Let's get a good OP going for once

Christian Hughes
Christian Hughes

Let's get a good OP going for once

All urls found in this thread:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtiNjvB_VMU
https://mega.nz/#!ysBSjJpQ!3XKmT3YTH_pd7Z1xHViFcaaI5THvtPPx0yWy-RTzbyk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/creationist-ken-ham-blames-atheists-and-fake-news-for-failing-ark-encounter-theme-park/
http://www.kentucky.com/news/state/article73971147.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right
https://news.vice.com/story/part-of-canadas-so-called-alt-right-is-endorsing-kellie-leitch
http://forward.com/fast-forward/370870/white-nationalist-richard-spencer-makes-alt-right-expansion-in-sweden/
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39433483
http://quillette.com/2017/06/01/paranoid-paleoconservatives/
https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Logic-Propositional-Revised-3rd/dp/0130258490
https://mega.nz/#!L9JkCTqB!BkwUkJ0qclbUQlZOKofL8mv4ckeLSjMNDIx8V2NWV8o
http://hellokitty.wikia.com/wiki/Kuromi
Brayden James
Brayden James

based luka

Matthew Diaz
Matthew Diaz

that you're rough probably
ngl I used to want to hate/skullfuck luka when I assumed they were a female

Daniel Watson
Daniel Watson

A lot of people like that.

Gavin Williams
Gavin Williams

Yeah. A lot of people don't mind being rough either.
It's a win-win for both parties.

Parker Barnes
Parker Barnes

A lot of people don't mind being rough either.

eww

Jayden Gray
Jayden Gray

I can't be bothered to do anything like that at the moment.

Nolan Gomez
Nolan Gomez

i like pets and hugs and hard pets and hard hugs

Jayden White
Jayden White

heavy petting tho
I wouldn't mind doing something like that right now, but it's hard to pluck meaningful partners out of thin air

Connor Ward
Connor Ward

heavy petting tho

dude those hard pets from based luka

i am so excited

Aiden Myers
Aiden Myers

I'm burntout and just turn people down now.

Aiden Richardson
Aiden Richardson

night lads

Xavier Stewart
Xavier Stewart

yo

Jaxon Diaz
Jaxon Diaz

no hold up lemme ask you something

Caleb White
Caleb White

that was such a poor based grimu showing tbh

Noah Peterson
Noah Peterson

I dunno
I saw zero appeal when I checked it out
It's like do boring grindy thing to be able to do next boring grindy thing ad infnitum

Landon Wood
Landon Wood

psure that grim is still jelly that luka and i respect each other

and grim just wanted to fuck her

Anthony Martin
Anthony Martin

Give women the respect they deserve !

Brayden Peterson
Brayden Peterson

What if we don't want respect?

Jeremiah Nelson
Jeremiah Nelson

I didn't say what they deserve.

Brandon Reed
Brandon Reed

Oh good.
How are you this today night time?

Joshua King
Joshua King

I made chickem noodle soyp from scratch

Easton Parker
Easton Parker

im miserable

Leo Anderson
Leo Anderson

s-so what if I have a mommy fetish...

Josiah Green
Josiah Green

very bored

Sebastian Hughes
Sebastian Hughes

Sicko

Joseph Taylor
Joseph Taylor

i mean like I'm much more into older women now (like 25-40)

d-does this make me weird

Jaxon Foster
Jaxon Foster

Let's get a good OP going for once
Sure, you know anybody who can make one?

William Hill
William Hill

no

Adam Bailey
Adam Bailey

Yes

Daniel Gutierrez
Daniel Gutierrez

w-what's so wrong with wanting a nurturing gf that happens to be old enough to have kids

Matthew Morgan
Matthew Morgan

Post music pls

Cooper Lewis
Cooper Lewis

Didn't think so.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtiNjvB_VMU

Connor Anderson
Connor Anderson

How old are you

Henry Gomez
Henry Gomez

I can't make shitty ones though

Jayden Anderson
Jayden Anderson

20... and a half...

