every fucking day, for 200 fucking replies you got a couple retards arguing about race and iq. I bet you 95% of threads with 150+ replies is arguing about race and its implications.
Can mods make a containment thread for this? or better yet can you fags stop replying?
Other urls found in this thread:
web.ornl.gov
debunkingdenialism.com
americananthro.org
physanth.org
livinganthropologically.com
robertlindsay.wordpress.com
peterdanpsychology.ro
cpsimoes.net
the-scientist.com
debunkingdenialism.com
livescience.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
youtube.com
facingsouth.org
marxists.org
twitter.com
You can't escape it. Holla Forums is beyond saving
Everyday until you like it
People responding to obvious shitposts should be banned until they learn to control their autism. It's the only way to fix the retardation plaguing this board
Y/N?
We could ban the iqfag, but he's autistic enough to pay for proxies just to post. You fags need to learn to call them faggots and be done with them, they'll just move goalposts or say it's Jewish Marxist lies if you try to respond.
How about mods doing their job and
sink the fucking threads so they're still in the catalogue but not on the front page
for a change
Did you expected anything different from an image board?
That won't solve the problem of retards responding to them.
but the thread topic isn't even about race or iq. Iq fag makes some comment like "figures that was what low iq people do" and then boom he gets 100 replies
The solution is simple.
IQ, I.Q and I.Q. should wordfilter to good boy points.
It'll curb the issue though.
It's a poor quality thread though.
Race is a myth. All theories of race are false. I know it, I think most of Holla Forums knows it. Either don't reply or bury it.
...
I take issue with these images my good man, shall we have a discussion about them?
This
...
You can't not respond to their claims or they win
They can't not respond back or you win
It's pretty fucking stupid but easy to avoid those threads
Racists have a way of taking tiny incidental differences and turning them into defining features.
Only if they fail to sage.
THIS
Ashkenazi Jews and Sephardi Jews share almost the same culture yet have a 12 IQ gap between each other, yet Europeans and Asians have a very different culture and have a 5 IQ gap.
Therefore: Genetics > Culture
Since your position is unable to be challenged without it automatically turning out to be wrong?
Race is a myth and white idpol is the ugliest of the idpols.
But if we don't reply they win.
Kill yourself.
Yes. BO make a stickied thread about muh race and temp ban retards who bring it out of it after warning, or bumplock/delete threads about race.
Bump, even though I'm guilty of the being a fag per OP.
+1 updemocracy
This
Le reddit upvote xD
bump
pls
Although I'm bumping, it's mostly just one IQfag, who then proceeds to get BTFO. He hasn't popped up recently, so I'd give a shit.
Or feminism.
I'm not him, and I only came here because this thread was on Velocity, but my opinion is while those graphs about IQ may possibly be correct, it doesn't take into account culture.
If you looked at people who had a common culture I guarantee you the Average IQs would be similar regardless of race. This is the reason why Asians are typically smarter, because their culture puts more emphasis on studying and education than others.
I'm interested in knowing your response.
Face it. Race is real and race matters. u mad?
web.ornl.gov
debunkingdenialism.com
americananthro.org
physanth.org
livinganthropologically.com
robertlindsay.wordpress.com
Roberts, Dorothy (2011). Fatal Invention. London, New York: The New Press.
Harrison, Guy (2010). Race and Reality. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
You were saying?
You have to go back
see
I agree, we should really just have a sticky regarding this. It's the same questions and replies every time.
You have to go back
peterdanpsychology.ro
Rushton and Ankney do not use raw measurements of cranial capacity, instead they attempt to adjust the values using a mathematical formula that's meant to compensate for the effect of overall body size on brain size, but the formula they use is disputed by other scientists, see cpsimoes.net
Two additional points need to be made. Rushton and Ankney (1995) suggest that cranial capacity estimates for Mongoloid-, Caucasoid-, and Negroid-Americans are 1416, 1380, and 1359 cm3, respectively, indicating larger differences than Rushton's (1992) valu es given above for these groups (1464, 1468, 1449cm3). The former values for the three groups represent cranial capacity estimates which are based on values corrected for body parameters (Rushton, 1992). To perform this correction, Rushton used slopes for the log/log plot of brain against body weight which are not appropriate for within- species comparisons (Harvey, 1988). For comparison of individuals drawn from the same species, a slope which is almost horizontal is appropriate, and should be close to t he .08 determined empirically by Reed and Jensen (1993). This is borne out by other available evidence. Wickett et al. (1994) state that for their sample of white women, it would appear that the size of the brain is largely independent of body size (p. 836). Similarly, Jerison (1979) found no significant association between body weight or height and brain weight for men within the age range of 29 to 41 years of age. A conservative conclusion is that there is no legitimate reason for using steep slopes in comparing brain/body size relations across races. As a result, statements about brain size differences between races should not rely on adjusted values, and it is not appropriate to conclude that higher IQ's in Asians are linked to larger brain size.
