What are some movies about anarcho capitalist societies?

...

oWo

...

pick one

…..and then they murder you because they are evil and just want your stuff because naive retards think anarcho capitalism is workable in the real world.

...

if it was ruled it must have been a minarchy then because you dont see any rulers or peacekeepers

that's why you take your gun with you when you go politely ask him to leave

...

So do ancaps believe in the freedom to make and sell meth? If not, how come you consider yourself anarchist?

of course

I think its dangerous and a bad idea, but as long as you are not endangering my property its none of my business
I would urge you not to though

What about incest? CP? Abortion?

PHYSICAL REMOVAL
H
Y
S
I
C
A
L

R
E
M
O
V
A
L

as long as all parties consent

WEW
E
W

I didn't say that, did I?

Abortion is listed in the post you responded to, so you pretty much did even if it was unintentional.

the parents, you autistic fuck.

no, I said abortion is okay if all parties consent. however, since a baby can't consent, abortion is not okay.

you gotta use logic, my man.

Glad we cleared that one up

You should have just put that in the post you were responding to him with.

I thought it was obvious

Oh man, ancap ball jokes are some of the best ball jokes

Only to someone who thinks that society dropping all standards and regulation except those regarding material property, would improve everyone's quality of life.

go away, property comes before liberty. You can't be free if you don't own yourself, because that would effectively make you a slave.

Freedom is good, but freedom without values or standards is unhealthy. How many Ancaps would be okay with stuff like Meth labs or the prostitution of minors? In an Ancap society would there even be an age of consent? Would it be perfectly fine for a 13 year old girl to sell their cooch on the street corner?

PHYSICAL REMOVAL
H
Y
S
I
C
A
L

R
E
M
O
V
A
L

this

the other user already explained it well, no need for me to repeat what he said

So certain standards should be upheld by force?

So a child can consent for exploitation and a fetus to be murdered in utero?

When you say physical removal do you mean a police force, or a lynching, some inbetween of the two?

Is this Repo! a remake of Repo Man?

No

Is Repo Men a remake of Repo Man?

So are Ancaps just Libertarians that want to feel rebellious?

this movie actually depicts a utopia - for the jews living on the moon pulling the strings

A fetus isn't human, user.

Based Hans.

Neither. Militia style justice as it was when our nation was founded. Some of us prefer Pinochet style; execution via helicopter ride into shark infested waters.

If it is in response to a breach of the NAP, yes.

That sounds a lot like a police force, just one that isn't weighed down by the pussification decades of kikery has instilled into our modern one.

Where does anarchism actually come into play for Ancaps? Thus far it sounds like you guys simply want different standards and regulations than what's currently in place not actual anarchism.

I just want everyone to fuck off and leave me alone to live my life tbh

That sounds like something a lot of people want, I just don't agree with describing it as Anarcho Capitalism.

The problem is, some people have really fucked up standards for what being left alone to live their life is. Because of these fucks we're not allowed to have fun

What do you mean? Like being able to be "left alone" to cause crime against others? Because when I say I want to be left alone, I mean it mutually, I don't want to initiate contact with other people either as long as they fuck off and leave me alone too.

...

Forgot pic

actual ancap instead of pinochet minarchist here
one of the freedoms people have when they own themselves and their property is to only associate with who they want to, when they own their land they can kick people off of it
if the community all owns a contiguous piece of land and they can unanimously agree on some rules then they could conspire to kick off anyone who dosnt follow the rules (such as an age of consent for example) this is what is known as a covenant community, feel free to break there rules just know you could be exiled from their town and blacklisted from their businesses
of course if you are not a huge nigger about it and there are no victims to your "crimes" then in all likelihood no one will ever know or have any complaints about your behavior

He's a hypocrite, or stupid.

So it's sort of about reducing Federal and State government drastically to try and emulate the kind of community dynamic that was present in colonial and pioneer times?

not exactly
its ABOUT a bunch of different things to different people, to me its about owning yourself, and by extension of that your labor, and by extension of that everything you produce until you voluntarily give it up because anything less then that is slavery
but you CAN emulate colonial communities and for some people that might be what its about

The spirit of that is something I adhere to, but Anarcho-capitalism just seems so nebulous in form.
Is that the point? Is that the anarchism aspect?

its nebulous as you say because it is simply anarchism with people who generally respect property
there are a lot of things like it and you can find discussion of them on
>>>/liberty/

No government, businesses will fill role of goverment (which means you will inevitably get a massive megacorporation that is essentially a government)

if it uses violence to force you to do things then it is a government and not anarchy
if you are saying that anarchocapitalsim would have a tendancy to backslide into some form of governance then I have some things for you to address
1 where the fuck did you get the idea that businesses will fill the role of government?
2 even assuming they do you would still have the ability to choose between them
3 a "corporation" is a shitty legalise term corporations do not exist in anarchy even if businesses do

Liberty is a jewish meme created to speed up social decay. The kikes want you to want a smaller government in order for their corps and banks to become more powerful and not have to worry about national interests getting in the way of their schemes. These are all steps towards atomisation and a weaker collective. The individual is of no threat to the jew, if any of their host peoples should band together and oppose them united they are at risk. They're always breaking everything up and dissolving, family, state, racial groups…

What does that even mean in practice?

