There are basically 2 outcomes of this…
a) Assange shows up healthy as a horse in x days and all is good
or
b) Assange himself is compromised/dead and they are now looking for ways to discredit him/Wikileaks/Trump
(personally I lean towards b, but that's not important for the next part)
If he is fine, great! If he is not, we have to act NOW, before (((they))) take control of the narrative and make him/WikiLeaks look bad
How?
We claim that Hillary got really nervous after her hillary.com server was hacked and had to act. She (DNC via G4S) tried to extradict him from the embassy (consistent with current evidence) and he is now either dead or locked up somewhere to prevent her dirty secrets from leaking.
If they did inded get him, in some way, they will soon twist things more and more and some plot will "reveal" that he was a horrible man and a Russian spy. In that case, it will help us immensely to prevent them from discrediting him, to have the "Hillary got him" narrative out and known. We do not claim that WikiLeaks itself is compromised, on the contrary, the sit is set to autopublish and the feds are forced to watch it happen or shut it down too early, which would blow their cover….
This will not stop people from digging, and IF something is "disproven" as a hoax, we can discredit it by saying that they controlled the server all along, but could only add hoax-stuff to discredit him, not remove things (that would blow their cover)
If by some miracle all of this is just pure cohencidences, the only one who will have a rumour as a killer is Hillary, and she MAY somehow be able to convince someone that she didn't kill the other people she have killed, but that's a fair risk/reward.
pic related; one of the biggest supporters and most trusted people around Assange died today…
Thoughts? I see it as win-win….