Keep in mind Big Science suppresses any research that contradicts the narrative. The last guy who demonstrated intelligence was heritable was forced to resign and his research was buried. But keep believing the lies the elites are feeding you. They are THE PEOPLE™ after all.
This is genius
This is why I am here and not at Holla Forums.
Uh huh
James Flynn (2012), pp. 140–1 argues that there is an inherent flaw in Jensen's argument that the correlation between g-loadings, test scores and heritability support a genetic cause of the gap. He points out that as the difficulty of a task increases a low performing group will naturally fall further behind, and heritability will therefore also naturally increase. The same holds for increases in performance which will first affect the least difficult tasks, but only gradually affect the most difficult ones. Flynn thus sees the correlation between in g-loading and the test score gap to offer no clue to the cause of the gap.
Hunt (2010), p. 415 states that many of conclusions of Jensen, and his colleagues rest on the validity of Spearman's hypothesis, and the method of correlated vectors used to test it. Hunt points out that other researchers have found this method of calculation to produce false positive results, and that other statistical methods should be used instead. According to Hunt, Jensen and Rushton's frequent claim that Spearman's hypothesis should be regarded as empirical fact does not hold, and that new studies based on better statistical methods would be required to confirm or reject the hypothesis that the correlation between g-loading, heritability and the IQ gap is due to IQ gaps consisting mostly of g.
...
Science is totes not agenda driven goys.
There is nothing scientific in any of that.
the-scientist.com
This why killing and torture of Marxists is justified 100%
Meaning the other half is not attributed to genetics
Jesus, your autism got triggered again yet you keep posting the same garbage sources that prove themselves wrong
Are you too stupid to understand how stupid this is or what?
Top kek, tumblrite got triggered
Literally parody'd
What good are peer reviews if the peers doing the reviews are unreliable?
Jesus christ, what's next you're going to tell me the holocaust never happened? Or that Europe is going to have a muslim majority?
If it's demonstrably provable in so many people, then it is common sense to assume it affects the other half undemonstrably. We don't need to demonstrate things to know they are real.
Opinions are not evidence cuck.
Face it cuck, reality is on the side of the right. You people are insane.
You are coming from a position that implies genetics determine intelligence and therefore, political intervention is necessary to increase the "quality" in the genetic composition of the subjects
This is wrong, and your own sources prove why
Stay mad u got BTFO by the 22th time
Didn't they say that there no alleles exclusive to any ethnic groups despite the fact that we haven't identified every gene in the human genome yet and new genes are being discovered all the time?
So the brain isn't formed based on genetic codes like every other part of the body? Are you retarded?
face it stormnigger, you got BTFO and your attempts at damage control are laughable.
Though this isn't surprising considering racists have low iqs
livescience.com
Also
Where did I say that? I have not said anything about this. And besides, if I was going to have children with some 3D whore of course I'd want to marry the best 3D whore to give my children the best genes possible. Eugenics makes sense in a personal biological decision making process, but I never said anything about the state intervening. Nice job at trying to fit me into whatever profile you have of me or people like me so that you can resort to a buzzword attack, cuck, but I am smart enough to avoid your trap because I'm smarter than you and your comrades. I come from good stock, you see.
Nope, intelligence is determined by the materialconditions aswell, as your own sources have explqined
Stay btfo
Good, fascism officially btfo then
Where's the real science? Oh right, it's been buried by the 🍀🍀🍀Scientific establishment🍀🍀🍀. How stupid are you?
YOUR SCIENCE IS FAKE
THOSE PESKY MICKS
Not only are you stupid, you're also delusional. Of course being a leftist that comes as no surprise.
Scientifically speaking, you're not
livescience.com
You're talking to a different person, fucktard. Also 2nd pic from says there no strong evidence for environmental factors influencing intelligence. Stay BTFO.
