Post yfw you realized that Mass Effect Andromeda protagonists are modeled after Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh

If Andromeda doesn't allow a Geth to be romancable then Bioware officially has no idea what they're doing.
They've had no idea for awhile.

...

I think it's just nu-male and jewess, and that's the extent of the similarity.

Josh McIntosh sometimes goes so full McIntosh that he crosses the cuck event horizon and becomes reasonable.

...

lmao

this guy sweats estrogen

Wow, that is rather reasonable.

Is such thing even compatible?

I can kinda see how the woman resembles Scameesian, but the guy just looks like your typical low T numale. Plus he's not doughy enough to be FullMcIntosh.

Josh, you're not acting progressive there, why are you being so racist against Obama? He dindu nuthin and you're a white man!

Would it be better if it were this guy?

Where there white people in Mass effect all I remember are different shades of shit?

this skit resonates with my soul

its how i feel every day i go to work

I see the McIntosh in him, but for Anita the nose just isn't big enough.

To me they just look like default characters in an RPG.

Why'd he get booted? Because he was a man?
Or did he die from his own terminal toxic masculinity or whatever he was always having a paranoid episode about?

He complained that he wasn't getting to suck enough of the bull's cum directly from the source so she kicked him out. Either that or she figured out that he's completely unnecessary for their scam and booted him. Both are equally as likely.

As if anyone was going to play another Mass Effect game, anyway.
The series died when 2 turned out to be complete shit, and with its final post-mortem muscle spasms farted out the three-colors-so-different endings of ME3.

I'm sorry to say that I actually did play ME2, but I never played ME3 and I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that it has not one single redeeming characteristic.
This lets me say, with empirical precision and inviolate truth, that any other game with the words Mass Effect in the title will be such shit that humanity will have to call human waste "bioware" from that point onward.

So since he's not longer under any illusions about getting to slide his swizzle stick into Anita's prodigious nostrils, suddenly he decides to stop drinking the kool aid and post stuff that's borderline sane like ?
100% of his bullshit was pure desperate white knight cuckold thirst? Why am I not fucking surprised.

nigga pls, mcintosh is the saddest of sad sack mother fuckers.

That dude is not nearly pasty and dumpy enough to be modeled after him

Honestly I don't see that as him being reasonable in the least. It's combination of his hipster "fight dah powah" faggotry, "think on the children!", "ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE" and "muh world peace all we need to do is hold hands and sign."

Yeah, you're probably right about that.
Funny how the two can appear to overlap once in a blue moon, like some kind of optical illusion.

it's got the same fucked up shape as her nose though.

The only people who should be allowed to say "y'all" are Southerners. SJWs and normalfags think it's ebonics, unfortunately.

It's still clearly McIntosh following the progressive ladder: Foreign Arabs>Arabs>Jews>Africans.

Why the characters in this game are as ugly as in Cisquisition? Are they doing it on purpose?

wat

Don't remind me of the travesties Bioware has done to their character design since after Mass Effect 1 and EA's master plan to fuck up their franchises.

I'd still fuck anita, I don't care what anyone says.

...

Prominent laugh lines like Anita's and cheeks like Chobot's are some of the most unattractive things a woman could ever have on her face.

and then you'd get accused of rape.

That gets me hardest

Why deny the comparison?

We can use this.

Force the comparison for months, bonus points if we can get FF to agree with it.

People who hate FF will not buy the game on principle, but the more important element follows when the game is released.

Make lets plays of "Anita Sarkesian" and "Jonathan McIntosh" as hardcore feminazis, and complete whores during the play through. Even better if we can get them to look as slutty as possible, for both of them.

Get all the media that sucked Biowares dick to turn on them.

Make them ever regret basing characters off of real life people, who are insufferable faggots.

Anita is pretty though

she objectively is not.

not even with a rented dick.

...

...

some one post the look a like porn

which one?

...

...

Beauty is objective. It's just that every person is biased in the regard in some way, and cannot separate the quirks that only he likes from universal traits that are beautiful for everyone (or almost everyone - there is always a small percentage of those mentally ill or otherwise damaged that have a warped view on everything). For example, the person in pic 1 is objectively more beautiful than the person in pic2

Why do SJWs almost always have a terminal case of Butthead mouth?

