Google Banned Our #BlackLivesMatterGame for "Hate Speech"

Hi Holla Forums,

Hoping this won't come off as a plug, because I think y'all will find this interesting, and that you would appreciate it coming right from a dev.

We made a game poking fun at #BlackLivesMatter and activists in general (I don't think I need to explain that kind of stuff to you guys), but it recently got banned from Google Play and then even pulled by Itch.io, both for "hate speech" even though all the speech in the game is from BLM activists themselves.

I wrote the whole story and some insight on Medium. If youre a dev, or you're just concerned about censorship (and more), do me a favor and take a look? -

https:[email protected]/* */[email protected]/* */ch-except-all-the-speech-is-from-81e927a417e5#.3usebt4lc

archive (no images): archive.is/bRjKK

The whole thing is beyond frustrating because we all know exactly what's going on, but the last thing I want to do is quietly go away like they want. This has gotta change.

I'll pop in to this thread to read and reply assuming this doesn't get deleted (lol)

Other urls found in this thread:

8ch.net/agdg/res/22087.html
don't
blacklivesmattergame.com
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Williams_(Internet_entrepreneur)
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

It is hate speech though. #BLM is a terrorist organization by definition.

apk or fuck off

provide download nerd, make sure to spread it all over reddit for maximum salt

So find some other way to distribute it? They're not at fault for pulling games they disagree with, it's just the nature of the beast

Good.

Free speech only applies to private residences, not public forums or privately-owned businesses. If you go into a public place and scream "NIGGERS NEED TO HANG" then of course you're going to be arrested for hate speech. This is one of the most grossly misunderstood things, right next to the right to bear arms. Seriously, the Second Amendment was written in reference to fucking muskets.

Google Play is a private business, so they have every right to police you


????

...

There's not really much anyone can do about their decision to pull it, but I think it's something still worth covering in the media. Like you said, they banned it for hate speech, but all of that came from BLM itself; people ought to be made aware. I at least hope the article gets some good coverage.

Got a torrent for that OP

Here's a wager:
You can't support one part of the constitution but deny another.
If google supports the 15th amendment and says that people can't refuse anyone service on their race, gender, sexual orientation, etc, they HAVE to support the first amendment too or they are hypocrites.

reminder this faggot has been baiting with this shit for more than a fucking year already
8ch.net/agdg/res/22087.html

dubs thread

...

top lel. You deserve it, drumpf-sheep. Go back to your containment board. Bet you're one of those anti-anime dickheads, too. Well guess what? Holla Forums is hosted on 2ch servers, so I can post anime whenever I want. Go cry to the mods, drumpf babbies

don't bump this sad shit

But he did, at the bottom of the article.
Here it is again.
don't use link shorteners/2dkrkrM

hahahahahaa
lol

Free dl on the website: blacklivesmattergame.com

Pre-BTFO by the article, which I recommend you read, then you won't have to keep posting that XKCD comic everywhere thinking the whole world is confused and you're the only one who gets it :^)


I don't blame people who think that whole thing was fake, I dont think I would believe it either if I hadn't met the person. (Am I allowed to call a nonbinary genderqueer a "person" or is that racist?)

I live in Australia and my waifu is better than yours

I've seen this game in motion, it's shit.
Make a better game or fuck off.

All I see is pixelshit hipsters bitching about someone disagreeing with their identity politics.

No ones saying it's not a fucked up state of affairs, but the OP isn't trying to spread his game he's trying to spread the controversy around his game. I'd have a modicum of sympathy if it seemed more like he wanted people to play it than that he wanted to make a hamfisted political statement through its existence

Observe how it's done.

OP the rifle is super OP compared to the other weapons. After getting it there's no reason to risk getting a shotgun or pistol in the mystery boxes.

Why do you enter a thread just to sage?

Buy a real gun
Just in case :^)

FUCK YOU NIGGERFAGGOT DON'T SHILL YOUR SHIT GAME HERE

Because he wants to add to a conversation without contributing to the continued existence of the conversation? Why is sage so hard to understand for some people

...

Why havent you tried steam?

Thank you!

It would be nice if people actually played it too, but let's face it, there are a zillion games out there and we can't even get on the only platforms anyone uses to discover them.

Noted, I think you're right! Thanks!

