Alright leftypol, I'm curious about "identity politics". I saw pic related on Reddit...

I definitely can see how it could be considered a distraction…it replaces real economic change with pandering to women and minorities while using meaningless identifiers to separate everyone. I just need a good way to word it, I know it's all bullshit but it's hard to explain.

I don't know, honestly. The full communism subreddit wasn't too bad with shit like this. It seems anarchists are the ones mostly attracted to idpol, like this is part of the agenda of about 90% of anarchists.

The world of internet politics has turned on its head, as reddit liberals started to argue for existence and difference of races
Holla Forums was right after all.

tbf pretending to be colorblind in a capitalist system is p stupid

You'd be amongst the first to go.

Makes me mad

You have no idea how perfect that is, I've been trying for years to make my parents understand it.

it isn't really. i think it's just edgy liberals co-opting leftist terminology to trigger conservatives

That isn't the point of the comic my man, it's about perception.

And you make me just as pissed as the OP

i wasn't really responding to the comic

I wonder how long it will take for SJWs and nazis to realize that all of their theory is exactly the same.

Why don't you go back to reddit then?

i try not to be concerned with what reactionaries consider leftism to be. that's always been a problem

Something makes me feel the creators of that pic in the OP would think so no matter which system you implemented.

This implies I came from reddit to start with

Problem is when it leaks into leftism.

i don't like to think of it actually leaking into leftism though. it just confusedly uses similar terminology

Identity politics is not necessarily a "distraction," but it can be weaponized as one by people who don't genuinely have the interests of the working class at heart.

Also, if your "anarchism" uses a word that can effortlessly be co-opted by writers in the Guardian to attack the left, there's a problem.

Even on reddit this seems far-fetched
Proofs?

Lol I got 4 on the first one (I guess the Hispanic under colonial foreign rule stuff doesn't matter and lol @ the implication you're automatically more excellent if you're a cis male but cis females are fiiiiine), the second one, the tenth one, the thirteenth one (???) and the penultimate one. I love the scorecard at the bottom that evaluates the democratic centralness of your opinions. Apparently I'm a full blown douchebag despite the fact I agree with most of their analyses anyway.

There are serious democratic issues involved with gender and race equality. Most people concerned with these things are not full-blown idpolitickers. Anyone concerned about equality should take these issues seriously. Idpolitickers promote gender and race issues as a replacement for the class struggle. Idpol is not about equality, but elevating a layer of relatively muh privileged into positions of state and corporate power. This doesn't help workers of any social identity!

The fight for social equality is the fight of the working class. The fight must unite all workers regardless of identity in a common struggle against all that oppresses them. This means opposing racism and sexism wherever it raises its ugly head, since such things hurt workers and hold back the revolution.

What's their problem with dreadlocks? Too raysiss?

liberals co-opting and misunderstanding the meaning of cultural appropriation

Putin pls

Which of them are not either greatly mitigated or solved outright by the working class gaining control of the means of production?

the fact that worker controlled capitalism is still capitalism and will continue to produce inequalities :^)

...

I think the workers seizing state power and the means of production is a prerequisite to fully addressing these issues. A prerequisite to workers seizing power is the political unity of the working class. Anything that gets in the way of that–both bigotry and false assumptions of bigotry–is evil.

m.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/5b8glk?sort=top&compact=true this is the post. Granted it's not the most popular post but look at the comments and see for yourself how many people are deluded by this stuff. It's weird. This is obviously an extreme example of identity politics but even in small amounts I cringe when I see it. I am interested in an analysis of this phenomenon and possibly a way to counter it

don't know why everyone shits their pants over those two pms. the mod pretty much gave the same answer for both questions

Did you mistake the syndicalist flag for a leftcom flag? If not, you have some hardcore cognative dissonance going on.

So, let's treat it like a prerequisite and do it first. Agreed?

It's what majority of this board thinks you dummy. Why do you think Holla Forums is so hated among the left-wing communities?

Racism and sexism must be fought for the same reason idpol must be fought.

Racism and sexism are also perpetuated by identity politics.

That pic makes me unconfortable

what if you are the one who has a fucked up perception of colours?

...

