Vice blocks archive.is from their website as a tool of "Racism, Bigotry, and Islamophobia"

"We are preventing all archiving services which are being used by right-wing activists to discredit us"

You heard it here first, goyim. Accurately recording our words is racism.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/3JbMx
archive.is/xeraj
archive.fo/qMsmk
archive.is/Ek3vl
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/simplewebcapture/
anthology.rhizome.org/heritage-gold
archive.is/z0abQ
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/mozilla-archive-format/
addons.palemoon.org/addon/mozarchiver/
superuser.com/questions/369232/how-to-save-a-web-page-as-mht-in-chrome#445988
web.archive.org/web/20170704211050/https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/wj88kw/this-independence-day-free-yourself-from-trump
chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/full-page-screen-capture/fdpohaocaechififmbbbbbknoalclacl?hl=en-US
torproject.org/about/corepeople.html.en
archive.fo/JzMt3
blog.archive.is/
unvis.it/
archive.is/8O5pL
archive.is/8iz8u
web.archive.org/web/20170705001350/https://www.svd.se/fn-farlig-upptrappning-i-nordkorea/om/varlden
archive.is/http://www.npr.org/2017/07/04/518876922/the-star-spangled-banner-verse-youve-probably-never-heard
archive.fo/https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/mgmzpv/i-was-left-like-a-freak-in-the-corner-visiting-the-doctor-as-a-sex-worker
archive.is/NIjvS
archive.is/pf7UQ
archive.is/9KGx4
via.hypothes.is/
zotero.org/download/
archive.is/mcqoj
facebook.com/vicenews/)
facebook.com/VICE/).
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

At least they aren't Christcucks.

Could you be any more blatant with the D&C, mini-Satan?

I'm laughing so hard at what it turned into after Gavin left and the worst part is that it's a Rupert Murdoch rag and it'll never live that down. Now for archive.is, there's countless alternatives. Don't you worry.

...

Funny how they don't mention loss of ad revenue. This entire blog post was rationalization of the hand rubbing going on.

Fucking hilarious

every. Fucking. Time.

Could you possibly be anymore blatant? Not for nothing but holy fucking shit dude really?

I don't even know why I'm complaining, this entire board died one of the slowest and agonizing deaths I've seen yet

...

...

That faggot is everywhere tonight. Same tactic, everything.

Vice is supposed to be the edgy young cool kids media outlet but they go with the same anti racism sexism narrative the government pushes lmao

...

CIA niggers finally waking up.

THIS THREAD IS ABOUT VICE YOU FUCKING SLIDING KIKES

And Vice was founded by faggot Christkike Gavin McAnalDildos.
It just goes to show, all avenues of Christcuckoldry leads straight to leftism.

The obvious. This just makes their moneygrubbing kikery tactics all the more blatantly visible. Blame white people when you do something seedy just to get more shekels, to take blame off you. This is the whole purpose of the kike globalist press being racebaiters. Fucking anyone who falls for this are totally lost. Complete fools.

Trips of truth dictate that we get back on topic.

So I went over to Vice's Faceberg page. I regret doing so immensely.

You don't even need archives. Just cap the articles, niggers.

...

RIGHT
WING
ARCHIVING
SQUADS

...

...

THIS

That's not even remotely consoling.

How good it feels to be vindicated in the face of Yeshua IDF spouting "shill".

Vice is the literal equivalent of that aging 30 some year old hipster with excessive amount of tattoos who's a manager at a Hungry Howies you'd see at a bar or coffee shop bragging to young girls that he knows where to get weed

Hide and report off topic shills, retards

every single person I have met who reads vice it the typical self castrated college white male bernie bro

Sometimes I wish christ would come back just to goatse this board and then never return.

How much longer do they think this house of cards will stand?

wishful thinking is the stuff chirstianity is made of

Vice, NPR, and New York Time consist of the smuggiest liberals known to man

I got the magggggic in me

Fucking this. What nonsense.

Wait till someone tells them about PrtScr.

oh look it's retarded

PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, this shit is hilariously Jewish.

You really should learn to lighten the fuck up, you miserable shit stain.

Like how the other Christcucks in this thread wish that anyone who doesn't like Rabbi Yosef is a paid shill. Hilarious.