Bentley Peterson
Bentley Peterson

Don't sell yourself short. You make some of the shittiest OPs, champ.

Samuel Reyes
Samuel Reyes


RTL = u"‮" #u202e RIGHT-TO-LEFT OVERRIDE
LTR = u"‪" #u202a LEFT-TO-RIGHT EMBEDDING
POP = u"‬" #u202c POP DIRECTIONAL FORMATTING

ehe I remember these

Oliver Williams
Oliver Williams

I can do worse.

Andrew Harris
Andrew Harris

its a bit small isnt it?

shiggy

Parker Evans
Parker Evans

That's why your the best at being the worst, chief. Always striving for new lows.

Adrian Wood
Adrian Wood

Try to keep your dating around .8n<n<1.25n

Bentley Nguyen
Bentley Nguyen

I made a whole pot but I only have the one dish that I could eat out of
The rest is in Tupperware in my fridge now
Fucking delicious soup though, I'm impressed I made anything without a recipe

Carson Richardson
Carson Richardson

Where do you find all the based music

John Morales
John Morales

The formula is 2(n-7) for lower limit. Apply that to the older person.

Hudson Price
Hudson Price

I fucked that up but I'm not fixing it.

Ayden King
Ayden King

I consume a lot of media. If I find a musician I like, I research them, their genre, and poke around until I find something I like.

Owen Richardson
Owen Richardson

I 400 some odd dollars to buy a book.

Jordan Myers
Jordan Myers

media is not something you consume though

Dominic Sanders
Dominic Sanders

home made soup can be baller, i once made one that was nothing but creamy broth, veg, and a fuckton of shredded chicken

Joseph Sanchez
Joseph Sanchez

It is exactly something you consume.

Aiden Flores
Aiden Flores

What the fuck other verb would you use for media

Oliver Martin
Oliver Martin

watch/listen to/read/enjoy/experience

consume implies it is somehow tangible or gets "used up"

Grayson Cooper
Grayson Cooper

Media is entirely tangible. You also buy media. Maybe not with currency or whatever, but with your time and energy. You also buy it on a psychological level, by giving it your attention and allowing it to percolate through your mind and inform your understanding of the world at large.

Eli Allen
Eli Allen

Nah, not in vernacular at least
The other verbs are mostly too specific. Experience could work, although it seems too strong.
Consume is widely used and accepted already

Samuel Edwards
Samuel Edwards

that is the most jewish thing I read in a while

Nolan Kelly
Nolan Kelly

Fool was more articulate
It's not that the media itself is 'used up', it's the time. For example, a task can consume someone's life. It does not literally kill them, it just takes up a disproportionate amount of their time

David Perez
David Perez

yeah but that is a somewhat negative connotation
fool is just being pseudointellecutal

Alexander Martin
Alexander Martin

It is entirely negative.

Isaac Morales
Isaac Morales

0 bytes/s on a steam download
still trying to start

Ryan Clark
Ryan Clark

Grim thinking he has class

Jayden Jones
Jayden Jones

Reeee~

Ian Fisher
Ian Fisher

Bump

Jeremiah Morgan
Jeremiah Morgan

bamp

Jaxon Sanchez
Jaxon Sanchez

How did it go ?

Owen Wilson
Owen Wilson

but that's 25 at highest and that's not even that old at all

age/2 +7 would leave me at 26

still too young

Christian Rivera
Christian Rivera

if it fits

Joshua Foster
Joshua Foster

IF IT FITS I DICKS.

Ryder Gonzalez
Ryder Gonzalez

sleepy saturday

Evan Parker
Evan Parker

Same. Listening to Jazz. Looking at memes. Dreading having to venture outside. The terror rises.

