Some whites actually believe a threshold has not been crossed, that ethnic conflict is not inevitable at this point, whether they want it or not.
They actually believe their 'tolerance' isn't a capitulation, that it isn't a demonstration of their incapability for group/collective competition and that this will be seen as anything except weakness and fear. While their whole institutional system and academia, their whole power structure turns a blind eye to the warlike rhetoric against the "white male", they still think there isn't a systematic intent on making their deaths and indignities impunitable. Even while there is no attention brought to educational pamphlets that say "To hate white people is okay and understandable." and Zimbabwe openly says that 'killing the boer' will not be punished by state enforcement.
These whites are only unconcerned because they believe that whites are too powerful, that it couldn't 'happen to them'. Despite their cries against ever identifying as a white, no rational person would ignore their being targeted for their race if it was a real threat. If they would, they are mentally ill. They are absolutely insane, crazy and ideological zealots that are self-suicidal before they would ever embrace their racial tribalism. As such, if they are such, let them be. Let them be crazy and fringe, without a sense of survival or instinct - zealots dying on the petard of "I wasn't racist." Their victimization being, to them, a proof of their ideological strength. Some, even, think they are anti-religious when they behave this way. And if they insist on actually attacking the ability for whites to organize together against the existential threat, then treat them like the enemy. They have ignored all reasonable argumentation.
We said to them from both a racial and non-racial perspective, even a libertarian one, that our movement is necessary. We said from the non-racial cultural perspective that the very existence of a 'Jewish' distinction or any other distinction except their national denominator was an indication of a failure of their culture to assimilate others. That a Jew still remains a Jew, despite being in a non-Jewish country, is evidence of utter cultural failure and, after 100s of years of accommodation, evidence of a giving up on assimilation at all. That is, they value none of their culture or its history. They are aimless. Even with no racial element involved, they have failed and are intent on failing in the cultural project so long as they tolerate Jewishness and are not Jewish themselves. They'll soon learn that the only 'Jewish' non-Jew is a goyim.
From libertarianism, we told them: look, any laws against discrimination are anti-liberal. The cake maker should be able to deny a customer on any grounds. A white man should be able to refuse service to a black man - and the Jew should be able to welcome the black man and acquire his business. But, these social justice warriors do not care for any principle of liberty, under a true establishment of which, the white race would prosper. They have no intense feelings against the so-called 'anti-discrimination' laws, so see no reason that there is a socialist state against whites. They abandon the liberty/liberal/libertarian argument all the same when it involves whites prospering for themselves and having freedom of association.
As for the racial argument, it has already been made and it is present in all sense of self-preservation as a natural human being.
