"Bloody neo-Marxists have invaded the campuses" - some cunt

get ready for the muh marxism is science!

Marxism isn't exactly science, but it does know its own limitation to the base. These superstructure-obsessed freaks who think of themselves as Marxists are clearly insane.

I go to Uni. He's absolutely right. They don't even try to hide it.

You'd think that for your university education you'd have some fucking idea of what Marxism actually is.

It does matter what he calls them. He's calling out a problem and that's a good thing. And many of the probably do think of themselves as marxists, even if they've read very little Marx.

*It doesn't matter

...

you're retarded

This is the real danger of SJWs, not their assault on normal people but their co-opting of Marxism and the left.

He is one of the few voices speaking out against the SJW. You're either with him or against him.

Not just insane. Dangerous. As based professor says, they attack free speech. If communicating an idea becomes illegal or even something that will have you ostricised, then you've lost your most important human right, the one from which all others are derived.

So chuckle on smartasses. Laugh and applaud the demise of ANY potential revolution.

He's talking about neo-Marxists, ya dummy. Neo-liberalism is entirely different. Marxism and liberalism do not go hand in hand.

what is the difference between neo-marxism and cultural marxism? Both focus more on super-structure than base right? Is cultural marxism just a strand of neo-marxism?

I wouldn't. Liberal professors work hard to talk around class as if it were some esoteric concept that is too complicated for students to understand. However, they will gleefully go on about critical theory in every social sciences class.

"Cultural Marxism" is a rightard conspiracy theory. "Neo-marxism" is intersectional liberalism.

...

Cultural Marxism is, in practically every instance of its modern use, a term describing a conspiracy theory which suggests that critical theory on order of the Comintern is being used to infiltrate colleges and universities to bring about the 'destruction of the west' by ideologically subverting it into 'degeneracy(tm)' (see: PDF and WEBM related).

The term could have been useful to describe the use of the Marxist dialectical method on cultural phenomena, but is absolutely worthless now that it references something ridiculous (just like how 'national socialism' could have been a proper descriptive term for the USSR had it not been gained notoriety under German fascist use first).

Forgot WEBM.

Where did the term originate? What was it's original meaning?

neo-marxists are the same as neo-nazis.

if you put neo in front of a word, it means "the new version is 10000 times shittier than the old, to the point where theyre barely related"s

The term cultural Marxism was invented by far right conspiracy theorists. It exists only in their minds

Germany. It is the modern form of "cultural Bolshevism".

So this book was written by a nazi? What does it mean in the context of this book?

here is the content of the book.

youtube.com/watch?v=S9AbuFhT0W4

So left/pol/ doesn't know what it was defined as in this text?

Pretty much.

I should also stress that the main goal of the left should be to abolish identity, and identitarianism.

We use the other name of cultural Marxism, we call it The culture industry.

Cultural Marxism is about saving culture from the hands of capitalists, ever wonder why the more an artistic medium get capitalized, quality take a back seat to Marketability ? this is the effect of the culture industry

Cultural Marxism "the real philosophy" is the critic of capitalists exploitation and monopolizing the making of culture

Cultural Marxism "the Holla Forumsack scarecrow" is this big conspiracy of the far left trying to have communism by destroying the moral values of the west and cucking them from their wives …..

Now how about you read these people for yourself now ? if you don't that mean you will live in fear from a concept that you yourself wants to be vague and scary.

Cultural Marxism is a term used by the far-right to mean "socially liberal ideas".

Socially Liberal ideas were growing support in Europe in the post-war period (women's rights, gay rights, etc) and this was recognized by Marxists at the time to be a) cool and good, and b) a useful way to find, revolutionize and educate people into socialists; people who were already angry at the status quo in some way, already seeing the contradictions of the bourgeois state from one angle, and already willing to fight for change. The idea was, that via movements for social liberation (which Marxists at the time thought were good; making homosexuality legal, giving women legal and economic rights, etc) the ideas of socialism could be spread too. The idea was that through uniting the various struggles of the world under the banner of socialism, all their aims could be achieved and more besides.

However, as points out, this was a double-edged sword. While some socially liberal groups became educated with class solidarity and proper Marxist ideas, and took those ideas into their own struggles and the working class struggle as a whole (see the "Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners" movement in the 1980s in England as one example), it also led to a co-opting of a lot of the language, message, and names of socialist movements. Ultimately, the class content is lost, and the concepts of oppression and exploitation are used without their economic basis. This degradation of Marxist ideas is the ideological background to SJWs.

So, 'A marxisn critique of culture'?

