What does left wing supporter think about cultural heritage...

There isn't a gulag big enough

Well, the partisans fought to free my country from the nazi-fascists and gave us peace.

Thank your gods for communism on my behalf.

Your big stronk manly ancestors would consider you a faggot as well you spooked retard

i hope you realize that most of your ancestors were shit-on peasants, not the glorious warriors you romanticize

History should be preserved
From capitalism and the problems it caused, yes. Anything that negatively impacts the people of my country in some way should be stopped and prevented. Problems such as the immigration crisis should be solved at their root, not used by porky to drive down wages and make them money, while fucking over both groups by lowering wages of the native workers, causing crime and ethnic conflict, and forcing people out of their own countries by imperialist wars.
Thats exactly what I am trying to do.

But I do also speak german you fucking idiot. Fucking anglophones should kill themselves. Being forced to speak german or english makes no fucking difference, they are both foreign languages to me and i speak both.

The first mistake most people make is that their ancestors weren't shit-on peasants.
The second mistake is that they're not shit-on wage-slaves right now.

Consider genealogy services advertised on TV. People desperately don't want their ancestors to be cucked nobodies.

I am all for cultural heritage!

GO BACK TO LIVING IN A CAVE YOU NORTHERN BARBARIANS!

WE GAVE YOU CULTURE, GIVE US YOU GOLD!

Being this autistic, and not being able to spot and obvious ironic criticism of the school system.

Now lets do the other bit, which i overlook.
No, dont be retarded.
strawman. I wasn't alive back then. I hold certain opinions over the power structures such as the imperialist romans enslaving german tribes but I guess thats too SJW for you, so Ill let that sit.
I respect the resistance fighters during worldwar 2 and those who fought the spanish for 100 years very much. I do not agree with the acts of genocide exercised in Indonesia or other places, but I do like that we were such a thorn in the side of the English.

An ironic critisism of the school system? What does american chauvinism have to do with schools?

I'm not American. God you're fucking stupid.

You sure sound like one.

This is a stereotypically American opinion.

Being unable to identify subtext in conversation is a symptom of autism.

There is no subtext in one sentence that is literally just a meme you liberal arts studying hippy.

Save Europe and the rest of the world from capitalism. "Cultural heritage" is nothing but a meaningless and divisive distraction.

While I do sympathize with your reactionary desire to keep the tribe safe, society is evolving beyond our primordial instincts. We will honor your history in museums, but we cannot grant you a nation seperate from the global community. It just wouldn't be fair to you. Like the Amish or the North Koreans, you would be left behind, out of sync, without access to global information and resources and eventually the difference between your nation and the rest of the world would be that of bows and spears vs the atomic bomb.

...

When I speak both english and German and russian… cause that's what people who live off turism do…

Cultural Heritage…

We were doing philosophy!

Nobody cares.
Majority were mostly peasants sent on war by those of my ancestors who were not peasants, but either way, I don't care that much since a) their mentality was a byproduct of their times b) they are dead and don't give a shit. Also my grandfather fought for communism if that's what you mean ;^)

So European cumskins really were a bunch of brutish hordes, uh… Really makes you think.

Can you stop being spooked for like a second

Why should I care about the euro prole but not the proles from the Americas, Africa, India, etc?

...

Fresh maymay just for you OP

If you are Indian, care about Indian proles. If you're African care about Africans.

I'm not a racist btw. Aryanism has nothing to do with race

Except it totally does. You want each race to stay region locked - africa for the africans, europe for the europeans…

Except you have two major kinks in your perfectly categorized-by-color world.

1. International travel has been a huge thing for quite some time

2. The aryan people are where they don't fucking belong. White people are all over the place too. America wasn't yours, it had the native Americans, the Mayans, the Aztecs, the Incans with their cultures, who you just steamrolled over. Same with Oceania, South Africa and an eventual failure in India and the middle east. Siberia was also not yours, but you took it anyways.

Your people have a lot of history destroying cultures, heritages and racial purities. Hell, white people brought the africans with them to their new homelands, so you brought that entirely on yourself.

