldon Adelson offered guidance and counsel and wisdom of how to get through it. He was there for Donald Trump about how to comport oneself and how to dig down deep, and it was his guidance and his wisdom that helped get us through it.”

Liberal Jewish groups protested Bannon’s appointment to the Trump White House last year because of Breitbart’s links to the “alt-right,” a loose network that includes white supremacists. Bannon has called Breitbart “the platform for the alt-right.” But he has disavowed white supremacists on a few occasions and said he is not a white nationalist.

A group of protesters from IfNotNow, a Jewish group that opposes Israel’s West Bank occupation, demonstrated against Bannon’s speech outside the dinner, which took place at the Grand Hyatt. The group also protested the event last year, when Bannon was invited but did not come.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Uo-UXZ-1ups
archive.is/J8qnw
archive.is/Y2pBA
thefreethoughtproject.com/us-forces-airlift-isis-commanders-syrian-battlefield/
archive.fo/H9s8O
ethnicelebs.com/dick-cheney
breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/13/im-proud-to-be-a-christian-zionist-steve-bannon-gets-standing-o-from-leading-jewish-organization/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

The crowd at the dinner warmly welcomed the Trump advisers, and they touted the president’s record on Israel. In his address, Friedman harshly criticized the Obama administration’s Israel record while praising Trump’s. In particular, he lambasted the U.N. Security Council resolution in December that condemned Israeli West Bank settlements. The United States abstained, declining to veto the measure.

“We came into office on the heels of perhaps the greatest betrayal of Israel by a sitting president in American history,” Friedman said. “I hope you agree with me that we have turned a page since the dark days of last December. Gone are the days when the United Nations bashes Israel with impunity.”

Friedman also said Trump sees eye to eye with Israel’s government on opposing the 2015 agreement on Iran’s nuclear program, which Israel views as dangerous for its security. Referencing a terror attack this year in the West Bank, he said Trump is more sympathetic to Israeli settlements than previous administrations — though he avoided using the word “settlement.” And he said Trump’s peace plan, which is still being formulated, will prioritize Israeli security.

“The president recognizes the critical importance that Judea and Samaria never become the failed experiment that we saw in the Gaza Strip,” Friedman said, using a term for the West Bank favored by Israel’s right. “And perhaps most importantly, you will never hear the president make the case, as his predecessor did, that there is some symmetrical relationship between, let’s say, building a house in the Samarian village of Halamish and the brutal murder of a father, son and a daughter in Halamish at a Shabbat table.”

Speaking at a news conference before the dinner, ZOA President Morton Klein criticized the Trump peace plan, saying that he feels negotiations are useless because the Palestinian Authority is not interested in peace. He compared the P.A. to Nazis and slammed it for providing stipends to families of terrorists.

“The goal is not statehood, the goal is Israel’s destruction,” Klein said. “They’re nothing but a bunch of Arab Nazis who want to murder Jews.”

Bannon in his speech framed Trump’s Israel record as part of fighting Religion of Cuck™ic terrorism in the Middle East. He said two of Trump’s top priorities coming into the White House were moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv — a promise Trump repeatedly made but has yet to fulfill — and decertifying the agreement on Iran’s nuclear program, which Trump did last month.

“He said, ‘Destroy the physical caliphate of ISIS, designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, decertify or renegotiate the Iran deal and move the embassy to Jerusalem,'” Bannon said of Trump.

Later, he called Trump “the strongest supporter of Israel since Ronald Reagan,” though Reagan as president was not unequivocally supportive of Israel.

Bannon also repeated some of his trademark phrases. He called the media the “opposition party” three times while gesturing at the press tables in the back of the room. Near the beginning of the speech, he listed a string of exit poll results, state by state, from the 2016 presidential election. And he spoke in militant terms about his fight against establishment politicians and the “global class.”

“We’re leading an insurgency movement against the Republican establishment, against the permanent global class in Washington, D.C.,” he said.

That line did not receive applause from the mostly Jewish crowd.

Whatcha sliding shlomo?

I suspect you're an outsider just because everyone here already knows this.

...

Bannon was the biggest leaker in the white house

...

...

lol what a totally natural thread from a real /POLack!!! Hello fellow neonazis!
Blew your load too fast, Schlomo.

