What's your opinion on pornography and prostitution...

What's your opinion on pornography and prostitution? Is it the ultimate form of capitalism by literally selling your body? Should it exist under Communism or, rather, would it even exist?

Also why has society vilified prostitutes and pornstars so much? An enormous amount of people watch porn or pay for sex so why they mad?

Also who's your favourite pornstar?

Other urls found in this thread:

ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0309/feature1/
alternet.org/story/142171/there_are_more_slaves_today_than_at_any_time_in_human_history
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Degeneracy

Prostitution and pornography are tools of the jew to lead volks into fun. Porky would trade his people's moral integrity for wealth.

I only fap to 2d because 3d porn is completely exploitative (with the possible exception of amateur stuff)

Well prostitution has been around forever but the commoditisation and then unbelievable scale of the porn industry are definitely are product of capitalism. It turns everyone with an internet connection into a hedonist that rivals the Roman emperors. Where else does someone sample specific body types, races and sexual dynamics all in one video?

It already did. According to "Do Communists Have Better Sex?" there wasn't any mass produced pornography but there was a great deal of amateur porn made by people who wanted to. USSR was generally very sexually free compared to the West even though the West had Red Light Districts and Scummy theaters.

Christian morals, mainly. Personal embarrassment as well in some cases. No one wants other people to know that they just watched some asian 19 year old suck 14 dicks and guzzle the cum from a glass. There are probably more sophisticated sociological reasons though.

as for favourites, I'm a big fan of Angela White and Lexi Bloom

Hey, that wasn't very nice user.

Spooky

Though in its current capitalist form a lot of it is exploitative and degenerate

Communism would have great porn in comparison, I can tell you that

I have mixed feelings on prostitution. On one hand I don't begrudge women the opportunity to do sex work if that's what they really want. On the other hand I think it has massive potential for capitalist exploitation. But on the whole in a socialist society I don't think prostitution would be as prevalent as in capitalist society.

Porn I think like all industries is super capitalist as it stands. But it doesn't need to be, as say for instance amateur porn is pretty socialist in its mode of production.

Eva Notty.

In capitalism, pornogrpahy is essentially rape. as it is fuck or starve. Same with prostitution

God, this is retarded. Why would you even mix two completely different things like that? Because they both involve sexuality?

Prostitution (exchange of sexual acts for money) would obviously not exist in communism because no money, duh.

Pornography (depictions of sexual acts) would thrive just like it does now, because people are naturally interested in sexuality and will gladly devote their time to it.

Prostitution is no more selling your body than any other job is.

"Prostitution is only a specific expression of the general prostitution of the labourer, and since it is a relationship in which falls not the prostitute alone, but also the one who prostitutes – and the latter’s abomination is still greater – the capitalist, etc., also comes under this head." - Marx

A prostitute is the ultimate bourgeois. She doesn't even produce anything, but still gets paid anyway.

Besides, sex for its own sake is pure bourgeois fun. It certainly isn't recommended by the Communist Committee of Public Morals and Protection of the Soviet Family.

Prostitution is an avenue more people will be pushed to as jobs elsewhere dry up or no longer provide enough income to survive off of. It seems shitty and doesn't have a lot of protection, but what job isn't under capitalism? It wouldn't exist under socialism because the factors that push people into prostitution won't exist anymore in the same way we wouldn't have golddiggers or people whose main requirement for a partner is being employed in an acceptable position.

Porn will always be around so long as people are willing to fuck on camera, write and draw lewd stories, or whatever else counts as porn. We'll likely see the more showbusiness stuff fade, like exaggeration of dick size or and brand building for performers, under socialism. Think more artsy shit and less formulated shit, with more variety than little white girls and MILFS.


Spooks. They fuck as part of their job and this is somehow worse than being porky's bitch or doing it for free.

Franceska Jaimes

It has made my life more tolerable, I honestly don`t see why we should abolish those things.

Why are most people not disgusting when they hear about the huge sex tourism industries in third world countries?

Sex should only be done with an individual who you're certain you'd be willing to raise children with

It's ok.

Nope!

Why? black markets will appear anyways and since we are talking about base human desire I don`t see how ending prostitution would be productive in any way. There are going to be always people who will be for reason or another unable to attain sex without getting involved with the markets.

Women turn into prostitutes because they like easy money, as simple as that.


Actually the biggest prostitution markets are in countries like the US and Spain.

Unless it has a victim (non-consenting person inb4 le eppib consent is a spook meem and unsourced factoids about mare vaginas from falseflagging Holla Forumsyp totally anfem, my fellow degenerates, animal or somebody underage, retarded, unconscious or otherwise incapable of meaningful consent), I don't give a rat's ass.

the illustrious alternate universe life of milliband

LOL WUT


Define.