I don't think we disagree. Racism and sexism are the oldest idpol. Modern idpol just reverses the names. Both are reactionary. An argument for one is just as good as an argument for the other.

Do you seriously believe this?

The "progressive stack" thing is definitely useful information btw. When people think they can apply identity politics to reality I just think about the oppression olympics, and how they're literally only concerned with identifying who's "oppressed more", as if it's possible to deduce such a thing. The end result of idpol is a bunch of transgaysexual minorities arguing whose lives were the hardest.

sometimes I shit on leftypol for being proudly brocialist/ socially reactionary, but it's shit like this that reminds me why brocialism is absolutely necessary in some contexts. fuck that shit bruh

...

Right. And it's shit like this that's dominating leftist discussion, at least in America. It literally makes me want to die.

I like shitposting and trolling every once in a while on reddit. There's a lot more content over there too so i can mass consume it to distract from my shitty life

Please don't tell me you use that word unironically…

kek

idpol is cancer my dude.

Please tell me you're not using that flag ironically.

I like the fact that some of these questions with yes/no look like dongs

fuck yeah boy

I wouldn't tell you that because it wouldn't be true.

Impeccable dick detection, faget~ I noticed it too, lol

You can answer the questions with a pattern where you agree with the statement that you aren't a feminist and get told in the result that you call yourself a feminist.
Putting a yes there gives you 1 asshole point. You talk too much at meetings? You are an asshole. You should ask others for opinions. You ask others for opinions? You are an asshole. Top science. Being against prostitution gives you 1 asshole point. Even though this is a hotly contested topic in feminism and there are many people for legal prostitution who'd never call themselves feminist. Agreeing with the statement
gives you one asshole point. At least they got that part right. Behead those who insult brocialism.

And don't miss the forest for the trees, let's look at the whole thing:
A lovely visualisation of how interested these folks are in open dialogue and learning.

no I don't, but I figured it was appropriate to use it there given what this thread is about. I coulda put quotes around it but I was too lazy tbh

None of those needs to be fought, merely discarded.

Also, notice how it implies that sex work in a capitalist society is not necessarily exploitative. This is the kind shit you come up with when you read absolutely no theory.

um exqueeze me sinner????? its a wymyns choice!??????/

wymyn can be forced to partake in whatever method of wage slavery they choose

..they should, at least for now

this is the same lolbert nonlogic that says that being a leftist whilst having a job or otherwise interacting within a capitalist system is somehow hypocritical

Someone should make one that says

'are you a liberal pretending to be an anarchist''

1) What is more important, the abolition of cultural appropriation or the abolition of intellectual property.

2) Most men are A) muh privileged B) Slaves to the capitalist monolith

WHAT THE FUCK

nobody should be allowed to do anything under capitalism because then normies might get the idea

It's good to see that the revolution isn't coming any time soon.

You're not supposed to argue, you're just supposed to shut up and accept that you're a brocialist

A
FUCKING
WHITE MALE

Ok, I forget the average person is unable to properly extrapolate, so I will spread it out for you.

In a truly communistic society, the idea of private property ceases to exist even up to one's own body. Everyone works together for the community in all things, and this will extend to personal sexuality. The idea of consent is linked with the idea of transaction, but without a market there will only be sharing what is produced. Public sex and orgies will be perfectly natural, and people who were formerly prostitutes or labelled as sluts will take the opportunity to be public cum dumpsters, encouraging a lifestyle of free use that will spread with the communistic ideals of communal sharing.

In such an openly explicitly sexual society, children would be voyeurs to all kinds of sexuality. Monkey see, monkey do, children will start sexing each other (hell, they already do, just not in the public square). Adults will see that children are just as sexual as adults, and the age barrier will cease to exist.

With sex comes fetishes, and a time-honored fetish is animal sex. Public horse and dog fucking will also be everywhere, and people at this point will just accept it.

It's simple, really, all one has to do is throw out the morality capitalism molded society to hold. No nuclear families, no system built around protecting the tribe's breeding production, no religious leaders demanding repression, only communal sexual satisfaction for all. Absolute perfection.

I suggest reading ChaosMuramasa's The Law and Jasper Ratt's A Normal Family. Both are erotic stories, both are pretty much exactly the picture of communistic sexual paradise.