I can't laugh it off.

kek, maybe someone here can make a webM of Joe Biden saying he's a "Catholic Zionist".

youtube.com/watch?v=Uo-UXZ-1ups

Funny how kikes are shilling against each other, 8/10 chance op is a kike who is shilling against good goy bannon. Typical tricks playing both sides.

Your picture has many inaccurate labels:

- Wilbur Ross is half-Jewish and half-Irish.

- Sean Spicer is half-Jewish and half-Irish, and has a Jewish wife (Rebecca Miller).

- Steve Bannon is Irish

- Michael Anton isn't Jewish. He's Lebanese, Italian, and Greek. However, he is a self-declared Straussian neo-con and the founder of "Trumpism."

- H.R. McMcaster is Irish.

- Reince Priebus isn't Jewish, but he has a Jewish wife (Sally Sherrow).

No…Don't you understand that Mueller is gonna reveal everything from JFK to 9/11 and Vegas effectively exposing the house of lies it's built upon. This will secure Palestinian sovereignty.

One more mistake:

- Joe Hagin is Irish.

If the meme is wrong then fair enough, but that's still a lot of kikes.

Joe Biden is Irish.

Also…

Mike Pence is Irish.

Tim Kaine is Irish.

Dick Cheney is Irish.

Mitch McConnell is Irish.

Paul Ryan is Irish.

Kevin McCarthy is Irish.

And a lot of Micks.

Sounds like they are just a bunch of good goy's to me.

Numbers confirm, this is shilling.

OY VEYYYYY YOURE NOT SUPPOSED TO POST THIS HERE GOY DONT YOU KNOW THIS SITE IS FULL OF NAZIS GO POST IT ON AR15.COM WHERE THE BOOMERS POST

where have you been since april

Yeah and they made sure to be born thousands of miles from Ireland JUST TO COVER IT UP THOSE BASTARDS!

...

So this is why trump didn't want him anymore?

The 21st century sucks at how fucking confusing it is

Good thing this kike loving son of a bitch is out of the white house.

Trump isn't a zionist. A zionist wouldnt have shut down the funding for ISIS. A zionist would have moved the embassy to Jerusalem already. A zionist would have stayed in UNESCO, a zionist would have already gone to war with Iran. A zionist wouldn't have let Assad stay in power. A zionist wouldn't want to have a relationship with Russia.

...

Right, I understand that. Makes me more thankful that Trump is POTUS.

oh man

since when?

Are you joking.
archive.is/J8qnw
archive.is/Y2pBA

No shit he's a Zionist. The motherfucker runs Brietbart news for fucks sake. What is your point? Bannon has never been anything but just another potential tool to further white interests just like Trump and any other mainstream normalfag who could be useful. I don't know what the point of this thread is.

Mueller is a Globalist you dumb faggot get the fuck out of here go back to cuckchan with your LARP faggotry
Bitch
Mueller covered up the FBI murders for Whitey Bulger
Mueller shut down 9/11 truth
Mueller lied about WMDs in Iraq
Go suck a massive cock you fucking queer

Hol up

That doesn't mean they cut funding nigger, it just means that Assad has been kicking the shit out of mossad's and cianigger's proxy mercenary army.

How can they be a tool to further White interests if they don't further White interests? Serious question.

also:
thefreethoughtproject.com/us-forces-airlift-isis-commanders-syrian-battlefield/

That's a weird way of spelling cuckolds
Gas yourself (((Aimless)))

Kikebart lost his funding:
>archive.fo/H9s8O

So it goes.

Carefully reread my post. You are ignoring a very crucial word that renders your question pointless.

fuck that potato nigger.

cuck traitor.

Why would he say this shit? Isn't part of his job marketing Trumpism to us?

ahhhhhh Taylor

greatest thing bout bein a hypocrite is yer never wrong

Now the left will hate israel even more…

I love israel! isnt being a christian great? we're all equals!

You could elucidate on where his potential is instead of trying to avoid answering the question because of semantics.

Being a useful idiot fo devil worshipping rats and proud of it haha. Must have been an open bar.

This is just so, so pathetic. Imagine a chinaman saying
Then make it his sole political goal to promote white nationalism in a foreign country while his own nation burns.
Embarrassing. These people just embarrass me. I just want to slap all white zionists in the face. Yet again, you make the white race look like xenophillic cuckolds. You refuse to love your own but fall over yourself to prove just how much you love the kikes.

When you actually think about another race cucking themselves for whites, you realize just how pampered these effete ratty kikes really are.