They're mad that they couldn't produce an appropriate counter to my: "there's nothing wrong with fucking equines." Not sure what the factoids part means or why it was abbreviated to only girl ponies.

>tfw financial femdom fetish
>tfw literally classcucked

I have failed you Marx-senpai

...

If he only had been as much of a leftist like his father. Who knows, perhaps he was the entryist whom never was found out?

I imagine that to them it would feel like being poked with the eraser end of a pencil.

You disgust me.

Which is really the softest end of a pencil. Personally I'm not dom enough to penetrate and too in love with someone else to consider it. But it's not like I can seriously judge someone with that kind of desire as it were especially when already my society eats those and alike animals.

Figured a mick wouldnt like the idea of losing his doublons

Ain't no hoor takin me pot o gold.


What's love got to do with it? You don't fuck everyone you love or love everyone you fuck do you?

Lmao fam

It is all about establishing some justification for the concept of "consent" apart from the obvious practical definition that is "to permit or approve of something." We can't use that definition, because that would mean that children and horses can consent which is icky.

...

Blow it our your ass you flower clutching faggot.

ban it, waste of resources

It'll just move across the border into Cambodia.

lmao

No to the former yes to the latter. My dream horse doesn't exist.


Why use a definition for something that doesn't exist in this case, unless you mean to negatively highlight "something that has yet to be approved of," inasfar as one would submit an application for the activity to the ruling Party and have it stamped for license! How absurd would that be?

...

There are more slaves today than those that were seized from Africa in four centuries of the trans-Atlantic slave trade. The modern commerce in humans rivals illegal drug trafficking in its global reach—and in the destruction of lives.
ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0309/feature1/
alternet.org/story/142171/there_are_more_slaves_today_than_at_any_time_in_human_history

Rape is favorite cause of the identitarian. Expanding the definition of rape by confusing the definition of consent thus serves their ends. Nevermind that conflating fucking a willing horse with beating and physically dominating a human cheapens rape. What matters is that everyone is constantly offended and terrified.

ITT people ignoring the best answer:

If you can eat animals then you should be able to fuck them too. Consent clearly doesn't matter.

Both are bad and should be banned for the greater good.

Both should be opposed imo, SWERFS&TERFS are correct on both accounts.

The Left cannot have its whores and its politics too

Everyone just needs to jerk it to hentai/furry smut, then there's nobody being exploited or whatever.

Rape is hot. It honestly boggles my mind that so many people claim to be against it. I don't know if the sentiment cheapens the concept any but at least to my mind it is elevated to the level of real gratification.

Pic related

Rape isn't always a violent intrusion though, you can manipulate a human (adult or child) into giving up the goods

And what does that have to do with this subject?

And what does that have to do with this subject?

Nothing inherently wrong with it, except for the class dynamics involved, the actors and workers literally get fucked while a studio makes a profit off their hard fucking.

Since its wage slavery its inherently exploitative to those involved. Suck dick or die basically.

Judeo-Christian Morals.

Judeo-Christian Morals.

If you fap to 3DPD you have shit taste.
3DPD whores are fit only for menial labor. The honor of being masturbated to should be reserved for your waifu and other cute 2DQTs.


Honestly, everything humans do is manipulated. If it were up to me the age of consent would be several hundred and you'd all neutered for your own protection, like they do to extremely retarded people currently.

/thread

Manipulation is present in most human interactions. If manipulation is the standard by which rape is determined, then damn near everybody on Earth is a rape baby. Again, the definition of rape has been expanded to the point that it no longer describes anything specific or even anything specifically horrible.

Porn reduces testosterone, making you not only garbage in bed, but it also ruins your sex drive.

The porn industry is dominated by Jews

t.

Your ass is dominated by Jews.

Its not, non-consensual sex is

Are you an SJW or something? The kind that thinks marriage is rape?

No one is doing that though, its simply pointing out that rape isn't always like the pic that guy posted

I like porn, but I'm selective about the kind of prostitution. I'm fond of cam models.
No, I think selling your time for unfulfilling work is.
I'm not against it existing at all; I'm against pimps, though. And prostitution will exist as long as humans are in any system of trade, because sex is easily exchangeable.
Puritanism.
Because they still believe sex is taboo, even if the belief is becoming more and more latent.
Don't have one. All the porn I like is niche and done by amateurs.

A woman has full right to her body and how SHE wants to use it. You have no rite to tell her how SHE wants to use her body you fucking sexist moron.

I only consume pornography that is free and was made to be free, where no money is involved.

I don't advocate prostitution, but I approve of (and fetishize) public free use.

Marriage is just legal prostitution

Define.


No, it's giving the term a definition so fluid that it describes nothing in particular. If you want to define rape according to consent, then you have to define consent.

Tell us more.

Define what? Sex without consent is pretty straight forward.

It really isn't, especially if the alternative definition as proported by the original user is being gang-raped by Chinese communists

...