Is this one a socialism?

Is this one a socialism?

Should WHITE farmers land be appropriated? After all, a man's gotta eat.

Other urls found in this thread:

news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/live-malema-appears-in-newcastle-court-20161107
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

really made me scrach my noggin, Holla Forums

I guess the courts and Afriforum just imagined it then huh?


news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/live-malema-appears-in-newcastle-court-20161107

So I ask again. Should white farmers land be appropriated?

yes

If it was done for class reasons then yes. If it's done in the name of id pol, then no.

So should black farmers land be appropriated? And will taking the land from these white farmers not just create a new class that 'must have land'?

yes

Depends. If it was forcefully taken from them, then yes. If it was unoccupied then yes and not used, then yes.

Race doesn't matter. Class does. The bourgeoisie doesn't have a singular ethnicity.

Fair enough. Now do you think that Malema has socialistic ideals in mind here?

To me it seems more nationalistic. Claiming the land that was once ours etc.

It's not done for the working classes, but for certain ethnicities. A bit like how Hitler "reclaimed" the banks and buisnesses from DA JOOS.

So in your opinion it is fine when this guy 'reclaims' whit but was bad when Hitler did it?

And I said, if it was done in the name of class reasons then that's fine. If it was done in the name of idpol, which nationalism is, then no.

It's not about who is doing reclaiming but why. If private property stays private property but only change hands, it's pretty worthless.
If lands claimed by Blacks end up becoming Black Porky's property with Black proles under his heel, then it was all for nothing.

There is absolutely nothing to suggest any appropriated land was going to be given freely and without condition to the plebs.

EFF is trash level Maoist "muh ancestry" nationalism wrapped in left-wing rhetoric.

You're really begging for that tasty screenshot aren't you?

He said it was like Hitler, why do you even need to ask for clarity if it's OK when white people are the victims?

If people are occuplying the land, then it does not need to be "given" to them.

all land should be appropriated

private property is shit tbh

No this is not socialistic it's just nationalist populism justified with cold war rhetoric. If black SA farmers are allowed to own property and profit off of it then white farmers should be able to as well. Even if you buy that there is some case for cultural reclamation/preservation, the Voortrekkers in particular have been there for centuries at this point as independent settlers, not colonists. They were in violent competition with native africans but now they themselves have no identity seperate from africa.

Proles should claim land from porkies. That means white proles should take land from black porkies and black proles should take land from white porkies and white proles should take land from white porkies and black proles should take land from black porkies.

Class war 101.

Yes. Seize the means of production and put them to use in service of the people.