Every time

Why do their characters always look greasy?

they're trying to model sweat and moisture, but are so inept that it ends up looking like the character just took an oil bath

Did anyone really ever want them to reveal Tali's face? It should only have ever been revealed to Shepard, but not to the player. Camera angle and light reflections and the like should have been used to obscure her face - because nothing Bioware could have created could have lived up to the expectation that Bioware built up, and having her face be just a badly shopped stock photo is either an unacceptable display of incompetence or a superior troll - depending on how you look at it. And you know damned well they were just being lazy, not trolling.

A combination of sheer ineptitude and a deliberate effort to make their female characters look "real", because we all know there are no good looking women in real life.

I thought their excuse was that they wanted to "challenge the high standards of beauty" and did so by creating disgusting beasts.

This. If Tali was some weird alien underneath, most players would think her gross. If she was very human-like underneath, they'd complain about the lack of diversity. Nothing they could've shown would be acceptable. So, what did they do? Chose an option worse than anyone would've imagined possible

Prove it philosophically
I dare you

Translated from leftist to human, it just means they made the female character ugly to not make their tumblr audience feel inferior and threatened.

People how are attracted to advantageous traits have a higher likelihood of passing on their genes over those who are attracted to people with pox or animals. While there is no objective "beauty", there is more accurate and advantageous standards for beauty. This is what having good taste means. This isn't even getting into the uncanny valley.

They just don't understand that people don't enjoy looking at ugly people.

Bioware has a combination of incompetent in-game artists/modelers and that shitty tendency that feminists/SJWs have to purposefully uglify their art.

McIntosh himself was modeled after Full Metal Jacket's Private Pyle.

Let's go with an argument of utility, then. If 99% of people find something to be beautiful, I consider it to be objective beauty, as for all practical matters and purposes, it is beautiful. When I paint a picture, I will try to make one that those 99% will find beautiful, not smear literal shit on canvas because one person in a million may find that beautiful too. If I want to air an ad and want to put something beautiful there, I will use something that attracts the 99%. The only thing relative understanding of beauty achieved was utterly destroy current year art. With the 'anything can be art and be beautiful' mindset, it opened the floodgates for pretentious hipsters and parasites, who flood galleries with their often literal garbage and call it 'modern art', their only audience being faggots that are impressed by 2deep4u shit and retards that don't care about art as much as being SEEN with art, as it's a status thing. Thus, since relative understanding of beauty is, in better cases, useless and, in worse cases, actively harmful, there is no reason to continue using it. If someone comes up to you with a large skype emoji he printed on paper, and claims that it's more beutiful than Botticelli's Birth of Venus, don't cater to him. Don't tell him shit like 'sure, everyone has different tastes, blahblahblah'. Call him a fucking retard and punch him in the face.

You can't prove anything philosophically. That's why Science has supplanted philosophy as the means by which we know the world around us.

You can't necessarily "prove" anything in science either, since it still rests upon the assumption that there is a material world outside of us which can be known - but it does seem so far to have made the most useful predictions. Even if those predictions we use to build technology and advance ourselves with are all just a shared illusion - it can at least build that illusion in a way we perceive as being tangible and useful.

Ascertaining that a principle as good is still contextually subjective. It doesn't matter anyways either way though, existential philosophizing is it's own arena and doesn't impact the way you interface reality unless you let it.

We could go all the way down the rabbit hole of existential nihilism and come out the other side lacking a distinct ego yet numb and frustrated. Or you could just accept that some dudes are fucked and happen to think whales are more beautiful. It's useless to define an "objective beauty" because the word "objective" (as an adjective pertaining to beauty) is merely subterfuge.

Don't be in bed with your opinions you fag
If you are wrong it is ok to say " heh, i was wrong "

My opinion here don't hold much wight for these matters are not in filed of knowledge

But you limit advantageous traits to apparent biological traits alone ignoring the human and attitude side of the other and in top of all that it is not proven to be objective at all

How are you going to standardize taste ? other than threats to your own health "like how we find women with some kind of lethal diseases that can be recognized from the outside unattractive " you can't .
You can't force your taste in tea in the whole world

It is still subjective , proven by some of your human surrounding and cultural effect but never objective

But this statement is a philosophical statement

this statement is also a philosophical statement

You are a living logical fallacy
Here a gift from leftypol

To the gas chamber with you.