Don't be crying any bitch tears, its the future your heritage chose.

To americans:
No take-backsies
You cant move back to europe, one immigration crisis with uncultured theocrats is enough.

Honestly Holla Forums I just want go destroy the proud heritage of myself others by … Actually I don't know how, since the past has already happened and nothing will change that.

History lives on in the present, by our society, and it's nice to remember those that came before us and built our current society (and it doesn't matter if it was my bloodline or someone else's, either), but what's more important than that is where we are going.

My ancestors and your ancestors will never feel anything ever again.

it's fine if you want to celebrate your culture's silly hats and weird foods and awful white-people music, but any more than that is fucking stupid

fighting with other races over imaginary lines in the dirt because of "muh cultural heritage" is falling for the whole race meme sustained by the bourgeoisie to keep the proletariat divided and fighting against each other instead of the rich and powerful. you're just another idiot if you fall for their ruse

Go to Aryanism.org and educate yourself as to what an Aryan is. Aryans can be of any race

You know there are multiple studies that show how traditionalism is pathological as fuck?

would be helpfull if that page would load.

My ancestors are dead, I have no obligation to them. I've inherited their world and I will do with it as I see fit. If they wanted to have a say then they shouldn't have died. Rather short sighted of them.

...

I don't particularly care.
The Europe is a pretty cool place with lots of nice things in it so I'd be sad if it went away. And establishing a better life for people is basically the goal.
I think that maybe if they were more class-conscious the world would be a better place.

STFU folk music is king.

Personally, I'm dedicated to the pursuit of cultural Marxism, and I really like the Frankfurt school.
"We must eliminate the white race by any means possible using our religion which we love, Judaism"
-Adorno
I firmly believe that whites need to become minorities in their own countries. I've spent my entire career as a lawyer banker trying to eliminate the truth of human biodiversity and racial hierarchy and I've been personally whitening David Duke's hair so he looks so stupid no one will take him seriously and that's why he's not going to get elected.

How the fuck do they oppress me if they're all dead?

I don't hate them, but neither worship them.
Just respect.

Come on now, let's not pretend this isn't happening

This is too obvious, it's hilarious.

Well if it's happening it's because I'm making it happen slowly. Every Saturday I go to temple and talk to the rabbi about new and exciting ways to cook white babies, eliminate the truth of the solutrean race being wiped out by the mongoloids in 2000 A.D., and fill white countries with muslims who as we all know are the biggest fans of judaism ever.

spook

Sure, with communism.

No

I could care less, because they're dead, and I'm here.

...

muh native Americans always is confusing and contradicting for the left
why the fuck are they native, there skin is just a better shade of brown than others?
Isn't exterminating a homogeneous racist society and replacing it with a multicultural society a good thing

...

Culture doesn't matter, what matters is the tasks that need to be done to allow culture to exist in the first place. What is the point of culture if it's in the shell game. If you care about culture, you don't care about it, for its own sake..

The question shouldn't be, "Why doesn't the left care about culture", then, "Why is the right so short sighted."

Holy shit, that's some contortionist shit right there. A few more posts like this and you'll be a delicious nazi pretzel.

Kek

Well, according to YOUR logic…

Those are some legendary mental gymnastics

The word native means, as in, what is there. Meaning, what was there first. Meaning native. Now let's go to the phrase America. It means, of the continent North America. So, from this, we get the phrase. Native American. Meaning native american.

implying these concepts and opinions are regurgitated by the left and even leftpol on a hourly basis, trying to deny this is just common cuck behaviour so dont do it.

again isn't exterminating a homogeneous racist society and replacing it with a multicultural society a good thing?

native
NOUN

Anyone born to a land is native to that land on almost every single definition you can find

It's not good or bad, it's how history works

Yes, but our logic does not support your ideology of white supremacy and racial segregation. Ours is not for conquest and dominance and subjugation and extermination based on race or ethnicity, unlike yours.