I thought you stormfags believed in the Jews controlling everything, not the Irish
Im not implying you are a fascist, after all you belive genetic composition is not a worthy basis for stablishing some form of goverment or societal roles, it wouldnt make sense anyway, as genetics dont really determine intelligdnce
Like how it's always capitalism's fault when a socialist country goes down the shitter?
Again, are you saying the brain isn't developed based on genetic instructions?
Did you actually read the sources?
It said that genetic IQ was also inconclusive.
Just stop, lad you're embarassing yourself
Neither strong evidence of genetic makeup
The one you posted does tho>>1019078
No, but that is not what determine intelliegnce, according to your source
ok fam
There are no socialist countries
Capitalists however have taken down the shitter several socialist reforms tho,like worker's union and social welfare
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
I didn't post that, but here's a source. Nice job telling people apart.
Sure thing, kid.
Guess what, there never will be.
Questioning race is a spook
Nice damage control
Good, nationalism is bourgeoise
Yup, read a book about history
Environmental factors including lead exposure, breast feeding, (as stated by Campbell, 2002) and nutrition (as covered by Ivanovic, 2004 and Salojee and Pettifor, 2001) can significantly affect cognitive development and functioning. As stated by Qian (2005), For iodine deficiency causes a fall, on average, of 12 IQ points.
Such impairments may sometimes be permanent, sometimes be partially or wholly compensated for by later growth. The first two years of life is the critical time for malnutrition, the consequences of which are often irreversible and include poor cognitive development, educability, and future economic productivity. (As covered in The Lancet Series on Maternal and child Undernutrition, 2008)
The African American population of the United States is statistically more likely to be exposed to many detrimental environmental factors such as poorer neighborhoods, schools, nutrition, and prenatal and postnatal health care (Nesbit, 2009 and Cooper 2005).
Mackintosh (2011) points out that for American Blacks infant mortality is about twice as high as for whites, and low birthweight is twice as prevalent. At the same time white mothers are twice as likely to breastfeed their infants, and breastfeeding is highly correlated with IQ for low birthweight infants. In this way a wide number of health related factors that influence IQ are unequally distributed between the two group.
Thats not how you stirner post, try getting past page 6 of the ego and his own
My buzzwords were used for explanatory convenience. Yours were an attempt to fit me into an easy to attack position. I won't play your Alinsky games. I also hold you to a higher standard since that's what you do to people on the right. My buzzwords are perfectly fine, yours are not. See how it works yet?
You've never heard of the Iberian conspiracy?
I never said that environmental factors don't have a small influence.
The problem is that ignoring these threads–or better yet, banning or restricting them–is what they want. They want to pester and bicker at us until we give up so they can call us evil white people killers that can't handle the tr00f. They are literally inverse Tumblr, they want an excuse to think of themselves as martyrs.
When you post PDFs and articles that explicitly detail why their hard racial views are wrong, they just close the tab, wait a day and start again fresh as if it never happened.
You just can't win.
Why read a book by a guy who couldn't run a milk shop?
Nationalism is also the best way to pursue stability and lasting peace in the world. Globalism = conflict, exploitation, and hell on Earth for all. Anyone with a brain knows this.
...
Not an arguement
wew nice cognitive gymnastics pal
Why are you just quoting me without replying? Ran out of things to say but cang accept defeat?
Idk
Why read a book by a guy who couldnt get into a fucking art school lol
Nationalism is working wonders in north korea lol
Yes because WWII never happened
Has nothing to do with fee-fees. I clearly explained how we both used buzzwords differently. If you can't understand this then it's o surprise you can't understand that the scientific establishment is rigged. It's totally rigged folks.
Wew nice cognitive gymnastics pal
Lmao
Btfo
Questioning his intelligence is a valid critique of his ideas. Why govern my life by the principles of a man who didn't have the intelligence to keep a milk shop afloat?
By that same token so is their socialism wew
I was just joking around as those graphs are the ones the guy OP is complaining about posts.
I think overall it's a bit of a moot point since the pol solution would be declaring war on a third of America at minimum, which only works in the head of the person pushing the agenda. It would be easier and cheaper to just increase quality of life so the implied resulting crime rate drops.
Just highlighting the irony of a leftist telling me to read a history book.
Good thing I am not a state socialist wew
I asked the same about hitler
nice mental gymnastics, my dude.
Why govern my life of a man who failed art school and lost WWII?
