Its at this point in time that you will start to see many hollywood stars come out and talk about guns with choked up...

Its at this point in time that you will start to see many hollywood stars come out and talk about guns with choked up voices and tear stained faces. I dont buy this for a second. Earlier I saw Jimmy Kimmel use his position to start talking about gungrabbing, bashing the NRA and then decided to post all of the politicans pictures who said no to some bullshit bill. This needs to be stopped before they try to fuck over our second amendment. God the acting was kind of decent. If it wasnt for the fact that he was trying to shame people I might have bought it.

Other urls found in this thread:

thegoldwater.com/news/9062-Left-Wing-Nutjob-Jimmy-Kimmel-Attacks-Christians-and-NRA-While-Simultaneously-Hiring-Armed-Security
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Nobody is going to take these kikes seriously until they start crying about niggers being responsible for the majority of gun crimes, which will never happen

you would be surprised how many people blindly swallow what they see on the electric jew user

Please people WILL take it seriously because you have 5 idiots saying "OH (insert faggot) YOU ARE SO KIND AND BRAVE. LETS VOTE ON SUCH AND SUCH TO MAKE SURE THIS NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN" (this actually was a post on youtube for the video posted) while you have the 1 saying that the guy or girl is just doing this for political bullshit.

I doubt Drumpf will cuck on this issue since he took NRA money and he doesn't want to further alienate himself from the voter base. All we'll see is a good deal of impotent rage.

Big problem is the states pushing gun control on their citizens.

thegoldwater.com/news/9062-Left-Wing-Nutjob-Jimmy-Kimmel-Attacks-Christians-and-NRA-While-Simultaneously-Hiring-Armed-Security

>implying the nra is not the (((nra)))

Sometimes I forget thst normalfags are normalfags and eat this garbage up with impunity.

It's all so tiresome.

Am I the only one who noticed he went a spiel about preventing people with mental health issues getting guns, but the shooter had no history of mental health and none of that would have effected his ability to get the guns?

Talk about a fucking slide. Just using tactics to impose more and more restrictions..we know how this cookie crumbles.

Fucking faggot, Adam Carolla was always funnier.

Opportunist kikes will always try to take advantage of events like these to get rid of the second amendment. It's a shame they aren't the ones being shot.

fuck this faggot, he want to play that game. lets dox his production staff. fat little fucking nigger kike. most of these narcissistic fags are low hanging fruit and will be easy to find

Max Schadler … Executive Assistant to Jimmy Kimmel / production assistant (193 episodes, 2014-2015)

Anthony Paradise … production assistant (190 episodes, 2007-2008)

Temur Topuria … audience coordinator (180 episodes, 2012)

Mike Matney … production assistant (179 episodes, 2008)

Josh Patil … audience coordinator (163 episodes, 2010-2011)

Kim T. Le … assistant production office coordinator (140 episodes, 2006-2007)

Kate Kelly … Audience coordinator (121 episodes, 2003)

Dyan Conner … talent booker (119 episodes, 2003-2010)

Reecy Pontiff … executive assistant: Doug DeLuca (118 episodes, 2007-2008)

Jessica Rodriguez … segment researcher / production assistant (106 episodes, 2009-2011)

Kandyce Evans … production assistant (104 episodes, 2006)

Hannah Kyle Crichton … stand-up booker / stand up booker (97 episodes, 2017)

Mike White … researcher (538 episodes, 2006-2008)

Johnny Byul Lee … audience coordinator (525 episodes, 2004-2008)

Tim Carr … assistant to executive producer (503 episodes, 2010-2013)

Becky Dorf Crowley … assistant: writers (445 episodes, 2011-2014)

Todd Livdahl … production tech (400 episodes, 2003-2004)

J Graigory … production coordinator (391 episodes, 2005-2007)

Miguel Lima … Executive Assistant to Mr. Kimmel / Production Assistant to Mr. Kimmel / production assistant (372 episodes, 2013-2015)