It means that people from Europe were not there before the Native Americans regardless of political context. That said people lived within the bounds of America, tens and tens and tens times longer than Europeans have currently arrived and settled. Which being reasonable would be roughly, around 600 years.

Got it now? I know you can get it. I have faith, it's not that hard to understand really

Apart from your absolute morality, no. Exterminating humans for their race is not good and multiculturalism has no inherent value.

This is the name of my new band

Agree, but nationalism and "ethnic homogeneity" have no inherent value either

So you support second generation immigrants?

Where did i say otherwise?

There was some retard in the above posts that was confused, copy/pasting a definition does not define my political opinions.

I think most of you missed what my earlier posts were about. The meaning was common lefty opinions being contradictions upon more contradictions especially when "Native Americans" are brought up.

Yes, but the white way was not the right way. You weren't trying to create a multicultural society, you were creating an empire and then forcing weaker peoples to allow it or die.

You can't worm your way out of historical fact. Whites were the victors, whites wrote the history, and we are all living in the consequences of it, yourself included. If you wanted Europe to stay European, you should have stayed in Europe and fought off every single person that wasn't European. But you didn't. You brought people from other lands in willingly, starting international trading and travel, and then you spread into the rest of the world, intermingling with what you found.

You did this to yourself.
You have only yourself to blame.

Now, you can either cry about the destruction of the white race, or you can embrace the multicultural world you unwittingly created.

White people are so incredibly short-sighted, you never think of the ramifications your actions will have, and then you forget that it was your actions that caused the consequences you endure.

You asked in regards to Native Americans, >"why the fuck are they native, there skin is just a better shade of brown than others?"

I was implying they are Native Americans by being the first people to really homogeneously establish in America, so being native to America.

I mean I don't get what you're so confused about.

No, people tend to die after about seventy years.

What "contradictions?"

What's the contradiction? Natives were there first, cumskin.

What?

Can we quit pretending as though people inherit some sort of racial identity and all of the pride/guilt of their ancestors?

You're all autistis.

In the context of the OP, the culture defended is the culture that carries with it the strengths and weaknesses it had.

It's usually the case, so it shifts upon itself to change.

Really not much you can do. You can't have it both ways.

Rope has never been cheaper, OP.

nob ent ragument

Obviously, this is bullshit, so let's call it what it is.

How?

You were arguing with a shitpost so obvious that did not deserve a single reply.

read the tread you will see many

your whole post was just saying it was my fault, I can assure you I have never personally engaged in geopolitical or historical affairs

How about neither, saying give up or be a liberal because sins of the father and other races have "divine right" is spooked shit, again basic cuck behaviours

this argument began with conflict over Aryanism, and is being fought with the assumption that you are an Aryan. Apologies if that is not the case, and if so, please state your points clearly

I despise most society, in general, though there are some decent people in them that I like on a personal level. If you mean historical societies, I guess hunter-gatherer lifestyle would be pretty fun, minus the part where you die or when resources in your area run out. Feudalism was definitely an improvement over previous slave societies and you got more vacation time. Even capitalism has some worth for bringing industrialization and automation of work. That doesn't mean there isn't a ton to criticize. Even if we got some sort of socialism, I'd probably still have criticisms. Its not so much about hate (though its there) but about improvement and making things work for you not slavishly obeying your society and accepting your role as a cog.
I don't really care about cultural heritage, so you can keep that shit to yourself if you like, just so long as it doesn't get in the way of what I want to do.
I'm not really sure what exactly you mean by saving Europe.
I have nothing against people trying to establish a better life for themselves, as long as you aren't doing it in a parasitical way.

Also, OP, you sound somewhat spooked, but at least you want to try to better your life. I advise you do some more of flag related.

So let me get this straight, Holla Forums says that they just want Europe for the Europeans, Africa for the Africans, etc. and when we point out that by this logic it would mean that all the white people outside of Europe would have to go back, they take this to mean that this what we actually want to do? How much of an illiterate assburger can you be to misread that bad and then project your own logic onto someone who's trying to show you the contradictions in that logic

As a German I believe all power should be returned to the folkmote, that is my cultural heritage.

