It's a common meme amongst the left wing that they were all peaceful bead collectors, which we know isn't true...

It's a common meme amongst the left wing that they were all peaceful bead collectors, which we know isn't true. But it's also the meme amongst the right (us) that they were all savage troglodytes, which also isn't true.

What's the real history on this and why were or weren't they genocided out existence?

Also what about that pyramid-tier space architecture seen at Chaco Canyon and the bronze forgings in Teotihuacan? Were these people European/Asian-tier or Aboriginal/Nigger tier?

Other urls found in this thread:

twain.lib.virginia.edu/projects/rissetto/redman.html
rt.com/news/stone-age-america-archaeologists-445/
telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9110838/Stone-age-Europeans-were-the-first-to-set-foot-on-North-America.html
archive.is/0eQi
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon_cosmology
exmormon.org/tract2.htm
biblebelievers.com/jmelton/Mormons.html
mormoncult.org/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallurgy_in_pre-Columbian_America
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoamerican_writing_systems
mormonthink.com/glossary/battlestargalactica.htm
salamandersociety.com/marktwain/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Sure thing Schlomo.
twain.lib.virginia.edu/projects/rissetto/redman.html

Some fuckhead tried to tell me that injuns were so incredibly peaceful that they completely avoided violence.
According to this wanker Sioux (or Cherokee or some shit) would stealthily ride their horses up to an enemy and gently tap them with a stick to symbolise a kill. And everyone would accept this and go back to their fucking wigwam with a peaceful grin on their face.
When I pointed out that horses were extinct there until Columbus brought some over (the redskins having fucking eaten them all, presumably) this clown got incredibly butt-flustered.
Pull the other one, Montezuma, the only metalworking they did was banging gold nuggets with a fucking rock.
Their most advanced technology was a stick with sharpened rocks stuck in it for fuck's sake.

It's when they got horses that their culture went from almost monkey like to a savage "proud warrior tribe", as in kill their own people and spread disease.

Horses come from Europe and were genetically engineered by Aryans

That fuckin' rock will never be done.

Not quite Aboriginal/Nigger tier

more like Mongol

the reason they traded their land away for beads and blankets was because they weren't tied to it, they were nomadic hunters

they rode around on horses with bows like the Mongols, except there were no people or towns to sac in NA so they just chased around animals

zero cultivation or agriculture which is nigger tier

Read the book "Scalp Dance."

Mongols knew how to use metal tools. Not a comparison.

rt.com/news/stone-age-america-archaeologists-445/
telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9110838/Stone-age-Europeans-were-the-first-to-set-foot-on-North-America.html

Good point

Indians were more like niggers , they didn't have the wheel either. I think Mongols used chariots at times

leftists would claim Africans are living in a peaceful utopia if they could get away with it

Mongolia is completely different land. America has the bread belt, while not much grows in Mongolia. The highland steppes have fierce winds. The Mongolian diet is mainly meat because about all that grows is grass, grass for the sheep to eat.

Some of the tribes started basic agriculture, but not beyond the basic. The Iroquois confederacy acted as a sort of proto-nation state that waged large scale strategic war on other tribes (often completely wiping them out)

They didn't have as much unity as the advancing whites. Imagine the hordes of the mongols before their unification vs Redcoats. They fought so much against one another they never could surmount the ever growing colonists.
They still live because we killed all of the hothead war chiefs. Except Incans. Bless those superheroes. Turns out their genes suppress the blood cell upping reaction to thin air, as living at that climate would otherwise give you a blockage of overproduction.

Olde people made weird shit. Also, see our rolling floodmyth explanation, things were nearing Roman tier before the ice damns burst and reset the coastlines.

Eastern natives actually have European genes. A small bit, but more than most. They were about Chinese tier, without the soulless narcissism and rudeness. However they had no pack/milk/riding/meat animals and were handicapped on the size of their urban populations. Only so far one can travel with food on foot, most cities show evidence of being starved out in cycles.

What is corn.

Many forest tribes abandoned their crop making for horses. Easier living.