We really wanted to, but if I understand the Greenlight rules, it's like $100USD just to apply, we need like 900 votes, and they probably will reject it anyway, AND we won't get the $100 back.

Check the local GamerGate thread, it seems more your speed, and I'm sure they would love it.

Will do!

Just fuck off

RIGHT WING DEATH SQUADS

I don't care if you are legitimately pissed by the way BLM is getting a free pass in the media, or if you're just some edgy provocateur trying to cash in on the anti-SJW attitude that's becoming more popular… But fuck you for your lame ass hipster indie pixel graphics.

Maybe if you live in a third world muslim country, like the UK. Freedom of speech has no boundaries in the glorious United State of America also known as the best country in the world 238 years running. other than if you are intending to incite a riot. If you are on private property you can be asked to leave and must comply, but out in public you can say whatever the fuck you want.

I hate to defend that retard but google play is a private distribution platform, so your point is invalid. This also doesn't mean he can't make a website to give out copies of his game.

Shouldn't free speech really only apply to personal property anyways with the way its done by Americans?

Thats not the point I was arguing. I was only correcting a false statement. Google can do whatever it wants.


Free speech exists because without it the voices of those that do not agree with the masses are not heard, or worse, are persecuted for such thoughts. not that it stops the liberals from doing so anyway

The United States is a huge place with many different views. If freedom of speech were to be only allowed within the vicinity of your property and a single group came into power they could immediately stifle all opposing views.

Even if I think you're a giant poof faggot that should die, I still believe your stupid fucking opinion deserves to be heard. That's the American way.

>>>Holla Forums

They are silenced and persecuted anyways. What difference does it make? None. All it does is make it so the government has no legal precedence to silence you, and even that is a failure.


No wonder it's so chaotic. This is something that should be altered.


Happened anyways.


And it's a failure. The Founders never once suggested you should let people admonish the constitutions amendments and let people talk and criticize your nation into the dirt. The idea of free speech is self defeating in this manner, and for a practical people this could not be their original intention. Free speech; No, the rights of the constitution, should be forfeit to anyone who should ask that they be limited or removed.

thiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiis

very well said

Niggers are dumb

Right, because being shouted down by retards is exactly the same as being thrown in a gulag for wrongthink.

The inefficiency of the American government is the only thing protecting us from the incompetence of the people that make it up.
Wanting it to work smoothly is practically suicide.

Not entirely.
For starters, this site still has a twatter account, among other things.
As long as the 1st amendment is there, it forces anyone who wants to shut up others to focus public attention entirely on the shouting retards in enemy ranks, which is much preferable to the shit they've got going on everywhere else.

There's your problem.
America was not made by practical people, it was made by free people.
Also, by the logic of the second idea you proposed, that would also forfeit the rights of everybody who wants the niggers sent back to Africa to remain in the US instead of being in one of the Eurotrash countries.

Quit being a defeatist little bitch.
Also, the extra line between the greentext and the response is unnecessary since the text is of two different colors.

I downloaded and played this game, and my biggest criticism is that it's just not fun to gun down niggers when identity politics is also in the mix.

Go straight to North Korea. Do not pass Go, do not collect $200.

To put it bluntly you need to add a level of subtlety.
This is just off the top of my head but go with something like a scifi setting.
There is a race of reptilian aliens that were enslaved by mankind.
Eventually they were freed but allowed to live along side humans within' the federation.
But the reptilians refused to assimilate into human culture, are savage in nature and lash out at humans.
They scream in dialect known as Reptibonics which one could decrypt if they worked at it.
You play a security guard at a rally for a human official who is hated by most of the reptilians.
They attack the rally and it is up to you defend the potential federation official and unmask his political opponent as the reptilian in disguise that she is!
They attack every spaceport on the planet you're on except for the one on the outskirts of the reptilian ghetto because of its higher security.
At one point the reptilians start doing drugs and become more difficult to kill.
You fight your way out of
It isn't escort missions, you're just clearing the way and at the end of each level the official and his security detail run past as the security detail gets progressively smaller each time.
Idealy the combat would be Paracite in City levels with the same level of sprite art but we are talking about trying to make a mobile game so any attempt at making an enjoyable game is practically dead in the water.

It is very very hard for me to not get mad at this post

huh google actually did a good thing for once

Pretty much everything you've said is false, but I understand how jealous it can make someone to not live in the beautiful United States of America.