Xavier Sanchez
Xavier Sanchez

comfy!
then do the outside thing quickly and jump back home

Nathan King
Nathan King

Yeee, hence why I leave now.
Brb

Hudson Brown
Hudson Brown

June 23, 2017

https://mega.nz/#!ysBSjJpQ!3XKmT3YTH_pd7Z1xHViFcaaI5THvtPPx0yWy-RTzbyk

Translated
Model-chan and Plain Manager by Taneko ch. 3
[Doki] New Game! - Chapter 45

Untranslated
(COMIC1☆11) [なむあーる (な!)] ご注文はAV?ですか? (ご注文はうさぎですか?) [DL版]
[MirrorWorld (未鏡)] みらいに続くまほう (魔法使いプリキュア!) [DL版]
[琥珀の島 (小鳥遊歩)] せんぱいは私の嫁っす! (咲-Saki-) [DL版]

Logan Scott
Logan Scott

Outside was terror.
Time to buy flags

Wyatt Robinson
Wyatt Robinson

Is it dead?

James Allen
James Allen

terror in Britain

Whodathunked

Luis Smith
Luis Smith

wshat happened?

Xavier Garcia
Xavier Garcia

wat

Jaxon Powell
Jaxon Powell

time to BURN flags

Henry Taylor
Henry Taylor

Fags will burn

Landon Morris
Landon Morris

Fag burning party when

Dylan Nguyen
Dylan Nguyen

Day of the rope.

Michael Murphy
Michael Murphy

I need an avatar

Kevin Baker
Kevin Baker

Diseased

Jace James
Jace James

kinda wanna see axel's daughter take two dicks at once... same hole. Not going to Arizona for that though.

Christopher Gonzalez
Christopher Gonzalez

Wow this place really is finally dying isn't it?

Isaiah Thomas
Isaiah Thomas

tbh i wouldnt be entirely opposed to giving /b/ a go for a while

Jason Ward
Jason Ward

depends on how much anyone cares. if you still use it regardless then others will too I'm sure.

Nicholas Scott
Nicholas Scott

I think that'd result in bans still

Jose Bennett
Jose Bennett

/b/ have had avatar fags/waifu fags for a while now.

Christian Rodriguez
Christian Rodriguez

if someone makes a thread on /trash/ on 4chan, it might not get screwed with. The original MLP is there and they don't fuck with them a bit.

Benjamin Wood
Benjamin Wood

They have, but they are selectively banning still.

Kayden Nelson
Kayden Nelson

/b/ only

8/b/?

Jason Cooper
Jason Cooper

I dislike 8 and everything about it. Would rather stay to this corner personally, but it might not result in bans. I do not know.

Anthony Cook
Anthony Cook

8/b/

I think we have enough alt-right trannies thank you

Lincoln Torres
Lincoln Torres

Bebop isn't a mod on /trash/ so we're safe and we'll get new people in our community.

Jack Jackson
Jack Jackson

I'm not alt right

Christian Lee
Christian Lee

sup rev

Matthew Collins
Matthew Collins

I guess

I guess you're alright then

Jason Wright
Jason Wright

Give me an avatar to use.

James Nguyen
James Nguyen

cute boys

Julian Ramirez
Julian Ramirez

ew

Ryan Perez
Ryan Perez

ur ew

Benjamin Nelson
Benjamin Nelson

boys are ew

Ethan Cook
Ethan Cook

Alexander Bailey
Alexander Bailey

h-hey

Jaxson Powell
Jaxson Powell

What constitutes alt right?

Easton Powell
Easton Powell

anything i find too right wing

Ryder Russell
Ryder Russell

If you want Muslims out of your country

Eli Ward
Eli Ward

Is this one of those labels that people give to everyone they don't like and/or disagree with?

Julian Howard
Julian Howard

The alt-right is a loose group of people with far-right ideologies who reject mainstream conservatism in favor of white nationalism, principally in the United States, but also to a lesser degree in Canada and Europe.

Logan Young
Logan Young

I understood those were words.

I stay so far out of political talks that that told me nothing, though.