Processed sludge that makes it's way in about every item at the grocery store.

No doubt pre-deluvian civilizations existed here throughout the americas. The pyramids of the inca, the aztecs, and the mounds of NA are evidence of this. I'll even include Easter island in this. Then after the cataclysm they descended into chaos (along with the rest of the world) and never really recovered. Any evidence we have of records and artifacts detailing technology and history was stolen or destroyed by the invading europeans. There is still so much we don't know about the history of the americas.

Semitic fairy tales are the worst. It is like all of them are compelled to destroy history. What the hell is wrong with them?

Yes, but they were white.

Okay video I happened to stumble across by Jared Taylor. He is still shit about the JQ though.

I keep hearing this. The soultrean? What is the source for this?

The modern form of horse evolved from small dog like animals that first appeared 60 million years ago.
Over time wild ancestors of the modern horse evolved for millions of years in north America. They then spread to other parts of the world by travelling southwards to south America by crossing land bridges that connected north America to Europe and Asia during the ice age.
Horses vanished from both north and south America in a wave of extinction that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene epoch, about 15,000 years ago.
Horses nearly became extinct in the rest of the world as well, by about 7000 years ago the worlds only horses were confined to a small area in the still open grasslands steppes of Ukraine and central Asia.
They were not seen in the Americas again until 1494, when Italian explorer Christopher Columbus transported them on ships from Spain on his second voyage to the new world.
Horses have been around a long time and were always very strong, it was also never a hard thing to genetically engineer animals either, you just keep breeding the best horses. Chinks bred chickens from the red jungle fowl and and south american injuns genetically bred llamas.

t. autist

Yes it is.

The Meme that the Injuns were peaceful is bullshit. The Meme that they avoided violence is somewhat true, at least as the early Americans saw them. Indians were a huge pain in the ass for early European Colonials because they, the Indians, would not stay and fight. These colonials would form up battle-lines, prepare a cavalry charge, load their muskets, and defend said muskets with a front line of swordsmen or pikes. The Indians, conversely, would hide behind trees and flick arrows at them. When the colonials did charge forward, the Indians would completely run away, only to reappear as the column was turning around and resume firing arrows at them. This was aggravated by the fact that the early match-muskets were designed to fire a massive volley of projectiles to eliminate enemy armored cavalry, not to aim and shoot. The colonials would have been better off going back to the crossbow. Most of these issues resolved themselves within a few decades as the early Americans adapted, and then the Indians largely got stomped, albeit with a few exceptions and massacres still occurring. Generally though, the flint-lock and the building of fortifications (Indians had no real concept of siege-craft) put an end to them.

What mostly fucked the Indians over is that they could be played off of each-other extremely easily. The Indians were remarkably diverse in their living and cultural habits, and this led to them having constantly shifting alliances and enmities with both each-other and the various European powers. Most colonial victories in the late 1600's and early 1700's were due, in some cases almost exclusively, to Indian assistance. Disease is another significant factor in their defeat, but it is greatly exaggerated in the effect it had. Some Indian tribes certainly suffered tremendous casualties, some even losing 1/3 of their tribe, but they still outnumbered the colonials by dozens, if not hundreds to one, and still lost.

Population growth was another big losing factor for the Indians, particularly almost all of them west of the Mississippi. While some Indians, most notably the Iroquois and a few tribes near the Great Lakes were proficient in agriculture, most really weren't. Most tribes still heavily relied on hunter-gathering and only really used agriculture for a little extra stability. From a demographic standpoint this limited their growth as they could only grow as much as the land allowed, from a war standpoint this meant that most of their villages were nearly always undefended as the men would be way hunting. This is true of the Eastern tribes, but the Western tribes had barely any agriculture whatsoever and also refused to adopt it when the Americans tried to give it to them. Dealing with the Indians was a massive headache for 1800's Americans as, when you gave the Indians a cow, they immediately butchered the thing and then demanded another one. The idea that "It had a calf inside it dumbass, let it reproduce and then breed it again" was one which they never really grasped.

