So I heard this was /bpol/

Jason Evans
Jason Evans

I wanted to post this on /pol/ but I got banned again.

Gabriel Powell
Gabriel Powell

I don't get people complaining about the whole jew thing with him.

Everyone knew well before the election that he was pro Israel, that his daughter was a jewish convert who was married to a jewish guy, etc. It's not a new development.

Nolan Hughes
Nolan Hughes

How old are you? What exactly don't you understand? People pointing this sort of thing out are trying to tell you he's just another neoconservative, and that he won't be different from past presidents. /pol/ wouldn't have endorsed Trump if they thought of him in that light. Instead they might have their heads out of their asses trying to enact change themselves instead of depending on their idol.

Jacob Foster
Jacob Foster

just another neocon

Whatever you say Shariablue.

Thomas Baker
Thomas Baker

stupid sheep

Noah Cook
Noah Cook

I'm too tired to respond to low effort bait, so just label my shit up, fam.

Nicholas Flores
Nicholas Flores

yupp, but still better then Hillary.If /pol/ wants to back up a candidate they should pick the suitable person early in the election, because they end up cucking themselves with meme magic.I want to point out, that there were good choices, but nobody cared.Only Mr Communism backed up by college kids, or Hillary backed up by cucks and feminists or Mr I love jews with le trolling.Nobody cared for the right choice, but only the person they liked the most after 30 seconds of thought.

Jose Wilson
Jose Wilson

This is all old news. No one cared then. No one cares now.

Hunter White
Hunter White

Rand was the best choice imo

Jayden Howard
Jayden Howard

still better then Hillary
Okay, so I've seen this parroted almost every single time somebody tries to say something about Trump and Jews. Let me just ask you: Does your mind explode if I even hint at a political change paradigm outside the box of voting for candidate? You aren't just choosing to vote for either Trump or Hillary. You are choosing to vote for the system that's been fucking us over or to vote against that system's legitimacy by doing something else entirely. There was a lot of societal unrest brewing (and there still is) right before the election. I'm disappointed that unrest was directed into endorsing the same corrupt system again.

Sebastian Nguyen
Sebastian Nguyen

There is nothing wrong with being Jewish or being friendly with Jewish people.

Brayden Hill
Brayden Hill

You want a redpill fam?

Almost every single revolution ever has been funded by wealthy aristocrats
The America Revolution was literally started by wealthy land owners, here's a fun fact; George Washington, the first president, was also the wealthiest president until Donald Trump assumed office in 2017, 230 years later. The French revolution? funded by banks. The October Revolution? Funded by Jewish bankers. Every single revolution in every third world shithole of the past 100 years? The result of globalist political theater. While we like to think revolution is the result of the common man rising up to fight for his rights, the reality is that the average man is a fucking sheep and revolutions are started by wolves.

Easton White
Easton White

Hitler's revolution was the only true revolution

Jack Collins
Jack Collins

mfw /pol/ was restored after the hack my permaban from /pol/ was lifted
mfw its so shit I don't even want to post

Matthew Carter
Matthew Carter

Shit man, you might actually be right

Luis Turner
Luis Turner

I got banned for trolling them about the Kushner situation months ago, /pol/ is a strict no fun zone.

Lincoln Phillips
Lincoln Phillips

that's sad
but they didn't have internets back then, so maybe this time will be different? or no…

so how to become wealthy powerful wolves to destroy corporations and jews?
the corrupt system won't allow you to get rich if you don't play their game and submit to them. in worst case they will simply eliminate you
it's all doomed we can only try to destroy world with nuclears

permaban
not using Tor and proxies

Cameron Carter
Cameron Carter

does /pol/ even allow Tor? I bet they're so cucked that they don't.

Some fag/shill will ruin any VPN anyway.

Xavier Thomas
Xavier Thomas

8/pol/ has strict moderation because the mods decided early on they wanted to avoid becoming like 4chans /pol/. Since 4chans /pol/ basically became /b/-lite with all the retarded spam and shitposting.
Pfft. You do realize the internet is run by powerful corporations as well right? You are literally paying a large corporation for the right to even use it. If any revolution happens online it'll be because they allowed it anyways. Unless we somehow de-centralize it and take control but the chances of that are slim.

Luke James
Luke James

I'm not entirely convinced by your okay but not detailed argument. It's an important point to raise, but unless you elaborate much more than this, I will assume that wealthy aristocrats sometimes just throw money at the side they like as a reaction to the rebellion they sense brewing, not necessarily in order to instigate it from the very beginning. I'm sure wealthy Jews start chaos with money too, but in what universe are people with power (money in this context) not tempted to get involved after tides start shifting? Historians may have trouble piecing together the correct order for this chicken or the egg situation.

James Barnes
James Barnes

True, but you see, here lies the problem.

In order to prevent the userbase from turning into one like 4chan, the moderation has to be one like 4chan….

It's a lose-lose.

Nathaniel Gomez
Nathaniel Gomez

The American Revolution was a great example. Many Americans were still loyalists, it was a revolution funded almost entirely by the rich, wealthy, and famous, all because they were not considered in the same social rank among Brits for being colonials. You know why George Washington was able to charter his own army? Because he was a Freemason, so he used his Mason connections. This isn't conspiracy, its just history, and its the reality we have to deal with. There's not fucking way the average colonial man would've been able to round up a revolutionary army and even if he did he would never have had the resources and ability to organize a new government in its place. The founding fathers were all very wealthy people.

Xavier Clark
Xavier Clark

it was a revolution funded almost entirely by the rich, wealthy, and famous
So we can have our revolution if we become rich, wealthy, or famous and network through secret clubs?

Cooper Brooks
Cooper Brooks

Pretty much yes

Joseph Sanders
Joseph Sanders

Does that mean self-improvement threads are the most politically revolutionary topics to discuss on /pol/?

Jack Lopez
Jack Lopez

Certainly. The only way to make any serious change in this day and age is to have a lot of money and influence. We sure as fuck aren't going to change things by chimping out like niggers or protesting like retarded hippies. We have to learn to play the system. Then we subvert the system. Then we take over the system. 3 steps. Play, subvert, take over.

Joseph Torres
Joseph Torres

I mean, going down this road leads to some conclusions like:
1. E-celeb threads are not cancer. They are essential to propping up right wing individuals to make them influential in society.
2. Some amount of laid back threads where people just chat and network are essential.
3. Tripfags are not cancer. Networking doesn't work with strictly enforced anonymity.

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page