...

Go away you faggot, I swear if it's just you being a weird fuck at every opportunity I'll be getting written up for splintering a perfectly good gun stock on your face.

Yeah, about that

scientificamerican.com/article/gonorrhea-may-soon-be-resistant-to-all-antibiotics/

cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2016/09/cdc-reports-first-highly-resistant-gonorrhea-us

Communism doesn't mean freedom to spread venereal diseases and unwanted contact with others that can result in pregnancy, and even the spread of non-vinereal viruses or even parasites.

You are asking everyone to get ring worm a cold and herpes and to be honest I'm not for it

You sound a little spooked fam.

It isn't spooks this is a society that will erupt in plague like rats

In the sense of, 'well you're white so you can't have an opinion on that', yeah. Arguments have merit based on evidence and not who said them, when it gets down to it.

Come to our side lads, we have cat boys

Well maymaid ecksty.

No, the problem is very much pedos finding cover to operate within places and being such emotionally retarded shits they destroy them, like Holla Forums, or librechan, or tor.

...

I'm willing to bet that in a non-capitalist global society, medical science will flourish, unrestrained by the evils of big pharma.

Hell, Cuba on their own cured lung cancer, and they were isolated by most of the world thanks to US and EU sanctions.

huffingtonpost.com/2016/02/22/cuba-lung-cancer-vaccine_n_7267518.html

Also

Fucking terrifying.

That isn't how viruses work. You can't eradicate viruses from the planet, they just get more resistant.

...

Fucking terrifying.

Wonder what this will do then
medicalnewstoday.com/articles/232766.php

GO BACK
>>>/Reddit/

How about we go to them with anti IDpol memes ?

Die i n flame plz

...

It's okay comrade, we'll just put a bullet in him and say he was a kulak.

Notice I said "in a truly communistic society" - this means full communism, taken to the max, beyond any current or historical society except Hippies.

Please try to keep up. My ideal communistic society is Huxleyian-Stirnerist, something I understand is rare on a board made up of Tankies and AnCaps.

I prefer ACTUAL catboys if you don't mind

You heard him lads, fetch him his last smoke.

HEY THIS IS NOT A CATBOY
This is furry famrade

A truly communist society where the logic of communism replace that of capitalism as an ideological superstructure will be i clime even more egoist and more individualistic.

Communism won't just end the alienation of labor and the alienation of others alone, you are forgetting the alienation of the self.

If anything it will reinforce individualist Beauvoir in way, the anxiety of being truly you without alienation will drive the individualistic mind set even farther.

Yeah. Except your body isn't private property to be abolished it is PERSONAL property and cannot be "taken" without your consent.
Read a book, nigger.

I think identity politics often goes too far, but I also think there can't be a revolution until we can get different oppressed groups like ethnic minorities and LGBT people to realize their common enemy is capitalism. My point is we should sort of have idpol but as a unifying thing; workers, queers and nonwhites all against the thing keeping them down.
Just my two cents, I'm often afraid the backlash towards idpol will drive them out and make them think they're not welcome in leftism.

Identity politics actually distracts from the evils of capitalism and directs all the blame for the suffering of minorities onto this nebulous and wholly fictional patriarchy. It cannot be a unifying movement so long as the focus is on the differences between people rather than their commonalities. You cannot have solidarity when half the people are being told to blame the other half for all their problems.

fucking kek

idpol doesn't unify anything. On the contrary it just distract and divide people.
If morons cannot understand that the thing keeping them down is the fucking system and not someone who might have not said their pronouns correctly then yea, they aren't welcome in leftism because leftism is all about the abolishment of the class system and for the workers owning the MoP.

idpol is strictly liberal, anyone who adheres to such ridiculous arguments doesn't have even the basic grasp of marxist ideology

purge them all

That's what happens when you think platforms are authoritarian.

Probably the most perverted display of idealism I've ever seen.

That's my secret, captain.
I always take things to their eventual results.

It wouldn't happen overnight, but in such a society it would happen. And since I at best tolerate morality because it keeps everyone else in the room happy, I'm not bothered by the possibility of such a future in the slightest.