Doesn't matter you added real quotes, you are still shooting nogs. BLM nogs, which is 9/11 times more egregious

Your game shouldn't have been banned but it's retarded and bad
Blocklivesmatter did this concept better, had actually creative gameplay, and didn't look like boiled ass

Is there an Android device that doesn't rely on Google Play?

wew

...

whenever I read this article something was screaming at me saying

JUST PUT IT ON STEAM YOU NIGGER

shoot yourself

So wait, the game is using actual BLM activists quotes and it's still banned?

lol what the shit google.

You can sideload apps if you disable some security option, but you have to be sure it's malware free

You can take solace in the fact I was only pretending to be retarded.

I recognize that second game
Good taste

Your kind was suppose to stay on >>>/cuckchan/

Wew lad

Wait a minute, are you this insufferable cunt? >>>/agdg/22087

...

seriously, tone it down.
I hate this style too - mostly because it's associated with sjw's, and also because it's lazy.
But it's a valid choice if you want to make something quick.

At least do the Hebrew right, bud. You might as well just type 'tiab' instead.

OY VEY I'VE BEEN EXPOSED, I MUST REPORT TO MARK

Submit to Steam.


POO

...

Holla Forums here.

I don't care that you're making fun of niggers, but Australia is a White country. You have to go back and poo in your own streets.

How about making a game in which as a black man you kill white people in a form of "crusade" in favor of a random ideal? Bonus points if they have to way to defend themselves, I'm sure Google nor Itch.io will take them down

They're just trying to correct the record. It's entirely harmless, goyim.

It isn't. But you accomplish the same thing in silencing someone. Free speech is still a failure in actually protecting free speech, all it's meant to do is prevent the government from stepping in and regulating speech. Which it has also failed to do.

No, the threat of Civil War is. A shitty government is going to be constantly in danger of being corrupted or taken apart by foreign powers. And, I was referring to America in general, not its government structure.

And Twitter can shut it down immediately if they wish with no repercussions.

How so? And it doesn't really seem to work that way. Liberalism is quite effective at getting votes and power, if nothing else. They've also been quite effective at using the 1st Amendment to destroy the 1st Amendment. Don't get me wrong, the Idea of free speech is a good one, but its self destructive when it allows you to speak out against it. It is inevitably going to be corrupted by those who would commit evil.

If America was not made by practical people it wouldn't have been made at all. The founding fathers were respectable and intelligent men, and the constitution that they slaved to create has been corrupted in ways they may never have guessed at. Do you truly think they were okay with Liberals shouting down the 2nd under the protection of the 1st? Do you truly believe that the 1st was meant to protect those who would destroy the constitution itself? user, that would be called treason in their time.

That's why you need to fix your demographics and society before you try and fix your government structure. Or better yet, only apply it to free speech. After all, you can't have free speech when people can actively destroy free speech.

It's defeatist to point out the flaws in the constitution? It may have been a genius invention at the time, but it is not flawless. Although if you insist that it is defeatist to point out those flaws, I suppose you already took my advice.

I see you've taken my advice; No criticism of the Constitution allowed :^)

Your game is virtue signalling trash, used as a containment tool by alphabetti soup agencies of Five Eyes. Just like the Don, but at least he's fun to watch.
Stop wasting my taxpayer money, you filthy melbournian trash!

what gaem

Yeah I don't know what this cunt's game is but what with those 'assets' in the other thread the entire thing is shifty as fuck.


The name is right in the post you twice barbarian of afric.

...

Niggers gonna nigg while thought police protect these animals; further allowing them to perpetuate black culture.

lel

Considering it's entirely made up of quotes from niggers themselves, will Google ban niggers next for the hate speech they do on a nanosecond basis?

It's hate speech because anything that reflects poorly on blacks is ebil.

are you saying 100 dollars is alot to publish a game? because if you are you can fuck right off.

I see the reeducation program has worked well with you comrade.
Keep on doing your daily work for the great nigg.. I mean brother.

why don't you just fucking kill yourself OP

test

>>>/reddit/

I remember you, you putrid cunt. I remember your game too. I remember your one pixel limbs and shit animations, and I remember you having a meltdown when people told you the game was shit. I remember how you tried to blame people disliking your game on "political correctness infesting 8ch".
You're a retard and you deserve it.

