Could Hitler and the german alliance

Have been expected to be loyal in the long term to Anglo Americans, Italians et al? There seems to have been a push against people with any indo European genes (le eternal anglo meme)
Personal perspective, coming from an Anglo/swiss american who used to feel charitable towards Jews as a viable Caucasian race, and as america granted some chance towards the mainland European side of my family whereas in south Africa for example Germanic people were decimated. Also tbh fuck sicilians and most slavs

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repatriation_of_Cossacks_after_World_War_II
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

I would think so. His life wasn't eternal and he wanted to lift Germany out of the pits and keep it out first and foremost.
Wouldn't have been prudent to needlessly antagonize the world beyond purging the kikes and communism.

What of the fursecution of French and French Belgians for example

...

What persecution of them?

I met an old French Belgian who talked of being put in a camp.

Getting put in a camp doesn't equate to wanting to buttfuck the entire country.
Everybody got put into camps back then, the US had plenty of camps even in peacetime to put all the foreign spies into.

The whole thing stinks of anti romantic chauvinism though, and maybe they were right about the French frogs.

(Also worrying in the drumpf age of resurfaced anti German sentiment by guys like john oliver or john q Anglo USA)

Does pol have any realistic plan to stop white on white violence in the power vacuum left after Jews are gone?

In Hitler's Table Talk he sounds extremely peaceful to the other whites. He talks about wanting to give Egypt to Italy, but he's also concerned about respecting France and Spain's claims in North Africa. Eastern Europe seemed to be the extent of his territorial ambitions. Sweden and Finland might have been annexed for the sake of unifying all the Nordics, but the German entrance into Norway was rather harmless so not much would have come of it.

Hitler is such a fascinating man. One minute he has an aggressiveness which is off-putting to the beta cuck in me. But then he's extremely empathetic and peaceful, and it's clear that he was very sincere about not hurting innocent people. Here's an interesting anecdote.

Otto Skorzeny recorded a conversation with Hitler where Hitler had actually canceled the German nuclear weapons program because he thought that it was too destructive, and he thought it would ultimately destroy the world. Some smartass is probably going to point out the destruction of the heavy water plant, but I will retort by pointing out that it is a historical fact that the NSDAP tested a small scale nuclear weapon. It really puts things in perspective when "the most evil man in the world" refuses to use a weapon, yet two consecutive American Presidents were desperate to attain and use nuclear weapons. It's also important to note that the Germans had massive stockpiles of chemical weapons they never used.

Hitler seemed to hate escalating violence on his own, and preferred to reciprocate what the enemy would do - this was a necessity in order to keep the fighting fair. Hitler never wanted to subject civilians to air raids, such operations were only authorized after Churchill had done it first. American, Britain, and France all held themselves to the Geneva Convention, so Germany obliged to the Geneva convention as well. But in the Eastern Front, the much more atrocious area of the war, Stalin refused to sign the Geneva Convention, so Hitler didn't treat them with the same respect he did the other Allies. Hitler seems to be the kind of man who would be willing to settle an entire war over a duel, and then be willing to accept defeat over that if he were to lose. I don't see where the war-monger expansionist narrative comes from.

Tbh even with he German american bund and american Jewish media against him, he really did a terrible job of reaching out to americans or Brits on the JQ, or rationalizing the genocide of eastern Europe, which I'm rather on board with but many anons arent

It really would've been interesting to see a bigger colonization of Africa. Also maybe due to the unfortunate christian angle, it is sad to see that Hitler's main allies, Spain Italy Finland Japan, were basically all non-white

Loyal? Fuck you.
It was very possible though to avoid a world war, the record of that was literally spread over the public record.

...

The H really was a beautiful dude
Leon degrelles speech here really hits the feels
I feel a sadness that in my time on the earth I gravitated much towards hostile asian ideologies when we had a few real respectable people in our own side of the world.

German, sure.

...

He didn't plan on exterminating the Slavs like kikes will have people believe. From what I can tell Eastern Europe had an extremely low concentration of people compared to the West, so he just wanted to use that land to satisfy the Germanic people's desire to grow. The heavy urbanization and population density was a major cause of WW1; I don't know why it's so rarely talked about.


Spaniards, Italians, and Fins are white. Stop trying to D&C. Also why are half of the posts in this thread by you?

Oy vey, why did that Hitler have no influence in ZOG? He should have been more friendly to it‘s jewish overlords isn‘t it?