I dunno fam, I don't see many smallpox cases around these days.

Pick one and only one. It's best, it's a petty distraction, at worst it turns into into being bizarro reactionary nonsense like the progressive stack. The only place identity politics belong is in the trash.

Questions look like dildoes in the thumbnail.

Also

WEW

Caring about race and gender equality isn't mutually exclusive with putting class struggle first

These liberal feminists need to get out reeeee

Huxleyian? You mean Aldous Huxley? You realize Brave New World is supposed to be criticism, right?

Everything you're describing so far is BNW.

So what if you are a minarchist and fail OP's test? Minmanarchist?

That's like saying we should unify trees into a forest using a chainsaw. People have identities in order to differentiate themselves from another. It can not be a basis for unification.

God damn if this isn't the stupidest shit.

Sometimes I just want to use my position as a transwoman to just shit all over them, but I know that I'll just be using idpol if I do that.

The good thing about idpolers is that the only tool that they have to get things done is the tool of bourgeois feminism and representative democracy through capitalism having to give a shit about them to make profit whenever they do public demonstrations. The only system that they can get anything done in is one in which they don't have to violently act, whereas non-idpolers are probably more likely to get shit done like violent revolution, meaning that the people that lead us in the DotP or the Vanguard Party won't have to subject us to the shit that is currently being dealt to us in the modern left. I'd imagine that once communism becomes more widespread, the non-idpolers will start to outnumber the idpolers, considering the vast majority of workers probably want to have nothing to do with it.

I hear people on here talking all the time about how we're subjected to scrap like this, when we're not doing anything to agitate ourselves. Do you feel that? Do you feel yourself being agitated in all the wrong ways? By the perversion of theory and lack of debate? Maybe instead of us commonly arguing about what tactics to use online, we should just use tactics period. We see idpolers doing dumb shit all the time, but guess what? Their dumb shit is working and we're still being subjected to this shit. All that we do is make inside joke memes that make us look like fucking cultists or something, like we're inapproachable.

Just do something.

You don't want to see the racial suppression happening!
Fucking racist!

>If people have a problem with my opinion they should teach me why my opinion is problematic

You want to learn? Fuck YOU!

That's it. Stay in line!

RAAAAPE!

You are so feminine, I want a REAL man!

totally agree, well said

I'm trying to get on it.

The organization and activism threads I've seen tend to get single-digit replies. I doubt it's because people don't want to get involved. Maybe they aren't quite sure how to start. I was going to try to form a local discussion group and see how it goes from there. Any ideas or recommendations?

As for violence, I believe it will be a good way to lose support and will make it easy to dismiss the movement, especially if it is small. You need a critical level of support before you can unlawfully challenge the status quo; everyone will just think you're insane otherwise.

People also have the very real threat of retribution for participating in this sort of shit (even if it's nonviolent). We'll need to find a way around that.

Memes on the left could certainly use work as well.

Driving my tank though your safespace

Jesus Christ. I'm not an anarchist, but I went through every single question and for the most part my answer didn't neatly fit into yes or no. This is what happens when you wholeheartedly drink the koolaid, you think your "enemies" totally fit into certain categories, with no room for an answer other than Y or N to totally loaded questions.

You made that up.

Le private property = personal property meme

this explains the difference yes?
reddit.com/r/Anarcho_Capitalism/comments/2nv2bx/the_difference_between_private_property_and/
first result on ddg

Yes, exactly, artificial reproduction and everything. I'm fully aware he meant it as criticism, but right wing scare tactics of the evils of communism are sometimes full of excellent ideas.

Life is a mimicry of itself anyways, we are nothing but walking hives of bacteria responding to stimuli, not very different from a plant - we might as well make it as enjoyable as possible.

Getting real tired of this shit

I would never do that.
Of course not! Thank God I'm not a manarchist.

That's unrelated to leftism, though. You're advocating positivism and hedonism. Claiming you want to make it as enjoyable as possible precludes your sexual fantasy; direct stimulation of the pleasure centers of the brain would be superior if you are referring to pleasure specifically.

