I'll just leave this here

...

KEK GREAT JOB user

Well goddamn OP.

Thanks?

Suck my dick man. If you have trouble dissecting a comic, you have no place asking for help here and should instead read a fucking book.

A practical study of argument - Trudy Govier
How to win every argument - Madsen Pirie (do exactly the opposite of what this book says, as this is focused on using logical fallacies to your advantage)
Hammer of the patriot - Zeiger (quick reference book regarding different kinds of arguments, read this last as your goal is to learn how to think not what to think)

Now, for a more extended list, you may wish to expand your knowledge on other subjects associated with reason, of which the list I'll post below.

LIST:

————————–
INFORMAL LOGIC-

A Practical Study of Argument by Govier

Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking by Merrilee Salmon

Good Reasoning Matters by Tindale

A Rulebook for Arguments

Relevance in Argumentation by Walton

Acceptable Premises by Freeman

Argument Structure by Freeman

Burden of Proof, Presumption, and Argumentation by Walton (2014)

Meta-argumentation by Finocchiaro

Critical Thinking: A User's Manual

How to Think Logically by Seay and Nuccetelli

————————–
FALLACIES-

Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings

Fallacies and Argument Appraisal

Douglas Walton's books

————————–
FORMAL LOGIC-

Logic and Philosophy by Hausman and Kahane

————————–
MODAL LOGIC-

Modal Logic for Philosophers

Modal Logics and Philosophy

————————–
INDUCTIVE LOGIC-

An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic by Hacking

Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic by Skyrms

Probability: A Philosophical Introduction by Mellor

Probability and Evidence by Horwich

Philosophical Theories of Probability by Donald Gillies

Philosophy and Probability by Childers

————————–
PROBLEM BOOKS-

Analyzing Informal Fallacies by Engel

A Workbook for Arguments

Logic: The Drill by Smith & Cusbert

Schaum's Outline of Theory and Problems in Logic
Dover Logic books

————————–
PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC-

Thinking about Logic by Read

Logical Forms by Sainsbury

Forms of Thought by Lowe

Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation

The Philosophy of Argument

Varieties of Logic by Shapiro

What Logics Mean: From Proof Theory to Model-Theoretic Semantics

Philosophical Logic by Burgess

Formal Languages in Logic: A Philosophical and Cognitive Analysis

Logical Properties: Identity, Existence, Predication, Necessity, Truth by Colin McGinn

The Concept of Logical Consequence

Papers on Philosophical Logic by David Lewis

————————–
PARADOXES-

Paradoxes by Sainsbury

Paradoxes: Their Roots, Range, and Resolution by Rescher

Aporetics: Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency by Rescher

Paradox by Olin

————————–
VAGUENESS AND AMBIGUITY-

Vagueness by Timothy Williamson

Vagueness: A Guide

Vagueness, Logic, and Ontology by Dominic Hyde

Unruly Words: A Study of Vague Language by Raffman

Vagueness: An Investigation into Natural Languages and the Sorites Paradox, by Lynda Burns

Vagueness in Law, by Timothy Endicott

Vagueness in Context, by Stewart Shapiro

Vagueness, Gradability, and Typicality: The Interpretation of Adjectives and Nouns, by Galit W. Sassoon

Vagueness: A Reader

————————–
CONDITIONALS-

A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals

Conditionals by Jackson

Modals and Conditionals by Kratzer

————————–
COGNITIVE SCIENCE AND PSYCHOLOGY OF LOGIC-

Thinking, Fast and Slow by Kahneman

How We Reason by Johnson-Laird

What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought by Stanovich

Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science

Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World

——————————–
From here on is Metaphysics.

Metaphysics is useful, because it allows you to analyse concepts in a very general way. Like what sorts of properties a concept has, or what sorts of relations. What kind of thing it is. This is pretty useful for analysing concepts within arguments.

————————–
INTRODUCTORY TEXTBOOKS-

Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction

The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics

Metaphysics: An Introduction by Ney (you need formal logic for this)

————————–
ONTOLOGY-

Writing the Book of the World by Sider

Ontology Made Easy

Category Mistakes by Magidor

From an Ontological Point of View

The Four-Category Ontology

Ethics without Ontology by Putnam

————————–
TIME-

The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Time

The World-Time Parallel: Tense and Modality in Logic and Metaphysics

————————–
MODALITY-

Modality by Joseph Melia

Possible Worlds by John Divers

The Metaphysics of Modality

Conceivability and Possibility by Gendler and Hawthorne

Possibility by Jubien

"Reductive Theories of Modality" by Theodore Sider in The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics

Modality and Explanatory Reasoning

————————–
MODAL LOGIC AND MODALITY-

Modal Logic as Metaphysics by Williamson

Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics by Stalnaker

————————–
MODAL EPISTEMOLOGY / THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF MODALITY-

plato.stanford.edu/entries/modality-epistemology/

Modal Epistemology: Our Knowledge of Necessity and Possibility (paper)

————————–
PROPOSITIONS-

The nature and structure of content by King

New Thinking about Propositions by King, Soames, et. al.