You seem to not grasp what philosophy is. It's not something you can really compare with science, as its purpose never was to invent a car or get man on the moon. It deals with things like morality and religion, asks about the nature of man, ponders political systems, liberties, and human values in general. It also delves into asking things about the world around us, but rather than the scientific 'how does this work and how can I use it?' philosophy asks 'should I use it?'

no you're full of shit, beauty is not objective. Beauty is not law of nature that can be proven. If a race of hambeast from another planet invade and they see our women they won't point anyone out as objectively beautiful.

large fat woman
Another lie of the left.

That's because they don't know how to use the Frostbite engine.

I don't know, Riley Reid has a cute face.

No they're not.

Isn't that girl based off that fake female dev from the GamerGate episode of SVU or whatever? Some character with the last name Punjabi or something stupidly on the nose like that iirc.

Webm related.

I dare you to prove that, faggot.

And why the fuck should some alien race concern us? It is objective beauty for us, humans. Apples are, objectively, food. If aliens came and found them to be poisonous, they would still fucking be objectively food.

Wwew, can't wait to witness Bioware crash and burn once again.

I admire your optimism.

While I don't disagree with you, the whole "MUH EARLI CIV FAT WOMEEEN BEUTIFUUUL" shit is completely rubbish.
Still, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I like big, egglaying hips, and a flat chest, myself.

But why? Do you want the girl to not be able to feed those eggs as well as she could if she had some fat tits?

Your argument is filled with cringy as fuck romanticism so if we drop this romanticism we will end up with a single main claim
The 99% is the objective stander argument
Ever heard of the phrase "General will" ? you will probably heard of it and its other form "social contract " as in an agreement in that society on said rules and standers "simple definition " developed the best imo by the based philosopher Rousseau and unlike what Holla Forums /gg/ and Holla Forums will till you it doesn't mean that it is fake it only means that in order to live in said group you will accept said thing
Here the thing tho, social contact is not objective , you are pacing your argument on a subjective notion of social acceptance to a said thing.

This concept takes root in the age of Enlightenment and a debate between Rousseau, Locke, and Hobbes over the rule of government at that time

Nice try bud just read more philosophy here and there

It is true where i live , living in the desert make fat women a high class and prestigious so some old poms praise women for being fat and addition to other traits
You see ? more evidence that beauty is not objective

Sandniggers like you aren't human though.

Nigger what? That's not what "objective" even means. Objectivity is something that can't be denied, like saying the Earth is flat. A better term to what you're arguing for would be collective consciousness.

Reported for being subtle.

She shouldn't be feeding what hatches from an egg with tits anyway, mate.
Just chew up some food for the kids. It's not complicated.

Not any of those niggers, but thanks for the PDF. I'll give it a read every now and then.

Though you could have just told him that if beauty was objective, every generation would see a group of people sharing the same traits growing in number to a point where everyone was exactly equal.
And yet you go outside and not everyone is the standard of beauty (whatever you may beleive it is) nor are most even close to it.

...

its not, that s what alchool do.
you know thoses video oddly satisfying ? with precise geometrical things ?

you know character creation in some rpg ? where some take HOURS to create their avatar like EvE (or more recently BDO) and half an hour just for single detail to the millimeter regarding the eyeborw position (like height?

that s because face and body is not about X eye, big boobs big ass etc … else you end up with a sex toy/dolls or a pornstar 100% pastic. purely and exclusively made for their "assets" and not the person itself.

fat girl are ugly because they lack what both of what model and what some guys in rpg spend hour doing while creating their avatar:
harmony

it s not about having Xeyes, X mounth X noze etc …
it s about having a combination of thoses theses.

thus one face can have beautiful eyes, but if you put it into someone else it will feel out of place and ugly.

as i said above that why you almost always end up waking up next to a ugly bitch if not then maybe she is not ugly but definitely not your style after a drinking to much at a party, when alchool disturb your brain it also affect your perception of facial traits.
a face that isn t beautifull may look like a normal one because your will be less perceptive to it.

then there is personnal preferences in term fo face shape.
some prefer: round , square like angelina jolie IIRC or triangular(pic2) faces

but fat ugly bitch, due to the fat on their face is OBJECTIVELY ugly.

sames goes for the body, you need harmony.
you like big boobs ? fine but for fuck sake dont put implant if it doesn t fit your "frame" just for the sake of big boobs!
thats what you get in porn because we dont care about the body, just the asset because we simply jerk off to it
still, i can t stand brazzer as it s really too fucking much…each of their girl seems to have football instead of boobs

i could go on and be more explicit and make a much more detailed post. but i think it s meaningless. you can shearch from here and think about it and apply to to your day to day experiences.