If you're not, I have a feeling others may not enjoy your ideas, and your last clause should be
>we might as well make it as enjoyable as possible for me

Also, Huxley is not right wing as far as I can tell, he was against organized society in general or perhaps more generally seeking abolition of all except analytical consciousness. It is difficult to figure out what exactly he was after because he never told us to my knowledge.

LOL no it isn't, private property is anything you can use to make material goods. You can't make shit with a smartphone or a car.

No, he didn't.

This is your brain on idpol.

WHY is reddit so infested with SJW idpol? What is it about that site which attracts this?

Kill yourself.

Usernames force people into an identity which results in social-preening behavior and creates cliques; combined with the voting system, they delimit the thinkable thoughts within a milieu and calcify the orthodox view. Those two factors ward those with alternative views away, often to their own tiny Reddit sandbox where the situation repeats itself.

...

Lemme guess, someone called you a faggot and hurt your fee fees?

Yeah.
You are golden = You are not a good fit for the community.
Exactly the same thing.

Fucking morons.

can i join Holla Forums please? everywhere else bans me for being a trap ;_;

i'm not a lefty but i'll fit in i promise. i hate identity politics and sjws too and i think Holla Forums are retarded, and also really mean and spiteful to people like me, even though tbh i do know it's wrong.

Everyone is welcome here so long as they're not Holla Forums shitposters or str*ssershits.

Nice spooks.

thanks user. tbh i have been banned for shitposting on other boards but even when i don't. so it's just bias.

traps aren't gay btw and it is wrong.

Of course, traps and catgrills are a big part of Holla Forums culture. do you have pics or nah?

You get GAY GULAG.

wow i'm really going to fit in here. >tfw ywn be a genetically engineered catgrill

>do you have pics or nah?
no ;_;

but user i'm not a gay/lesbian. i'm a straight trap.

No idpol, but can we get more sexually exploitive commie-themed images of men to balance things out? I'm bi; I'm not missing any of the bubbly feels with all these hot woman cartoons, but I feel only half satisfied. I don't have graphics skills, or I'd make some myself.

1000 years gulag

...

fuck liberals

SJWs are just Holla Forums in drag. What else is new?

damn, I just noticed, wtf? They are literally race realists

liberals need to fuck off with their edgy pretend anarchism.

Bitches leave

Took it against my better judgment. This sort of liberalism needs to die.

Strasserists are cute, pls no bully them.

Then become one or get ready for the wall.

Those comments are as overplayed as Holla Forumsyp "into the gas chamber you go xD"

This. Maybe
will learn something and turn left. I was a centrist when I found this board

Grow a pair of balls faggot. The revolution won't be a party where reactionaries peacefully accept socialism.

Choke a potato you mick

Read some theory or learn how to shoot you impotent faggot.

Genius.

i got really mad so I made my own version.

That is some high-quality OC, comrade.

very good my man. How did you make this?

saved, well done comrade

1000 hours in paint.net

My modest proposal is to get rid of that shitty conspicuous logo too

this is much better and makes cropping the black boxes easier. thanks comrade. i gave up trying to shoop it

made those changes and fixed cropping a bit

Created my own version huehuehuehue

Oops, fixed a typo

What if I'm retarded and very autistic and everyone around me just acts like my friends and is nice to me.

keke

lel good work comrade

why are you mtf lass?

wew. even i don't do that and i don't really believe in trans.

catty tbh

ok Holla Forums turn me leftist.

probably because we live in a matriarchal society where its damn impossible to be a man. as a girl he gets special rights, immunity from certain laws, everything from better healthcare to preferential loans from banks and government.

My sides

What the fuck is that pic. Half of them are something I would think are an aswer that disqualifies you from being a "brocialist" rather than make you one.

I hate parts of my body that I can't change without surgery, hated the feeling of testosterone compared to estrogen, and am generally very feminine. When I didn't pass, people were intrusive into why I wanted feminine things, but now that I do pass nobody cares. Now I just live and work like any other person.

Oh totally. I love free birth control, abortions, and maternity leave. And that discount on car insurance ($~20) is dank as fuck.