Ryan Reeves … segment researcher / production assistant (346 episodes, 2009-2013)

Angie Jedlicka … executive assistant (335 episodes, 2005-2007)

Jessica Jaskolka … production assistant (306 episodes, 2013-2015)

Shawn Carlow … clip researcher (305 episodes, 2011-2013)

Cameron King … production assistant / assistant production coordinator / Assistant Production Coordinator (268 episodes, 2013-2016)

Zach Mahassine … production assistant (261 episodes, 2011-2012)

Neil Ruane … production assistant (257 episodes, 2010-2012)

Justin Wragg … talent coordinator (233 episodes, 2008-2009)

Darrell Davis Jr. … production staff (204 episodes, 2006)

Anthony John d'Almeida … clip researcher (201 episodes, 2014-2015)

Claire Daniels … assistant to co-executive producer / production assistant / executive assistant (196 episodes, 2007-2010)

David Morgasen … field director / segment director (145 episodes, 2008-2010)
Ann Rogerson … associate director (66 episodes, 2005)
David Craig … associate director (9 episodes, 2009-2016)
Kathy Fortine … associate director (9 episodes, 2009-2016)
Jeri-Ann Wong … associate director (9 episodes, 2009-2016)
Andy Fisher … segment director (8 episodes, 2009-2010)
Peter Siaggas … segment director (8 episodes, 2010)
Wayne McClammy … field director (7 episodes, 2006-2007)
Brad Morrison … segment director (7 episodes, 2009-2010)
Mark Lafferty … segment director (6 episodes, 2010)
Ken Cooper … associate director (2 episodes, 2014)
Zack Bornstein … segment director (1 episode, 2016)
Will Burke … segment director (1 episode, 2016)
Jonathan Kimmel … segment director (1 episode, 2016)
Brad Morrison … segment director (1 episode, 2016)

Matt Musgrave … production manager (3 episodes, 2009-2010)
Nancy Vezzi … field production supervisor (3 episodes, 2009-2010)
Tony Romero … post-production supervisor (1 episode, 2004)
Mike Coughlin … production supervisor: The Muppets Studio (1 episode, 2015)

Jimmy Kimmel … executive producer (2,636 episodes, 2003-2017)
Rob Crawford … audience producer (1,925 episodes, 2003-2013)
Ben Biscotti … audience producer (1,791 episodes, 2003-2013)
Chris Fraticelli … producer (1,726 episodes, 2003-2011)
Jill Leiderman … executive producer (1,476 episodes, 2006-2016)
J Graigory … special projects producer / location producer / coordinating producer (1,413 episodes, 2006-2017)
Daniel Kellison … executive producer (1,330 episodes, 2003-2015)
Steve O'Donnell … supervising producer (953 episodes, 2003-2008)
Daniel Tracy … audience producer (904 episodes, 2012-2017)
Nick Koskoff … associate producer (695 episodes, 2005-2008)
Joanna Jordan … senior talent producer (547 episodes, 2009-2013)
Becky Orenstein … senior associate producer (479 episodes, 2006-2010)
Rich Brown … senior human interest producer (367 episodes, 2003-2005)
Josh Patil … audience producer (257 episodes, 2010-2012)
J.R. Clark … audience producer (230 episodes, 2011-2012)
Laura Stupsker … associate producer (228 episodes, 2003-2005)
Tim Carr … associate producer (106 episodes, 2013-2014)
Shawn Carlow … associate producer (58 episodes, 2013)

Erin Irwin … supervising producer / co-executive producer / producer (56 episodes, 2008-2016)
Jason Schrift … co-executive producer (55 episodes, 2009-2016)
David Craig … producer / co-executive producer (55 episodes, 2009-2016)
Ken Crosby … producer (55 episodes, 2009-2016)
Doug DeLuca … co-executive producer (55 episodes, 2009-2016)
Vicki Ariamal-Prieto … field producer (52 episodes, 2009-2012)
Anthony John d'Almeida … associate producer (47 episodes, 2017)
Tony Romero … coordinating producer / producer (45 episodes, 2009-2016)
Jennifer Sharron … senior field producer / field producer / producer / supervising producer (28 episodes, 2006-2016)
Seth Weidner … comedy producer / producer (26 episodes, 2009-2016)
Josh Weintraub … segment producer / producer (26 episodes, 2009-2016)
Brandon Crosby … field producer / field associate producer (25 episodes, 2009-2010)

...