Well it's a good thing I'm not a socialist then!
Ive read more books than you my friend
Have you seen what's been going on in Syria and Europe lately?
Genetics do certainly matter, but in no way that is intrinsically tied to race. Adaptive theories of intelligence differences don't make sense because there is no place on Earth where intelligence wasn't highly advantageous; it'd be like putting a shark in a different spot in the same ocean and being surprised that it still breathes.
Art is subjective, business success isn't.
Leftist propaganda written by fucktards isn't good reading material.
Explain
WEW LADDIE
E
W
L
A
D
D
I
E
Holy shit I made that pic and I only ever used it once months ago. Feels good man!
If you don't understand the difference between statistical evidence and empirical evidence, you should probably not be having any sort of scientific discussion.
Pffft, no wonder he got btfo by the allies kek
Neither is Rightist propaganda
What are you? You believe we individuals can exist in our own bubbles? Delusional.
Have you even read that source which I posted?
Or seen this?
...
...
I'm only going by what we can observe. If observing reality, deducing a hypothesis, repeating results, and coming up with a conclusion based on these results isn't science then maybe I'm not a scientist.
Wew lad, do you preffer coke or pepsi?
WEW LADDIE
Lmao, are you also a limey
Nope. It's just baseless confirmation bias that genetics don't matter so there's no point. I know it's lies.
Except you tend to throw a fit when an observation is made that you don't like.
peterdanpsychology.ro
Feudalism is a style of economics. You can have a leader who serves life terms and social mobility.
I'm the just BTFO of you in regards to race realism. Your arguements are as pathetic as you denying evidence.
IQ doesnt measure intelligence
Or you can decide not to b a monarchy-cuck
I'd argue that it is still a very useful metric in psychiatry, but it's grossly abused as a way to measure human worth.
At no point do people stop and consider: don't stupid people still have rights? And why is it that you have a high IQ but are still a loser?
What fit? When dealing with things of this nature we are considering general populations. The reality is that no niggers will be as smart as the smartest whites, and that no whites will be as smart as the smartest chinks because chinks cheat on IQ tests.
...
Literally the political equivalent of being a cuckold.
Ayy lmo kiddie is throwing a tantrum
You can stop now.
Exactly my point, you have the nerve to claim to be neutral and objective while wearing your personal bias like a badge of honor. You know nothing but your own personal feelings.
I'm not sure why you just expect us to accept what you are saying. You are a fucking retard and no one should consider your opinion valid on anything.
Anarchist Spain was a hellhole where people were starving to death until the Communists came in. Fortunately the rightists won that war and kept the country from falling into the Soviet sphere.
Did your mom put lead in your food as a kid?
Have fun starving under marxism
Most of the country was a hellhole wherever you didn't suck Franco's shriveled dick, because he was sort of killing anyone who resisted like dictators usually do, and the Soviets actively sabotaged their efforts when they wouldn't bow to tankie demands.
Hey congrats, you guys are finally starting to understand what I've been saying. 🍀🍀🍀Science🍀🍀🍀 can not be trusted due to a whole assortment of agendas. Well, I see I finally got through to you. Remember to keep questioning The Narrative and try to stop being useful idiots for the corrupt establishment that uses to to promote its agendas. Cheers!
C
U
C
K
youtube.com
And from George Orwell He wrote to Cyril Connolly from Barcelona on 8 June 1937: "I have seen wonderful things and at last really believe in Socialism, which I never did before."
I do question everything I read. I believe what people like James Flynn write because they genuinely make a compelling argument and have an exemplary grasp of research.
They weren't fighting the entire world.Hell that had people form all over the world helping them and they still got raped.
Then why are you using science to try to make up diffefences between humans?
kek
Here's something I don't get though: if The Establishment means all of this data could be propaganda and lies, doesn't the same apply to the racial IQ disparities and The Bell Curve, a widely published book?
Or is it trustworthy when you DO like it?
Jesus lad, I thought you were against the Jews?
I never said it wasn't a futile effort, only that you are clearly trying to pull the "muh marxism apocalypse" burgerclap propaganda argument.
BAHAHA MR BONES LET ME OFF THIS WILD RIDE!
...
...
You see its easier if you omit all this politically correct scientific studies and go directly to the point
Its means we have more time to call each other a faggot instead
Yes yes cut off his head, that will surely bring the rains. Idiot.
K
Top kek, you cant be any more cucked than this
...
