As you can see from Holla Forums, true NatSoc are extremely proud of their beliefs and generally have a chip on their shoulder about being shamed about them since the popular misapprehensions about their actual beliefs are ubiquitous, ignorant, and often unfair. These people may constitute some who would wave a flag or wear it publicly. Others might think it is edgy and tough since it frightens people they don't like but would likely be called degenerate by an actual NatSoc. Some others might just be trolls or plants trying to make whatever group their embed themselves in look bad in the eyes of the masses. Overall the idea of making the swastika PR-friendly with the current nature of the media is basically impossible - the media will always tavistockkeep in order to show the swastika associated with the worst optics. So that's why you get criticisms against 'muh PR' whenever someone suggests it isn't tactful even if there can be a point to that criticism in some circumstances.
Making that distinction between 'race realism' being factual and reasonable and the understood 'racism' that is simply blind hate would definitely be good. In any case the term 'racist' is fast becoming dulled and useless from the overuse by the Left, which is great for decent folk.
Obviously an idea with merits - decoupling the imagery from the ideas would allow you to get a few sentences in edgewise before people immediately shut you out due to their overwhelming emotional conditioning. However, I think the abandonment of a symbol in favor of another needs to be for more than just that, especially if the ideas have not evolved far from that original symbolic source.
Most wage-slaves don't have time to even concern themselves with politics or philosophy like this. There's a reason why it took a massive depression to spark the original NatSox movement - all the capable people were released from their occupations and were desperate to serve a good cause for better days. America is due for an economic collapse in the next year or so, and when it goes that is when the best people will be available for a real movement rather than the current show we observe.
You could read Mein Kampf aloud on a college campus and until you hit the JQ parts no one would even know what you were reading frankly. It's a useful thing - there are ideas in NatSoc that are not only convincing but inspiring to a lay audience.
I can attest firsthand that if you are earnest, inspiring, and truthful in a tactful way, people will gravitate towards you and your positions even if they are (((instinctively))) appalled at first.
Perhaps, but then again most of Holla Forums is here having at one point in their lives accepting the prior indoctrination in earnest. You'd be surprised at whom the plebs will follow if only they are shown powerful examples. Five years ago no one would have even dreamed that Trump would be President, not even on Holla Forums, but here we are.
Hitler was an artist, which is quite helpful to have around for such things. Perhaps we should encourage memesmiths to have a go at it. Still, has a point about the swastika weeding out the undesirables and attracting a certain sort that could be useful. Imageboards do as much in a different way.
Excellent idea, and it is already working.