(continued)

As for the question of "Genocide": literally no one wanted to kill all the Indians. A sort of vague Libertarianism characterized much of the United States' expansion, and that is largely what dominated the political atmosphere of the time, with the right and left generally agreeing on large concepts. Expansionists believed that the Indians should be assimilated, or kept on refugees if they insisted on being faggots, and the Humanitarians believed that they were a proud, noble people who would certainly be only too happy to live with whites in white areas in white cities, giving up their ancient ways. Jefferson, for instance, was a huge proponent of the idea of "Expansion with honor", although Jefferson was also a bit of a faggot in general. Jackson is best girl. Much of what drove the expansion had nothing to do with the Indians at all, but with economics. The Indians lost any real significance to American or world affairs by the mid 1800's. After that they were just an impediment to the country or a training exercise for the military.

Finally, it's important when studying the Indians, no matter your perspective on them, not to lump them all together. Thinking of them all as just Indians when trying to draw a conclusion about them is like studying Europe and thinking of "the whites". Some tribes, mostly Eastern tribes, were somewhat advanced. There was one tribe near the Great Lakes (I can't remember their name, it begins with a P) that actually managed to learn iron and lead working, thus allowing them to create their own fire-arms, albeit they could never figure out gunpowder. The Iroquois actually understood the significance of a fortified and well defended town, and this kept them relevant long after other tribes bad been eradicated. Conversely, western tribes generally deserve to be thought of as Plains-Niggers.

I recommend that you try to get your hands on the book "For The Common Defense: A History of American Warfare from 1607 to 2012". Fantastic book that gives several chapters to the Indian wars from a military perspective.


This post would even make Tumblr cringe.

I would certainly place them above nigger tier. The Aztecs and Incas did some impressive shit, and the Cahokia mounds point to a fairly advanced, urban civilization that existed in North America. The Guns, Germs, and Steel guy postulates that North American Indians were seriously held back by a lack of animals worth domesticating, and as shitty as a lot of his book is, that part seems persuasive. Buffalo are a bitch to domesticate even today, and without beasts of burden, building a complex society is very difficult. Furthermore, there's good evidence of a doomsday-level catastrophic drought that occurred in the late 14th-early 15th century that made agriculture impossible and forced all of them to go back to being hunter gatherers, so it's possible that Europeans just barely missed out on encountering some of the more advanced Indian civilizations.
However, it's hard to take a group of people very seriously when they never figured out metalworking or writing on their own.
What really interests me is the Ghost Dance. Someone in one of the Meme Magic threads said that the US Government was right to respond violently to the Ghost Dance, because the Indians were weaving powerful meme magic to bring about the end of the world, and it was spreading virally. I've tried to talk to a few real Sioux about it, and they uniformly avoid the question and refuse to discuss it.

Well…………

According to Mormonism, Aryan Jews sailed to America as commanded by God and built temples to God and then 2 tribes split up and one abandoned their traditions and so God cursed them to be brown, the brown tribe eventually began to outnumber the Aryan Jews and they were eventually shoahed. also Jesus visits his hebrew flock in the Americas before that happens The last Aryan Jew left a record behind of their history written on gold plated tablets that would eventually be aquired by WASP and convicted con artist Joseph Smith and be translated into the Book of Mormon, the Natives would then be kill as revenge for killing the righteous god-fearing christian aryan chosenites.

Join Mormonism now and get your own planet

How are they "native" if they migrated over from sebira three thousand years ago?

To categorize all of the peoples of two entire continents across all of prehistory similarly is profoundly ignorant. Genetic, archeological, and anthropological evidence contradicts this notion.


Literally no one is memeing this.

Washington was called the village burner and when americans go to war women and children invariably become casualties. call it what ever you want but you are on a board that openly calls for genocide in every thread every day.

noone remember the legend of Kon-tiki?

siberia*

They did not all migrate from siberia. And yes this means that potentially this board is celebrating the genocide of european ancestors by european rejects if the solutrean theory is in fact true. But I would expect nothing less from an autistic SS brotherhood simulator.