Hunter Perez
Hunter Perez

to some degree, its primarily used by anyone who considers themselves right leaning who has significant ideological differences with current american right ideology, such as neo-nazis, ancaps, right leaning liberals, etc.

if thats the case then why the fuck are ancaps and ex-leftie liberals calling themselves alt-right?

Sebastian Myers
Sebastian Myers

Right winged extremest.

Jace Hernandez
Jace Hernandez

ignored by rin

Austin Garcia
Austin Garcia

I don't know. I don't keep up with politics.

Asher Ross
Asher Ross

not being alt-right

Mason Gonzalez
Mason Gonzalez

well if you dont keep up you should take care you dont say anything silly out of ignorance then

Xavier Davis
Xavier Davis

I don't have an affiliation.

I didn't. Not keeping up with shit and not knowing what things are are not the same thing.

Hudson Morgan
Hudson Morgan

What does that meme?

Adrian Anderson
Adrian Anderson

that u is a bich

Jackson Green
Jackson Green

you did though, you gave an incomplete description of a political faction

Leo James
Leo James

It was a summary.
Don't be retarded.

Christian Morales
Christian Morales

Fufufufufu

Jace Gonzalez
Jace Gonzalez

an incomplete and misleading summary

Robert Smith
Robert Smith

How will I ever recover now, all dignity... Lost.

Jason Rodriguez
Jason Rodriguez

Not really. Its actually very much on the money.

Dominic Sullivan
Dominic Sullivan

You will all go back to /b/

Julian Barnes
Julian Barnes

You have to have had it to lose it.

No, not really.

David Butler
David Butler

Fuck off, Dexter.

Joseph Russell
Joseph Russell

not really, you cant boil a faction down to a single sub-faction unless it is totally dominant, especially not when its a coalition faction like the alt-right is. thats like calling the lib-dems socialist, or labour marxist.

Cooper Morgan
Cooper Morgan

alt-righters are people who unironically scream cuck and think Man of Steel is "kino"

Isaiah Russell
Isaiah Russell

So much for the tolerant left.

Cameron Lee
Cameron Lee

It's spelled Keanu and he wasn't in Man of Steel.

Brayden Turner
Brayden Turner

then tell me why it is for the last year every fucker from ayn rand fellating ancaps to slightly right of center youtube users have been flying that flag?

Luke Clark
Luke Clark

This
Hang them all

Austin Ross
Austin Ross

you will never be Kino and analyzed by /tv/

Hunter Russell
Hunter Russell

See my post about knowing what is going on in politics and knowing something about them are two different things.

Soon comrade.

Carson Bell
Carson Bell

the USSR will rise again.

STALIN DID NOTHING WRONG, MAO IS BAE

Robert Fisher
Robert Fisher

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI

Elijah Jackson
Elijah Jackson

Best part of that video... and I know what I am listening to on route to work tomorrow.

Hudson Taylor
Hudson Taylor

It's my ringtone.
Sometimes I like to just let it ring.

Andrew Carter
Andrew Carter

doesnt matter, unless there is a widely recognized ideological tradition associated with a given faction you cannot go asserting that individuals who claim to be part of a faction are not part of that faction, unless an overwhelming majority within that movement elects to disassociate themselves from that person.

Caleb Young
Caleb Young

Soon, Comrade. We await the call to arms.

Michael Kelly
Michael Kelly

It is though so I'm not sure how to help you, dude-o.

The river runs red like our nation.

Jose Parker
Jose Parker

it is what though?

Austin Jackson
Austin Jackson

You'll figure it out.

Oliver Nguyen
Oliver Nguyen

Sebastian Adams
Sebastian Adams

dunno, seems to me you just want to take a given sub faction of a faction you dont like and apply the label of that sub-faction to everyone within the faction at large.

Dylan Cook
Dylan Cook

Could you please use "Faction" a little more, otherwise this makes no sense at all.

Adrian Jackson
Adrian Jackson

I don't care about the alt right. It is the literal meaning of alt right, you tard.