I'll do as I please, and you'll have to take it.

Well you are a D&C faggot as is clear from your first and completely irrelevant post.

Dude, I can't stand Christcucks, and even I think you're being an enormous faggot… Which makes me think you're actually probably a Christian. Or a Jew.
>implying

...

Filtering the LARPagan really improves the thread quality.

KYS

That's not very clever.

what a stupid thing to assume, even so

You're a faggot and you're filtered.

Sorry, I read that as

Looks like Christcucks can't handle the bants.

So you're a bot?

report the autists spamming this thread, they deserve a vacation for baiting/taking bait like this

The obvious response, whether right or wrong, will be: "That's photoshopped."

also, everyone pushing this Christ-cuck and LARPagan bullshit needs to be flogged. You're not helping anyone or anything with your D&C

If reality is racist and anti-semitic, reality is the problem and must be banned.

thats obviously not the issue since you can rearchive a newer version on archive.is at anytime. archive.org takes awhile, like months or something before you can ask for a rearchve assuming it doesn't auto rearchive

...

You hit the Kike on the head before the shower.
More and more normies are aware that these (((Kike faggot fake news outlets))) get their revenue from clicks or pass through links direct to their sites. They are now trying to equate archive sites as somehow related to far-right or even racist driven in order to place some sort of regulations. A $$$ starving Kike shows how desperate they are when they attack simple archive sites. Vice has been busted so many times trying to memory hole articles of course they have to kike-blame others for their own inept editing and bullshit making staff low tier bloggers.

I filtered the D&C and this thread looks like how an old thread would look like.

...

Hahahahahaha. Watching kikes squirm is so pleasurable it's almost pornographic. And naturally, their anti-archiving system doesn't actually work.

archive.is/3JbMx
archive.is/xeraj

Mmm. Squirm, jew. Squirrrrrmmmmmm

Archives are neutral insurance that neither side effectively lied. The website because they can't point to an archive and to the live version to show they haven't edited it like a dirty jew, and critic because he can point to the original version of articles pre-edit Now we edit their articles to say anything, save it as a .png, and use the excuse "well they blocked archives"

Example given

But don't think for a second this is just about their "credibility". They could not give any less of a fuck about their credibility, this is about shekels, and how archive links bypass that.

He's in other threads too; started posting at the same time. I think somebody wants to make the holiday unhappy.

Only been here since Trump election, but if a thread gets my noggin joggin'…

Why not just build an archive website that runs the website in a browser, scrolls thru the page taking a few screenshots, then stitching them together to make a big screenshot.
Posting that on their site.
Or is it just that they're blocking all ip from archiving sites?

A congressman got shot in the hip due to the MSM's constant attacks and slyly calling for the assassination of the President. When's the last time a journalist got shot by a radical white supremacist? Hell, when's the last time anyone got shot by a radical white supremacist?

Fucking Jews. At least archiving their shit to rid of their revenue is working.

Archive sites archive the whole site page in order to truly make it an undeniable archive of that moment. Simply taking a screenshot is not really that impressive as it can be manipulated. The fact vice started blocking it shows their fear.

pic related

Wew. How soon before they declare screenshots racists and a tool of the patriarchy?

So they claim to be Sailor Moon fans, whilst being mentally ill cross dressing trannies, and they can't even pose with a fucking smile?

Lesson since the election has shown you is that you should archive fucking everything.

About time, if you ask me.

Imagine, needing an actual editor for a publication. The horror.

Checked. And indeed, how ass-blasted will they be when they realize this?

Memory holing Kikes don't want people to remember what they right. Disgusting.

Agreed

Take that Nazis

These people are retarded.

Did ANYBODY even bother to verify OP's claim?
Because it's bullshit. Archive.is still works on vice.com
archive.fo/qMsmk

Just print the webpage as a PDF and save that somewhere.

not hard.

Did you even read my post? Ufufufu, how pathetic user~

i was trying to verify it also, it does appear that they do redirect to a 3rd party archive site to be archived instead of their original article

>archive.is/Ek3vl

I guess I missed that.


Ah interesting, I think you're right… What's this wbrc.io thing? Is archive.is bouncing their requests through there? Is Vice going to start playing whack-a-mole with VPNs and proxies? That'd be hilarious.

