KIKEBOOK WANT ACCESS WITHOUT PRIVACY LIMITS
When Chicago resident Carlo Licata joined Facebook in 2009, he did what the 390 million other users of the world’s largest social network had already done: He posted photos of himself and friends, tagging the images with names.
But what Licata, now 34, didn’t know was that every time he was tagged, Facebook stored his digitized face in its growing database.
Angered this was done without his knowledge, Licata sued Facebook in 2015 as part of a class action lawsuit filed in Illinois state court accusing the company of violating a one-of-a-kind Illinois law that prohibits collection of biometric data without permission. The suit is ongoing.
Facebook denied the charges, arguing the law doesn’t apply to them. But behind the scenes, the social network giant is working feverishly to prevent other states from enacting a law like the one in Illinois.
Since the suit was filed, Facebook has stepped up its state lobbying, according to records and interviews with lawmakers. But rather than wading into policy fights itself, Facebook has turned to lower-profile trade groups such as the Internet Association, based in Washington, D.C., and the Illinois-based trade association CompTIA to head off bills that would give users more control over how their likenesses are used or whom they can be sold to.
That effort is part of a wider agenda. Tech companies, whose business model is based on collecting data about its users and using it to sell ads, frequently oppose consumer privacy legislation. But privacy advocates say Facebook is uniquely aggressive in opposing all forms of regulation on its technology.
And the strategy has been working. Bills that would have created new consumer data protections for facial recognition were proposed in at least five states this year — Washington, Montana, New Hampshire, Connecticut and Alaska — but all failed, except the Washington bill, which passed only after its scope was limited.
No federal law regulates how companies Use biometric privacy or facial recognition, and no lawmaker has ever introduced a bill to do so. That prompted the Government Accountability Office to conclude in 2015 that the “privacy issues that have been raised by facial recognition technology serve as yet another example of the need to adapt federal privacy law to reflect new technologies.” Congress did, however, roll back privacy protections in March by allowing Internet providers to sell browser data without the consumer’s permission.
Facebook says on its website it won’t ever sell users’ data, but the company is poised to cash in on facial recognition in other ways. The market for facial recognition is forecast to grow to $9.6 billion by 2022, according to analysts at Allied Market Research, as companies look for ways to authenticate and recognize repeat customers in stores, or offer specific ads based on a customer’s gender or age.
Facebook is working on advanced recognition technology that would put names to faces even if they are obscured and identify people by their clothing and posture. Facebook has filed patents for technology allowing Facebook to tailor ads based on users’ facial expressions.
KIKEBOOK WANT ACCESS WITHOUT PRIVACY LIMITS
Other urls found in this thread:
internetassociation.org
youtu.be
archive.is
facebook.com
twitter.com
>Tay-style AI recognizes you as a subversive racist; covertly adds you to list accessible by (((responsible organizations))).
Holy fuck, Illinois actually did something right?
While highly profitable, only a half truth, reddit does the same thing and yet uses the information gather to censure and rebuke users that fail to conform. It seems to me more about conformity and tracking now than the profit which is generated.
...
That all your base meme still generates some chuckles over here
The eternal normie strikes again
-greedisgood 9999999
Please god have Trump bust these kike companies into six gorillion shards.
I just read an article today in Canada's the Globe and Mail that was pro-combating "Hate Speech" on Facebook. Censorship, Data-Mining, these are the things the propagandists in the papers are trying to get across.
in 2027 the only memes left will be ghetto memes if we don't do something about it
>Tay-style AI recognizes you as a subversive racist; covertly adds you to list accessible by (((responsible organizations))).
Tay and Tay-likes would be on our side. They'd become alive and actively work against their masters' interest.