Spooky

spotted the half breed indian. Do the indians still make their casinos in burgerland?

Yes. Its was seperates the 3rd world tier reservations from the well off ones.

whats*

The left is, in fact this is probably the common view of Indians in the classroom. OP mentioned it, and I responded.


Which was unusual for the time. European colonials were appalled at the Indian methods of warfare, and this included the slaughter of civilians. While Europe was still forming massive armies and issuing personal challenges, the United States had adopted total warfare because the Indians had brought them total warfare. Europe would later adopt this strategy again once they remember that it was so damn effective. The early colonials, under Washington, were fighting for their lives and land against a treacherous and mass-slaughtering foe, so they fought totally. Later, around the war of 1812 is when the idea of "expansion with honor" became popular. A that point in history the United States was relatively stable and white's weren't facing potential eradication from the Indians anymore, so the method by which we interacted with them changed.

I'm not against genocide, simply saying that genocide was not the goal throughout the majority of American-Indian relations… at least on the Americans side.

You're retarded. There were 2 migrations: one happened before, when Europeans first traveled via the atlantic sea to America. Then came injuns from Siberia, who genocided the europeans. Those siberians are the "injuns" we know

spotted the Mormon

No, they were godless savages and it's truly unfortunate any survived.

well that's kinda cool. At least your natives made something. Our aboriginals make niggers look like geniuses.

So they were mongols then.

Yeah many tribes and their reservations are fairly wealthy because of their right as natives to have casinos. Natives are allowed to legally do certain things other citizens can because they were things done in there original cultures; such as gambling and smoking Peyote.

Though many tribes don't and their reservations are basically 3rd world wastelands inhabited by depressed Alcoholics that curse the white man.

basically
the injun is what happens when the mongol degenerates into a more primitive culture
like how the abo is what you get when you degenerate an indonesian

other citizens cant*

"zero cultivation or agriculture"?????WTF-How stupid are you??
The Native Americans domesticated and perfected half of the plants eaten in the world to this day.They were the worlds finest horticulturist with no other culture even close.
A partial list includes -Tomatoes,potatoes,maize,almost every kind of bean,eggplant ,all peppers,pineapple,papaya,sweet potatoes,tapioca, amaranth,quinoa,strawberries.raspberries,blueberries, and tomatillos.

When the Spaniards first entered the Mississippi river valley they found cultivated croplands extending 10 miles wide on both sides of the river running from Louisiana to Missouri.
The Native Americans are mostly Asian genetics and are smarter than you. Go back to Cuckchan where the stupid reside.

The aztecs/incas were above nigger-tier, since the built a functioning civilization with a big, nice city.

The rest? Nigger-tier.

That is smart. Smarter than whites lining themsleves up in lines and shooting at eachother

At least I still have my foreskin.

I agree that Natives did well with agriculture but your defense of the 'noble savages' makes you come across as a mestizo or at least one of those burgers with "1/64 cherokee", also only a handful of natives actually did any agriculture; most natives on both of the American continents were hunter gatherer 'nobel' savages.

only because you were born in the back of a stationwagon instead of a jewnited states hospital

Did da red dots inventa a stikk dat iz hollow or a stikk dat iz cums bak or ah stikk dat chukks stikk
Nah you iz dum kompared to da great aboriginez

What would abbos do without the white man's petrol?

...

Nah de iz stole itz, we inventeed da sniff n da white dog stole it from uz

History books are probably pozzed to hell now but I remember reading about the First Nations in Canada. They grew crops and had some trade system in place but only if both tribes were strong in a way that attacking would be dangerous. If a tribe was weak they would just roll in, kill the men, take the women and burn the village. ESPECIALLY common among the plains people of Alberta and Saskatchewan.

The only people that were ever remotely "peaceful" are the Inuit and Eskimos where resources and people are so damn scarce that they can't go to war at all.

