Can we have a discussion about male on female courtship in the modern age?

Can we have a discussion about male on female courtship in the modern age?

Watch this first:
youtube.com/watch?v=bRNLnA_AhF8

I have my own take on this "scandal". These are Harvard college boys, they're athletic, they come from wealth (assuming since they go to Harvard). If a girl is so hot for them; why don't they just go and talk to them? Why do they need to go online and behave like perverts? Why is nobody asking these questions?

Other urls found in this thread:

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3128753.stm
huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/02/penis-shape-explanation_n_1642613.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

No

Not left related. These threads are always trash. Its going to no gf nazi and the rest of the virgins on this site vs. anfem and normies bad mouthing each other.

Do us a favor and delete your thread pls

Because the student and the worker is so consumed with studies or work they have little time to go out and search for a hookup or partner. So we see the rise of porn and hookup apps that streamline the process and making cumming easier by cutting down the selection process.

It certainly has negatively affected finding a partner, but that's to be expected as capitalism pushes us to keep busy and shit.

she doesn't respond to my messages

interesting….

grow up then faggot


We need you're take on this the most; you call yourself a Feminist no?

Go to a different board on 4chan

No.

no, if you don't want to disscus then why the fuck did you even post?

it's all in the flag

Feminism isn't about dating. Why do you want to talk about dating on leftypol.

...

If you don't want me to post in the thread why are you responding

Well, I was trying to tell you to fuck off in the nicest way possible. Fuck off cunt.

Already told you the same thing but you didn't get the message

Hookup culture (and with it empowered by the internet) provides ANY woman a buffet of men to choose from. A proprietary app like "Tinder" only makes it worse.

The only way we can be happy is through arranged marriage. Otherwise, we'll just be stuck in a never-ending crisis of fear, loneliness, isolation and mistrust.

See what I mean. The only people who are going to talk to you about dating are the people who can't get dates because they want to talk about dating here.

IE nazis who JUST their lives away

See how you sound?

If you're comparing finnancial stability to getting pussy as like, at all similar

I would try to explain where you're going wrong in life, but I mean this speaks for itself and you're not going to get why.

I have no money and met the love of my life already

nogf nazi has arrived. Have you worked on self improvement like I told you in the last thread bro?

Did you watch the video by chance? What was your take on it?

...

...

You're probably an asshole, which women are unfortunately attracted to. The point is that inherently good men are disadvantaged by the system.


I am currently attempting to fast until Thanksgiving to get rid of any unwanted pudge on my face, but I don't think it will make a difference as I lack the domineering, arrogant qualities a man needs. sage for blogshit

You do know you're the asshole right

To go even further, we are going to be sold an increasing variety of dating and hookup apps as time goes on. Hookup apps will largely be about fetishes or with an other (ie nigger or midget or something) while dating sites will splinter on preferences(old, has kids, animal lovers, etc.). In theory this is good, after all who doesn't want someone with similar interests or kinks for a partner or a selection based on "cravings" for casual sex. But consider the impact this has on us, for sex we are ordering off a menu and for partners we disqualify people we might like very much because they don't like punk or are out of our age range. In a way by expanding our options using the apps we are preventing ourselves from finding someone we might really like who doesnt use the same apps or have completely aligned interests. Speaking from personal experience, I average about 3 different people a week but have no real interest in them and find myself wanting a cool gf I can talk to about books, but no digital option has given me that and the ex I had who was like that I met in class.

This is dating under capitalism.

Oh noes, a list ranking the sex appeal and stuff of women, how terrible!

Fucking first world retards don't have to deal with any real problems in their lives so they go and create giant shitstorms over absolutely nothing to feel like they have troubles.
Fuck you all. Seriously.

he a guud boi, din dunuffin

domineering, arrogant men aren't "good" men? What do you consider a good man?

You sound like a Muslim with every passing day. Why don't you become one? Your grievances with Western sexual freedom will no longer become an issue.

A friendly man who does not commit crime and wishes to help others, including strangers and build a better society. Who doesn't treat men as his sexual rivals and women as his sexual conquests, but as fellow brothers.


Because it's not real, and Islam is basically covert Arab supremacy anyway

I am a nazi but I'm also friendly and I don't have autism why won't you date me beta uprising

i'm sure he can easily get a gf as ugly as he is. But he wants a cute virgin aryan waifu

This whole Harvard scandal is just bullshit. It's just white normies getting triggered that porkies sees them as every bit disposable as the poor and black and brown people.

Where was all this indignation over Clinton fucking over Hondorous. Fuck this scandal and anyone that's moved by it

Delete your entire thread you fucking idiot. What is this garbage. Seriously, what is this shit? Sliding garbage that either allows for people to go sjw or anti-sjw, nothing else. Swimming around in the upper scum tier of what floats above social relations within capitalism and making it into the main thing. Woo-fucking-whoo.

Jesus.

You wanna pick a side in the framework you're setting up that isn't adopted by capitalist marketing and demographic analysis? Oh wait, it doesn't exist.

...

thank you for your input

Looksmatching doesn't exist, men usually go for women a bit uglier than them (and women can make themselves more attractive with makeup). And being virgin and white isn't some high-tier thing, it's something that they all can do.

I don't give a fuck about your relationship problems.
fuck off.

so basically the "nu-males" that Holla Forums likes to shit on most?

I already hate her

As for why straight men have a problem with this, it's not like us dykes didn't warn you straight women were shallow in their wants. But then again, it's not like straight men are that bright either.

Look right along the surface of any heterosexual person and you're not going to like what you see when it comes to yourself.

I can say the same of you and your sexuality.

hahah, jesus. I c what you mean yuck.

Feminists are so god damn stupid.