Also, I find it particularly amusing that Vice accuses archive.org of being a rightwing archive site since archive.org is run by a bunch of internet nerd lefties out of San Fagcisco.

forgot pick of wbrc.io

the point of archiving is having a third-party service that is hopefully non-intervening which can 'prove' what was actually on a site at a specific time. Anyone can edit and save a live webpage with their browser, so a PDF has no trust factor.

Anybody know of a blockchain-based solution to web archiving? It's the best proof you could feasibly have.

Who gives a damn
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/simplewebcapture/

I'm not even able to find the facebook post where VICE says they blocked the archiving services…

I think OP rused us tbh fam.

well done OP

You're missing the point. Online archiving is useful for archiving proof of articles and sending the links to other people. We all know you can save webpages locally, that's far less useful for our purposes though.

wbrc.io is owned by rhizome.org which appears to be some gay shit like vice

>anthology.rhizome.org/heritage-gold
>archive.is/z0abQ

They were afraid the post was gonna get archived, so they deleted it.

Archive.org is some gay shit like Vice too…

THIS JUST IN: VICE DOESN'T KNOW HOW COMPUTERS WORK
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/mozilla-archive-format/
addons.palemoon.org/addon/mozarchiver/
superuser.com/questions/369232/how-to-save-a-web-page-as-mht-in-chrome#445988

i dont trust archive.org anyway

...

Vice is blocking archive.org
web.archive.org/web/20170704211050/https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/wj88kw/this-independence-day-free-yourself-from-trump

They're 404'ing articles when requested by archive.org.

So we make them delete everything

I've met a few of the people affiliated with archive.org IRL. You're right to not trust them, they're typical far-left SF faggots.

they're just giving archive.org a 404, the article still exists

That's not how it's working. When the page is requested by archive.org, they return 404. But when other people request the page they return the actual page.

The OP post does not exist, and I highly suspect that it is fake, but they actually do put a script on their page that makes fake 404 messages if they are scraped by archive websites. (See ) They've done so for a couple months at least.

You still can archive and view Vice articles on archive.org.
Block all 1st party scripts with uMatrix. The article comes up just fine.

Silly normalfag vice writers. Getting your shekels isn't so easy. Archive is just one tool – one among many. Try to stop this:

chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/full-page-screen-capture/fdpohaocaechififmbbbbbknoalclacl?hl=en-US

Start screenshotting articles that will not allow themselves to be archived. It creates a file that's usually small enough to be uploaded to an imageboard.

See

Screenshots don't mean shit because you can tamper with them.

my guess is you might see an effort for news sites to force their archive sites of choice or possibly archive sites will become a racket, giving site authors the authority to remove or edit pages

The logical step two is to make a social media bot that follows what Vice posts, screenshots the whole page, posts them to an image hosting service, and replies to the article with the link. However, social media sites are so spineless that they'd likely ban any account that dares to deny them a click.

beat me to it

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

RIGHT WING ARCHIVING SQUADS

Checked mini Satan. They are still faggots though

...

...

Better than nothing, bit usually they'll just claim it's shopped.

...

...

First picture. Dead ringer Peinovich in the middle.

Once upon a time news websites used to host archives of their own publications, but this is incredibly rare to see these days. They hate people being able to dig through their old archives.

Just think of it, if the library were invented today, publishers and media outlets would try to legislate it out of existence.

(checked)
That's never not true.

this is pathetic, but it won't stop us from archiving their shit and depriving them of their precious ad revenue.

"they shouldn't be worried about archives, they should be worried that people start killing journalists."

oc related

(checked)
So you're mentally undeveloped?

how old is gavin anyway?

what the fuck are you talking about? this is a thread about vice not about god.

almost 47 as per wiki

Then stay on topic and don't respond to my post retard.

If there were an archive service using a VPN with it's crawler that would be impossible to block.

...

The societies did
The individual people didn't, they had the one god their philosophy resonated with so they stuck to that particular god

Guess what?

TORArchive when?

How frequently do we need proof of a stealth-edit? It's happened a few times with Huffington Post employees, but usually, the archive is just to keep them from getting shekels/info on how much traffic is coming from a board.