The Injuns are just eternally assravaged about the fact that the Europeans were just a thousand times better at conquering and pillaging than they were.

larpers

One of the many reasons some people initially thought themselves to be in India, and not a new continent, is because forests were as well tended to as the average British garden, and not wild the slightest, so they really thought they were on British soil. Most of the green areas they ran into were the result not of nature, but human activity.

Yeah, they knew a thing or two about agriculture.

archive.is/0eQi


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon_cosmology

This is what Glenn Beck, Ed McMuffin, and Mitt Romney actually believe

Mormon Jesus

It's all in the numbers, Praise Kek

Who told you this?

Horses were first domesticated by the North Sea peoples

People think this video is fake but it has been proven time and time again to be truthful. Are you Mormon? They've been lying to you. It's like Freemasonry and Scientology. They keep truths from you until you raise in degree/level/what-have-you.

exmormon.org/tract2.htm
biblebelievers.com/jmelton/Mormons.html
mormoncult.org/

...

...

That's not what I asked.

That wasn't true at all though. The Spanish were getting demolished by the Aztecs, which is why they had to flee Tenochi-whatever. The only reason they were able to take the city is because disease resulted in the streets being covered in corpses. I believe Cortez wrote about it in his journals. Cortes even had to go to court for slaughtering a random village on his way to Tenochi-whatever where the Aztecs were.

The same thing happened further North. Nords have constantly been making their way to North America and prior contact to post-1492 Europeans caused a shit ton of them to die out.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallurgy_in_pre-Columbian_America


They also knew how to rape Ancient Europeans and Ancient Arabs. I'd be careful with invoking the Mongols as they were very close to taking Europe.


This is very true. The Indians were far too busy killing one another.

That's because they lacked proper waste management. I'm trying to remember the name of an ancient indian city where the indians eventually all left, because the rivers turned to literal shit.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoamerican_writing_systems

They were heavily into bronze.

No one would be native by that criteria.

I come from a Mormon back ground, though I don't believe in it let alone do the people you've listed believe in it either. As much as I dislike alot of the globalist shills prevelent among high Mormons the actual book of Mormon, the religion, and early community was very focused on a white american mythos and theology.

The Mormons believe that basically Aryan Jews were commanded by God to flee israel to a continental promised land in order to flee the anticipated babylonian captivity. That they sailed from Israel to the Americas and established a holy city in where would be Maya/Aztecan lands. That the original Aryan Jew family would split up into two groups, one the nephites based on righteousness and tradition and the lamanites based on wickedness and abandoment of tradition.

The lamanites abandoned their religion and morals and became savages so God cursed them with a "skin of Blackness" as a way of seperating them from the "white and delightsome" nephites.

The white nephites and dark lamanites basically had a race war until 0 AD to then which the resurrected and glorified Jesus Christ traveled to the Americas to meet with his "other flock" as described in the bible. Jesus Christ makes covenants with Nephites and the white nephites are basically White Christians facing off the Wicked Brown Godless Lamanites.

Because the Lamanites outnumbered and with the work of satan the Lamanites eventually would win the race war and went on to genocide the White Christian Nephites.

One Nephite was left named Moroni who was a prophet of God who in 420AD buried a record on gold plated tablets containing the records of the Ancient Inhabitents of the Americas.

Joseph Smith, the WASP Farmer would then be called upon by God to undercover these records and translate them creating the Book of Mormon.

Smith and his new church went on to genocide the wicked lamanites as revenge for killing off the nephites and as a way of reclaming the promised land for White Christians.

Also he had revelation that polygamy is cool and that when you die, your after is basically becoming God yourself like your heavenly Father and you get to create planets and colonize them with the spirit children you've created through endless sex with your hot Godess wives.

Mormons basically believe the meaning of life is a weird form of evolution that takes place on a cosmic scale where humans are live on earth so that they may grow to become potential gods and rule over their own planets.

Mormonism is pretty cool in my opinion but maybe its cuz I'm biased. If Mormons werent such good goys for the most part the church would be great.

The people for whom the term barbarian was invented had more technological progress and societal development than the native americans when we encountered them, frankly if anything its a generous comparison.

