Audience Gasp When Trump Calls Socialism A Discredited Ideology At The United Nations

youtu.be/GFRq2ONUCug
everyone's going nuts over this. How do we use this to our advantage?

Sage

Remember the good old days when you could just listen to a nice chat the president is having at a theater then shoot them dead.

As opposed to capitalism, which is in fact, not eating itself.

"NOT AN ARGUMENT"
Also lol at that pic. Even when the cameraman does his best to make him look badass he still looks like a fucking alien

...

Holla Forums and Holla Forums BTFO!

It just exposes his fucking Iguana like dewlap more. Why don't they just, fuck I don't know, photograph him from a more upwards angle. So it doesn't look like his neck is about to burst the buttons from the seems.

I didn't hear any gasp, I heard some laughter, then some soft awkward clapping followed by a strong clap.

That and it, once again, makes his hair look like some sort of parasite.

Reagan said it, Bush saidit, Truman said it. And yet look who manufactures all our nice hardware. It certainly isn't the industry we drove out

What I can't get over is his lips. They don't look his god damn age. he must have gotten plastic surgery or botox, but the rest of his face just looks exactly like it should.

It's just these random blowjob lips. It's seriously offputting.

Who cares, every US president says this.

Why are people so shocked every time he does something stupid? This shouldn't even be considered news.

Well, it's the president of the United States, so by nature of the position it unfortunately does create news

this is nothing like our previous president's though and you know it. The media gives this guy a whole different spin.

Regardless of his disposition, the position he's in is going to be reported on. Whether any of us like it or not. The press isn't just going to suddenly stop covering the president of the United States because he says silly shit.

pic related

from above with fucking bombs and shit right

So he agrees that capitalism is a success in the West.
Tankies confirmed as state capitalists.

Nice trap pics btw

Fam…

He made posts just like that. You know it's true fyam.

rebel's too busy taking fascist dick to come here anymore

he's trying to lay the groundwork for invading venezuela, netanyahu is riding his dick hard on twitter

Wouldn't be surprised if the CIA was in Venezuela training troops for a coup as we speak.

I almost thought that was a reply to

top meme lad

What history is this

I would put the certainty of that being the case somewhere around 100%. I find it hard to believe that the Opposition in Venezuela is going completely unaided by the CIA, et al.


lol

Rebel deleted all his social media, became trans, said that he got raped and did drugs on curiouscat, then started erping with a fascist twitter guy as his sex slave/pet.
I think that they broke up now but I don't care enough to check.
Saged b/c off topic

Is this the biggest right-wing strawman of all time?

Why is public ownership considered worse than worker's ownership? Children, the infirm, and future people should have some stake in production, and we might want some amount of resources be allocated to those who advance the state of the arts rather than the workers.

If your problem is with the word "state" rather than public over worker's, I get that the correct orthodox leftist definition of "state" is specifically collective organization of last resort under a class system rather than collective organizations of last resort in general, but you must admit many people use "state" to mean the latter rather than government. For example, people in the UK refer to the "Cameron government" and the "May government" as if they're distinct things.

what are you trying to say here?
I'm saying the anti-trump crowd could be more interested in socialism now

We're talking about Socialism.

Note the quotation marks. I'm saying our response should be to scream "not an argument", since he didn't make one.
It's a joke famalam

Should clarify myself here: those who advance the state of the arts are absolutely workers, but their contribution is a lot trickier to measure than most workers, and it works differently in general. Putting x hours into research may generate you no new knowledge at all or a great deal of knowledge. Those who don't get any new knowledge in a given hour haven't really contributed anything to society (so from a pure pay-for-action standpoint they haven't really done anything worth paying for), but nevertheless, their being in the library or the laboratory trying to figure things out needs to be possible so they have the opportunity to come up with something at all. So, labor has to be confiscated from the direct workers to pay the knowledge worker's sustenance. Hence, some power has to be possessed by the public, rather than just the workers.

It sounded like they were laughing to me.