>tfw chubby chaser
you can bully me.

>you can bully me
How chubby are you talking, user?

...

Anywhere from chub to landwhale.

I never said that this was a beauty standard we need to keep, I said that beauty is not objective. The view of beauty changes throughout time so it is by definition subjective.

This is a nice way to invalidate all arguments of the past in life. It's why your views won't ever be accepted or enforced Holla Forums. I'm done talking enjoy the last say.

That shit's disgusting. What fucked up trauma did you experience in your childhood to become attracted to that

nice argument
I bet you can't even prove it philosophically :^}

He can't pill you in a philosophy entry nigga
Get yourself together you fag

hah better argument than main tbh
But it require a perfect world with no rape no war and tribal raiding no sex slavery etc.. to be reality

Explain why it's rubbish, I'm not saying that the standard is fat= beauty today. There is more evidence that it was the standard in early civilization than otherwise. If you have evidence that it wasn't than please share, I love history.

...

that is a genetic anomaly.

how come her lower body has so much fat yet her upper body looks average?

name?

Wow feel free to delete your life any time now.

Faggot.

I ain't attracted to what that other guy posted. I want that clear. I like a little thicc on the occasion, not severe medical problem and high-risk heart attack.

Sorry, if I wanted to masturbate to lard I'd just masturbate to lard.

You need to stop masturbating, go at least two weeks without touching your dick to that garbage. Stop yourself down that road before your fetishes get even more cancerous.
Fat is objectively unattractive since it harms fertility and promotes bad health

But then who would keep your mother and sister company?

Prove it :^} i dare you

...

Your approach to this is autistic as fuck, you're not as intelligent as you think.

synthol.. i guess

Are you a retard? Or do you just not understand how burden of proof works?
You can't prove a negative. Or at least, not easily. Where's your proof that there's a fat-positive beauty standard in early civilization?

I can show you proof that a thin form was beautiful in early civilization, if that's what you want. Just look at statues of greek goddesses, if you want that jazz.

naive

love randalin

Jesus Christ user, even I'm not that degenerate.

It was a shitpost you dip
i hate you jk

He just did.

Both of them look like all sliders are set to max, especially head size.

I can tell you're just shitposting, but it actually is possible.

1. Sexual attraction is a biological function evolved to help organisms seek the most genetically beneficial mates.

2. Health, including traits indicative of health (strength, rarity of illnesses, longevity, etc), is biologically beneficial. Conversely, disease (and tendency to disease) is biologically harmful.
2a. Thus, health is objectively attractive.

3. Obesity is a trait indicative of disease/poor health.

4. Therefore, obesity is objectively unattractive.

Culture can modify our base, instinctual desires, but only within certain vague limits. Some cultures may be able to view slightly chubby people as attractive for various reasons, but hambeasts will never be widely perceived as attractive and will forever be relegated to a fringe fetish.

Greece was ahead in time and the standard of beauty changed. Before that the standard of beauty was fat in Mesopotamia

You haven't shown any evidence at all, mate.

...

succ my dik lad

You only have 1 statue.

...

And he didn't even present it as evidence. Someone else brought it up in an image debunking the statue as evidence.
He literally has nothing.

So who's gonna be the brave soul who makes rule 34 of these shitty characters to trigger the sjw fanbase? archive.is/73AcY

I've been meaning to ask, where did this lot start up?
That is to say, why'd someone tie the whole skyrim 'muh ancestors imperial' lot to this crab?