Hunter Stewart
Hunter Stewart

the word fits and is clear in its meaning, why not use it?

Christian Morales
Christian Morales

it's simple. the friction here is from squash using a fraction of the faction to represent the whole faction, which is a fiction and contradiction

Luke Collins
Luke Collins

it's not factual, i mean to say.

Jaxon Cruz
Jaxon Cruz

pls no

Adrian Hernandez
Adrian Hernandez

the alt right is the alternative right, nothing more and nothing less

precisely

Logan Parker
Logan Parker

We're having a conversation.
Of the factions in our nation.
A silly allegation of extreme exaggeration.
There's a lack of information.
When it comes to confirmation.

Adam Rodriguez
Adam Rodriguez

Maybe qt is just pretending to be retarded.

Noah Young
Noah Young

It is the far right winged. I literally took it off of Wikipedia.

Christian Hill
Christian Hill

When a fraction of a faction create friction it is a little fractious and facetious to falsely fracture and fillibust the factional subfaction to refract and reflect your falsehoods

Xavier Barnes
Xavier Barnes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zQTmkY7GI

Joshua Russell
Joshua Russell

I was only pretending to be a nazi - Literally every Alt-right scumhole ever

Wyatt Williams
Wyatt Williams

☭A NATION WHERE ONE IS FOR ALL☭

Logan Gonzalez
Logan Gonzalez

But (((Wikipedia)) is founded by an Ayn Randrone and the Zionist agenda to destroy America, etc, etc.

Carson Robinson
Carson Robinson

wrong, the alt-right is a rallying point for those who wish to distinguish themselves from the mainstream right, its right there in the name. what precisely constitutes the alt-right as a faction currently is up for debate, but while you have multiple wildly different ideological factions rallying under one banner you cannot claim that only one of those represents the whole.

Connor Long
Connor Long

eth no gra phic dis place ment

glowball ism

Aiden Rodriguez
Aiden Rodriguez

Samurai Jill?

Alexander Bennett
Alexander Bennett

3rd wave feminists and other non-extreme feminists are still both feminists.
The same applies here.

What something is and who rally under the title are not the same.

Carson Martin
Carson Martin

samurai jacky.

Nicholas Ortiz
Nicholas Ortiz

Show your support for our man Marx.

Nathan Torres
Nathan Torres

wrong, feminism actually has an tradition of thought within it spanning at least half a century, the alt-right is a purely temporal faction within american politics with nothing unifying it besides common opponents. these two factions are not comparable.

Jacob Walker
Jacob Walker

an tradition
fuck

Juan Wilson
Juan Wilson

Meninism

This BS gets better

Tyler Anderson
Tyler Anderson

Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy.

Parker Robinson
Parker Robinson

The argument isn't about tradition and how long it's been around. The argument is that comparatively both have multiple sub divisions rallying under one title while sharing different views.

You don't have to be around for a century to develop this mentality in a culture.

You are arguing semantics now.

Lincoln Hill
Lincoln Hill

Paint it red.

Joshua Bailey
Joshua Bailey

Steve Bannon is really Jesus come to purge the Jews and Muslims from America to return America to the white country it's been since Biblical times.

Michael Lee
Michael Lee

wrong, right-wing extremism and white nationalism has an tradition of thought within it spanning at least several hundred years, feminists are a purely temporal faction faction with nothing unifying them but common opponents.

Jacob Thompson
Jacob Thompson

Where are the other posters like Erio and other good people?

Kayden Butler
Kayden Butler

Erio
and other good people

Leo Taylor
Leo Taylor

you are missing the point, i am saying that the alt-right has no unifying traits beyond common political opponents, and a shared interest in the ending of some political trends.

point to me the philosophical underpinnings of the historical faction that has consistently chosen for themselves the label of "alt-right" for the better part of their history

Samuel Butler
Samuel Butler

what does it matter what they call themselves

James Miller
James Miller

It does though.

