Holy shit, so, what you're telling me is, young women enjoy sex and will pursue it if not instructed against such, to their detriment?
What a revelation. Well, clearly, it was a-okay then - you know, if a dumb young girl wants to do something because it feels good, that must mean its good for her!
Now, let me tell you about cocaine…
1. there totally were.
2. they weren't necessary in most cases, because the society dictated otherwise.
3. you are in fact coming off as a greasy pedophilic faggot.
Simple fact: According to all available evidence, in the case of females, younger age of first sexual encounter directly correlates to a significant increase, one might even call it a 'spike', in lifetime sexual partners and a similar reduction in the ability to maintain relationships.
No, and your rhetoric is dogshit. Frankly, adolescence achieve puberty in their early teens, and are biologically capable of sex after that point - this does not suggest, especially in our society, that they are prepared for sexual relationships that they pursue. They do not have the experience and/or cognitive ability to reason this shit out, and the result, in a society such as ours, is the destruction of their capacity to form functional pair bonds.
Young sex destroys females, and it is evolutionarily the job of the adult male to drive off males that would seek to utilize his female offspring in such a flippant manner as we see accepted in society today.
Simply put: That a 13 year old female gets horny and feels inclined to stuff something in her cooter does NOT suggest she should be given warrant to do so at her leisure and without restriction.
You, sir (or more likely, madam), are a depraved faggot, presenting this harmful condition of our modern society as acceptable and accusing - utterly without warrant - anyone who opposes your sick fetishism of young, innocent women (whom you no-doubt could not acquire in a more rational society, due to being a lout who could not acquire such young women from their guardian fathers) as some sort of 'prude'.
Throughout the history of mankind, adult males have stood as guardians over the young daughters, guarding their chastity and by extension their ability to fucnction as wives and mates until such time as a viable male came along that he could entrust such into the care of, and perhaps never in the history of mankind has the job of such guardianship been so fraught with difficulty and so disdained within the society.
Freedom is nothing but the absence of obligation - it is not the paramount. If you become obsessed with your freedoms, and forget you duties, your society, your nation, your people, will die. WILL die. Not might, not could - WILL.
It is not an absence of freedom you decry, with your whining about 'kike money' - its your total abandonment of the very concept of duty, at the societal level, the result being a perceived state of 'total freedom' on behalf of the populace, wherein they feel - like a puppy who was never trained - that if it feels good, if it is met with pleasure and 'success', it must be moral and righteous.