Here's some other crabs

The thing about time is that the farther back you go the less physical stuff you have to show for it. Since Greece was here at a time after early Mesopotamia, anyone in this thread can google pictures of Greek statues. In your heads if an user googles a picture it's now proof of whatever he's talking about. Use you're common thinking. In a time where almost everyone was a hard worker, and looked the part, the fat ones were the result of not working. Aka the higher class. The women who were more likely to give successful birth were more attractive to the men. No one was picky about facial looks until later, everyone was a nigger who liked bigger thighs.

He didn't prove anything

Increased weight can lead to complications in birth. This idea that being fat is good for child rearing is idiotic. Whats necessary is birthing hips and constitution, not being a whale.

Because in order to kill the crab, you have to snip it in that removes its face. Since the crab has a lack of emotion when it's about to get its face chopped off, people have tied that to the Nord at the beginning of Skyrim saying the line and not giving a fuck about getting beheaded.

In other words, you've got no evidence, and you're pulling shit out of your ass.
Well gee.
Issue I take is, I don't even disagree with you. I do think that beauty is largely in the eye of the beholder. But, at the same time, I rather sharply dislike this runup people've got that people thought landwhales were attractive back in the day. There's just no evidence for it. You guys are pulling crap from your ass, and demanding everyone accept it. I don't much care for that.

Fair enough. Crabs are ice cold motherfuckers.

ah, so it's just so long ago that men were attracted to landwhales that all the evidence has turned to dust.

but we're not attracted to landwhales anymore, so what are you arguing?

no, everyone was a nigger who liked child-bearing hips - a broad pelvis. you can't even distinguish the shape of a landwhale's pelvis because it's hidden under all its blubber. adipose tissue exists only as insulation in colder conditions and as energy stores for when food becomes scarce. otherwise it's just evidence that you're a fucking lazy, gluttonous cunt.

for another thing, mesopotamia was not a very cold place (so mesopotamians didn't require insulating blubber) and therefore was not subject to the kind of winter food scarcity periods you'd find in say russia or northern europe. so, if anything, you'd expect obesity to be attractive to natives of those countries far more than it would for mesopotamians. it doesn't make any sense for mesopotamians to be attracted to fat bitches because fat bitches are not built for the climate of mesopotamia.

and nowadays, when we have heating and preservable/importable foods and stuff, it's absolutely irrational to be attracted to fat bitches. she is a waste of food because she eats more than she needs and she's a hazard to herself and others because she weighs more than she should; for example, if you're walking up some stairs behind a fat bitch and she slips and falls, she'll probably fucking crush you as she comes tumblring down. if someone's going to fall onto me, I want it to be someone of a healthy weight.

there is no argument that justifies obesity. lose weight, god dammit.

I'm arguing that beauty is subjective not objective. Objective means something is a hard fact. You just agreed that standards have changed.

The whole thing was just an example to another user who said beauty is an objective truth.

The middle class was small or nonexistant back then. You choose skinny lanky girls who got that way from life of poverty of you get the rich fat girl with her full effort to look good.
The whole Round statues are a bit exaggerated since most people can't get to that weight and not die from health issues. They probably just preferred them bigger rather than smaller.

Using fertility fetishes of obscenely obese women to argue women of such sizes existed and were desirable is about as valid as arguing there used to be guys with three foot long dicks because of Priaptic fetishes.

Well you got me there.

Right, because that changes your lack of evidence that fat was beautiful in ancient days.

Mate, I don't disagree that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. After all, if that wasn't true, I wouldn't think a 20ton mech could be 'beautiful'.
What I disagree with is this whole 'muh ancient man wanted to fuck landwhales' load. Ain't seen no evidence of such, and I've seen plenty of jazz what seems to contradict it.

It's just dishonest.

Physical beauty can be subjective to the sexual preference spectrum of each individual

Beauty in general, however, can be subjective too (some warped person may find sexy that a woman is selfish and self-centered, etc) but, it can also be seen from an objective view where its lens are general positive virtues, such as kindness, honesty, loyalty, etc. Same applies to bad traits, which also happen to be objective. Uglyness can be objective too. not because "many people find it this way thus it is like this" but rather because what each virtue (or opposite of) describes objectively something. There is no way something like kindness or loyalty, in a balanced and hearty manner, can be seen as a negative trait. It is objectively positive, thus an objectively beautiful thing.