Besides, Satan here makes a good point. Someone who isn't lazy, do this.

do you have the one about "the truth"?

We already know that ur a faget

This gets funny when you see how many kikes work for TOR.

torproject.org/about/corepeople.html.en

At least you can sage.

...

Pastebin again then?

...

Save as HTML, then upload to mixtape.moe. Re-save as PDF and open with SumatraPDF (doesn't execute PDF macros) if you're more suspicious than usual. If you want text-only, upload to Ghostbin (Pastebin is under surveillance) or use the Textise addon on Firefox to instantly convert the whole page to text.

There's a ton of ways to circumvent this bullshit really, anyone who is handicapped by such 'measures' is a complete retard who should lurk moar (preferably on >>>Holla Forums ).

This is some orwellian bullshit. What a strange age to be alive.

MFW actual, objective data supports racism

THere are still other ways around this. If the intent is to prove that an article was in a given state before an edit, then someone create a tool to create a checksum of webpages, embed it in a full-page screenshot, and send the checksum to a server which hosts the sums for the viewing public.

That would be client-side. Vice wouldn't be able to block it without blocking people from viewing their website. Of course, the issue with that is that someone could manipulate the tool to send fake checksums to the server. You would have to create some kind of anti-tampering mechanism in the code. In addition to info from websites, the checksum includes something unique which has to be re-calculated by the server. And if doesn't work out, the checksum doesn't get added to the database.

Can anyone find it?

A kind of proofchain, in blockchain but this could only save cheksum of the screenshot, the date and few words about the pic.
But i'm stuck at, why would someone run the client or in few years it will be even easier to fake cheksums.

disregard that. I'm retarded. People could just edit the HTML.

Too old to be dressing like this.

More frequently we need proof of deleted articles. Particularly ones that are embarrassing in retrospect to our greatest ally.

>Like how the other Trumptards in this thread wish that anyone who doesn't like Rabbi Presidente is a paid shill. Hilarious. ** :'^)
**

Won't work on any site that includes dynamic content generation. For instance if it includes a list of "related articles" that updates periodically, any sort of "published x minutes ago" text, etc.

no, you were onto something there, maybe a bit off, but its still a good start, really what you would want is to print the page to pdf as well as to have a copy of that page to view, and then make a checksum of the file. It can be handled by a server and no user submission would be needed, it would be almost impossible to detect and probably couldn't be blocked because archiving the page to a file such as just taking a screenshot of the page with an imaging tool or pdfing it wouldn't requests every and wouldn't require it for viewing either, as its all saved in that single file.

...

And people still wonder why we think western civilization is in decline.

If the politicians can do it why can't the reporters

From what I can tell, npr.org and svd.se never blocked anything.
Vice wasn't working yesterday, but now they are.
I want something that's not an image, considering it some of the info in that pic appears to be false.

Again, for those that can't read,

YOU CAN STILL ARCHIVE ON ARCHIVE.ORG

DISABLE SCRIPTS WITH UMATRIX OR DISABLE .JS ALTOGETHER ON THEIR WEBSITE

DILLO MASTER RACE WINS AGAIN


There is no objective way to prove that a file came from a server at any point. The sites that exist now can't prove beyond a doubt that they didn't modify the contents of the archives, but doing so would be so antithetical to their mission and damaging to their reputation that their authenticity is never doubted.

The ideal system would be a trustworthy authority that creates archives and signs off on the checksum in such a way that it can't be forged, and then makes the file available for distribution peer to peer to offload hosting costs and increase the survivability of the content. So basically archive.is but modified to serve pages from/to IPFS.

example, I printed to a pdf document, then converted it with image tools to a jpg

the solution to websites that refuse to let themselves be archived is shared screenshots of the pages, verified by anons checking the original website in the thread where they are posted
"web of trust", "check out for yourself" style, and then we can archive the thread where this verification was posted, optionally with hashes of the images if the h8chan hash isn't enough
just needs a storage solution for the screenshots, because archive.is doesn't save linked images

Also,
ARCHIVE.IS APPEARS TO BE AWARE OF THE ISSUE, NOW REDIRECTS VICE LINKS THROUGH WBRC.IO TO AVOID THE BLOCK

See: archive.fo/JzMt3

hahahha faggots

Archiving a page including the html and css etc doesn't really mean it's "undeniable". Archive.org or today should not be taken as infallible, they would both be immense tools for deception if compromised.