I still run BDS on my university campus. Because, hey where else can primarily a bunch of white people talk about Jewish Globalist Intervention on campus? Its great when you get someone who voted for Bernie Sanders to say, "the only reason someone on campus is against BDS is because they're jewish".

Why WOULD ANY Christian be pro-Israel? Because Jesus was a Jew? Actually a Galilean I seriously do NOT think Jesus would be pro-Israel if he somehow came down from heaven today.

You can think that kike scofield for altering parts of the bible. And thank John Hagee's Satan worshipping ass as well.

Somehow Christians were made to believe that the nation (land) of Israel in 1948 is the same one mentioned in the bible. The nation (people) of Israel are just that. Descendant of Abrahams son Jacob who was later named Israel.

Christ came from that lineage about 7 generations later and became a perfect sacrifice so that thru him all could become the nation (people) of Israel.

He hated the Jews. They were blasphemous idolatrous kikes. He let them know it as well. In Matthew 23 he calls them out. He says Jerusalem (land/Israel) will never see him again until they proclaim he is Lord. I don't see the synagogue of Satan doing that anytime soon…

Actually he would be jewish if he did exist. His "lineage" is important to the role of who he is a descendant of. There are no records of him that weren't forgeries.

The one historian that tried to prove he was real in the early days of christianity was a well known fraud even during his time, but for some reason the early church fathers wanted him around. The source for his proof came from a jewish historian who aside from being a jew was also known for being a fraud, particularly for constantly (((revising history))).

If you have to rely on a jew to prove your case for historical accuracy, you're not telling the truth.

m8 you can call Jesus a kike on a stick but you'd have to forge a lot of documents to disprove the fact he at the very least was a real person. Maybe he was another kike conman, but he was certainly real

I never asked for quads

You shouldn't check yourself since that leads to arrogance but I do see repeating digits with your ID in a post in this thread.

user, where do I even begin. This is like wikipedia trying to improve credibility for the fake news, e.g. "The nytimes is real news. See NYT article on why. - wikipedia."

All jews, and even those don't offer much detail let alone credibility to follow up on.

If we had a record that specifically named him, that would be the end of the debate going on for two thousand years. That would be preserved well since when rome converted to christianity before it collapsed, wouldn't they want to hold on to the record to remember their (destined) mistake of crucifying the son of god?

That's not how that works user. You forge documents to fool others to think something is real. You're going about it from the wrong end. Despite the collapse of Rome and even the burning of the library of Alexandria, a lot survived. There are no primary documents supporting the existence of that guy aside from a series of books compiled into one that were finished hundreds of years after the supposed time period.

The greatest moment of retardation for this community was when faggots took the god emperor meme and convinced themselves that Trump is the next incarnation of Hitler, instead of just a stepping stone towards a revival of the Aryan soul.

You can vote for Trump, and not support him.
You can vote for Trump and criticize his actions and words.
You can vote for Trump, and not be a fanboy.
His administration is full of Jews and Zionist "gentiles". Just as every administration has been since this country fell to Jewish control.
Until the banking monopoly is broken, the federal reserve demolished, the IRS abolished and land/weapon rights returned, we will live as rebels in an empire of deception and degeneracy.
While it is possible, in secret, in his own space and thoughts, he could possibly be "/ourguy/", he can't possibly reveal that in any determinable way and remain alive. They would, I assure you, do anything and everything in their power to kill Trump if they ever suspected he was truly a sleeper cell National Socialist or champion of Europa. We cannot afford to assume he might be on our side. The brief respite he may have afforded us in this intentional culling of European bloodlines must be utilized if we are to combat this world war. It's a pity we haven't mobilized our bodies, assets and minds in any effectual manner such as build communities, as the Volkisch movement did. We have in our capability to build self sufficient European towns with our own farms and government. Certainly we'd risk being labeled outcasts in our own lands, but that would force them to make a move, what will they do then, kill us? Choke us with laws and regulations? Force us to take in foreigners? Difficult to do when we are a religious community, unless they want to break that protection, and lose it too. See the Orthodox Jewish communities and the control they are granted in controlling who is and isn't allowed into their enclaves.

To take back our nations we have to rebuild the spine that made them in the first place. That spine is our way of life, the European culture which is ingrained in our blood and lineage. Without blood and lineage, a culture, national identity is nothing more than an economic fashion statement.

Literally a cuck.

Wow.

...