Well, start with describing your beliefs currently

You have to educate yourself as well and then decide. I can post videos and short pamphlets for you to read if you like

It's 'genitalia', user

;_;

what sort of feminine are you?

but…

Eh just so we are on the same page, why do you need free birth control if you are transsexual?

brocialist = not being an sjw feminist.

it's funny that those questions would make Holla Forums and the like good feminist comrades.

ok, very briefly, i think capitalism is the fairest redistribution and nation-states are the best way yet of making laws that that are best for the people involved. and immigration control is good for protecting the culture of the nation and free speech and freedom are fairest and traditions are good because they are tried and tested.

ok, but shorter ones please, especially with the videos. and pamphlets/articles instead of videos when possible.

I'm unsure what you mean by type of femininity.

I was being sarcastic at the r9k-tier post. I'm sterile so the majority of those healthcare perks don't apply to me at all. I don't actually know of any perks I do get. I still pay full price for my trans-related prescriptions.

Ah ok. are you cute?

yup, but there's no way I'd post a pic here since Holla Forums would might creep on me.

Shit, you're right.

aw shucks

wanting to be a housewife, or wanting to be pretty and admired, or wanting to be motherly, or wanting easy sex.

or the different sorts of feminine personalities. submissive or dependent or whatever other kind of mentality some women have.

tbh it impressed me with how "red-pilled" Holla Forums was.

the other ones he said? special rights and immunities, preferential loans. affirmative action, society caring more about you, men giving you special treatment. none of the ways society hurts men.

I think she just mean wearing dresses and shit, jesus christ.

here is a good intro to what socialism is, please read it, because I may not understand what it (or capitalism) is

strikemag.org/bullshit-jobs/
this is an article about how capitalism has us do useless shit

It is always amusing to watch trannies and feminists argue.

theory won't protect you from a hail of bullets you faggot.

but anarchism is for tools, and manchildren

it's more than that for most trans/traps.

i'm not really a feminist i'm just using the flag. and i'm not arguing just asking.

ok

Preferential loans: My credit sucks, and I'm not starting a business or buying a house anytime soon.

Affirmative action: Every hiring manager I've met sees this as a meme. Pajeet might get an interview, but they don't want to deal with his accent, so he doesn't get it.

Society caring more about you, men giving you special treatment: Benevolent sexism is still sexism.

>>>/r9k/

Also, who doesn't want to be attractive or admired?

Are you retarded? Being trans is only about wanting to be the opposite sex.

still a benefit.

there is literally affirmative action, quotas, etc written in law.

preferential sexism is still preferential.

wtf i just asked when you meant by "am generally very feminine" no need to be horrid to me.

but you just said she meant wearing dresses.

Yes, wanting to be the opposite sex usually comes with wanting to also act as the opposite sex.

Yes indeed. The person who gets the job is the "minority" who speaks English like he grew up in a pleasant Portland suburb. I suspect that got me hired at several places.

right, you were wrong about what it "is only about".

and she said she is (acts) very feminine and i asked what she meant exactly.

It's not my fault. I'm for communism.

You still have to prove they broke that law, and you'd have to be a dumbass to tell someone "no because your race/gender". Pregnant women get refused for hire routinely and good luck bringing anyone up on charges

The solution is marxist feminism.

your views on women are childish.

stop being nasty and answer my question. you sound like just another feminist denying her muh privilege.

The basis of your question is invalid. "What type of inferiority do you practice?" is nonsense.

I like trying to look beautiful, and enjoying stereo-typically feminine media, fashion, and hobbies.

lel, trust me, I don't want it.

til being motherly, wanting to be pretty and liking sex are inferiority.

you're revealing your own prejudices tbh.

imo fashion is more inferior than anything i mentioned. so much for attacking me over my examples.

what feminine media and hobbies?

you've already admitted real example of female muh privilege yourself, preferential loads, affirmative action, so too late to try to pretend it's just white knights.

=ANALYSIS TIME=
>Are you a cisgender man?
Best read as: "are you part of the largest Anti-Capitalist demographic group?". Cis-gendered males are a good majority of Anti-Capitalist not only nowadays, so by putting this question there, we make sure we have got them either out or under control.