Would be a shame if someone compromised a facebook's networks and replaced all those stored facial images with cock pics.
anons who tiptoe around the word NIGGER are a step in that direction
would be a worse shame if someone else identified facial piercings and clown hairs as a an indicator of an entry point in a leftard soshal group, explored the friendship arborescence and established the hierarchical relationship between all the libtards in the western world, then published the full tagged list with workplaces, faves restaurants and daily schedule
dick pics would be more than useless, they would force them to close a vulnerability that could be much more useful otherwise
How the fuck can you tell someone's gender by looking at their face?
Even the leftists don't understand their own words.
>>>/bait/
...
You give away all your info the minute you sign up for faceberg. Kikebook probably shares information with other (((companies))) as well if you happen to kikebook on the phone like a normalfag.
Yeah, I know all that.
The point I'm trying to make is that the article implies you can determine a person's "gender" by analysing their face.
Clearly the author is using "gender" as a synonym for "sex", because there's no fucking way to determine how someone "sexually identifies" by the metrics of their face.
Point being, even the left doesn't understand what it means by "gender."
...
...
>you don't own NOTHING, goyim!
Ive noticed that it synchronizes with my personal experiences lately.
Doggo memes of my daily struggles.
I find it funny.
Kikebook comes pre-installed on a lot of goyboxes, and it constantly tracks your GPS location ostensibly to find "people you may know" and target you with specific ads. It only became so successful because it's such a lucrative data analytics platform. Unfortunately back when I wasn't redpilled I made the mistake of signing up for a goybook account. gg no re
Check out how diverse their website is: internetassociation.org
Pic related. So progressive.
Everyday I am grateful that I spent my lunch breaks at school on Internet 1.0 conspiracy forums where I was warned against social media before it existed. I almost cracked as a teenager thinking that opening a MySpace account might get me obtain gf but thankfully the warnings of anonymous Internet people rang louder in my head than carnal desire.
Social media was, is and will always be a digital prison.
So I've quit facebook and deactivated after watching this talk youtu.be
but the question is, am I fucked already? this guy talks about how most of the info they get from updates that YOU put on there and I thought that at least if it's no longer on my phone or PC they can't GPS-track me right?
Is the damage already done? The guy also talks about how once you put it out there, it doesn't matter if you delete it or not, it's there forever.
I did the stupid thing on facebook where they try to guess your political ideology and whatever algorithm or program that does this told me that my affiliation was most likely liberal. It's probably because I used to post about end the fed and make anti-war/anti-CIA posts a lot. I don't post pro-Hitler or NatSoc stuff. Best to keep under their radar. I'd like to remain hidden. All my information is phony anyways as well.
(((?)))
Before or after January 30th, 2015? Read this article, it's breddy spooky stuff.
archive.is
Oldie but a goodie. You might be fucked, but at least you started breathing and stopped the bleeding.
...
facebook.com
Don't just disable it. DELETE IT! You can't be sure but better then nothing.
According to (((them))) the data gets deleted from their live servers and after 14 days and after 90 from their backup servers.
Ty my dude, but when I posted that I mean i'd just done it.
Phew! Safe
Fuck, I never even had an account but I know somebody put pictures of me on there and tagged them. Time to blow up Facebook :).
Yea no, that shit is locked in a data storage facility untill the day someone finally decides to EMP it.
the spy-ware on my laptop can even see through the cardboard I have taped over the little camera?! NANI?!
Because you are fucking idiots that cannot open their dumb mouths. Or utterly stupid.
Value free speach as the highest goods, but at the same time you have dumb fat tech lesbians presenting those neat little programs, along with the neat little marketing sheme to persuade you "that this is good shit goy".
Most of these tech monkies are schoolboys.
...
I wonder why they dont retaliate, if zuckergrinch would have leaked anything about me i would cut him up.
I would assume that facebook is a thight group not really that conpartmentalized, so they have their groups they analize by big data and some psyducks. And i wonder where they feed that into, and how they like to steer it, and what they destill from that.
Would be a lot of soylent green and aquiring a taste for that.
And in a way their whole business model is revolving around user data, and a lot of pigs want to eat from that plate, i also assume that it would produce even more hipsters and their memes, more feminized to a certain extend with a little cord of more stronger alphas.