Those things are objectively positive from a philosophical standpoint. Thus, if we see beauty from these attributes beauty can be ruled objective.

Physical beauty however is victim of society and each individual's own perception of sexually attractive molded by their experiences in life.

But the pic in all but outright states that our view of beauty has not, in fact, changed over time. At least, our view of what makes a beautiful woman.

You could construe loyalty to be negative in the right situation. Same for kindness.
Is it "good" to be loyal to the devil?
To kindly treat a serial rapist?

You may argue beautiful is an adjective and not the same as a positive trait, but what people find positive or negative is subjective, thus beauty is subjective.

Nevertheless I'm comparing Objectively (and lowering goalpost, generally) positive things to things such as "hard" or "soft". if something is hard, it is objectively hard. if something is soft, it is soft.

If someone is loyal, kind and generous, it can be objectively a positive thing too if the formula allows it (all extremes are bad in life, too much kindness can be negative since it allows people to take advantage of the person, etc)

If the formula of positive traits is balanced, then yes, it is objectively a healthy and beautiful equation. Thus the person can be said to be beautiful.

BEauty = positive traits in a healthy balance

If the person has an extreme number in the equation then the result is no longer beauty, or beauty + naive or beauty + fool, yet still beauty.

WHo am I to say what is beautiful? Again, moving the goalpost, generally speaking positive virtues are seen as beautiful. Hence Virtues.

Definition of virtue:Virtue (Latin: virtus, Ancient Greek: ἀρετή "arete") is moral excellence. A virtue is a trait or quality deemed to be morally good and thus is valued as a foundation of principle and good moral being. Personal virtues are characteristics valued as promoting collective and individual greatness. The opposite of virtue is vice.

Holy shit, blow him if you're so in love.

You're agreeing with a guy who hates his own gender. Don't be a fag.

A virtue is something objectively positive

a virtue, which is objectively positive, is beautiful

Beauty can be objective.

Moreover I'd like to add that beauty can also be subjective. as we have stated in this thread

It depends from what angle you see it. From a person's personal point of view or from a larger picture without any bias. If you start adding specifics to context such as "loyalty To THIS person" or "her loyalty is so much she would do anything for him" or adding more variables to the equation then of course it will give you more than just beauty.

In practice humans are beautiful yet complicated because each trait they posess can be from 10loyalty to mom to 100000kindness to girlfriend then 1000 greedy. An equation to measure one person would result in MUCH more than just a vague beautiful as result.

You could still in theory be objectively beautiful but it would come with much more than just beautiful if we lay down each case scenario in an equation.

To conclude, is this result of the equation beautiful? Is this person's equation beautiful? its up to each to decide, thus being subjective.

However, if the equation ends in a + number and not a negative, you could say its result is objectively positive, thus beautiful.

I hope I got the point across.

If Mass Affect was moddled after Vincent I would probably skip the char selection.

Ultimate gameplay: Gomer Pyle.

I wonder what McIntosh is like in bed.

EA and Bioware are retarded but not this retarded. Anita shittalks EA's Games so I doubt they'd glorify her in such a way

Looks like somebody ate too many krabby patties

...

mouth posture is active behavior. slack jawed faggots are low INT, low self awareness.
appearance matches behavior because behavior alters appearance.

...

You're underestimating the cuck- and m'lady-level of nu-males who dwell in tech.

...

Obama and Hillary are not neocohens. They are just Marxists. An example of Neocohens are all of the Bushes who pretend to be redneck-loving christcucks but are merely hawkish mercenaries for Jews. The difference between the two groups is that Marxists practice their Jewishness openly while neocohens act as controlled opposition. The two-party illusion is currently set up to see how much are people going to tolerate different degrees of totalitarianism. People like McIntosh (Democrat voters) or those supporting the likes of Cruz unironically are just useful idiots for either side.

Holla Forumsite sage since I'm being a conspiracy autist.

Sometimes you're not supposed to judge a book by its cover, but most of the time the cover tells you everything you need to know about its contents.

Bullshit. I don't find woman X attractive because I'm just following what society said. It's the other way around.

You always have fetishists, faggot.
A thousand years from now, archeologists will find furry porn and conclude that furry was popular and desired among ancient humans.

your argument is shit.

