no. to them they see feels harmony on television, which is what they intended.
so 'purpose', as a collection of symbols and associated phonetics, means: (1) one thing in the context of verb-noun, but (2) a chain of verb-nouns is exempt from the same definition. this is what you would have me accept.
that's crazy. that's incomplete. that's lazy. which is what i rejected. it is explicitly, intentionally, acutely, precisely what i sought to destroy. with absolution. period. that is purpose. –that– is what 'purpose' is.
rejected, because you would have me believe a child playing 1-move-only verb-noun chess doesn't intend to win the game. for as much as the child can see, they have intent, they are not innocent, though they be stupid blind pustules of ingratitude. nogs saw detroit, intended to eat it, and did. less you would have be believe that nogs ever saw detroit, intended to grow it, and did. likewise, poz'ed white hipsters intended to eat, they ate. incidentally, the also intended to feel harmony, and they did. that [sic] 'zogmexico is quite far from harmony is not what they intended' is only worth committing to this screen as the acute demonstration that the definition and context of 'harmony' was just changed and excrement from 'eating' was replaced by 'zogmexico'. harmony feels was absolutely intended, eats was absolutely purposeful, and the quite specifically targeted you-hateful-racist-disharmonist was the confession that the children knew their purpose (to feel harmony) and intent (to eat). does shitting follow eating? does disharmony follow shitting everywhere? certainly. absolutely. tell me more of your intentional purposeful guesses.
likewise, 'diversity', 'harmony', 'ascension', 'utopia', and 'privilege': each one of these collections of symbols without spaces and their sounds have definitions. you're not using them. but you think that you are. and so you end up asking an 'ask' – after you've created word salad, where each word simultaneously has multiple meanings, from contexts of both 1-move and 7-move+ chains on a chess board, where you end up precisely where you intended from the beginning. so lets just cut out the simulation.
you want forgiveness. there is none. the average liberal white knows. their knowing is a followings the manipulative intelligence that every squirrel and horse and fox has. yes, they are stupid – they they'll end up dead. did they intend to purposefully die? am i going to ask you another question in the following sentence where i change the definitions and contexts fluidly like a psychopathic fox again and leave your head spinning?
no forgiveness will be granted. especially to the kumbaya singers. let them feel innocence, and let it suffocate them at the day of the rope.