>Have you ever felt you're the only person speaking in a political meeting?
Okay, legit one. People who monopolise speaking time are assholes. Though, I also kind of want to remember certain groups of activists interrupting and effectively canceling meetings by screaming, chanting and generally being extra lousy.

>Are you a white person with dreadlocks?
This one is funny, because it implies that, if you do have dreadlocks while at the same time being what is commonly referred to as "white", you are doing something pretty bad. That something pretty bad is what, in the jargon of these people, is called cultural appropriation. It means you do something that is not proper of your particular ethnic group, i.e., you do not stick to your own kin and should contribute to perpetrating racial stereotypes. That such a question is asked, with such implications, makes me honestly wonder if I am not taking a test to join the SS.

>Do you often feel your analysis of situations far surpasses that of your [non-male] comrades?
This one is semi-legit, because if you do, you probably have an overly inflated ego. And if it only happens with a certain demographics, then you probably have an unjust bias. This one is not that bad.

>Maybe someone's a rapist, but they are such a great activist so they should stay involved
If they are currently being a proven rapist', which is I guess this question is about, then yes, they need to leave, no exceptions. However, if someone has been a rapist in the past, while showing absolutely no signs of continuing being one, then the past is the past. This one is OK, too.

>Do safe spaces unsettle you?
While in theory safe spaces are an absolutely legitimate way of dealing with certain traumas, their warped liberal version have turned into "growing spaces in which the owner decides what can be and what cannot be done under the phony excuse of defending someone else's right not to be offended". Since I am guessing this question is about the latter option, this is a no-no. People silencing other people fosters either feelings of submission (which are not an Anti-Capitalist thing to have) or group thinking and sheep mentality (not exactly what you would want for a successful Anti-Capitalist movement). A dangerous one.

>I don't experience that form of oppression, but if you want equality all opinions should be equal, mine included?
Are you daring to expose your filthy opinion? Do you not respect the hierarchy diversity of opinions? When will you stop questioning things? I have no words for how disgusting this one is and how shameful it is that anyone who calls themselves "Anarchist" actually believes in responding "No. I shut my mouth whenever someone higher than me in the hierarchy speaks.".

>Do you often feel the need to speak on behalf of others?
Legit one, people who feel that need should just shut the fuck up. Now again, chances are high this chart was not made by a trans-gendered Black woman, so… A legit albeit hypocrite one.

>Safe space = police state?
So, are you opposing my control of the discourse in an increasing number of places? How dare you? Same reaction as the previous safe spaces one.

>Are identity politics a distraction?
Do you think, as an Anti-Capitalist, that Anti-Capitalism should be your primary cause? If so, you might as well not actually be worthy of Real Anti-Capitalism™. So, stop attacking Capitalism for a moment and look at how muh privileged you are, and maybe even part of the ruling class, albeit part of the Proletariat.

>Are you racially 'colourblind'?
I am guessing this means: are you able to overcome racial differences? No, no, no, remember, races are different. I think this is how non-divisive these people are.

>The real struggle is class struggle, when we overthrow Capitalism, race and gender won't be issues so let's not worry about them now.
This affirmation is a well-constructed one. It is both the most important, in my opinion, of the entire chart, and, at the same time, the longest. In fact, it is not a single affirmation, but rather three different affirmations. The first one is that the real struggle is class struggle. Real here obviously means most important, and no self-respecting Anti-Capitalist person would think that such an affirmation is false. The second one is, [when Capitalist conditions have disappeared], race and gender will not be issues. This is a vague statement, and it is confusing enough to prepare for the last affirmation. What does when we overthrow Capitalism mean? The very day the last track of land is socialised? A year after? A century? A month? While, again, any self-respecting Anti-Capitalist person would know racism and sexism are but manifestations of a society divided by class, and that therefore a classless society would most likely lose these traits, it is however obvious that both would still exist in the initial time after the Capitalist society has disappeared. Which one is the right one here? Worry not, for here come the third affirmation: [because of the previous stated reasons], let's not worry about them now. No one thinks racism or sexism are not quite adverse conditions for the development of a genuine Anti-Capitalist, so this affirmation is quite stupid. That last affirmation itself is the one we are supposed to either deny or accept, and it is obvious which one we should chose. Right? Well of course, you chose no. Because you know unfair discrimination is to be addressed if you want a strong movement to thrive and resist external pressure. But, because that last affirmation was defended with the previous two ones, it is a bit like denying them, too. Because a stupid affirmation is put in the same category as two fundamentally right ones, you begin associating them, even if it is a subconscious process, with something stupid and harmful. So, this one "question" just exists to make you slowly lose faith in the original Anti-Capitalist cause.