I bet you think that improve living condition are the result of leftism and not better technology.
You guys are the ones spamming cuck.
The cuck denial is overwhelming
Lmao
Top kek
IQ fag is a monarch-cuck
My sides
...
There were king before and after feudalism. Read a book that wasn't written by Marx, Hegel, Stirner, Engels, or any leftist non-thinker. Read a book by someone with intelligence.
wew
Top kek
Literally cucking yourself
Can't tell people apart based on their different writing patterns.
Literally retarded.
Yes, and we know exactly what to do with them, considering they have let people starve and go to wars they didn't want any part of.
That's like saying you can build a snowman near a volcano
Not even a monarchist. It's just easier to defend monarchy than it is to go along with your false historical narratives. For one, the worst King in history was incapable of getting away with the crimes committed by post-monarchy 🍀🍀🍀democratic🍀🍀🍀 regimes, and the best Kings were what ultimately created the modern world. It took 1000 years to recover what we lost in the collapse of Rome. It took less than 100 for 🍀🍀🍀Democracies🍀🍀🍀 to throw it all away.
That sounds just like a Democracy.
How deep the rabbit hole goes?
I didn't mention the jews. Nice job being illiterate.
Wow you are retarded. In a power vacuum someone will eventually emerge on top. Either that or they will get dominated by a society with hierarchy. Explain to me how a fit individual won't eventually emerge as a leader in an anarchist society?
Bourgeois democracies ruled by the capitalist class, and not the people.
It is the king's fault that there is insufficient food when he uses the food that he gets from peasants to support an army which he uses to force the peasants to give him more of the food that they grow instead of putting the surplus into storage in anticipation of a dought.
Well, the House of Windsor is illegitimate after all.
Then pray tell, who are these people you keep talking about? Is you be sayin I be kangz?
That's what would happen in an anarchy. The people would be subverted.
Or maybe the food in storage doesn't last long due to lack of refrigerators, preservatives, insecticides, and other modern technology. Keep trying.
You're right. Collectivism doesn't work. Perhaps what would have been better was a sort of free-market system… Oh wait, that did exist under certain monarchies because Monarchies weren't all isolated to 3 years in France in the late 18th century when God didn't feel the need to cry for a while.
And you say I'm retarded
WHOA BUDDY, THAT'S ONE HELL OF A CONSPIRACY
Apparently not. You are getting your ass handed to you here.
Only because they were too small. Feudalism does not lend itself well to territorial expansion. You are excluding emperors from pre-feudal slave societies, aren't you? Those guys performed some monumental genocides to rival anything that bourgeois states did.
Only in Western Europe. The Eastern Mediterranean never lost any of it.
It would be a bit hard for capitalist to subvert the people if there was no capitalist class.
...
Good christ. Open a damn history book.
Did you reply to the wrong post? None of that follows.
Whatever you say. All you have done is throw historical lies and fake science at me.
Describes Obama's America pretty well.
Your Holla Forums is showing.
It doesn't matter what values the society was founded on. What matters is biology. A hierarchy would be much more efficient and streamlined.
The grains went bad much faster before pest resistant crops. open a science text book.
Still better than Allende's massive inflation.
...
So you'd be the first to go, considering racists have low iqs, and right wing terrorism is second to that of Islamic terror.
Good to know
Joanna Plucinska (June 25, 2016). "Study: White Extremists More Dangerous Than Islamists Since 9/11". Time.
Really makes me scratch my noggin
looks like you were right
"New America's tally of shows 18 instances of right-wing terrorist attacks causing fatalities since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. These were the 2015 Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooting (3 killed), the 2015 Charleston church shooting (9 killed), the 2014 ambush attack on Las Vegas police officers (4 killed), the 2014 Overland Park Jewish Community Center shooting in Kansas (3 killed), the 2014 Pennsylvania State Police barracks attack in Blooming Grove, Pennsylvania (1 killed), a 2012 tri-state killing spree by white supremacists (4 killed), a 2012 ambush of St. John the Baptist Parish, Louisiana police (2 killed), the 2012 Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting (6 killed), the 2011 FEAR group attacks (3 killed); a murder in 2010 in Carlisle, Pennsylvania (1 killed), a 2010 suicide attack by airplane in Austin, Texas (1 killed), the 2009 shooting of Pittsburgh police officers (3 killed); the 2009 United States Holocaust Memorial Museum shooting (1 killed), the 2009 assassination of George Tiller (1 killed), the 2009 murders of Raul and Brisenia Flores in Pima County, Arizona (2 killed), the 2009 murders in Brockton, Massachusetts (2 killed), the 2008 Knoxville Unitarian Universalist church shooting (2 killed), and the 2004 bank robbery in Tulsa, Oklahoma.[38]"
Still far less fatalities cause by Islamic terrorists. Hell even Omar "Take my AR to the gay bar." Mateen alone killed more people. Pretty much proves that your sources are all unreliable.