...

It's another "I'm not racist I just want shitskins out of my homeland but I also want to conquer shitskin countries for their resources and the expansion of my empire reee shitskins go back" episode.

By saying, "That's bullshit."

Post them or fuck off. This is an anonymous image board, not a discussion between two individuals.

You know there is a difference between Nationalism and Colonialism right? Fascist countries, as aggressive as they sometimes behaved, have not been aiming to colonize any Third World country to exploit resources. In fact, they have been supportive towards national liberation movements to get rid of the Brits.

In what sense is it bullshit. Western culture died the moment it decided its own imperialism was of cultural importance. Can't bitch about the state of the shit

Nationalism =/= ethnicism.

You mean, since Alexander the Great?

Tell us more about your genetic trauma OP

When your nationalism is defined by ethnicity, what's the difference? Do you think the guys at the Berlin Conference splitting Africa apart were ethnocentrics or you think they just perpetuated their agenda of dynastic imperialism?

Bruh what even are you doing right now, it's still less than a century ago that Germany proved you wrong

If you're defining The West as it is, as a military leader from a decaying nation more sought by mercantalism that's connected to East North Africa and the Middle East with beliefs going every which way; completely lost sight of itself

Then yes. The West then, has been at a rate of decay since it started idolizing Alexander the Great as a role model just for being a good military thinker

this isn't usually the case though. I mean, look at the entire americas

Pick one

Are you a Kraut

Isn't aryan a hypothetical language group seperate from ethnicity and HItler just went "didn't read lol" and made up his own definition?

Colonizing is colonizing, doesn't matter who you do it to.

Yes there is civic nationalism (France/USA) and biological determination (Germany/Eastern Europe).

Was Hellenism that bad? Hell, he himself became more Persian in the End. I guess what I wanted to say is that your statement "West is shit since they started conquering" is intellectually dishonest considering every main culture on this planet eventually enforced their supremacy onto others to have a territorial scope to distribute, diversify and evolve their cultural narrative.

Yes

that's literally not what nationalism is.

It really isn't. This is a terminological simplification. That being said, I support the Nazi expansion not a single bit since it was driven by economic necessity because their economic policy was shit due to the insane amount of loans to the point where they weren't credible and had to exploit neighbouring countries - ironically, Hitlers long-term goal was to become autarkic.

Everything from Hellenism to Rome to Rome's death is just pure shit

West is shit since they decided they wanted to start conquering after being fractured into pieces after the fall of Rome, after Rome got too large for the same reason and it fell for the over complexity that followed.

Blind ambition as a cultural heritage learned from a previous culture which died from its vice of blind ambition, is a very dumb idea.

Rome was a multicultural melting pot that in the end got subverted by all the cultures it encompassed - the eastern half became more oriental pretty quickly. It was not at all supremacist - Romans were dicks in the sense that they gave everybody hell who didn't want to join the empire but if you did you were free to do what you want, while having the chance to gain the citizen rights of Rome as well.

Also, there wasn't a single attempt of expansion in Europe since the fall of Rome for 1000 years, except the Crusades that had no intent of expansion but security for pilgrims to Jerusalem and didn't conquer more than a coastline.

Do you realize that Marxism, Anarchism etc is also part of the European cultural heritage?

...

In what sense is it bullshit that individuals are responsible for the crimes and accomplishments of their ancestors and race? Is that what you are asking?

Nice

"We wuz warriors with swords!"
Get a life nerd

Do you deny that?

what do you mean by this

I never suggested that.

Uh

yes ?

I mean just because an ideology has elements of denial towards its own cultural space or is in fact a counter culture doesn't mean it didn't spawn right out of said culture and perpetuated its inherit dogmas, substructures and scholastic; the same way Punk music originates in Western culture for example.

Do you think Marxism just fell from the sky?

so what does this imply? That only euros are true commies or something?

