Mfw you get stinking high and realize that Stirner's ideal model of society is Buddhist theocracy

[ominous throat singing in the distance]

Other urls found in this thread:

newbuddhist.com/discussion/7708/what-do-you-think-of-buddhist-theocracy
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

cant wait for all the edgy stirnerfags to look for an even more obscure movement to join in and disregard anything they dont feel like discussing as "spooky".

...

newbuddhist.com/discussion/7708/what-do-you-think-of-buddhist-theocracy

buddhists dont seem to like the idea a lot

Are spooks a spook?

Way to completely misunderstand Stirner OP
Buddhists are even more Spooked than christfags

Well, he mentioned using drugs.

We're not nihilists though

...

You're worst than nihilistic, because only the inconvenient thingredients are spooks. And I'm not sure but so.easy of you seem to think that 'the community won'the let that happen' is an argument.

How?

The community won't let that happen

IF the community wants to SURVIVE.

But you forget one thing - this won't be one singular community, but a vast worldwide network of communal nodes. A community in need can recieve aid from one that is not, so the whole system would have to fuck up very badly for it to fail.

is that so

...

...

subjective value is considered ignorance or exploitation, I can understand that. But what is the ideology building towards besides being an endless golden age of consumption fueled by innovations? The utopia is basically a bunch of mr.handy robots babysitting entire continents out of altruism.

Muh objectivity

This is why the movement is a joke to most people

confirmed for full retard

so what's the anarchist version of theocracy? instead of a religious elite (of people), everyone is ruled by just a religion, gods or not?

???

If you aren't working towards a utopia, aren't you the ones with a reactive ideology?

The same exact reasons Christianity is?
Nirvana is spooky asf
And the psth to Nirvana pretty much requires that you Spooky yourself by ditching desire

What's the problem with buddhism?

Budhism is an ATHEIST religion. And let me go even further; Siddharta never wrote anything.

You can basically believe what you want if you just meditate

The comparative assessment between Christians and Buddhists will not be addressed; though, the latter being what you would likely refer to as "spooked" should be correct.

However, what is more important is for a man to possess the ability to look through himself when necessity is called upon by time, for the sake of exploration.

Now, to show reason for some of what was said, behold, a relatively recent translation of one of the 550 Jataka Tales:

The Elephant

A Tale of Self Sacrifice

At one time, the Bodhisattva took birth as a large Elephant. He lived in a forest far from civilization. The forest contained a lake that was both deep and wide and the entire wilderness was surrounded on all sides by an expansive desert. This beautiful oasis was well suited for the elephant as well as other smaller creatures. Delicious fruit grew on the trees, young shrubs carpeted the earth, and the whole area was bordered with high mountains. The Elephant lived alone as an ascetic and sustained his large body only on leaves and lotus roots, dedicating his time to contemplation on the virtues of contentment and tranquility.

One day while wandering along the forests edge, the Bodhisattva Elephant heard the cries of humans coming from the desert. Their cries began to get louder; surely they were approaching the oasis.

Urged by compassion, he ran towards them swiftly and when they came into sight he saw that it was a large group of men, women, and children, all nearly dead from starvation and thirst. Noticing that they were fearful of him, he called out in a human voice and stated that they need not be frightened. Upon hearing such peaceful and comforting words the people regained their composure and humbly greeted him.

The elders explained that they had been banished by an angry king and that many of them had already died in the desert. The kind Elephant realized that all the fruit in the forest would not be enough to feed them for even a day. He resolved that he must offer his own flesh as food and his organs and intestines as bags to carry water on their journey. He then instructed the people on how to find the great lake and said that just beyond it they would find the corpse of an elephant that had fallen from a mountaintop, not telling them that it would be his own corpse. As the group set out towards the water, he quickly, by another route, started to ascend the mountain. Upon reaching the top he then, feeling great joy and oblivious of the impending painful death below, hurled himself over the edge of the precipice. The impact sounded like an earthquake throughout the entire forest.

Meanwhile, the group of exiles had reached the lake and refreshed themselves with the cool water. Following the Bodhisattva's directions, they discovered the body of an elephant not far away. At first, they were surprised that the corpse so closely resembled the kind Elephant they had just met. Before long, a clever one in the group determined that it was in fact the same Elephant. Awestruck by the incredibly generous and selfless act of the great beast, they burst into tears of gratitude.

Some in the group thought that they should not eat such a great Bodhisattva, stating that such a magnificent and compassionate being deserves nothing less than a proper cremation ceremony. Once again, the clever one explained that the true way to honor the elephant would be to eat his flesh as the Elephant had intended. The people ate until they were full, made bags to hold water, and crossed the rest of the desert without trouble.


You are almost completely wrong.

Buddhism is not atheist, for at most, it is non-theistic.

What do you wish to express by claiming that Sakyamuni never wrote anything?
Think about Christ and his personal writings.

Your last statement is quite unfortunate.

First, the anything or all is not available for belief. It is not New Age-ish.
Furthermore, meditation is not required to be a Buddhist. That there, is a Hollywood-related belief.
Finally, know that religious meditation is not only encouraged or found in Buddhism.

The main problem for Buddhism is that the impressionable do not even know it on a fundamental level, and thus, are unable to even provide appreciable critiques.


Your plan was successful.

...

what?

Agree. Stirner fags must be killed alongside porky. They are very dangerous people.

Utopia is a spook, m8.
There's a reason the utopic socialist fell out of fashion.

...

...

Yes they are. Stirnerfags mindset is very dangerous.
If more people start to believe their mambo jambo, humans will self destruct. Because if everything is a spook according to Stirnerfags, they why living? It's a fucking suicide cult, it's what it is.
So yes, i believe Stirnerfags must be killed before their ideas contaminate (more) the world.

Because I want to?
Also, are you sure you know what a spook is?
I have feeling it's not what you think it is.

stop writing like a zen master.

stirnerfags are not dangerous they are just annoying af by still milking a dead meme

It is the vexing result of humanists appropriating Buddhism into their liberal ideology during these ugly and artificial times. They know not how to be proper secular atheists, but let them rather pester another religious group or perhaps resurrect one long forgotten and dead with which to play.


What is it that you mean?

Zen Buddhism isn't followed, and English isn't the first language, by the way. Sloppy writing is also disliked because it confuses.

And then there is the neurosis.


Do it.
Offer your flesh!

Congrats, you are fucking dumb and spooked

Buddhism reaches the same conclusions as Hegelian philosophy for those who understand it. By extension it's also compatible with aspects of Stirner's philosophy. Not so much the Individualism, but that kind of depends on how you interpret both Stirner's individualism and Buddhism's selflessness. It's possible that they could be reconciled, but I think it'd be simultaniously divergent from both.

Bump

mad spook detected

Are you sure you mean Stirner, not Sternberg?

THE MILK MUST FLOW

None.

Stirner is real!

Easternposter! You're back! What happened to your trip?

No, not Eastern
Latin-American.

The trip-code vanished.

Loneliness.

Read Siddhartha fam, Jesus