...

dummy
and about jewish control, having a strong government means that there is a method of control (which inevitably ends up compromised by jews) where as less government means less control.
if you have no chains the jew cannot drag you around

Liberty applied to the family unit, rather than the individual works. Peter Thiel and even Stefan Molyneux have come to this conclusion.

not the original man asked but when he said "if all parties consent" he meant it, it is only a question (one there is much debate over) of whether children are capable of consent and whether a fetus is a party or not

I'm a nationalist who lurks Holla Forums. I'm also a Burger so I'm doubtful about the modern notion of socialism community microfarming would probably do us some good though.
For a while now I've considered that all governments (regardless of what they claim to be) operate on two basic principles.
Socialism and Fascism.
The Socialism aspect is taxation and the distribution of tax funds to pay the costs of crap you kinda need like sewage treatment, road maintenance, police force or militia.
The second principle of Fascism is where your standards/laws come into play as well as said police force or militia. From my point of view using force or the threat of detainment to enact your laws is the most basic form of Fascism there is and one that's unavoidable if you want to qualify as a civilisation.
Likewise I see Socialism and taxation in a similar manner. The only real difference I see between governments is the standards/laws themselves and the methods by which they are formally implemented. But that's where talking to you ancaps has opened my eyes, because I understand now what government is. Government is a business.
I'm pretty sure that Government is actually the biggest business out there.

btw is pic related an ancap film?

...

WEW
E
W

women have aliens in their wombs, someone call the DHS

this, it's basically a HOA on steroids

You have meme concepts of fascism and socialism. Use of authority isn't "fascism", fascism implies corporatism.

The Thain was only a symbolic position, only able to command a small military force in times of exceptional trouble (which never happened, nor were the expected to happen as evidenced by the scouring of the shire)

The true seat of power in the shire was the mayor of michel delving

I view it the other way around, I think various movements and regimes simply built up certain stigmas regarding the general definitions of Socialism and Fascism.

Do you know what corporatism is? It's the core of fascism, each sector of society represented in the government. The working class, the agricultural industry, the heavy industry, etc. The point of corporatism is having a government that pulls together for a common goal like parts of a body, instead of the perpetual opposing factions that democracy has.

Now that I understand government is a business I kinda get why you ancaps want the system (or lack of?) that you want. It's pretty much a matter of Federal government and by extension things like the U.N. being unchecked monopolies, with corrupt dealings. I know it's a lot more than that also, but it's generally about wanting local standards to be top priority starting with your own person and household?

local interests isnt my reason (my reason is

but if it is your priority ancap/voluntarism would be reasonably good at it, other contenders would be minarchy or otherwise small states, or even a union of states like pre civil war america

Seema like Ancap is the most hermit like political idealogy on the chans, is there any that takes a step further?

Anarcho primitivism.(Varg, Manson..)

It means you fuck off and leave me alone.

I'm not an ancap, and corporatism doesn't mean the government is a business. It doesn't mean corporation as in a company. It comes from corpora, body. And it means the different sectors of society, working together for what's best for the nation.

Mado Ma Kuso

ancap allows hermitism and innawoods fucking off from society in full but anarcho primitiveism "enforces" it
I put that in quotes because being anarchy it isnt really enforced, but to qualify for the category you would more or less have to be innawoods

I bet commies don't care for that one very much.

That sounds like the definition of society itself.

A healthy society, yes. But it also means each sector is represented in government. You have delegates allocated for each sector, and they have to negotiate with each other. It's a bit like the Roman Senate.

When did Grant Morrison get an action figure?

Who does?

...

Wildman hermits I suppose?

Okay that makes sense. Gotta say it's nice to talk to others with different ideologies that isn't just me trying to understand why commies think state mandated labor results in "collective ownership".

...

...

If you have no sovereign you have no one to expel the jews. They will freely violate and murder. Liberty is what has allowed them to thrive in America, the tolerance of their degeneracy and filth.

Nah, he's just perverted. The only reason he's caught is because of some retarded kids who end up as powerful as him and understand how he's committing the crime. Other than that, he's blended in Morioh for over 15 years, committed his first murder without a stand, and has a superpower that erases the evidence from then on. The only reason all the evidence isn't gone is that he'd rather fuck a girl's hand than the girl herself, leaving him as an eternal bachelor (until he switches identities). Even then, Kira COULD have won his freedom with Bites the Dust if he didn't say a word to Hayato.

Sure, he could've used his own hands and be a degenerate for the rest of his life, but fate was so kind to him as to give him his break, no matter how depraved it is.

maybe read the fucking discussion after the post you originally replied to?

dumbass

...

this guy gets it

Any love story is ancap. Politics aren't just between masses of people, even just two.

Why whats the point of wasting your time like this seriously do something else

Ancaps are against the State not "government" per se. they aren't fucking retards who want a breakdown of civic order. they simply want the organs of civic order to be produced under voluntary conditions, not with a monopoly on force.

in actual philosophical terms the world is already ancap but with too few players. there is no real differance between a western government using uniformed men to demand you pay income tax and the bandits in the movie 7 samurai demanding a tithe from the local japanese village. the modern westphalian nation state is simply a larger form of the same concept.

Ancaps simply want equality of justice, natural rights to be upheld for everyone and end to banditry. this would be acheived according to the conditions of each locale and not by some fareaway capital city. laws enforced by various means (most common theory is polycentric law firms but other options exist) would not be uniform at all and instead would be decided by the culture of the people enforcing them. this promotes a participatory nature to society where if you want something changed you change the culture surrounding the issue. if you want a conservative outcome, empower the church, promote charity, go out of your way to solve housing and drug crises directly instead of pawning this responsibility off to a centralized government that only cares about what statistics look good during the election year. you the individual should make the world a better place if you want it to be so and there will not be the same centralized government trying to stop you.

...

excellent rebuttle. i'm signing up to the communist party next week.

thanks user

The world isn't ancap because states exist. They hold the monopoly of violence and there's the notion of the "social contract", a "contract" no one ever agreed to but rather that is forced upon individuals from their birth. So yes, your argument was autistic.