Not at all. I'm just saying it's quite ironic when AnFem goes on how Western culture has been shit while following a Western ideology.

Not at all. Unlike a commodity, an ideology is evolved based on its forerunners or at least in opposition to them and unthinkable without centuries of philosophical background. Take the fetish with labor: That's more or less based on "Ora et labora" of the monastic orders of the early middle ages.

Well, it is European philosophy after all.

The answer has been known for ages.

"As long as there are humans living on earth, will the battle between the subhuman and the human be a historical recurrance.
No matter how far we can see back in the past, this battle against the nations, led by the Jew, is a natural part of living on this planet.
One can be reassured to come to the conclusion that this battle of life and death is a law of nature, just as the battle of the plague bacterium against a healthy body is one."
-Reichsführer SS, Heinrich Himmler 1935

Just like the night that rises against the day, how light and shadow are eternal foes, the worst enemy of man, ruler of earth, is man, himself.

The subhuman, this apparently biologically similar creation of nature, with hands and feet, a kind of brain, with eyes and mouth, is something fundamentally different.
A brood with humanoid facial features, but mentally and spiritually lower than any animal.

Inside this creature there is a gruesome chaos of wild, unbridled passions: nameless desire of destruction, primitive covetousness, the most unveiled form of baseness.

Subhuman – nothing more!

"Because not everything that bears the countenance of a human is the same."
Woe be him who forgets about this!

All that this earth possesses, great works, thoughts and arts - the human has thought it up, created it, and completed it.
He devised and invented, for him, there was only one goal: Work his way up to a higher state of being, to redesign the inadequate, to replace the unsatisfactory with something better.

From this, culture grew.
From this sprang forth the plow, the tool, the house.
From this, man became social, came family, came folk, came the state.
From this, man became virtuous and great.
From this, he rose above far above all other creatures.
From this, he became next to god!

But the subhuman also lived.
He hated the works of others. He raged against it, secretly as the thief, openly as the detractor - the murderer.
He consorted with his own kind.

The beast summoned the beast.
Never did the subhuman keep the peace, never was he placid.
This is because he needs the twilight, the chaos.
He dreaded the light of cultural progress.

To preserve himself, he required the swamp, the pits of hell, but never the sun.
And this underworld of the subhuman found its leader: - The enternal jew!

He understood them, he knew what they wanted. He nurtured their most vulgar desires and passions, he let loose a horror upon mankind.

It started in historical times,with the extermination of the Persians, the celebration of Purim, the first glorification of organized mass murder.
75 000 aryan persians fell victim to jewish hatred. Even today, the jewry celebrates this deed of horror as their greatest "religious feast".

Eternal is the hatred of the subhuman toward the radiant figures, the bearers of light.
Eternally the demise of the western world is looming from the deserts.

Eternally, in distant steppes, the powers of desctruction congregate.
Eternally Attila and Genghis Kahn collect their hordes of huns, to race through Europa, a living apocalypse, leaving fire and death, rape, murder and consternation in their wake.
So that the world of light, and knowledge of thousandfolds, the powers of progress and human excellence shall sink back into the abyss of the primal state.

Eternally is this the will of the subhuman:
That, when there shall be desert again, where, just now, the radiance of sublime enlightenment inventively illuminated the darkness, then his final goal would be achieved.
Chaos.

Thus, there has been the struggle between those opposing poles that raged for millennia, under terrible, unpredictable laws.
Forever will be there a Genghis Kahn, a new Attila who tears open the gates of Europa, who only knows one thing: The complete annihilation of everything beautiful!

Today, the embodiment of this will of destruction is known as Bolshevism!
But this Bolshevism is not a modern phenomenon! It is neither a product of our current day, nor is it an innovation in the context of human history.
It is as old as the existence of the jew himself.

Its forerunners are named Lenin - Stalin.

