Is communism really inevitable comrades?

Is communism really inevitable comrades?

No.

No, but the conditions for it's possibility is.

Socialism or Barbarism, capitalism will collapse into one or the other.

Sporadic and friendly reminder that communal property is just another form of private property.

Sporadic and friendly reminder that you should kill yourself

Yes, for a certain value of "inevitable".

You can think of it sort of like evolution. If you have an organism in some anomalous environment that never changes regardless of how much time passes, you can expect for that organism to eventually evolve into a "perfected" state. That is to say that since the path of evolution isn't completely random, kept mutations help help organism survive and/or multiply in some way, eventually the organism will reach a state that invites no more change. Any new mutation will make them less survivable and/or less likely to reproduce.

This is why communism (or classless society, at least) is "inevitable". If society evolves in ways that resolves its class antagonisms, then it will eventually reach a state where there are no more class antagonisms. Since classes are naturally antagonistic towards each other, this means a classless society, or communism.

There are things that can greatly delay the achievement of this classless society, or halt progress altogether (like human extinction), but so long as society continues to develop as normal, communism is inevitable.

...

I think capitalism will reinvent itself at least one more cycle as a cyberpunk dystopia.

Also millennials are a bunch of cucks, so the revolution will be delayed a generation.

two can play that game

What is that?

...

...

Daily reminder that Rousseau BTFO'd Lockean property rights in the 18th century.

Daily reminder that "I have lots of guys with guns on my side so I'm enclosing your commons" BTFO of either.

Five minutes after communism we'll be back to private property again when we enslave the stateless cucks who sit around getting fat off completely free shit.

Except communism proper would likely entail almost complete automation so we would all be lazy fucks getting fat on free shit. That's the point.

Automation doesn't magically produce infinite resources. It just means that no humans have to labor to get those resources.

Sure human input would be required, but it would be such a small amount (relatively) that you would almost certainly be able to find people who would do it while the rest sit on their asses.

Now why would you do that?

Cause I want your shit.

I do not step shyly back from your communal property, in which I respect nothing, faggit.

Not in the Leninist sense of a stateless and moneyless society because that's just retarded.

You can get the same where I got it. For free.

For the second time: what is that?

Just watch as third worlders come in and rape the shit outta everyone and steal our shit and enslave everyone.
Communism can only work in a racially homogenous population with strict protection from outside invaders.

...

Communism can only exist in the whole world.

Gl convincing the whole world communism is the best system
Non Eurasians are fucking poor serfs who dont understand shit.
You're gonna go into Niger and start preeching stirner or marx then you're gonna get stabbed by a spear.

Wrong. Like I said before, there is a finite amount of resources in the world no matter how good technology gets.

I don't want my resources limited to whatever rations you decide are my needs.


The very point of communism? I guess you won't mind if I enclose it and turn it into private property then, right?

Commies dont realise the problem of scarcity
Having a mixture of private enterprise and government action can allow sustainable growth worldwide.
This delusional idea of 'GIB MEANS OF PRODUCTION' will just set us back into the stone age - similar to free market capitalism (ill turn my shitpost flag off)

Thats the plan Sam!

sorry meant for>>1005410

And you have a finite consumption capacity.

As you've just explained yourself:

The point of communism is the abolition of the value form, and subsequently the abolition of classes. It will be realised through social ownership of the means of production and of their products.

Now, could you please tell me what you mean by "communal property"? You keep talking about it so I guess that shouldn't be difficult.

Wrong. I want a palace. I want my own personal rollercoaster that only I get to ride.

I want a helicopter. I want a tank. I want more.

As you've just explained yourself:

Yes, but if we dole them out unequally then I can get more shit. Actually, it would be easier to genocide some people. This is why communism will probably increase racism.


Also known as common ownership. I will reject it by forming an army of people who want more and taking your shit.

It actually worked pretty well until EU and US got involved.

fam plz

Yeah, the bourgeois.

Enjoy being dead then? After you and your would-be-dukes are shot by the armed populace.

No you don't.

You just want to disprove communism, and your entire point is based on people acting according to that premise rather than to what history, experience and common sense show us.

Extinction is the other possibility.

It's a jewish invention, and jews don't know civilization, they don't know how it works.
So the more of it gets used the harder the resistance of reality grows.

Why?

Libertarians proving once again they are fascists

Now thats what I call a shitpost

So Jews are pushing communism to dominate the world like they apparently already do under capitalism?

Well you see, if we imagine the Capitalist Jews as Demons, and the Communist Jews as Necromancers…

Tactics of revolution and radical politics were already used in early 20th century and by the start of new century all those states that had revolutions more or less reversed back to market economy. I honestly don`t think that communism can be achieved long as socio-economic conditions are this way, perhaps radical politics will become more viable once technology advances to certain point.

Once AI gets past turing's test I will join you immediately on your struggle but until then I think that economic calculation problem will hold us down.

Or just capitalist barbarism tbh, which the third world has known for a good two centuries now. Why would the elite ever get rid of the most useful form of ideological and material domination ever conceived? In capitalism the masses literally enslave themselves.