.is/.today should allow viewing when on a VPN. The fact that they disallow this makes me think they intent to track their audience which of course leans heavily to our communities.

why are you assuming that when its more likely that vice is forcing the redirect
look up http 302 to see how redirects work

...

That's not what's happening.

you have to be lying since there is no mentio n of it on blog.archive.is/

...

it literally shows you the redirects in the top of the page and you're saying it's not redirects

The first thing it does is check wbrc.io for the archive. It never mentions vice. I'm not 100%, but I think it's avoiding accessing vice.com altogether.

i stand corrected

Typical liberals. Free speech is only for degeneracy. Once they are called out for distorting reality, they would rather destroy the whole internet than start telling the truth.

RIGHT WING ARCHIVIST SQUADS

Irrelevant.

I've seen that exact comment posted before.
I'm on to you, user.

Who wants to set up streisand.archive?

Got a link to that post? That way some of us can shitpost on them

Screenshots can't be used as evidence, but they are good for giving anons an idea of what to expect if they click on a link, or a reason why they should want to.
They can make digging threads go faster too. When used to discredit people, they are almost always doctored however.

Same.

The Great Archive War of 2017 was pretty disappointing. I expected them to put up a better fight. gg no re, Vice.

Is that donkey fucking documentary still up there?

Seems kind of pointless to call it "great" then isn't it?

By now, it's basically a pasta to be used whenever Vice is mentioned.

Quick someone make a blockchain verified screencap thing. You could do an initial coin offering and get $60 mil easy.

post your alternative archive pages

unvis.it/

Huh. I was able to archive this.
archive.is/8O5pL
No images basically.

1st pic is insulting. I like Sailor Moon and she isn't owned by these fags!

Is he the Grinch?

It's about time that Jim and Co. host an archiving server so we can stop relying on third parties.
I would even donate

Courtesy of Holla Forums and the gg thread

Got some shots for you guys!
First is some vicefag projecting about Trump!

Very useful, I have been looking for a workaround for a few sites (the Independent for example) that had already blocked archiving.

Fucking hell, looks like a job for a
RIGHT WING ARCHIVIST SQUADS

they should free themselves from trump with a rope and a chair.

They'll probably block wbrc.io next. Something client-side is still the ideal solution.. if you can find a way to do without allowing an edit. Something like:
They would have a hard time blocking that. The problem is that someone you know… Holla Forums would find a way to pause the execution, edit the page, and send whatever they want. But still, it's a really promising technique if someone could find a reliable way to preserve the original data.

another woman Journalist totally obsessed with trump they really can't help it can they?

YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE OP

You can also archive the jewgle cache.

archive.is/8iz8u

...

1) im telling you blockchain that shit. When someone does the download, have some peers verify its authenticity.
2) profit

fucking lmao. facts and history are fucking racist, goy

thinking for yourself is racist and fascist didn't you know?

IS A TOOL A BOT?

So apparently any website that archives the truth is a "right wing" website, even if they happen to delete WLP archives etc. Leftists just dont believe in the truth. If they deny they ever said something, its the leftist thing to do to believe them, even if they are wrong. If you save proof that they said it, clearly youre some right wing zealot, interested in objective truth! Objective truth is racist and bigoted, sexist etc, remember.

...

...

Are they, dare I say, /left wing activists/ that need to be chuckled?

OP, you're full of shit. I couldn't find this post anywhere on their faceberg page, and I just archived random pages from all 3 sites. svd.se seems to only have issues with archive.is, works with wayback just fine. Kindly fuck off.

post the archives fgt

this, no one ITT verified it

Surpise! OP's a cumguzzling faggot that can't get his shitty shopped facebook post right.

web.archive.org/web/20170705001350/https://www.svd.se/fn-farlig-upptrappning-i-nordkorea/om/varlden
archive.is/http://www.npr.org/2017/07/04/518876922/the-star-spangled-banner-verse-youve-probably-never-heard
archive.fo/https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/mgmzpv/i-was-left-like-a-freak-in-the-corner-visiting-the-doctor-as-a-sex-worker

Fuck it! The files are too big. Freeze Page doesn't work for me! AS works for now. Download the zip. I'm sorry.

