The kid isn't naked.
The kid isn't performing a sex act.
The pic doesn't focus on the kid's genitals.
So why is posting this pic a bannable offense?
The kid isn't naked.
The kid isn't performing a sex act.
The pic doesn't focus on the kid's genitals.
So why is posting this pic a bannable offense?
Out of caution? The admins and mods aren't lawyers.
...
because it gives boner to mods
Not yet she isn't but through some grooming and conditoning it'll become second nature.
/thread
/thread fags get out
/thread
/thread
because a fucking white male might experience sexual arousal by looking at it, and we simply can't allow that because it is harmful to children and will destroy the fabric of society.
I'd sperm her
there are no such things as "kids" or "adults"
true. age is a social construct
Age isn't a social construct, age of consent is. Not that it being a social construct invalidates it. The English language is a social construct and it isn't wrong because of that fact.
< Funy giu
Really big if true!
Because you feel the need to shit up 3/4 the board with your pedo faggotry.
Normaly i just hide the thread, but decided id make you feel loved for once by giving a quick response.
NAKED CHILDREN
YOU are a social construct. I'd tell you to go ask your dad if it's true or not but I'm pretty sure you don't know who he is.
The only crime is that she is JUST TOO CUTE!
TOO CUTE!!!
JUST TOO CUTE
Doot-DOOT-Doot!
it's a cp
...
ill fug tbh
...
There wouldn't be anything wrong with the photo if she were naked, because a child's body isn't inherently sexual. The only rule, code or law it would break are the sensitivities of the dysfunctional Americans.
what are primary sexual characteristics
...
no, it's not
yes it is
...
yes it is
lurk more
no it isn't
No, they're tards who doesn't grasp simple logic.
The pillowcase doesn't match the sheets, and both are hideous.
If there's sperm on one of them you don't need to change both.