"There will be the bloody decapitations of the leaders of a people, who then are cast into the statist, into the economic, the cultural, the mental, the spiritual and the corporeal slavery.
The rest of the people, through countless acts of miscegenation robbed of their values, degenerated - and in the historically short passing of centuries one will only merely remember if these people once existed."
-Reichsführer SS, Heinrich Himmler 1935

...

feels>reals
the post

I like quite a bit about my heritage, actually. I don't personally care if societies in the past were oppressive. We aren't living in those pasts, and so instead I take a historical lens and decide what was interesting or compelling about those societies.

Cheese and fries, dude. Go cut yourself.

reactionary

...

Sounds like the rantings of someone ass-blasted because the "subhumans" are kicking their ass at their own game.

Honestly this is the main problem with the left. I actually agree with lots of your critiques of capitalism, but the "one humanity" "muh human race, human rights" is something that is fundamentally flawed.

Because niggers just aren't human. Think of them like stray dogs, when they misbehave and start biting people you need to cull them

If leftists stopped denifining niggers and abos as human, you will be successful.

>>>Holla Forums

Whoever bases politics on "human race" still thinks about politics in biological categories which isn't politics at all as it isn't possible to decide on anything since it's already decided from birth. E.g. if my whole politics is based on the biological fact that I'm human or white, then that's it, I'm already human or white, biology will take care of everything, so there's nothing to decide on.

There is nothing to abandon, everything left from them is represented in our culture. Retain the good parts, purge the bad. Easy. No need to mystify my past.

Try again dumb cunt.

web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml

debunkingdenialism.com/2015/02/03/mailbag-fetishizing-richard-lewontin/

americananthro.org/ConnectWithAAA/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=2583

physanth.org/about/position-statements/biological-aspects-race/

livinganthropologically.com/anthropology/race-reconciled-debunks-race/

Is there a reason why you act like what you think black people are

Remember it, preserve it an museum, and move on.

If you think Islam is going to be the dominant culture their, objectively that's false.

blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/factcheck-will-britain-have-a-muslim-majority-by-2050/13690

How do ruhfoojees drive down wages? They scarcely work at all, mostly living through the government dole, crime, or even black markets.

Have recent arrivals from the refugee crisis done well in any of the host states? Very few find employment in say, Germany.

Racists tend to have lower Autism Levels. Which is odd, considering how they whine about the black Autism Level being so low, and yet it's on the rise.

what does

have to do with

and what do you mean by

Fashies can only speak in euphemism because even they realize that what they are advocating for is terrible and no one would listen to them if they didn't sterilize their speech (same with tankies but that's another story).

When you say preserving cultural heritage, I'd prefer you just outright say you are violent and want to release your inner pent-up rage on some brownies.

When you say "saving the europe" it has nothing to do with the rather arbitrarily-defined landmass that is Europe. It doesn't even have anything to do with saving the people populating Europe. It's a euphemism for deporting/executing a specific group of people who came there generally out of economic necessity and concern for their well-being.

I want you to say this shit. I want you to outright say that you have absolutely no concern for practicality, general well-being, or saving much of anything really. You just want to make real life look like one of those fantasy movies you watched one time or some video game you liked and you're willing to commit mass atrocities and waste shit-tons of resources and time in order to achieve this goal.

holy shit the filters are working

[Angery]

Let's try something

IQ

I.Q

Is this the new word filter for Eye Qeue? I like it. Anyways it's always funny how sensitive aut-rightists get about being lumped in with other groups of reactionary lumpens.

It's almost like they know that the right-wing has a reputation for being full of stupid people and if we were to mass deport/ "cleanse" arbitrarily-defined defined groups based on their intelligence the far-right would be the first to go.

They focus on the blacks because they don't want you to realize how much better off we would be if we just deported them right now.

I prefer to think of them as orcs

COSPLAY
O
S
P
L
A
Y

You do realize that Fascist Italy invaded Ethiopia and Albania, right?

so is this a new meme I'm not aware of or what

wew lad

It's wrong.
Stray dogs are comparatively safe to be around.

Blacks are more like gazelles.
They have less of a sense of deferred gratification, they are skittish, they show extremely exaggerated responses when spooked, etc.

