Dictatorship by a strong authoritian Socialist leader is a destination on the
path to true Communism, which is dictatorship by the proletariat. This is a part of the Communist ideology.
The bread lines obviously worked : web.williams.edu/Economics/brainerd/papers/ussr_july08.pdf
Average heights increased during the Soviet era, which means people were getting more nutrition and better healthcare under
Communism.
"the muds, the fags, the trannies, the fems, the kikes, etc"
pro·gres·siv·ism
prəˈɡresəˌvizəm/Submit
noun
support for or advocacy of social reform.
"the country is seen as a bastion of social progressivism"
re·form
rəˈfôrm/Submit
verb
1.
make changes in (something, typically a social, political, or economic institution or practice) in order to improve it.
"an opportunity to reform and restructure an antiquated schooling model"
synonyms: improve, better, make better, ameliorate, refine; More
Ideology and race are not one in the same. Each ideology has a different notion for progressivism, but only one really has
at it's core the belief that human progress is based upon improvements in quality of life for the proletariat.
It's communism.
I'm not sure what you want me to argue. There is one definition for progress. Progressivism? One definition,
but different meanings for "social reform." Sometimes "social reform" means going backwards and
reducing the proletarian quality of life.
As a communist, I have no inherent moral system. I seek to improve the quality of life for the workers, which benefits me
and everyone else - perhaps as side effects the rich might suffer, but the collective will not.
Keep in mind if everyone was a conservative we would be living in the stone age indefinitely.
Conservatism may have worked in the ancient world, but now it's time for conservatism to die off, if need by
by force. Conservatives are holding the human race back, preventing and / or slowing progress.
Interracial couple disgust is a trait best left to the stone age.
Keep in mind if we were to obey "laws of nature" or start obeying them we would likely go extinct. Our entire world has been
changed by humans overpowering natural law. We have nuclear reactors, we are causing global warming, we have
nuclear weaponry. Shall we go back to the natural laws and cause our own extinction, or accept that we are now
the leaders of our planet and must accept the responsibility using unnatural means?
The human race overtaking nature has been going on for millenia now. Farming = unnatural. Should we become
hunter gatherers again?