>If people have a problem with my opinion, they should teach me why my opinion is excellent
Do not ask questions. If you want answers, find them yourself, but we're not helping you. But that is only the superficial reason of why negating this affirmation is excellent. People who are new in the Anti-Capitalist movement will soon find a wall made of these chart-making Anarchist-card-giving people, who consider that proselitising is a loss of time, and that we are better off as a closed secret club that expands as little as possible. This is in direct contradiction to the need of an Anti-Capitalist movement to appeal to the masses. Adopting that kind of attitude means the slow, painful death of the movement.

>Discriminating against men is equal to discriminating against women. Sexism is sexism.
Do you remember when we made you remember that you were a male. Well, it turns out that you are less affected by discrimination. See how well that plays with previous assertions of the muh privilege of the Proletariat and the equality of oppressions.

>You are not a Feminist. You are a humanist/equalist.
In theory, both movements claim to have the same goals: gender/racial equality. Well, too bad for you if you want gender equality as much as we do! You also have to go by our banner and our labels before we start treating you like, not one of our kind, but not an enemy either.

>Will the black bloc secure the revolution?
I honestly do not understand this one at all. It is just odd that it is present in the middle of everything else. I would ask the maker of the chart, but I guess educating me is not their job anyway.

>Sex work is always oppressive. Sex is all about free love, bro.
I do not really understand this one either. On the one hand, it is obviously directed at fedora-wearers who feel the need to be the Most Feminist Gentleman on the Internet℠, but on the other hand, it is kind of true that the interaction with a market is sort of oppressive in its own way. And what is that extra statement about sex and free love? Is free love not okay? Just like the "class struggle" one, we put together a wrong and a right affirmation so that you start losing faith in the right one. Except this time it is a little bit more confusing.

>The best anarchist has no fear of arrest. Every arrest is a badge of honour.
This one is a legitimate one, but it applies to LARPers, not Anti-Capitalist folks under suspicion of being sexist or racist.

>Do you find consent alienating? We should just be able to read body language?
I do not understand this one. Is it asking are you a literal rapist? Why? Of course not. Am I?

>Are you still a member of the SWP[?]
The author was getting tired here so we do not even get a punctuation mark. I had no idea what the SWP was before looking this one up on My Favourite Search Engine™, and I still have no idea why this one is particular is wrong from a strictly Intersectional Feminist point of view.

>Manarchism/Brocialism is not some great contribution to Marxist thought of discourse, it is just a silly little meme-like joke.
The author is feeling desperate to fill in their chart, which might explain the oddly specific question about the SWP.

>We're all one race. The human race.
I REALLY, REALLY NEED TO PUT SOMETHING HERE SO I'M ASKING MY GRAND-GRANDPA SS-HAUPSTURMFÜHRER GUSTAV WHO EMIGRATED FROM SILESIA BACK IN 1945. Seriously though. Before this chart, I had only seen it mocked by Alt-right people, outright Nazis who did advocate for ethnic genocide and would be very proud of the Holocaust should they admit it happened. It screams remember you're not equal to your comrades, so now get on line and continue producing.

CONCLUSION: LIBERAL GARBAGE THAT NEEDS TO DIE RIGHT NOW ALONG WITH /R/FULLCOMMUNISM AND MARXIST MEMES

Sorry for the autismo, lefty friendos

Jealous landwhale attacks trap for being more beautiful and feminine.

yeah, no

Have you seen the landwhale?

We need to ironically embrace the "brocialist" thing.

i'm not attacking her and i'm not a landwhale although if she is prettier than me probable then i am jealous, i'm just asking her questions about what kind of trap/woman she is!

Why ironically? Liberty Equality and Fraternity my dude.

Okay, you have a point.

No we don't, we're the real Socialists.