...

unless I'm mistaken you misspelled Donald Trump. If you didn't, fuck off and find an actual source and not a lying kike.

So, a cuck?

Idk fam it seems to still be up the next day.

did you think "christ-cuck" was just a meme?

Not only that, but if he even did exist, he's still just a pacifist kike on a stick who is the total opposite of an Aryan role model. Seriously–get away from cuck ideologies.

FUCK ISRAEL

GAS THE KIKES

Literally just a single mention and it's not an account of something we don't know; he is reiterating for the reader what Christians are. If stating what Christians believe in is proof he existed then that explains Christians and their circular logic.

Jew historian. Enough said.
Same as Tacitus. No really.

Yeah, let's use the talmud. Like using a jewish historian.

Same exact thing as Tacitus. Brief mention, explains what christians are. Nothing more, nothing less.

If he was referencing Jesus, his mention is even briefer than the above examples. If, the reason why it's if is because no one is sure who he is talking about.

Same as above. But in his case the writing has evidence of tampering, particularly the mention that is more likely to be about christians than any mention of jesus.

I'm glad you posted this so everyone can see how poor a case for his existence really is. I doubt you yourself have even bothered to look. This is why people who study Theology end up agnostic, they study hoping to improve their faith and realize they've been duped by a 2000+ year figment of jewish tricks. Evidence about jesus existing is on holo caust-tier proof. I'm not even exaggerating. If anything, there's more ((("proof"))) that jews got shoah'd in germany than there is of jesus existing. That's how you know believing in (((him))) really is a about (((faith))) and nothing more.

I first read this yesterday at Breitbart and although there were less than 100 comments the majority were calling him out on this. I returned this morning to read the other comments and the BB article is gone. Front page now is all spin on how he's so Catholic, how he

Unless they're jews of course.

Bannon might as well be a jew the way he used Holla Forums like a dirty $10 street slut, he came, he manipulated, he got what he wanted, HE GLOATED, and then he sucks off his masters jew dick. Not much different from Brock when you take an honest look.

Based.

Got a link to the breitbart article? Even if it's gone there might be an archive of it.

It's illuminating when all those old stereotypes prove valid, instead of everyone pretending they were just made up, for no valid reason, by big meanies.

Please explain why Christians would make up something that serves no purpose like Christ being baptized by an inferior and being painfully crucified, if anything it would harm the faith. Please explain how historians for two millenniums were in on some Jewish conspiracy to invent and perpetuate a myth of a man god that defied the Pharisees and was killed for it even though he had a vast amount of followers witnessing his deeds, powers, and wisdom.
Please explain how Christ just so happened to follow all the prophecies to a T predicting all that would happen centuries before his birth.
Please try to justify your modern man impulse to destroy the faith of the western man as well as their culture. I really am intrigued on how your mind functions, you seem to have defied common sense, logic, and two thousand years of history/culture/theology/architecture/music/art all because you believe "Christianity is a Jewish conspiracy to undermine the West because some modern "Christians" are Zionist shabbos goy stooges and Christ was Jew". Do you even understand how pathetic this is? How weak you sound? Your personality reeks of frustrated Jew hellbent on destroying all semblance of pre-enlightenment traditional western culture and mentality because you're too edgy and afraid to come to the same historical conclusion that Christ did in fact exist, and was crucified for calling (((them))) out.

Dick Cheney Ethnicity: English (mostly), as well as small amounts of Scottish, Irish, Welsh, and French

Rest of the list all have multi European ancestry along with Irish mixture. Typical German,E
and Irish American mixtures.


ethnicelebs.com/dick-cheney

Also,

Also…tiny 2% Jewish cancerous population that's been thrown out of 109 countries isn't comparable to some mid management shabbos goy politicians with some Irish ancestry.

This a thing? Again, this almost parallels holohoax denial reactions.
One word: (((Christians)))
John the Baptist was most likely one of the many messianic cultists which was popular around that time. It's symbolic to have a caricature say that the other guy is the chosen one even in other works of fiction.
Do you even understand how pathetic this is? How weak you sound? Your personality reeks of frustrated Jew hellbent on destroying all semblance of pre-enlightenment traditional western culture and mentality because you're too edgy and afraid to come to the same historical conclusion that Christ did in fact exist, and was crucified for calling (((them))) out.
Where was I edgy? Also I'm not the one that's painfully obvious and butthurt. Clearly you're not emotionally stable enough to discuss this topic and digest simple facts. Also I find it interesting that you specifically named "pre-enlightenment" culture when one of the most important factors of the enlightenment period was the waning decline of the (((church's))) influence, and the re-discovery of pre-christian wisdom and works. Again, christianity is clearly a stranglehold on white development. You cannot tell the story of the enlightment without mentioning that very important fact.