Are you a Holla Forums plant?
Also
I'll consider what is my own self interest thank you very much.
Yet they are done more frequently. Stormniggers can't control themselves in their """western society"""
Not a frequently has negroid terrorism.
yes, yes, and the jews will continue to cuck me and keep the white man down etc
While I despise BLM and the shit that they've done, you're again shifting the topic when you get BTFO.
i dunno about 'white extremists' but the FBI has up and admitted that they no longer consider reactionary muzzies the most dangerous group and that sovereign citizen lolberts are the cool new terrorists on the block
also, most recent attacks in the US were native citizens that went batshit insane after being literally brainwashed by propaganda recruiters
...
The acts of terrorism I listed above were mostly shootings. Which is very common around nigger terrorists.
Just stop lad, you're embarassing yourself.
What? How many people have those fucktards killed?
You're th one who got BTFO, retard. How is a black man shooting cop not terrorism, but a when a White man does it it is?
Terrorism by definition is the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
Some of these """terrorist acts""" often happen on the fly.
You can continue to deny evidence all you want and act like the dumb cunt you are, or you can just stop posting.
But I'm using facts. Black police shooting are politically motivated.
you'd be surprised, they just don't make the news because they are tons of smaller incidents instead of one big show by someone trying to die
facingsouth.org
If there is a bait thread, the best thing to do is not to reply and click the triangle next to the name and press report. It will make it easier for us to get on the case than scanning posts in threads for IQ faggotry derailing.
No one ITT has implied that, go back to freerepublic
Or your Blogspot circlejerk.
cont.
That's not to say that a black man should be exempt, especially when you had that resentment of cops (albeit I don't really trust them/ give a shit about american cops), but to say that ALL cop killings have had a political motivation are false. Especially when said cops are also black.
If it's """""terrorism""""" then it's really shitty terrorism.
So those retards got tired of being BTFO by police on youtube. Funny that they're basically anarkiddies who can't accept authority.
They love authority, what they hate is the NWO fluoride chemtrail boogeymen they've made up.
Actually I'm buzzworded because you implied white people are some kind of homogeneous entity you can generalize about, which is even worse.
That's why they refuse to follow any laws. Keep falling on your face.
Yes please.
...
You know the BO won't see this here? Go to the moderation thread and suggest it or if you're feeling rebellious report the post with DO THIS as the reason
Psst, hey Board Owner, make this happen.
kek, I like the idea of filtering IQ, but I'm not sure of good boy points is the best thing to filter it to. Any other ideas? Brainstorm?
mmmh… something adding an ironic side to the post without making the sentence unreadable. What typical sentences Stormfags type when they mention IQ?
After digging trough an infamous thread. Here is a sample:
>How about posting a study that shows iq is equal across race? I've never seen one and until I do I will continue to believe black are intellectually inferior.
>Pointing to Nigerian Igbos and making the claim that Africans as a whole don't have an extremely low iq is about the same as claiming the average Ashkenazi Jewish iq of 115 is proof the European mean isn't 100.
>Blacks have a lower IQ due to genetic reasons. Get over it
>Your IQ can only increase or decrease by 5 points throughout your life without severe brain trauma.
>Do you even outdated philosophy written by an 80 IQ point pseudo-intellectual.
>Intelligence genes discovered. IQ is mostly genetic.
>>Molecular biology isn't real because IQ can go up by a few points.
>The B-W IQ gap is 80/20 genetic/environmental.
>And on OP. These tests are for teens, however IQ becomes more and more heritable with age, GCSE is BELOW A GRADE (which I think is important here) and also IQ isn't stable at these ages.
>The average IQ of african americans in the US is 85.
>I must note the of the information gathered here, the african american average iq score was the most difficult to find.