This. I was just about to post something related. We need to call out these faggots on the fact that they have little armed posses wherever they go. You first kikel Kimmel you piece of shit.

...

Fucking faggot

I did notice that too user.
another thing is that the guns used were automatic weapons, which are already illegal to begin with, so what do law makers have to do with this mess…

can't not checkum

Sauce on the "automatic weapons"?
I don't think a list of the weapons used was released.
Lot of disinfo out there, you even have media talking about SAWs.

The guns were NOT automatic, one of them had a bump fire stock which "mimics" auto fire.
Is a retard or shill.

One was a slidefire which is completely legal.

crocodile tears

you wanna know why your guns will never be snached?
you wanna know why whiny TV hosts and teary-eyed liberals will never get their way?

because the defense industry, the firearms manufacturers, and their respective lobbies are a hundred times more powerful than the sentiment of the anti second amendment cucks. which is a good thing for your average liberty-loving gun owning hick but also detrimental to unseating the globalist warhawks who've kept our country in foreign war for the last few centuries.

regardless, the political chatter is completely useless in actually solving the issue; how do we prevent mass shootings like this from ever happening again? if not by seizure of ALL civilian firearms, then how?

You don't. Obsessing over controlling every possible negative action an individual can take and trying to create controls to stop them creates far more evil than it ever prevents.

I will point out that mass shootings are a relatively new phenomenon in Western societies, however, and so you must look at at what has changed over the last few decades. The most compelling theory I've seen is that the mind altering drugs that are now prescribed en masse to so many are the cause. Aside from Omar Mateen and Breivik, every single mass shooter all the way back to Columbine was on a mind altering prescription drug. The theory is that the parts of the mind that those drugs shut down also shut down the parts of the mind that tell you "this is a bad idea, let's not do this". Of course, that will never be discussed in the MSM as 70% or more of their advertising revenue is garnered from pharmaceutical companies.

As for the main topic at hand, I sincerely doubt that they will pull off gun control legislation. And they know it, so they're adjusting. What's troubling this time is how they seem to be focusing on creating TSA type security in multiple locations across the United States instead, which doesn't have the kind of pushback that gun control does, but it is still a great threat to our liberties.

ban SSRIs

So when the kikes figure out what they're talking about, they'll be pushing the lefties to ban bump fire stocks, opening a huge can of worms as to what actually constitutes a "machine gun".

You're pulling that trigger too fast goy, you're literally a machine gun.

Ya know, I'm always torn on this issue. I work in the mental health field, and, truth be told I've seen it from both sides. On the one hand, I've seen the MOST dysfunctional ("crazy") individuals, turned back into somewhat normal and functioning people. We're talking psychotic or schizophrenic individuals who are mumbling and talking to thin air, laying in their beds and pissing/shitting on themselves while they laugh with the voices in their head, threatening to kill themselves because the voices in their head wont stop telling them to do various bad things…. I've seen those people returned to a relatively balanced/normal state through the use of anti-psychotics and such, combined with ECT (which until I saw it actually push these people back towards a normal state I thought was some insane people version of "hit your computer with a hammer if it stops working and hope it fixes it"… but it actually works on a lot of people oddly enough)

On the other side, I've seen SSRIs and other over prescribed meds utterly destroy people. Turn friends into "zombies," make them emotionally dead, or remove their ambition, their drive, push them towards suicide, push them to lash out at people around them, and so on, effectively making their problems 10x worse than what they were before. Oh and of course we can't forget the opiate thing, used to be all craze with drug companies loving to push it, now they have their new, equally addictive versions of those things and they're eager to switch to selling them for much higher prices, so now we have the drug war going after opiates as well (go figure right?) which, aside from the abuse, I've actually seen level out a lot of people and generally help them lead overall better lives, but I've also seen it destroy others.

