If anarchists don't want to be associated with chaos and violence and simply want to be associated with anticapitalism...

If anarchists don't want to be associated with chaos and violence and simply want to be associated with anticapitalism and anti-statism, why are always harbingers of chaos and violence?

Property destruction is not violence.

Here are some picture of kids that porky maimed. Poverty and imperialism is violence.

How come you're so concerned about property damage but not these kids that porky bombed.

These are Syrian war victims BTW

...

Yes, goy, get mad at these kids.

Fund more wars in Syria.

keep telling yourself that

nice red herring 7/10

It was CNN tier and it was on leftypol

you can go back to your shit hole board anytime now kiddo.

Hey bitch boi, the moment you "destroy my property", I'm gonna destroy you.

Try it nigger.

...

...

lol

who needs children anyways heh?

You're shitty trailer isn't private property. I'm only interested in destroying private property

oh boy, you sure are useful for porky.

Why is no one answering the question?

Question? You mean where you presuppose all anarchists are edgy LARPers who know nothing of theory and are just out throwing tantrums in the streets?

The anarchists that don't want to be associated with chaos, behave as such. We aren't a fucking hivemind.

Because it's a dumb question.

"CHAOS AND VIOLENCE!!!"

Why do people talk about how important the first amendment and then turn around and support cops denying people's right to assembly and protest
local governments: "haha yeah you can assemble and protest, but only with our permission at a specified time and location, AKA 2 in the afternoon in a park or outside the city limits so no one sees you"

What about collective property? If it's no big deal destroying it then we wouldn't want to expropriate it. This is dumb.

What about socialist pacifists?

hyuk hyuk, I'll whip a molotov through your window faggot lmao

only acceptable if they are cute