I tought about something like "autism level" but it doesn't render well when there is a number next to it…
autism points, however I still like good boy points more
So since you all are here now and it looks like nobody ever looks in the moderation thread, I may as well ask here - are IQ threads/IQposting bannable/deletable offenses? I've been letting some slide so far since I don't want to come down too hard but I would very much like to B&D near every mention I find.
Also how do I post as volunteer?
After thinking a bit more about it,"autism" alone would be quite funny.
Let's try both:
GBP is the better option no matter which way you slice it. We may even see a renaissance of tendieposting, which would be great.
Welp, i'm a bigger newfag than i tought, what's that?
filter IQ to austism and I.Q. to good boy points
win.win
faggot alert everyone, it's a faggot. sounds the bells
I don't know did they? Considering the fact that human gene flow is incredibly large, that would be a logical conclusion to make. It would be incredible if there was any allele exclusive to any ethnic group except ones who are extremely geographically isolated.
I like the idea of making it "Autism Quotient" or something like that. It would fit in the context a lot better than GBP.
However, does anyone have some objections? Are there ever really any non-Holla Forums discussions of IQ on Holla Forums? Is it actually relevant to anything?
not really if it's not aggressive shitposting. However it's OK to give it a bump lock if you think it'll just be unproductive and waste catalog space.
"## Board Volunteer" in name field.
It's everywhere. Holla Forums, Holla Forums, whenever there's a black guy mentioned, there'll be a stormfag.
I would say it's an acceptable casualty. If some stormfag walks in and says IQ and it's replaced by something else, we know he's not from here. It's an easy tell.
The only context in which i saw IQ being posted here was in racebait threads. But i'm not here 24/24.
At worst, nothing prevent you from suppressing a wordfilter if it becomes detrimential to the discussions.
The harder part for this one is using something with relatively elegant result grammatically speaking. Muh muh privilege dont always comes off great by example.
glad to see everyone so quick to remove some words and throwing freedom of speech out the window
shit like this just reaffirms my nihilism.
Violating freedom of speech would be banning them, this is just poking fun at their insipid rhetoric. Toughen up.
Come on, wordfilters are a joke since at least the weeaboo case.
...
do this
Is the best way to go
nice trips.
Even though I'm a general supporter of free speech, I now kinda want to filter "freedom of speech" to "fre████ ██ sp████" or something like that.
nah I think I'll pass on the GBP filter.
you don't know how much shit this IQ thing causes.
Countless of threads being derailed by talking about races and their iqs.
kek, please do
Seconded
gb2 >>>/liberty/
DO IT
No, that'll put us on the same category as r/socialism
DO THIS
I think good boy points is the best option. It's downright hilarious
Don't kill the tendie renaissance.
Chicken tendies are the reward mommy gives you when you get enough good boy points by cleaning your room, eating your greens, not pissing in jugs etc
...
on the issue of "IQ" or abilities of people in general, this is what Lenin said:
"When we say that experience and reason prove that men are not equal, we mean by equality, equality in abilities or similarity in physical strength and mental ability.
It goes without saying that in this respect men are not equal. No sensible person and no socialist forgets this. But this kind of equality has nothing whatever to do with socialism. If Mr. Tugan is quite unable to think, he is at least able to read; were lie to Lake the well-known work of one of the founders of scientific socialism, Frederick Engels, directed against Dühring, he would find there a special section explaining the absurdity of imagining that economic equality means anything else than the abolition of classes. But when professors set out to refute socialism, one never knows what to wonder at most—their stupidity, their ignorance, or their unscrupulousness."
marxists.org
What does this say about "IQ and race"?
That it does not matter and sorts itself out naturally under socialism.
We do not need liberal bourgeoise "quotas" to emulate "equality". We do not need reactionary segregation of the working class as everyone is a free, equal and productive member of society.
Only socialism can and will provide for everyone to develop their full potential.
The point is that even if by some weird case of global confusion in the scientific community it is actually true that there is a provable difference in iq between the 🍀🍀🍀races🍀🍀🍀, it doesn't matter in the end because Holla Forums never bothers to argue why that warrants different treatment. They never even bother to pretend that they close the is-ought gap, and none of the discussion on the subject - as I say, even if they come to some conclusion - will matter in the end as it's completely inconsequential to any political issue.
Do the word filter (The freedom of speech one as well) for the bantz, and to trip up stormniggers, and if you won't just fucking delete threads with IQ in the OP, then at least be more aggressive with bumplocking them.
Fukken saved
...