...
Restrained, alone, quietly miserable, generally unnoticed, possibly working little...
He sounds amazing.
He sounds fucking unreal to be honest, like some anime character among hordes of normies.
it's even funnier than foucault dying of aids because he believed it was a spook
Also that's not what spooks mean, Holla Forums.
now i'm waiting for the response in which you call a concept like "failing at life" a spook
Damn, you're right, what a cuck.
so a conman who spent more time on justifying his cons than actually planning them
it's really fitting for Holla Forums. like leftypol, he was friendless, loveless, smoked the 19th century version of blunts all day and utlimately achieved nothing of note
Ok dude.
...
union of egoists vs SS einzatscommando
you don't understand something that hitler did, you're forever stuck in the babbling stage
He did pic related.
rightio
*the left hasn't
you actually believe that your arguments are somehow reality, as if reality were some big other
it's truly Holla Forums tier "not an argument" tier reasoning which denigrates such conceptions to ideologically hijacked adjectives
Are you new my dood?
pure scientism
lol engels fucked his wife how is he not the literal definition of a cuck
You're thinking of Holla Forums's guy.
You're thinking of Hess, the ideological founder of Nationalist Socialism.
pretty based
By your logic you've already proven my point for you. Nice fallacy.
there is no "reality" that dictates any interpretations of the words i use, there's only interpretations, which is feels
by interpretating my posts, you are literally placing feels over reals
Then in that case … your arguments themselves are literally nothing.
Defeated by your own logic. How ironic.
but i never posted stupid "feels-reals" shit like you did
Read a fucking book, starting with some school level English textbooks.
Smallcaps posters are cancer.
reminder
He cured Marx's idealism, which i would say is a pretty big achievement.
fantastic
We're talking about him and his work one hundred and fifty years after he died. I'd say that's something of note.
'Cured' nothing by sublimating it with his own idealism; with Stirner the ego is something transcendent and outside of material reality.
but that's wrong
But it isn't wrong. Stirner's ego is a 'fixed-idea', he clearly holds it above all else, alien to the material world. He never discussed (as Marx lambasted him for) the fundamental grounds that produce the ego, or what the ego is as a sum of relations. There is no real essence to the ego, he just supposes it to be.
...
Responding with a meme is rather germane, that's all Stirner really is to most people. It's also an easy way to undermine an argument without actually countering it.
Wew lad…
...