Joseph Cooper
Joseph Cooper

The term feminist only started in the 1900.
That doesn't mean the ideology didn't exist prior.

Same for the alt-right.

You're arguing semantics again.

Nathaniel Cox
Nathaniel Cox

did I say Erio? I mean Sci.

Hey uhm, I know you are but I forgot your name. How are you?

Joseph Reyes
Joseph Reyes

Put on a name or I am not continuing this conversation.

Nathaniel Barnes
Nathaniel Barnes

The future is ==RED==

Parker White
Parker White

It requires its own line you

RETARD

Grayson Miller
Grayson Miller

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/creationist-ken-ham-blames-atheists-and-fake-news-for-failing-ark-encounter-theme-park/

they actually built this

the madmen

Benjamin Price
Benjamin Price

NO IT DOESNT LOOK AT ==THIS==

David Russell
David Russell

My stupid phone won't let me. What do I do?

Justin Cook
Justin Cook

Atheists are the reason a $92 million taxpayer sponsored piece of shit failed!

Austin Gutierrez
Austin Gutierrez

tfw Capitalism's lapdogs in this thread

Julian Jones
Julian Jones

http://www.kentucky.com/news/state/article73971147.html

Dylan Brown
Dylan Brown

because you can make the argument that if you choose to adopt a label of an existing faction you are supporting them and their ideology by counting yourself among them, this doesnt work however when the label is both generic in its literal meaning and where no single faction has held ideological dominance for an extended period of time.

semantics are important, sloppy use of language leads to sloppy thought, as clearly evidenced by you trying to assert that a single group within a coalition of groups represents the whole.

Jason Powell
Jason Powell

Do I get cock rations under communism.

Logan Ward
Logan Ward

Yes.

Andrew Taylor
Andrew Taylor

Wow, i read this wrong.

Tyler White
Tyler White

The single group is a sub division of a larger group.
It is being used to describe that singular group.

They are just rebranded Neo Nazi.
And the Nazi have a pretty lengthy history.

You're arguing incorrect semantics.

Liam Gonzalez
Liam Gonzalez

How come you talk to this guy? He doesn't even have a name.

Jacob Cook
Jacob Cook

It is being used to describe that singular group.
by whom?

you are arguing for an inaccurate use of a label simply because of popular conception.

Christopher Foster
Christopher Foster

Redistribution of poon?

Blake Brooks
Blake Brooks

You can't call them feminists because not all of them are the same.

Eli Rogers
Eli Rogers

The term was made to describe a particular group of people.
Who uses it now could be much broader, but the term was made with a specific group in mind.

Grayson Foster
Grayson Foster

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right

Here. This is just going in circles. Argue something in here or whatever.

Bentley Morales
Bentley Morales

We must smash the Capitalists in every sphere... From economic and political to the bedroom

Jose Perry
Jose Perry

when the commies dome you with a bike-lock but it's okay because that's not the only head they're gonna be giving you

Leo Jenkins
Leo Jenkins

If you can't call the alt-right Neo-Nazis, does that mean you can't call any Muslim a terrorist or Brits cucks?

Grayson Russell
Grayson Russell

Oh shit did this nigger just use a motherfucking BUZZWORD

Anthony Rodriguez
Anthony Rodriguez

((nechumi/eve))
huh what do you mean? ^_^;

Easton Ross
Easton Ross

Anyhow I'm off to play FF15.

Daniel Hernandez
Daniel Hernandez

:heart_eyes:

Alexander Kelly
Alexander Kelly

Its time for bed
time for dreams
dreams about Communism ♥

Juan Cooper
Juan Cooper

nini ;~;

Blake Flores
Blake Flores

I wonder if Luka doesn't get hired, will he file a lawsuit for discrimination against him being a lesbian?