Movie shilling!
archive.is/NIjvS

Comparing Black Lives Matter, the Women's March and shit like that to legit protests!
archive.is/pf7UQ

It's never enough #5937
archive.is/9KGx4

This never ceases to amaze me. Leftist hipsters spent 20+ years bitching that the biggest problem in America was Christian fundies like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell trying to turn the country into a theocracy. Then when an even more fundamentalist death cult starts committing terrorist acts all over the West, they bend over backwards to protect said cult from criticism. What the hell is the psychology behind this? It's mental illness bordering on psychosis.

Does anyone have the link to the faceberg post?

Pretty much boils down to the enemy of my enemy is my friend

You an altar boy?

archive is just a convenience, can still visit once & screen cap.

If only they could do the same with Google, their business plan would be complete.

HEY Holla Forums! be on the lookout! bookstores are pushing the book "the rainbow fish" really hard right now! I dare to you go read your old copy from when you were a baby! it's disgusting globalist propaganda! make people aware of it's disgusting message and expose it for what it really is!

And web.archive.org wants you to (((register)))

looking for the source on this and it looks like CFN (cuckchan fake news) originated this fake screen shot. It may be bait for the Vice Kikes to respond and still end up labeling archives as some sort of white oppression used by racists and far-right groups the maintain control over the interwebz.

Cap yourself

FUCKING HEINOUS

He honestly are you guys fresh to the internet and this fucking new or are you just trying to make us resort to a discreditable form of online evidence gathering?

The truth is toxic to them it seems.

That article was fucking infuriating. Basically the author tried to discredit the video by saying all the clips were "taken out of context and didn't represent the current wave of refugees", except that the earliest clip found was from 2012, it seems that idiot didn't get the point about letting arabs into your country, and of course plenty of bullshit excuses for the "in context" clips, like
So I guess emotions give you an excuse to riot. These people are dull.

And of course their attempt to discredit the part at the end with that Jew spectre.

I hate these people, I want to do things to them I will not mention here, and I hope to fucking god that day comes soon.

If librarians start burning books..

...

I don't subscribe to your point of view, it seems to me altogether too politically expedient and "'"profitable"'"

Wut?

Gavin going through Israel was hilarious. If you're a US soldier it's even more hilarious, know why? Israel is like one of the least white places you can be ironically in the whole Middle East and they looked even more inbred than sandniggers usually do I'm guessing it's that insular jew thing. Maybe that's why they project their inbredness to the rural whites

Anyone know what triggered them so hard that they felt compelled to introduce this policy? I feel like I'm missing out on a good story.

oh my god I thought I was alone

Aren't there other small-time archive.is type sites in addition to Google Cash and archive.org, echo-ey as they are, the general principle's the same, and it adds at minimum a layer of difficulty to memory holing.

...

Found an archiving tool that works. There is always a work around.

via.hypothes.is/

can you make a zip? im interested in your stash

|
|>
|x
|

Don't give your stash to


Collection sharing like this will give a powerful tool to shills, as they can use collections like your own to better fingerprint individuals.
From there they can put pressure on influential anons or better morph their posts to match influential anons.

(((vice)))

do it!
Phillipines server capital of the world

the SJWs of (((vice))) and virtue

why is the dirty hobo in the punk outfit?

You do know Gavin did that for a bit, right? Disparage him all you want but try to be accurate and honest about it. Don't post a screenshot of something he did for a video and pretend like it's just him being him. It makes you look fucking stupid.

I was looking for some salt (but couldn't find any) because I couldn't taste anything in my soup
Now I have more than enough, thanks Vice!

Do they read what they write?

My irony of the day. Damn that's rich.

The solution is screenshots hosted anywhere you want. Nimbus plugin for Firefox is nice.

The nazis had to gather up and burn communist literature. Modern leftists will allow it to disappear with time on their own.

That is the beautiful irony here. (((They))) will try to paint the either apolitical or leftist archiving websites as tools of the "far-right" and end up getting even the brainwashed shabbos goyim to wake up to how kiked their world is, that even a fucking internet archive is somehow a tool of "Nazis".