Their faces look like glossy plastic.

And yet you got people denying it.
You can deny anything.
I can deny science itself. It proves nothing.

Alright.

here you go.

philosophy proven.

go to the fucking doctor

...

...

Can't even go back to ME1 at this point knowing what the future of it holds.

Oh god, Rousseau, Locke, and Hobbes. The quintessential mandatory American leftist humanities course starter set. Are you in your first year of college?

8/v/ has become a safespace.

Just like every other fucking human being in said society.
It's almost like social customs are a gestalt-ish manifestation of commonly shared viewpoints of said society's many constituent individuals. Beauty standards are objective in the capacity of the general rule of prevaling social normality and acceptance and pressure to achieve. The subjectivity is merely the margin of error created from each individual when compared to the overall set that constitues the society.

You are the outlier who's margin of error is much higher than the standard deviation.

help me

...

Your mind is a safespace.

Plato and Pythagoras would like a word.

Schopenhauer is a pussy btw.

Your brain is a creative computer.

Judge his statement by the merit of said statement.

Point to any culture that does this. Mudshits and niggers don't count, they might as well be a separate species as far as their behavior is concerned.

Rubens was a known fetishists and a clear outliner even among his contemporaries. Can we please fucking drop this stupid pandering to tumblr already?

Do Asian islanders count as niggers or mudshits? Not that I care. You're a huge faggot.

Do they behave like mudshits and niggers? I have a suspicion they do.

And you're a whiny cunt. Fuck off to tumblr.

Oh, wait, they actually do behave like niggers.

Maori and Pacific Islander overrepresentation in
the Australian criminal justice system
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10509674.2015.1124959

I don't know what engine Bioware uses but how come everything they produce looks like it's made out of plastic ?
Ironically, I think ME1 was the one where it was the less visible.

Tumblr? You mean your opposite? You made the "You're a white male!" tier posts, you'd fit in better.

Completely irrelevant, but it matters to you because "muh niggers". Fuck back off to your Jewish Holla Forumslitical subversion board.

Is that synthol?

holy flying fuck, it's not even a stretch, look at the guy's nose and the distance in between eyes and brows, that looks a lot like Josh

No worries, user, as a southerner, only human garbage uses y'all. It fits him perfectly.

...

More than likely he must enjoy pegging.

That would imply someone actually wants to peg him.

Mercedes Carrera offered to peg him.

...

we have reached the event horizon.

beauty is power, thus all power is beautiful.
is that not why we call them the arts of war?

Outlier?

Nah, I don't like fatties

its like a signed integer and if he gets his marxism level to –2147483648 then he will become the most redpilled man that has ever existed

I'd still fuck the statuette.
Heck, I'd fuck all those statues.

coal burner

...

Gravy injections.

honestly user I looked at the images before reading your psot and realized they were modeling every one of their characters after jews, every bioware character, that is why they are all so ugly

it explains EVERYTHING

Most likely.
She probably injected it at first to look muscly, but after a few months it became like that, and now she profits of a new niche of horny bastards.

Mass Effect is dead anons, haven't people realize that the new ME its gonna be a new IP ? whit new characters and shit, i mean come one. If i remember one time they announced the game cause it has a new version of the Mako in it, they announced the game whit a fucking meme, and in ME2 the mission when you visit the crash site of the Normandy SR1, you see the mako crashed in it, thats the image of fucking EA crushing our dreams little by little. Just fuck EA games and everything they do.

The first time i play this game was in 2010, i remember one friend that was playing this all the time, i asked him about it, i play it at his place and i enjoy it, so i buy the first one and its freaking awesome, then i buy ME2, wich has less things than ME1, and i enjoy it to, then i buy ME3 like every faggot that falled in love whit the lore of the game and we all know what happend.

EA they dont make games, they destroy them no matter what no matter by who, look at the guy in twitter saying all that shit, you think someone like that understand what we want as a good game ?

I dont care if the new ME ends up been good, i dont care what people say about it, for me ME is dead.

DED

What did give you the impression this was going to be the case?

The girl looks much better than Anita.

are you implying you masturbate in the company of his mother and sister? you wouldnt have to touch your own dick to fuck them so you can't mean that

If i was gay i wouldnt mind being pegged by her tbh.