People who say they "see something" in sexuality are exactly within the problem I'm talking about

I'm positive you're a caricature created by the repeal the 19th people. By the way, I agree with them now.

So you're admitting you're cancerous?

You shouldn't assume motivations of other people in complex ways to come up with simple instant answers. It makes you lose foresight in other places beyond getting wrong about why a dialectical feminist, willing to talk about feminism, would put on a feminist flag


I'm admitting you're cancerous

That's a lot of hot air, especially since your whole role in this thread is to make a point that you are not willing to talk about feminism.

If you can read, I'm not willing to talk about feminism "about dating". And it's because I have a mild opinion on it mostly centered around the obvious that the surface of large demographics of people are intolerable and not able to be in a relationship with, which is unrelated entirely to feminism itself but a personal opinion.

But what is the feminist problem, of sorts, is you probably agree that a large number of people you shouldn't date (you should if you shouldn't) but the reason you don't find it that way, is your so stuck up about the very concept of feminism, or your precepts with it, with what is personal opinion and what isn't.

You should numb that part out, so you don't end up making mistakes from your own emotions.

Women are more ready to "give it up" than at any other time in modern history. Seriously, just ask us out. If we don't have a boyfriend or we don't like him that well, and you're not an ass or a slob, we'll say yes to dinner and a show. We might even let you diddle our ladybits (feels really good) if we think you're nice–just ask first.

Holy shit this is nonsense. Please speak using clear and understandable language please.

Yeah you're a cheating slut. I get it. Maybe I'd talk up about how good you are at giving blowies or something, but I guess that's banned now.

Basically, you agree that a majority of straight people aren't able to be dated. You just look at it differently and less directly, but you would otherwise agree. The reason you don't, is because I'm a feminist, and that upsets you, into making a point to argue about it and convince yourself people who do it must be a false flag.

It all runs down to you are upset, so the things you disagree with are more pronounced, making you more mad. So, obviously, I must be trying intentionally to make you mad.

Which isn't true. Your emotions are getting in the way of being intelligent, or you're just not intelligent. In other words.

And you're a cheating slut too. So, what's the point

This is the central issue with these fuckers. It seems nowadays ugly, fat, autists would rather stew in thier loneliness than date thier own kind.

Maybe this is a consequence of porn or media, idk

Hey, dumbass: it takes (at least) two. Besides, men don't own their girlfriends–if they wanted that kind of commitment they should have proposed marriage by now.

You're still unfuckable in the context of a white ethnostate with nuclear families and traditional marriages you fucking weirdo.

Who gives a shit? No one would care if the genders were reversed. I knew girls in freshman year of undergrad who kept lists of the 30+ guys they fucked and compared notes with one another and I didn't feel personally violated.

...

Feminism is neo-puritanism.

Monogamy is a spook.
Back in the very beginning of humanity people just engaged in delicious gangbangs, to the point that it even shaped dicks.
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3128753.stm
huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/02/penis-shape-explanation_n_1642613.html

Monogamy is literally a social construct that goes against our very biology.
Stop being spooked.

I really want these neo-stirnerites gassed

Sure

Feminism is anti-left.
1st wave stalled the revolution
2nd wave expanded the capitalism.
3rd wave expands the idpol.

Feminists are class enemies, don`t respond to them.

If feminism is anti-left I have no idea what tankies are to the left. Anathema?

My dude have you noticed how those articles mention that males have a jealousy instinct for keeping their mates from banging other dudes? If anything, our very biology is for males to be jealous and possessive. That's why our cocks are shaped that way, to nullify the effect of mates sleeping around.

Retard, you tankies have had plenty of revolutions and not only did they fail, they failed so spectacularly that we can't even criticize capitalism in public without someone mentioning Stalin.

But somehow, feminism is responsible for a lack of class consciousness, the cognitive dissonance here amazes me.

They are responsible for de-valuing labor with 2nd wave feminism. Inclusion of the females to workplace without socialism will only lead to lower wages for the male workers along higher unemployment.

Mmmmhhhmmmmm you sing it sister all us ladies know that it ain't no HEvolution we need it's a SHEvolution!
*snaps fingers*

So you're worried about the wages under Capitalism. Isn't that what you said you were already against. IE, worrying about wages in Capitalism leads to bad things

I don't see how rocking the boat for equality is awful besides you don't like it when it turns more equal from what you just said . You can't even complain much being in the first world about the consequence of a wage difference.

Welcome to the party asshole everything sucks

...

1. Retard, there will always be an abundance of labor within Capitalism, you can thank technology and trade deals for that. Even if women never got the right to vote, Porky would always have another white guy begging to work for less and less money, or he can go to Haiti and pay people pennies. The only thing women did was speed up the process by a few years.

2. Even if what you said was right, Tankies essentially ruined Socialism, you have no room whatsoever to talk for following a bullshit worthless ideology.

There's your argument.

There's your argument. Notice how nothing here correlates.

Wait so asking for a comparable wage is a weapon of war? Isn't what you're saying that, decreasing wages is a weapon of war, no? That poor people among that specific sex get the shit choice out of it all?

Well, basically, if you are asking for women to "know they're role," you're essentially the same thing.

They're just Stalinists.

t. butthurt woman

No, as in all these feminists who fancy themselves as revolutionaries constantly crying about "muh brocialism" and "muh manarchy" who would be curiously nowhere to be seen if shit ever went down.

...

You know that one person is probably just baiting you right

No? How?

If I don't have a stupid flag, I'm baiting?

Fine, here.

Okay cucky.


Where do you think we are?

I think feminists (not necessarily the ones here) churn out far too much patronising rhetoric to peddle their oppression shit. If black people were doing it they'd be getting beaten up on street corners.

That's an interesting spook. Have you tried constructing a slab to put it to rest?

Women are basically children, they deserve no rights.