Oy vey, he should not have attempted to kill all people without blue eyes and blond hair, are you even a real nazi?
Anyway they were all traitors to the internationalist and socialist cause, Uncle Stalin had to depose of them regardless.

Massacre of Cossacks at Lienz

On 1 June 1945, the British placed 32,000 Cossacks (with their women and children) into trains and trucks, and delivered them to the Red Army for repatriation to the USSR;[citation needed] similar repatriations occurred that year in the American occupation zones in Austria and Germany. Most Cossacks were sent to the gulags in far northern Russia and in Siberia, and many died; some, however, escaped, and others lived until Nikita Khrushchev's amnesty in the course of his de-Stalinization policies (see below). In total, some two million people were repatriated to the USSR at the end of the Second World War.[11]

"50,000 Cossacks including 11,000 women, children and old men".[13] At a location near Graz, British forces repatriated around 40,000 Cossacks to SMERSH.[14]
Fort Dix, New Jersey, United States[edit]

Although repatriations mainly occurred in Europe, 154 people were repatriated to the USSR from Fort Dix, New Jersey in the United States; three committed suicide in the US, and seven were injured.[15][16
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repatriation_of_Cossacks_after_World_War_II

By “placed into trains and trucks”, as pozed Kikipedia write means, the officers were separated under subterfuge from their men and arrested, their men with truncheons and bayonets and ready machine guns forced into waiting box cars. Their women preferred to drow with their children in the icy floods of the river instead of being tortured and raped by the “liberators”.
None of those handed to the Soviets by the Brits survived, they were all killed.
Those Cossacks surviving until “Khrushchev's amnesty” were never been in the west, never were involved in any hostile activities, were people who were summarily rounded up for belonging to a group of people declared an enemy of the Soviets.

BTW Cossacks are Russians who obviously preferred the company of German Nazis who alleged “attempted to kill Slavic subhumans”.

It wouldn't have been that hard to at least disseminate mein Kampf more, start a radio station, et all

Truly anyone who criticizes Germany must be a zogbot

Stopped reading there. Faggot thread with a faggot OP.

Why do you spread disinfo when you've got the biggest archive of texts right at your finger tips you dishonest kike? Both Poland and Russia were among the top world population in 1939.

You speak like a faggot and your shits all retarded.

Depopulation of an entire continent to expand farming sounds like genocide to me FAM, not that I disagree with it. Also, looks like someone's bluepilled on the Finnish Question>>10386672

Read more about mass psychology. The masses are really stupid and the only thing they desire is a full belly and leisure time. There was simply no point in fighting the foreign printing presses, because it would've been wasted energy. It was already a wonder that Hitler got into power. Many variables were involved, but the most important was that Hitler could reach the Germanic soul. This is messiah-tier stuff. It is no coincidence that so many people who voluntarily (!) joined Germany in her fight had various degrees of Germanic blood, be it in Russia or somewhere else. Those he could reach, he reached because they were able to "hear." The rest were unreachable, nothing would've changed that.

...

lolwut

The biggest pill he could've dropped would have been the mass killings by Jews in the USSR IMO, and setting up more radio repeaters with the German American bund.


Too true, UK/Anglo American chauvinism…

There was simply no point in fighting the foreign printing presses, because it would've been wasted energy.

This sounds kinda suspect though.

Hitler created a very unique third way. When Hindenburg died a vote was cast for Hitler to also become president which gave him supreme powers. He didn't even ignore the democratic principle in this case, he was put up by the masses to Führerprinzip. We see here that nazi germany clearly was not tyrannical in the sense that democracies paint it out to be. The plebs ruled by popular vote which pushed them out of kiked democracy immediately. The kikes were really scared at the new traditional orders in the Reich like the SS which was like a new Teutonic order (various princes joined the SS). We can see that they called on very ancient traditions that existed before the Prussian state existed.

Really the only way out of kosher democracy is a sort of third way, I don't feel like there is anyway for any nation to immediately go back into traditional order without a sort of playing the system like was done in Germany.

We can really see how easy it is to distort what happened in Germany back then through liberal perversions, but it was an organic movement that grew out of the vacuum created by the interregnum after WW1. It wasn't perfect, but what they were working on would have established lasting traditions even after Hitlers death.

Yeah, besides the whole continent of Europe, excluding zones that not long before that underwent commie kike subversion; less than a handful of countries.
Not to mention he did reach America where many spoke German as a second language, he also obviously reached places like Argentina and Mexico, who the Americans feared would side with Germany and attack America itsself. Don't give me that self righteous Socratic bullshit, no one gave a fuck about the kikes until the trials and the (((evidence))).