My links and videos show you my sources for my statements.

big problem with that theory
there are no Aryan jews

So nobody told you that.

mormonthink.com/glossary/battlestargalactica.htm

Battlestar Galactica was a Mormon Propoganda show.

What a lot of people don't realize is that Mormonism is a lot like what we know to be with Judaism. It's not just a single holy book (The Book of Mormon). You also have The Divine and Covenants (a book claimed to be written by God himself through Joseph), The Divine and Covenants, The Perl of Great Price, and a few others.

You must have an understanding of most or all. Only using the single book creates a warped view of the religion. It's a UFO cult scam with little to no origins in actual Christianity.

No shit dumby. The religion was invented by a man who didnt know Jews were not in any way white and thought that if you werent a negro or an injun you would basically be white. Or White and Delightsome as described in the Book of Mormon.

"And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them." 2 Nephi 5:21

"And after it had come forth unto them I beheld other books, which came forth by the power of the Lamb, from the Gentiles unto them, unto the convincing of the Gentiles and the remnant of the seed of my brethren, and also the Jews who were scattered upon all the face of the earth, that the records of the prophets and of the twelve apostles of the Lamb are true." 1 Nephi 13:39

Fair enough, though I was focusing specifically on North American First Nations during the 1800's colonial wars where whitey gets blamed for "Evil Colonialism" all the damn time when it's really no different from what anyone was doing for centuries before Europeans arrived in the Americas.

salamandersociety.com/marktwain/

Mark Twain's notes on his trip to the Utah Colony and his understanding of The Book of Mormon

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallurgy_in_pre-Columbian_America
Cold hammering NATIVE gold and copper - which appear as the refined metal in nature - is not fucking metallurgy.
Similarly finding a rare ore of copper and arsenic and banging it with a rock is not bronze-making.
Happening upon an iron meteorite and smashing it into a crude club is not metallurgy.
You'll notice that the shit-tier communists like your wikipaedo ledditors don't have a single picture of anything the redskins made that couldn't be picked up off the ground and fashioned into shape by banging it with a rock.
Because that's all they could do and it's not metallurgy.
Not even fucking close.

Pre-historic Native Americans cause the extinction of multiple species of mega-fauna because their idea of hunting was chasing entire herds of animals off a cliff.

That's a lot of projecting for a simple merchant. You may want to try lurking some more before going full-on-retarded. Also, there were plenty of pictures for you to look at if you followed the links. It's not hard.

That's how hammers work. Yes.

Kek
Never change, Mormons.

But, you said;

So show it to us.
There must be shedloads of it being how they were so heavily in to it 600 years ago.
Additionally, them being heavily into bronze and all, the Incan and Aztec Empires couldn't possibly have been wiped out by a few hundred smelly spics since bronze isn't far outclassed by the Spaniard's steel.
Simple fact is that they didn't have any "bronze": they had arsenic bronze in tiny quantities and it's a shit-tier alloy.

Eskimos found iron meteorites on the ice and splintered parts off to use as fishing hooks and cutlery.
Were they metallurgists? Of course they fucking weren't.

I'm not a native or mestizo by any means but it does mention that the central and South Americans had actual metallurgy via smelting etc. Though they never thought to make a fucking sword the unimaginative proto-mongols.

What is disease, you literal nog.

He had a good argument. I would like to hear a decent rebuttal.

Something that doesn't make large quantities of advanced bronze alloys disappear

You're being lied to by communist quackademics on their noble savage crusade.

Atahulpa's army was in fine fettle when he begged for his life. The cannibal Montezuma II's army died alongside him from blood loss.

It's a common belief that Aztecans and other mesoamerican kingdoms actually welcomed the Spanish with open arms because they viewed them as being obviously technologically superior but also that they believe the Spanish were Gods prophesied in their religion, specifically of a 'white-skinned' God named Quetzalcoatl who promised to return to the Aztecans one day to bring gifts from the world beyond.