Google deserves to go extinct.

Now that you mention this incident, does anybody know what happened with the #BlOckLivesMatter game?

to be fair, you also can't open a restaurant and say "no Pagans" or "no Muslims", even though both of those are belief systems that one has control over

Your trips confirm faggots like you exist and need to commit suicide.

Will you kill yourself when Trump is elected, or will you wait for inauguration day?

Why?

Why is social justice wrong again?

Because it isn't justice.

Does anyone have a actual refutation of this?

But why?

...

...

Too bad repeating rifles existed in the 1770's.

I guess, if you're a nigger, you might like abusing white people.

Yes, it is monumentally retarded to make the claim that there is no freedom of speech in public; considering that the right to assemble is one of the major tenets. You have things absolutely ass-backwards, in private forums the owner of the forum can censor/limit speech as he sees fit. Public forums are owned by the government, technically to say, the bill of rights exist to limit governmental powers and not the individual freedoms of private citizenry, so the government has no right to restrict speech in public places. This is why neo-"nazi", KKK, or otherwise FBI fronts can march/congregate/assemble around courthouses or down city roads.

On the second Amendment, the Bill of Rights are to limit Government, not citizens. What's more, Independence was won by: rifles, cannon, explosive mines, and private war ships. Militias are civil associations made up of private citizens in order to mutually defend, a militia that is federalized or run by the states is an army. A well regulated militia is an armed populace.

tldr; You have the right to scream GTKRWN in a Jew Deli as they are open to the public, but they have the right to ban you and file a restraining order against further harassment. Whether your rights will stand up everywhere is questionable.

imagine you have a chair there are ppl who dont own chairs right? so they beat you rape you then steal your chair because you a fucking white male and there ppl who cant or dont have chairs

Obvious bait, but I do like to take every opportunity to point out that years before the 2nd Amendment was ratified, there were semi-auto rifles with 20 round magazines.

Trivializes and weaponizes the races it claims to defend, in the interest of using them to advance socialism and take control by weakening the nation through infighting and racial upheaval. It's also not "justice", but rather perverting the word to use it as a call to action to attack a race you disagree with.


When people stop talking about a problem, its seen as compliance.


Go fuck yourself communist. The founding fathers were smart enough to know weaponry would advance with technology, and they were smart enough to know their creation would eventually grow corrupt.

Is the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea a Democratic country? A Republic? For and by the People?

As a general rule, if something labels itself something that sounds good it probably isn't. Like a tool that says PRO on it or anything that says NEW & IMPROVED. Social Justice, in the modern parlance, is really Socialist Justice; think of it like Gulag reform camps. The goal isn't to further righteousness, but to make everyone guilty of something.

Or like the patriot act. Nothing patriotic about it. Or the freedom act.

Hate speech isn't free speech.

Besides, it is googles business they can do whatever they want.

Just because you are a triggered stormfaggot doesn't mean anyone here cares.

Why don't you fuck off back to >Holla Forums and jerk your tiny dicks to drumpf some more.

>OUR
>U
>R

Nobody wanted to have anything to do with your pixel shit political cash grab. Fuck off.

Because real Justice does not care that people are different, only that they are governed by a single set of rules.
There is a reason there's only one set of scales held by every statue of Lady Justice.

But "Hate Speech" is free speech. Unless you live in a commie country.

Does free speech include screaming fire in a crowded theater? Does it include libel and slander?

No it doesn't. This isn't free speech and it isn't protected.

Libel and slander are (theoretically) only illegal when untrue. In that case, along with yelling fire, it is a case of someone saying something false with the sole intent of causing harm.
This is substantially different than a statement of opinion.

If "hate speech" fell under any of those things they would just call it that. Hate speech is practically defined as "legal but SJWs don't like it."

You can say something completely untrue to slander/libel someone; it is only illegal when you know it to be untrue and you say it to defame/attack someone. If you are saying something as satire, or sarcastically, you can lie your ass off about someone; to better protect yourself from possible litigation, where the court decides if it is satire, make your statement so obtuse that no reasonable person would believe it.(see- Ted Cruz is the Zodiac)

Yeah, because wanting the EU to have an army really makes them the best, doesn't it you fucking xenophile nigger?