By your logic flat earthers should be taken seriously or else we're reacting like believers of the holocaust.
>One word: (((Christians)))
What's this supposed to mean? Not an argument, (((atheist))).
Or you know, he was literally just a Baptist and not some cultist in on some Jewish conspiracy to invent a Messiah who would disturb the establishment, kind of defeats the purpose doesn't it?
It's to emphasise that it would be embarrassing for Christians to admit such a thing, autist.
>There's only one historian that tried to perpetuate it and he was jewish, and then you have the shabbos goyim that worked with the (((church fathers))) to record what they did.
Greeks and a small amount of disciples that broke from Judaism wrote the Bible and spread the faith, early Christians were persecuted for centuries. Literally zero incentive and a lot of risk of being executed and for what? Perpetuating a myth that directly shakes the foundations of Judaism?
Where was I edgy? Also I'm not the one that's painfully obvious and butthurt. Clearly you're not emotionally stable enough to discuss this topic and digest simple facts. Also I find it interesting that you specifically named "pre-enlightenment" culture when one of the most important factors of the enlightenment period was the waning decline of the (((church's))) influence, and the re-discovery of pre-christian wisdom and works. Again, christianity is clearly a stranglehold on white development. You cannot tell the story of the enlightment without mentioning that very important fact.
The fact you believe in fringe nonsense like Christ never existing is edgy. I'm not butthurt, I've ignored pleb-tier posters like you for too long but somebody has to speak out. You provide zero facts/evidence, you simply work your way around logical fallacies and claim the thing that built the western man and innovated his philosophy on life, not to mention created a reason for Christians to oppose to Jews is a Jewish conspiracy. The enlightenment was opposed to Christian beliefs and traditions, it was heavily against the supernatural/events/miracles that occured in the Bible, it was against the traditional idea of role of God, not to mention the criticism of Christianity that came from the enlightenment. I won't even begin mentioning the list of enlightenment era writers that were opposed to the Crusades, labelling them barbaric.

In short, you're a faggot who needs to read books and not listen to whatever some bluepilled faggot on Holla Forumsspouts about religion. Hurr two plus two Christ was Jew kill the Christians. It's intellectually dishonest to be frank. Also I'm on my phone, probably won't reply again.

nope, wish I did. It was fucking full front page yesterday, extra big type in red, he was signaling what a good shabbos goy he was but I guess the comments didn't go his way.

Bumplocked. Fuck this kike hive.

Actually I'm merely building off of what I mentioned in a previous post. Nice attempt to associate this with flat-earthers. Are shills defending christianity now? Only shills cite flat-earthers in a lame attempt to discredit things.

>What's this supposed to mean? Not an argument, (((atheist))).

2/2


What did (((he))) do, in a substantial way? Also what philosophy does christianity already offer? When catholic thinkers like Thomas Acquinas encountered Greek philosophy they merely applied it to catholicism and pretended that it was compatible.

So why is the enlightenment proof that the catholic church had a stranglehold on Europe's development?
Aside from censorship and having to pay artists they censored so they can make art the church uses as propaganda. Did you know that another artist's talent is not proof of the church itself having talent?

Like how christian-roman senators were way more degenerate than the pagan senators.

I don't think you even understand what you wrote.

Wow

Kek

So we'll just ignore prior white civilizations and achievements and the fact that christianity brought the jews to its most wealthiest status ever.

And the enlightenment was where we had the most scientific development, a major offset to the stagnation a powerful church brought Europe. Also let's not forget how the northen crusades decimated northern europe as a major example of conversion through force.

lmao
You will though. Every thread bringing up the jewish subversion via christianity yields more redpills on the longest lasting jewish trick ever. You're just one of the last few still defending a jewish lie that needs to die.


Too bad. I guess I'll check archive.org and see if it has a snapshot of yesterday.

found it in another thread.
breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/13/im-proud-to-be-a-christian-zionist-steve-bannon-gets-standing-o-from-leading-jewish-organization/

Good to see it's still up, and just archived.

...