Hi Holla Forums. I would currently describe myself as an anarcho-communist. Recently I have been questioning my views...

Hi Holla Forums. I would currently describe myself as an anarcho-communist. Recently I have been questioning my views, and I feel less certain about where I stand. If you present me with your political views and your reasons for holding that they are correct in a civil manner, I will consider what you have to say.

What is your ideology and why is it ideal?

lurk for at least two years before you post again.

Lurk if you're really interested.

First let me ask you why you feel that your ideology is ideal.

This thread will probably get deleted but feel free to join us on the Holla Forums mumble and we'll bully you about being a commie.
www.mumble.com/mumble-download.php
mumble-us.cleanvoice.ru
50688

to be honest, only talking ideals, anarcho-communism isnt even bad, its just like a primitive form of government. in terms of what anarcho-communists actually DO (as in antifa), thats just fucking retarded. how will you have your ancom revolution by fighting against your fellow man (as in 'nazis')? antifa retards should be fighting the banks like back in the day of occupy wall street, not this shitty jewed up controlled 'rebellion'

barely anyone on Holla Forums sees that we have shared goals thought, at least in the short term (relatively), which are to get rid of the current powers that be. see pic

Fine, i have a few hours to spare. I welcome anyone else to watch me debate you into submission

that's you're job newfriend, its called lurking

i guarantee OP won't be back

THIS IS NOW BABY'S FIRST RED-PILL THREAD. POST YOUR BEST SCREENCAPS

Enlighten yourself OP. Read the works of Hitler and Nietzsche. If your willing to entertain an idea you may ne more willing to accept it. NatSoc ain't that bad. Motherhood is a respected and paying job, culture is appreciated for what it is and is preserved. Sciences are to be held in high priority. What's not to like?
Also, as it is NatSoc is the only political/economic system that seems impervious to the jew.

tl;dr
Your free trial starts now. Don't waste it.

Bonuses:

If you are interested in the culture lurk for a while.

I can tell you this: a 'real' Anarcho-Communist is simply tribalist. A tribalist cannot exist without being racist.

The only ideal is The All. Call it God, call it the Universe, call it everything, the past, present and future all at once. The absolute. That's the only ideal there can ever be.

The Everlasting Aryan vs the Eternal Jew. The Apollonian and Dionysian. The Alpha and the Omega. The First and the Last. The Beginning and the End. Order and Chaos. Self-Organization and Emergence.

Hermes Trismegistus. Nietzsche. Jung.

Both you and I have a place in this world. Things are as they should be. And yet, there is more. To transcend the duality of existence, the chaos of one's own ego and walk forth with God. Or to succumb to the devil within us all and accelerate the Hegelian dialect to suite one's own selfish desires. The Golden Path to the Heavens. Or the blood-soaked ravine into the Abyss.

Ordo ab Chao.

I hope you're ready, I will be on in 5 minutes

dubs of truth

easy smiley, this ain't /fringe/

...

So you’re too stupid to realize your own belief system is predicated on two inherently incompatible thoughts. Got it.
GET THE FUCK OUT.

...

GET OUT, JEW.

Best solution is to kill yourself faggot

These bait threads are getting old.

Good for you, now go back to your trashcan

The best I can do is describe my own personal views. (I like to think of myself as a national socialist.)
Here are some of my core beliefs:

It is my belief that the "free trade" deals imposed on us by boomers, multi-national corporations, and the ((1%)) have done far more harm than good. They have vaporized virtually all manufacturing in the west, leaving us with significantly less jobs, and crippling our economy, as now our countries can only make money by selling raw resources, or perpetuating that "service economy" meme. (And of course bankers, ((1%)) are always more than willing to LOAN our governments money when needed at an interest :^) )
Not only have these policies harmed us by virtually eliminating our ability to stand on our own, they have also enabled such companies to more easily take advantage of poor, desperate workers in third world nations with lower, or no minimum wages.

Once upon a time, a bank could only have as much currency as they could back in gold. (That's why various bank notes used to say "Will pay to the bearer on demand".) With the Federal Reserve act of 1913 (As well as similar acts in other western nations), the right to print money was transferred from the state to private entities controlled by ((very rich, powerful families)). Is it of any surprise that the gold standard was shortly abandoned soon after? Now in the United States, when the government needs more currency, the Federal Reserve LOANS it to them, at an interest rate. This means that not only is the currency in most western nations basically just worthless monopoly money, but that there is also a very significant portion of the national debt that is physically, mathematically impossible to pay off. For the owners of the Federal Reserve, and other similar central banks, this is good, as it ensures continued servitude indefinitely.

It is my belief that in order for diversity to exist, weather it be in race, religion, and/or culture, different, distinct groups of people must exist. With the heavy shilling of "multiculturalism" and "diversity" coming from multi-national corporations that profit from it, we've seen cities all across the globe begin to look the same, as well as people begin to dress and speak the same. (Western business attire, huge rectangular skyscrapers in every city, ect) This is not the blending of, or celebration of many cultures. In my opinion, this is *the loss of culture*. I believe that the same applies to race. What diversity is there to be found in the elimination / extinction of different phenotypes? I believe that distinction and differentiation are required for any sort of "diversity" to exist.

I believe that unless you contribute to the pot, you have no right to take from it. Perhaps instead of welfare, people in need could become employed by the state to labour on various public works.

Communism: all property is owned by the state, this includes the labor of its citizens.
Anarchy: abolition of state.
How the flopping niggertits is this not an oxymoron?
Literate people call that Libertarianism. We still understand it to be retarded, though.

communism will never work, it does not address subjective value
recommended reading: anything
nice id
lurk moar

I just saw an emo poem posted in the catalog for an OP and it reminded me… We don't want you. Go away.

Left wing are leaches, they take.

Right wing are builders, they create.

I think OP is drunk and just wanted a discord/mumble/irc to shitpost on.
In case you're still reading this, OP, the jews don't like you.

its sad listening to you talk

Goys, OP was asking us to describe our views, not screech artistically and shitpost.

Oh good. I'm not a very artistic person.

...

...

...

Demographics is the only ever real politics. Understand this or everything around you dies.
You've made to many bad decision, there is no forgiveness only conflict. The white race shall not be tainted by your weak mind and body.
You should just leave and get more in tune with your own peoples' ways. Civilization is not for you. White people are real, not some caricature you can lambast whenever you feel slighted.

remember how the whole thing was neutralized?
FBI shills among the leadership forced identity politics in the middle of it (minorities having equal speech time / representation as white males or something like that) - it was instant kill.
This should be the first redpill for OP.

I became a capitalist facist because it is the only way that my childhood dreams of a Über-human exploring the galaxy can come true.

Nigga what are you smoking. Marxist leninism was only a theoretical method of how to get to communism, not communism itself. And before then anarchy and communism were seen as one in the same (freedom for the workers) hence the split and emphasis on ideology

Christ Holla Forumsacks are this uneducated but they shoot first and ask questions later.

Anyone who doesn't know what something is obviously isn't appropriated to critique it