No I find oil for the nearly 100% white owned companies that actually extract the oil and gas in Western PA(oil marketing like Standard Oil is the kike shit).
Except they don't within the conservative white demographic. Liberals have more college degrees, degress in fucking nothing of any value. The conservative whites with degrees still have their 2.7 kids, there is no appreciable difference in birthrate that correlates with education within that demographic.
The liberal's intelligence means nothing if they also carry the traits which predispose them to kikey behavior, xenophilia, altruism directed at shitskins, and have to be beaten over the head just to get them to breed. You aren't losing anything with their slow extinction. If the rightist whites replace them then you have a population more amiable toward fascism to begin with who are nigh immune to the negative effects of modernism. They effectively developed a resistance to it in the same way a colony of bacteria would to an antibiotic, the unfit die and those able to reproduce in that environment continue on.
You are breeding for cruel, insular, taciturn people who have the same mean IQ as the liberals who are dying and the original population, 103. What dysgenic effect is happening here? What are you losing other than the predisposition toward undesirable behaviors? Hell if anything they are more inclined toward technical and scientific pursuits than the liberals what more do you want?
Yes, that would be excellent for us. Organic Chemistry is your friend. pastebin.com/TGzmYw7E
I advocate the total extermination of all non-whites, except japs who can get exiled to some colony of their own.
Dipshit, I never said the rich were stupid. I pointed out that gross income is less effective at determining socioeconomic status than disposable income. The more intelligent within a demographic tend to have highter income and less children. However this doesn't hold true for conservative whites who under present conditions do not display any correlation between income and birthrate. The smarter conservative whites still make more money but they produce just as many children. Their natural inclinations include a compulsion to breed. That is the hypothesis and it is supported by statistical data.
This is actually supported by statistical data as well. According to the US Survey in 1990 1.2% of the population was homosexual and 1.8% were bisexual by 2010 the number of homosexuals had declined to 0.8% of the population(0.6% for whites) and the number of bisexuals had declined to 1.1% of the population.
blogs.scientificamerican.com/bering-in-mind/2011/08/01/the-end-of-gays-gay-marriage-and-the-decline-of-the-homosexual-population/
The hypothetical cause of this decline is the decline in the homosexual birthrate since the 1960s, when social obligations which previously ensured some homosexuals entered into marriages with the opposite sex and produced some offspring who have a 20% chance of expressing some sort of homosexual behavior.
I imagine that faggots having a mean age of death of 47 now and a 35% infection rate for HIV in their lifetimes doesn't help either.