>Even their allies, Ukraine, Italy, Russia (B-BUT, HE NEVER REALLY ALLIED WITH MUH RUSSIA!)

Direct democracy is really preferable unless your nation is swamped by wetbacks for example

Can we have some serious discussions (tm) on the invasions of Scandinavia and their roles

...

sage

cuckchan distraction thread.

Spencer is CIA and they commited a false flag today!

Almost all white Americans have either Irish, Italian or slavic heritage, even if mostly Germanic.

So the nazi thing is ridiculous. We know we'er not aryans, it's not about that anymore.

This is legit tinfoil autism that everything is some slide, and I am a hwhyte 8ch regular

Tbh Americans are very polluted with native American genes especially, even if they aren't sicilianiggers or 1/4 kike or whatever.

English under the 'British Empire' have always been History's real version of what we consider 'nazi' behavior today.

So how do we solve Americans Germanic relations if all the Jews are wiped out…… Gas the UK?

Yeah, you've just proven exactly what he said. Reported.

Suicide bomb a mosque, kike.

It really appears to me that the uk is thoroughly cucked by Rothschild's trillionaire power, at least americans have some hope of securing financial independence

I distinctly recall America fighting a large war against UK perdifery in the past, Nigel
Not saying it will be totally necessary again, but there are obvious reasons for the UK to undermine relations between white America and Germanic north Europe.

"Everyone who disagrees with me must be a Jew."
The UK seems like a full on slave camp in the year 2017 for whites. At least middle America has room to hide.

The lack of HONEST discussion about white American/UK/Germanic etc rivalry will only bite everyone in the ass after this is all over.

Not in a general sense. Direct democracy can be shit and cause liberalism and shitskins to come in.

"Everyone who disagrees with me is a Jew"

Even guys like Mosley seem more bluepilled on the jq, though they did write this,


Mosley and the British Union of Fascists saw the Jews as an alien and hostile race within Britain. They also saw Jews as the most active force opposed to British nationalism.

This is a 1933 BUF pamphlet written by William Joyce.


Fascism and Jewry

By WILLIAM JOYCE

First published 1933

FASCISM in Britain had advanced but a little way when it was assailed by forces of whose existence the Leader, despite his great political experiences, had not dreamed when he set out on the Crusade. The greatest of these forces, never arraigned against the old parties, was found to be the power of organized Jewry to-day mobilized against Fascism, which has long refused subservience to it.

Because Fascism has known how to resist this alien menace in the people's midst, the Jews have raised throughout the land the cry of religious and racial persecution. Yet, in the thousands of Fascist speeches it has been made clear that the Movement recognizes and will observe the principles of complete religious liberty; whilst the racial diversity of the Empire renders absurd the suggestion that the concept of persecution on racial grounds should be entertained by the Fascists. This Movement does not attack Jews by reason of what they are, it resists them by reason of what they do. They have dared, in their great folly, to challenge a conquering force of the modern age, and their challenge must be answered. The Jews have attacked us physically where there have been six Jews to one Blackshirt. Wherever organized opposition manifests itself at our outdoor meetings, there can be seen behind a row of policemen, in security, a mass of bestial Jewish faces contorted into hideous and obscene grimaces.

Apart from actual observation, the records of the Law Courts have irrefutable proof of our charge. In the whole population only six in every thousand are Jewish, and yet of the persons convicted during 1934-35 of offenses against Fascists at Fascist meetings, or on their way home after the meetings, over 20 per cent. are Jewish. The only possible inference is that within Jewry there is a ferocious, inflammable propaganda against Fascism. The Law Courts provide ample evidence that the attack on the Movement is led by Jewry and, be it noted, before we retaliated we had proof of this fact. During the five months prior to the Leader's answer to Jewry at the Albert Hall on October 28th, 1934, fifty per cent. of the persons convicted of attacks on Fascists were Jews. There can be little doubt but that the remaining fifty per cent. were subject to Jewish influence.

Nor has the attack of the Jewish sub-men been merely physical. They do not hesitate to employ the grossest and foulest devices of libel and slander against our members. Only a few months ago one of the leading propagandists of the Movement was the victim of the monstrous accusation in print that he had appropriated to his own use funds subscribed for an association of ex-service men of which he had been the Chairman.

And this is not even to speak of the trump era pivot to at least make an alliance of convenience with Russians, which has many people divided among WNs about the "Slavic question"

...