Even if you took the conspiracy on face value, and actually studied Marx a little, you would find the claim that SJWs replace class with identity, even if true for some, is still missing the crucial endgame of it. Abolishing it. Communists want to abolish class, where's SJW's ingrain and pot identity on a pedestal, rather than abolish it. Their tactics are wholesale reactionary, and tribalistic. Their also funded by Le Soros man, someone who most certainly does not benefit from a society with no classes, state, or currency, which would render people like him completely redundant.

Also, speaking of Soros, does anyone have those article showing him funding anti socialist, or at least anti worker functions?

S/he/it claims, piercings flapping, while impaling xirself on a 16 inch rubber horse cock produced in Taiwan by bewildered workers who think it's a fake mushroom.

If neo-Marxist means IdPol, he's 100% right.

Why did I make it a reply?

youtube.com/watch?v=ElX4PUUsja0

He's an idiot

Anybody knows the song?

Again you make the made-up link between gender study and the culture industry "cultural marxism" .

Ever think of how vidya is becoming less good the more the capitalist company behind get wealthy ? ever asked why the AAA sux ?

Cultural Marxism is the saving grace of video games, anime, movies, music etc…

Not an argument.

"Cultural Marxist" was coined by Trent Schroyer as a catchall for Western Marxist who examined capitalism's' effects on culture, and its break with Soviet Marxism. Marxist weren't the ones who came up with the term.

Also, the right uses it completely differently than how it was originally.
Read more here.
theconversation.com/cultural-marxism-and-our-current-culture-wars-part-2-45562

kek

That we can't just call them cultural marxists has made them that much easier to fight. What should {{{they}}} be called?

SJW? The Ultimate Reactionaries? I don't know.

I don't even care.

They just need to be removed if our society is going to get anywhere.

Reactionary Identity Politicians. Or RIPs for short.

Ooooh that's a nice one.

How can you combat something if you can't even define it?

It's been used a few times. RIPsters.

Identity politics is clearly defined. It's this plus making it about the identity which you have virtually have no control over, unlike class. Meanwhile Communism, Capitalism, Socialism, and Marxism, all get vague or non nuanced definitions.

The way the far right uses it is much closer to the way the Nazis used "Cultural Bolshevism".

Identity politics is a bit broad no? I'm referring specifically to the same group as the good professor. Their traits are well known,

All suggested terms have been shot down (virtue-signalers, regressive left). If nothing else an agreed-upon term will at least shame some of those with self-awareness into stopping.

We can define it, we just don't care what it's called.

You're confusing the definition of a concept, with a word for that concept.

Do you not need a name for a concept to articulate your opposition to it, especially to an audience that may not be familiar with them?

No.

If they aren't familiar with the concept, then you'll have to define the name anyway, right?

It's cultural capitalism. Peak neoliberalism.

You know that might actually work…

Yes and then referring to {{{them}}} later, having a concise and descriptive term would surely help? I mean every other faction you oppose here has a title. Why spare the SJW?

You could just call them liberals, or neoliberals, like:

As for RIPsters, it can also refer to Nazism. It's a bit of a catch all term, hence why I use it.

...

Rekt

Source for that quote?

bennorton.com/adolph-reed-identity-politics-is-neoliberalism/

It amuses me that the only group obsessed with idpol doesnt have a name for their identity.

Horizontal Hold by This Heat

thanks user!

"Marx is the patron saint of social justice U"

youtube.com/watch?v=XbOeO_frzvg

Reminder that this faggot has currently worked himself into the position of intellectual of the alt right. If we don't use this as an opportunity to call him out on his bullshit I'm fucking done with this board.

Call him out how?
He's basically just using recycled rhetoric.

retard

Rebel, you wanna get on this? Hell, even Muke the fluke.

I fucking wish we had invaded campuses.

I had two profs that were marxist/neo-marxist out of about 30, and I was in a sociology program (where marx was literally our founder)

95% of professors are conservative, rich, reactionary, class traitors and dont have time to study marxism.

I doubt this

Even in alabama the majority if the professors are left wing.

So where the fuck did you go to find this:
Some kind of private rich fuck school?

not in formal title, but you'd be surprised how many of them don't realize the entire university is just an ideological state apparatus to make sure the children of the petite-bourgeoisie find their way into the 'right' class position, how many profs believe in authority, social/cultural capital, discipline, maintaining bourgeois institutions and structures and so on. For example when cleaning staff go on strike the profs ALWAYS will cross the picket lines. They have nothing in relation to the revolutionary subjects of the working class.

they are only the liberal left, at most.

He probably means their liberals. :^)

Left is left.

marxism is a very specific set of theories and beliefs. Just thinking poor people deserve more or should be pitied or war is bad really or we should use pronouns has nothing to do with mcm or surplus value, or dialectical materialism

your average prof isn't in that game.

bump