Scooby-Doo's Daphne and Velma are getting their own live-action movie spin-off

Is WB trying to start a hanna Barbara cinematic universe?
digitalspy.com/movies/news/a844181/scooby-doo-daphne-velma-own-spin-off/
amp.dailydot.com/upstream/velma-daphne-scooby-doo-spinoff/

Other urls found in this thread:

slashfilm.com/hanna-barbera-cinematic-universe/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

moar 34

Does pantyshots count as rule 34?

I want to see velma get fucked by the dog

Okay.

When will Daphne just ditch Fred?
Can't she realize that he prefers traps?

Is that real?

Yes

Yes.


They've been trying for years, but no one wants to fund it considering live-action adaptations largely fail.

Solo Velam/Daphne would be fine, it'd just have some shitty grill power in an otherwise normal mystery.

The idea will be scrapped and they'll go back to making animated films/series.
I'm looking forward to Scooby-Doo w/Batman Brave and the Bold in a month's time.

What if they do a DCEU batman and scooby doo crossover?

It's a running joke on that version of the series. They mean literal traps, look at the cover of the magazine. Fred's role on that show is building all the traps they catch the monster with.

Yeah

slashfilm.com/hanna-barbera-cinematic-universe/

So basically a rip-off of this?

But why? they already have the conjuring cinematic universe and monsterverse.

...

leaked screenshot

But which one is the best girl?

Daphne.
Velma is for beta cucks.

They should make another movie with Bobbi Starr as Velma.

shouldn't Velma be chubby?

God, she's perfect.

have i got news for you

I prefer my Velmas to not burn coal thank you very much.

Was the book about furries?

Sort of. Talking animals play a big part in the story.
The chain of events in that picture is uncannily similar to the entire story presented in the book with the exception of a few minor details. There are no snorks and the animals instead gain intelligence through surgery and mutation. No dinosaurs either. The only element from the book missing from that pic is aliens.
The part where the intelligent animals contaminate the local wildlife and the very end where they finally replace humanity is what really gets me. I guess those were popular tropes back then? The book was written in the 50s.

Can't fuel a ship without burning a little coal, Holla Forumstard.

Linda Cardellini is best Velma

Couldn't find chubby it was this, or a 400lb whale.

reddipol communist is mentally stuck in the early industrial revolution apparently.
do u kno gas o leen?

I want to say something but it would help the bestiality-race mixers. so here's a Velma pic instead:

Generally, in the past film sequels were different in many ways to the original film. This means spending more money doing something different (especially with practical effects), while on the other hand a modern "cinematic universe" means reusing the same formula in many different films, reusing CGI assets already geared for that formula, and are generally the McDonalds of film production. Cinematic universe is facade over a very clever profit to loss ratio favoring profit.
They are lying about their film expenses and they get away with it because their kike friends in government will never audit them or investigate their numbers, and the general public is stupid enough or doesn't care enough to pick up on that. Instead they are okay with consuming their Mcdouble: Infinity Diarrhea.
1. The food industry, unlike the film industry, does not yet run on a price fixing conspiracy.
or
2. People (even some of the fattest in the world) are more picky about spending too much money on shitty food than they are on seeing a shitty movie.
and other stereotypical faggotry
then if the intelligent user pointing this shit out proceeds
or
or
or

For a second there, I thought her tits were burned or something. Reminded me of those pics. I don't have them. You know the ones I'm talking about, tho.

no

Gee I wonder why that is.
Could it be that fans of the cartoon want it to remain a cartoon instead of some boring live-action shitfest?

I know they make it live-action to reach a wider audience, but it still fails. Could it be that people who aren't already interested in a show aren't going to develop an interest just because you took it from 2D to 3D?

Fuck hollywood execs are dumb.

Yes you do. Don't lie to me.

3D adds sex appeal.

2D has superior sex appeal.

Velma is a reddit as fuck, true connoisseurs prefer Daphne.

Not really. Cartoons look all weird and shit. Sends signals to my brain "This person is deformed! Do not fuck it!"

Where is all the porn?

Yup. It's pretty sad that user's mind is so full of fuck from browsing Holla Forums for over a decade that he automatically associated the word "trap" with homosexuals.

That corset won't hold much longer!

I wanted to call you a normalfag, but what you described sounds more like severe autism.

...

Who would win a Farting contest between Velma and daphne and why?

I wonder what her farts smell like
haha

It's a mystery!

Are you sure about that?

...

Right, Traps are gay.

Why is this webm always so cozy?

Did she photoshop her legs? Not even /bbw/ would touch that.