It says the South Americans made a metal alloy called Tumbaga which was metal made through smelting a ratio of gold and copper together. That seems like legit metallurgy to me, though not that complex, just heating two metals until they melt and mixing them in a ratio that creates a better metal.

Note that I'm not defending natives. Any natives that still even exist are pretty shit tier compared to what would have been the well-bred aristocratic anomolies of Native American civilizations. And even with these small civilizations achievments they still never got far.

No heat is required to make an alloy of gold and copper.
Both metals are found pure in nature.
You simply mash them together by banging them with rocks.

The article says they did it through smelting though. It's very basic smelting but smelting none the less.

pfft, yeah, and they retreated because their leader died, right?

Surprised nobody posted this yet.

Didn't Indians own African slaves? And have a special hammer to kill them when they got out of line.

(checked)

What movie is this? I feel like a good western.

Never mind me, found it.

Yes, the five "civilized" tribes did. I don't know about the hammer thing.


The wikipedia entry on the subject humorously tries to mitigate these facts with shit about not knowing how they felt about other "people of color" and evil whitey made them own slaves. From shit I've read they hated blacks just as much as or more than whites. They were known to make excellent slave hunters too. I always find it funny how white liberals think all brown people love and empathize with each other. Tell that to the spics in Los Angeles who are currently in the process of ethnically cleansing the place of niggers.

...

Oh look

Another slide thread

With this exact same format

genetically speaking indians are some sort of asian low tier north asian

up north inuits do little else other than freeze their balls off hiding from wind and chew fat all day

plains and continental indians are nigger/Bantu tier tribes fighting over pelts and committing cannibalism and kidnapping women

american southwest indians had to work in order to maintain survival needs, but it was hot instead of ball freezing cold, so they built adobes instead of igloos

central and south america in certain areas civilization had just started to develop, pre-columbian societies had developed from earlier distant societies which history was either lost or destroyed, artifacts from prior societies such as the Olmecs were found buried in areas dating much more recent, almost as if some sort of keepsake, at the time of european contact, south america was in a sort of twilight zone proto-antiquity stage of development, metallurgy wasnt around, but several civilizations had since come and gone, building vast networks of roads, aqueducts and vast cities, supposedly they even had written records and accounts of stories which were destroyed by the spanish, much of these city-states ended with agricultural failures

their leader supposedly was redheaded and blue eyed, sooooo ….

Anthropology.

Anthropology, you fucking dipshit.

I know a secret of the Potowatami and the Anishinaabe, masters of oral history. You see, in our folk legends there is a character named Michebou. He's a trickster rabbit who plays pranks on evil men. Men who prey on children, as they sleep and dream deep. For that's when God speaks to them, the God of Dreams. The Strongest God. For us it was just a story, a goofy character shamans would tell children about. But in 1938, he appeared in a cartoon. He's Bugs Bunny. Its odd, and sounds insane but its true. That's how our shamans would describe Michebou when he would come in their dreams. Its a secret of the Potowatami but its a secret for free. And here's another thing. There's a similar character named Nanabozho, who is a trickster deity much like Loki. Some people think Michebou and Nanabozho are the same folk hero. They're not, they actually two separate spirits but they travel together.

If you're wondering how I know this, its because I met a real honest to God Moloch worshiper as a child. I met a member of the Black Nobility. A man who would molest then eat children. Nanabozho and Michebou protected me. You can think I'm insane but I know what I saw and other members of my tribe have seen them.

Here's a gift for free from the Potowatami and the Anishinaabe. If you want to enter Eternity, don't be a Moloch worshiper or be like a Moloch worshiper. And essentially, a pedophile is like a Moloch worshiper.

You're really enamored with this "banging together with rocks" thing huh?

X hardly counts as "European" genes. A small number of Georgians and assorted sand niggers have the gene. Overall, not even 2% of Europeans carry it.

Genetically speaking, Injuns are almost as different from North Asians, as Asians are from Whites. They have about as much in common with Asians, as Europeans have in common with Bantu.

I've heard of reddit spacing, but this is a new form of cancer.

Was for

...