So.. I really don't know how to approach all of this anymore frankly. I've seen it work in some cases, the field truly help some people get back to as normal as possible. And in other cases I've seen it destroy lives completely. Sooooo… I dont know where to draw the line exactly. Obviously neither extreme is going to be good, but its one of those blurry subjects trying to find the proper middle ground.

Maybe it should just be that in order to get a Rx for any kind of mind altering drug you need at least 2-3 different doctors to all agree and agree on the dosage levels? Maybe that would at least create enough checks that ONE of them wouldnt be a total kike?

How is this going to end up any different from the other shootings that have happened prior? You would think they'd pass stricter gun control laws by now by the third or fourth school or movie theater shooting. Every time this happens, it follows the same predictable cycle. First there is talks about gun control, then after a while, people forget about it and move on to the next controversy or tragedy and talk about that. Also, even if all guns were removed in the United States, a person with the intent to kill will always find a way to get those guns or find other means to do the massacre that he/she/it wants.

I think people are putting the cart before the horse on this issue to try to put singular blame on something, when everyone should share the blame. Fix security protocol's for hotels and public venues. Having multiple check barriers can lessen the number of casualties in the future because mass shootings isn't going to stop. You might even have to have teaching videos similar to what we had in schools in what to do during a shooting event, if they haven't been made already. Might not stop all people from panicking but could get more people to take action to calm a rampaging crowd, disperse without running over each other if they should happen to find themselves in such a situation since this will be or has already been the norm if you are leaving the comfort of your own home.

Venue, targeted group, method of attack, type of weapon used. Consider the rebuttals to the previous points from the pro-2A side about any other attacks based on those criteria.

Look at, lets say sandyhoax and compare:

The venue was a school, on a normal day, yes its viewed as hitting close to home, because "this could be any school on any day," but it was mostly viewed as a tragedy especially considering the subject was a known mentally ill man who had to steal guns to use them IIRC. For LV the venue was a celebration (concert) with people completely unsuspecting anything. They felt safe in a large crowd like that. Now they don't, now they are afraid of large gatherings, and itll stick in their head. The school thing? Well, you can't just not go to school for 99.9% of the population, so you suck it up and go, and as time goes on and lots of days pass with no events, people forget. But this? This is a vacation, a once or twice a year thing for most people, you don't get many of them, so the memories/events of one stick very strongly in your mind.

The targeted group for SH was children, unable to vote, high emotional appeal, but little more than a tragedy. This one, the targeted group were the ones defending the right to gun ownership in the first place, now the weapons they wanted to keep were used against them. It creates fear in the minds of many that what they fought for can be used against them, something that some of them didnt think of before.

Method of attack? One went in close range, person to person, leaving them vulnerable and could have been stopped by someone else with a gun. One stood way the fuck away, hundreds of yards, shooting from a sniping position basically, leaving no room for people to shoot back, no one to quickly get to him, and leaving him plenty of time to kill with impunity. So the "the problem was the gun free zone" argument has no weight here.

Finally, the weapons of choice. SH involved semi auto "baby killers" but nothing more than that. Normal weapons most people can get, but nothing "super scary full auto military weapons" which are generally illegal or tightly controlled. LV involved those same semi auto weapons modified to effectively fire full auto. Liberals already didnt give af about the difference between semi and full before, but now there is little effective difference. So when they talk in circles about semi/full and treat them as the exact same thing, people cant rebut them by pointing out the difference and derailing them, because now they're practically the same thing in the minds of normies due to how they were used.