That only flies if the target is ruled to be a public figure.
Basically, it means that you can lie about Trump all you want if you can sufficiently convince the court that it was really just a failure in fact-checking rather than cooking up shit to throw, but you can't do the same thing to, say, the OP of the h-game general.
t. user in a business law class.

If you want to get really technical, "hate speech" is related to "fighting words" and, oddly enough, "obscene speech," in that it really doesn't get acted on a whole lot due to libertarian folks getting up in arms over the subjectivity of finding it.
"I'll know it when I see it" is not very reassuring when you've got the supreme law of the land behind you.

What is #blacklivesmatter even about anyway? Is it black panthers 2.0?

your sick to be making a mockery of a struggle black african-american people of color are suffering on this country.

because when you take a universally good concept and append an adjective to it, you end up with the opposite
see also: people's republic

Can we objectively narrow down the best country?

I already know that this is some heavy duty false flag COINTELPRO shit so fuck off right now. You talk like a faggot, you shill your unarchived bullshit like a faggot, you think people want to play your faggot edgelord game. But no. I don't want to play your bullshit because I don't give a fuck. I don't give a fuck about faggot Google, got it homeslice? This is some normalfag meme war bullshit to stir up CNN controversy pieces rather than do anything productive. You, yes you are a faggot. Put your game up somewhere else rather than simply throwing shit at jewgle knowing it won't stay there and then bitching about it. If changing the way something works simply meant doing dumb shit like this, we'd be living in a utopian society right now. Enough with your faggot edgelord shit, because if you gave a rat's ass, you'd actually be working out a solution rather than screaming for attention like a faggot fuck.

should've used and/or, but proving slander/libel is quite hard. Unless the shit-flinger is stupid enough to admit that they made it up.


Kind of; the hope was to fund a group of blacks to transform America the way Civil rights groups the Soviets funded did. In the ensuing slackening/chaos Soros and co. would clean up at the cost of the American public. It's pretty hilarious that a Hungarian Jew is using these negroids as money making tools without having to pay upkeep on a plantation house.

Of course, one critical difference is that "hate speech" has never been specifically defined in the law because it's never been held illegal in any context, unlike those other two things. Even when past lawmakers tried to do so, they have NEVER been upheld by the courts in a case that's still binding today.

The OP is good but you nig nogs always have to ruin the thread.

I say we take over New Zealand.

Switzerland or Austria, esp. if Hofer wins, are my votes.

Are we being raided?

...

I'm pretty sure medium is not a publication, the OP is basically linking to a glorified forum post.

He's trying to play us like a damn fiddle for a quick shekel, send him to the gas chamber with the rest.

See


It's a blog post, not a real article.

He's still profiting off of it, so I don't see why the difference is important.

Even worse. Medium is a fucking cancer on society, and the fact that it's being linked to on here makes my eyes bleed.

...

Even more worrying. The website is run with no ads, yet has bullshit like this on the front page. Makes you wonder who's financing it, and what they have to gain from the website being visited more often.

You have nothing left, back to the cotton field with you.

and guess who started it? One of the toppest jews of current year: a former Twitter CEO.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Williams_(Internet_entrepreneur)

(((a certain "Hungarian" perhaps)))

hilarious, my friend.

Let me rephrase, top editors openly ADVERTISE Ted Cruz and BLM pieces on the front page. Which begs the question: who are you, >(5)?

Full Frontal is a shitty television show. Television shows don't post; they cross promote, which means there are advertising shekels to be made. Keep in mind a retarded woman paid millions for Tumblr; try monetizing that.

This thread is fucking garbo killing legit vidya discussion.

Sorry about your thread, man. With the Luckey Mass Triggering Event, goons are working overtime.

it's… a blogging site. it's like blogger. you're getting worked up at a blank notepad. you're an idiot.

can I get a religious exemption on helping you with this

So posting a link to a facebook post or a twitlonger or a youtube video are all haram because someone somewhere is making money from it and supports a some murrican politician you don't like.

I said back to the cotton field.

you ok, sonney jim?

Case in point.

Right, so I can just link to pretty much any social media cancerous post looking to get attention and ass kissing from anons. On top of that, said website promotes certain (((articles))) over others because the editors said so, got it.

you made the accusation, back it up, faggot.

Trigglypuff pls

debatable how much control someone has over being muslim when most are born into it and apostates are killed.

What the fuck are you doing nigga?