This is because if you get caught in africa, which their kind spend thousands upon thousands of years in, then you're toast.

And not resisting arrest is a kind of deferred reward, which they are not good at, either.
It's usually much better to not resist an arrest, because if you do, the likelyhood of harm goes up, but many of them cannot think in those ways.

They are also more tribalistic and don't have high trust in strangers, cause, again, Africa.

Modern life is very young, hell, the USA are very young.
Expecting people to just get along no matter where they are from is naive.

Also, I don't know if it's Autism Level or what, but they're not as suited for life in the west in general because it's more intricate than living a simple life for thousands of years.

The body, evolution, goes the path of least resistance.
Imagine if there was some sort of fairy creature that came to you every day and made you perfectly satisfied to just lay around.
The fairy comes and all your drives vanish, you have no hunger, you are actually nourished, no boredom, simply laying still and staring at the ceiling is as exciting as the best book, etc. The fairy even gives you the best orgasms. After the fairy has come, you have zero wants for the whole day.

In this reality you simply would not be able to do anything, you get by just fine by laying there.
You would not strive for anything great, or even something stupid out of boredom.
You would just lay there, perfectly satisfied.
Then multiply this by thousands of years for your whole species.

Do you think your species would be on the same level as some species that had to fight hard to survive after 5000 years?
You know it would not be. If there were no need to communicate, then there would be no language. No writing, nothing.
If there were no need for agriculture and stuff then it would never be researched and used.

Granted, blacks are above such a fictional race, but the results are the same.

Europeans conquered the world so hard at one point in time because they worked their asses off for ages.

You can think of whites/europeans as brutes, if you like, but you know damn well that being a brute doesn't magically bestow you with the knowlegde on how to build sattelites and co.

You don't become an artist by never drawing and beating people up instead (unless you claim that it's some modern art bullshit, some people might buy into that, but you wouldn't be able to draw from that).

Mixing people up to the point where everybody gets dumber, is not the way toward an overall improvement, but that's the reality we live in now, and it's certainly not the fault of racists or nationalists.

In fact, if people disallowed immigration then the prodigies of developing countries would actually stay there and help out the countries more than a reality where all the good people wander off into countries that already have a lot of smart people.
This only increases or at least maintains the divide between people, which leads to exploitation, which leads to outsourcing and other capitalistic bullshit.

Could it be that the "racist children" grew up in an environment that had a lot of blacks around?

Maybe that's the cause for them being less developed?
If they were as developed as they could be then that would just be racism again.

As in, the blacks in the area would feel discriminated against if they were held to actual western standards of education.
And because das raycis, the schools were instructed to tone things down.

This is why they do commie purges every few decades.

what the fuck did i just read

statistics say otherwise

Get a grip you hysterical cunt.

of pollution, natural ressources depletion and global rising of ethnofascism ? No

That's why we don't give a shit about those pre-industrial tribal trivial things that Holla Forums thniks is the actual threat

It's a correction on a "meme" and a basic rundown of evolution and, if you like "priviIege".
Which is basically just hard work because the ability to touch the skies doesn't just come to "evil racist bigot oppressor sinners".
It only comes to researchers, engineers, scientists and so forth.

Tribes that were able to just get by didn't do anything to exceed that.
They never even reached the state of "mental greed" that comes with really meaningful technological achievements.

Which I consider a stepping stone in the whole thing.
All tribes created tools to get better, but some tribes created some really impressive tools, based on their situation, saw how great those worked, got greedy for more of that and henceforth applied more effort into researching more of that.

Whereas the others leveled out on "well, this is pretty comfy now. We can go on like this forever."
And they did.

That's why you won't see blacks or other low I‍Q /high time preference tribes.

Racism is built in, lower trust is built in. In everybody.

I wouldn't be able to criticize this if it weren't a thing.
So, take your own advice.

They won't build sewers or even clean up the vicinity.
And you don't need much financial aid to pick trash up and put it away.

Kill whitey