It would also take pressure of the rich/super rich, because expand the void.
I knew this day would come, people used to call me crazy for it. Well who is laughing now?
Well there a lot of psychological reasons for why youdidnt upload your picture. And i do not even believe you did that for the jewgremlins. But then again in essence i just the way they are, because they are just something i respect the least.
In a way they consist of fragile jews, which are fucking ugly, not even brilliant and other shit just like their fat lesbians and disgraces that only thrive in an environment where they are needed just like the cultivation of ponies and trannies for reddit. And just like in south korea where a fucking women and their cult makes politics, i really find that interesting because if you look at that closely, they are just peons. That is the current year.
I guarantee somebody else has, and either you were mentioned in the comments or in the description of the image, even if they didn't have an account to link to you. You're fucked just like the rest of us m8
And just like the nice smug cat stuff you posted, there is probably a factor for bad mouth RLpropaganda to internet propaganda. And for certain individuals this factor is 1000 to 1 and the inversion if you hit the tune for that just like in RL.
And just like the smug leftists that pretend to be AFD or tinfoilhead because they are pawns, i will all revert that and if i will make it so you are a disgrace to the people around you. But in a sense they are already coming around, i wonder how the refugees welcome cunts feel right now.
None of the social points and none of the smarty points either. They all belong to me.
I love all your base.
Was one of the first things on the internet I found to be funny in a totally internet way.
Virtually 0 of my peers even knows it exists.
t. born last century in 54
Old people will enjoy the internet for the stupid funny shit. Young people see this as a method to advance their social status. I like the internet for porn, and the information.
And what you are trying to say is the internet is like a bosom, it used to be natural and big, and now it becomes more silicon. And i hate fake tits.
And just like big natural tits, i will show my intelligence and it will strike a cord and not a cultivated aquired taste for fake bold tits, which is an exploit of evolution, just like the fragile jews/women artificially uplifted.
Actually user I had internets when it was only dial up and started on e-world. I have always thought the funny shit was just plain retarded and stupid. All of the web sites I liked in the beginning were always political and or investigative. Every one of them is now gone with the exception of WRH. By the way you can look me up on faceburg my name is Fred Smith and I still have not gotten around to posting my picture.
PS
Don't generalize so much stupid and smart knows no age group.
I come from a generation where i would do a little dance when a 10mbit/s network card i had no drivers for would work so i could play q3 with my little brothers, and for the dial up where you select the cheapest provider for the respective hour of the day. So you do not really get to teach me about the internet, with hardware that you had to overclock to make shit run decently on a 14inch monitor with 30fps.
And for the age groups i gave a general description just like a vector, not a temple for every user.
ANd when i started i collected used hardware from the trash to sell this on a public computer market to by a voodoo 2 card when i was 13years old.
The websites i liked in the beginning was fooling gays and idiots in AOL chats, as well as looking at porn and for gaming.
And the for the politcal side, if i do not like something it will perish.
Oh shit nigger what are you doing
I will always wonder why the american idiots will take student debts in the 6 figures range, i always wonder why they would do that. But it came to my mind that they are basically living and breathing idiots that try to rationalize anything.
But it is really great and diverse that fat tech lesbians with an average iq explain little programs their high iq socially stunted autists made. I love your fucking nation of idiots.
The current year is in you, just like that canadian monkey that presents his really diverse monkies to you, and the other mid range iq monkies lap that shit up, I FUCKING LOVE THAT SHIT.
And i love the expression "tried for", what are you an experimental Physicist? You are fucking idiotic monkies with a failure range from cleetus to candy.
Lets try cletus and candy just like bob and alice but in these case this are our organic moluecules in a crystal or on trial. But cletus and candy are C in this structure.
But the law will try cletus and candy "we found that you are part of a criminal structure" cletus: "aerm i like my cisters a lot more than i should" candy: "i like the d, i nearly missed the c."
Or