I use zotero, which is used by academics, to maintain research catalogs and local databases.

You can save the snapshot locally, and use the search function to search all text, and meta tags, link, date etc…

zotero.org/download/

Sometimes i think we're more left wing than the shitlibs.

you can just save the page with a browser, any browser can do so, then upload to filesharing site, probl solved

What's that?

I can't find this information anywhere except a few sites calling VICE cucks. This is fake. You retards.

Trust but verify. So far nobody has found the link so I guess it's fair to say it's fake


I archive shit there and it never asked me to register


Vice got aware of this one a couple weeks ago and blocked it

Reminder archive.is needs shekels to run their shit. Since you guys practically hog it at least consider helping them

https:// liberapay.com/archiveis

Keep in mind the moment they can't run it anymore all the shit you archived will vanish

You're bringing in unrelated topics and getting pissed when others don't buy into your kikery.
Please step into the chamber.

...

Literal 1984 memory hole stuff

good thing they can't stop screen shots

They can just halt and store until sufficient funds are met. No big deal and now way are they gonna delete all the juicy stuff.

This, I believe, because i couldnt find it either

...

literally anyone can make any kind of screenshot


in the same way, literally anyone can edit any website to say what they want. If something is on archive.is, you know it's real. If it's on user's computer then you know fucking nothing.

This sounds like fake to me.

Let me guess (((vice))) is run by kikes

Someone tell them about full page screenshots.

Never the bastion of journalistic integrity but still, this is an incredibly defensive and embarrassing declaration to be made. It implies they have an issue with being held to their own statements and being unable to rewrite their own record. 'Ethical journalism' is newspeak for a poorly disguised attack on an opponent, playing the audience against their target and ensuring they are misled.

you're all being gaslit

vice goes by vice news on facebook

archive.is/mcqoj

You can still archive vice articles. I just tried the Chris Christie one.

Vice is still shit but don't become FAKE NEWS like some other fraudulent cable news network.

Must have taken a while.

sick dubs mah nigga.

It did take a while for it to archive…I think it had more to do with Vice cluttering up their article with a shitload of pictures. More a symptom of them having shitty design aesthetic than them trying to stop archive.is.

Can't go wrong with 7. It was more a joke about CC size than Vice behavior.

I figured that might be the case but I also figured I should clarify how my upload went anyway.


u cheeky cunt

look at your own archive, it uses via.hypothes.is, archive.is cannot archive vice directly
hit ctrl+f wbrc.io in thread to read more

Indeed I am.

This is cryptic shit nigga.

Is the reroute controlled by vice? Explain it in some laymen terms if you please.

thats what i thought if you look at my post id, but it appears that archive.is is using other archiving services and archiving what they have.
since there is no log of vice giving a redirect (status code 302) as seen in you could only assume that archive.is is the one redirecting and not vice

nah, there is a vice news (facebook.com/vicenews/) but there's also a Vice as in the OP (facebook.com/VICE/).

But still, I haven't seen the OP either, yet I've seen it fucking everywhere. I would like to know who's behind this and why, even if it's only a prank.

Luckily they'll never block google, just use thier cache

how do you know it's real though?

well, it's at least real in that it can't have been edited or forged by the end user who archived it using that service. But if you're asking about something fishy going on serverside, like if archive.is's servers were hacked or someone who works for it edited things in secret, that's a different story. As far as we know that hasn't happened yet, but it seems inevitable.

vice news Writers are Too literate to Capitalize random Words
FAKE AND GAY

Read the thread faggot
archive.is is being redirected when trying to archive Vice pages

Companies and organizations have communications people who run their social media. They are hired to communicate to an audience, not write properly.

...

HOW THE FUCK DID YOU ALL MISS THIS

Because it's an old meme from It's always sunny

wew lad
the slippery kikes really didnt think this through did they?

anyone who has had even the slightest bit of redpill will see how this shit only confirms what they feared to be true

HEIL HITLER

Screencaps could be shopped and hence they can not be trusted. While an authoritative archiving web-site, like Archive.is is a trusted source, since it archives exactly what was by the URL and doesn't permit editing it.

...