There are fundamental differences that make it harder to hold a pro2A position on this. Moreover, it targeted the group holding those views, and shakes them, makes them less steady in their determination. Its like being in the military and being all fire and fury.. until you're actually on the beach and hiding in the boat pissing yourself because you suddenly realized what you're doing. Thats what they're hoping will happen to many pro2A people

The kikes play a good game I'll give them that. They effectively targeted the arguments used to tell gun grabbers to fuck off, and staged an event that would eliminate those arguments from being valid WHILE targeting that same group to make them feel threatened/unsafe and less staunch in their defense of the 2A.

Plus, it undermines points we've made about shit like the mayor of londonstan staying "terrorism part and parcel of living in a major city," because now if we say "bad things happen once in awhile," well, now we look like hypocrites wanting mudscum gone because they keep snackbaring us, but are unwilling to disarm despite some boomer trying to go rambo on us.

Like I said, the kikes played a really good game here with this little staged event. The key to undoing their plans, as always, is going to be in digging up info on the pawn used. BUT they've even made that difficult by picking someone so completely off the radar theres very little to dig up on him.. so we're almost forced to just accept the (((official story))) from the police and w/e they find at his homes.

This whole situation is fucked basically.

All of fucking (((hollywood))) shilled against Trump, and lost.

They did it again during the congressional elections, and suffered the greatest defeat in a century.

Easy. Create homogeneous nations and let them deal with their phychos on their own terms.

Following suit , we have all the talk show hosts and a bunch of other people starting to emulate Jimmy Kike and start talking about gun control. Even day time faggots are doing it. This will go on for quite a few weeks I suppose. The only problem is that there is nothing on TV or their programs to give a decent debate. They turned the entire television right now into an echochamber and this will effect people who actually do not know what the fuck is going on and how to stop it.

Yeah I saw an article about it. They want mental health issues to mean anyone who's take an anti-depression once in their life.

So another guy who has armed body gaurds to protect him and lives in a secure gated community is telling us goys we don't need guns.

Sure I'll turn them right in.

SURVEILLANCE IS PEDOPHILIA
Look it up.

This is the most accurate post in the thread. The weapons lobby isn't really about the NRA, it's about Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Boeing, Northrup Grumann, ect. Which is basically to say the fucking CIA, the organization that actually runs this farce we call the United States.

Well I know who to unfriend now, at least. You'd be surprised how many try to feel morally superior over it.

FTFY
FTFM

If you're going to target anyone, don't hit the comedian as they're an actor. Your main focus should be the writers, producers, and researchers as they have control over the content in the show. People laugh at the notion of a conspiracy, but corporations do plan for a multi-million dollar show to go properly. Maybe you can even target "content assistants".

If you're ballsy, then you can even try hitting his parent company, abc. They're known to be anti-Trump as they did a hitpiece on alt-lite folk a few years ago. Their shows are Netflix-lite too, so it's safe to say that the majority of them are complicit with what he's doing.

YOu can bump fire a gun with with just your finger.

Literally why they made them in the first place because people couldn't afford to get a legal machine gun and were just bump firing them instead, so they made the stock to assist that.

I've tried one, its actually not that easy even with the stock.

Their overall goal is to seize all firearms after people remain dissatisfied with more ineffective restrictions. However, we're aware of their end game, regardless of how many crying "comedians" they put out.

They can only argue from emotional appeal because they know that they're objectively wrong.

Given enough time, the Jew always lets his true colors slip through.

Their getting ready to confiscate guns either before or immediately after the Presidential coup. Tightening the noose, it's the reason the Vegas massacre happened in the first place.

I don't have TV for a reason, user.

How about this. I'll accept the dissolution of the constitution and the revocation of the 2nd amendment for the average pleb if I can get some stipulations.


If we get something very close to this, I'll go with getting rid of the constitution (which any attack against the second is exactly that). Otherwise war is the only answer.