Propositions by Merricks

Rethinking Language, Mind, and Meaning by Scott Soames

Truth and Truth-Making by Lowe

Truth and Truth Makers by D.M. Armstrong

————————–
CAUSALITY-

The Oxford Handbook of Causation

Causal Models: How People Think about the world and its alternatives

(will post more about causality in the statistics reading lists)

————————–
FREE WILL-

The Oxford Handbook of Free Will

Freedom Evolves by Dennett

————————–
META-METAPHYSICS AND METAONTOLOGY-

Metametaphysics: New essays on the foundations of ontology

————————–
PERSISTENCE-

tedsider.org/teaching/pp_bibliography.pdf

Four Dimensionalism by Sider

————————–
NATURALIZED METAPHYSICS (SCIENTIFICALLY INFORMED METAPHYSICS AND ONTOLOGY)-

Everything Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized

Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method by Maddy

Nature's Metaphysics

Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings

Good and Real by Drescher

Baboon Metaphysics

The Structure of the World by French

The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science

————————–
NATURALIZED ACCOUNTS OF CONCEPTS, CLASSIFICATION AND CATEGORIZATION-

The Origin of Concepts

Doing Without Concepts

Concepts: Core Readings

Conceptual Spaces

The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities
————————–

Now GTFO.

What palce is it of yours to tell me how to spend my time? I am still running off of fumes and I needed some help, Thanks for the fuckhuge tl;dr list of shit i probably won't read though. Also, I can ask for help here if I very well please, especially if it helps anons like myself. But honestly, i do appreciate you taking your time to copy and paste that list.

Once again faggot, I won't GTFO. How about you GTFO? Obviously philosophy n sheeeiiit isn't my expertise now is it? Also telling another man to suck his dick is quite homosexual. Stop projecting your latent homosexuality.

Get the fuck off my board subhuman 80 IQ scum.

You're not helping shit, you're a fucking retard who came straight from cuckchan and can't formulate an opinion for his own life. Continue bumping this thread though, I'm sure somebody with an IQ more than 70 will appreciate the list.

...

thats your go-to insult when you can't think of anything else isn't it? FYI I am very appreciative of the list. I don't need to validate myself to any user, that would make mea cuckchanner to sit here and sperg out about whos the older oldfag now wouldn't it?

Also I had an opinion formulated before I made this thread but maybe I wanted some help? Is it that wrong to ask for help when it could be needed?

Gee got em. Being a "cool Nazi kid" actually requires critical thought as opposed to mindless parroting, fuck off to twitter you cuckchan retard.

I've been up for over a day now,excuse me that my mind isn't in PRISTINE CONDITION enough to where i don't need to ask for anons opinions. granted I could've re-worded the first post better.

Go back to T_D you redditfag shill lord
see how that sounds? Sounds as fucking retarded as everyone else who says HURR GOBACK2CUCKCHAN
and yeah you've got me assblasted right now.

Also point out where I parroted anything. i'm waiting kike.

There is no paradox. (If) Comey didn't lie when he testified, he lied before.

Fix that typo, otherwise great.

He lied and conspired with lynch to sweep to under the rug? Thats Obstruction of Justice isn't it?

Sweep it*

You cant even comprehend simple statements, what makes you think we believe anything you say? You type like a fourteen year old girl, fuck off outta here mong it certainly doesn't apply everywhere but it absolutely does apply to you.

oh fuck off already. I already told you I don't need to validate shit to strangers over the internet.let alone to autistic anons on a Mongolian barbecue forum

I don't post often, but I just to say that even if the other guy won't use it, know that I'm very thankful for your help and I'll see if I can spread the list to some good friends. In fact, I can think of two of them that were looking for new book lists earlier this week.

Saging for poor OP. A thread died for this.

This is the problem. Sub iq 100 whites like OP need to be enslaved and used for farm labour when the Jews are gassed. Hitler was wrong when he said that the German working class was the way it was due to the indoctrination. Why we're they susceptible to the indoctrination in the first place? Half of whites have an iq below 100, and OP is a prime example of that. He doesn't want to read, is unable to control his emotional state, and fails to benefit from even the simplest and most direct advice given. My question is, if we are going to use people like OP to overthrow the jews, we might as well include blacks and spics. Blacks might have an average iq of 80 but that means half of them are more intelligent than OP.

bored so here's a shit edit

OP probably doesn't know how or why it's a strawman though, he's gonna fall flat on his face and make Trump look dumb

HOLY FUCK that's savage

You don't belong on Holla Forums, double nigger

You can't train retards to be good at arguing.

That's quite good, user.