Jayden Fisher
Jayden Fisher

I'm gonna see if I can follow how this thread went:

Michael Keaton says he's methodical about spending his time, thought and money on media. He uses the word 'consume'
Dusty says 'consume' implies 'being consumed by' instead of 'taking in'

English user says maybe we should try /b/
Loco acossiates /b/ with alt-right trannies
Revy says she's not alt-right

Rin asks: "What constitutes alt right?"
Squash: "a loose group of people with far-right ideologies who reject mainstream conservatism in favor of white nationalism"
Rin says she avoids and doesn't comprehend politics

Squash simplifies it all the way down to: "Right winged extremest."
English user says 'its a label for right learning individuals, instead of groups, that differ with mainstream conservativism'

English user thinks Squash's definition has gaps
Squash: "I don't know. I don't keep up with politics."
English user suggests avoiding sounding ignorant if Squash admits he doesn't keep up
Squash says his apathy is towards keeping up with current events, but that he still knows things.
English user repeats that Squash's definition was lacking
Squash says it was a 'summary', and tells the English user not to be 'retarded'
English user repeats that Squash's summary was lacking
Squash disagrees
English user says Squash's definition was incorrect, specifically because of how it makes them sound like a focused group, instead of mixed and varied
Squash memes in response: "So much for the tolerant left."

English user says some self-identified alt-righters don't match Squash's description, as evidence that Squash's definition is lacking
Squash says: "knowing what is going on in politics and knowing something about them are two different things."
English user says the alt-rigt doesn't meet the criteria of a faction (still on about the fact Squash made it sound like they were)
Squash says he doesn't know how to help

Daniel Bailey
Daniel Bailey

Hit send without typing, doi.

I'd the ravenclaw, tbh

Jose Allen
Jose Allen

Part 2.

English user hasn't caught on to Squash's hints of ignorance and apathy, and persists at telling Squash that his definition was too vague
Squash says he doesn't care about the alt right. (I don't understand when he says: "It is the literal meaning of alt right")
English user says the alt right is the alt right, suggesting that specificicty beyond that means having gaps in the description

Loco raps
Squash raps
Scoots raps
Scoots memes
Squash sovet memes

Squash says he took Wikipedia's definition
English user boils it down to: 'alt right is a label for individuals who wish to distinguish themselves from the mainstream right'. period.
Squash says that all kinds of feminists can be put into the feminist label, despite differing ideas and concepts. The same applies to politics.
English user says that's not true. That the different kinds of feminism shouldn't be bunched together.

Chase Butler
Chase Butler

Kyle is such a hypocrite

Ryder Cruz
Ryder Cruz

Lewd! I thought trans MtF only liked men

Colton Jackson
Colton Jackson

The fat one looks pretty loveable.

Ryder Jones
Ryder Jones

Squash!

that's his name, I totally forgot :3

Cameron Miller
Cameron Miller

wish I didn't read all that

John Hill
John Hill

I like how Dexter user posts still.

Camden Morris
Camden Morris

Ok, Test. I get what you mean now.

Adrian Jones
Adrian Jones

Is that really Bebop?

Wow.

Noah Collins
Noah Collins

He got pointed out a few times in the past.
Grim says he regularly user posts too.

Jason Sanders
Jason Sanders

Part 3!

Squash says that they're all just sub-groups of one another, so bunching is okay to do. "You are arguing semantics now."
Loco intrejects that right-wing extremism and white nationalism "has an tradition of thought" spanning hundreds of years. But feminists are "purely temporal faction" and only unified by "common components"
isn't saying something is linked by hundreds of years an example of something being 'temporal'? so they're both temporal. and both changed. and both are only unified by common components.

Colton Sanchez
Colton Sanchez

Unified
Workers of the nation unite. You have nothing to lose but your salaries.

Joseph Hill
Joseph Hill

you could at least read the thread if you're going to do this.

Christian Collins
Christian Collins

I prefer girls.

Benjamin Thomas
Benjamin Thomas

He summarized.
Like I did with alt rights.

But lord knows that ain't ok.

Chase Cook
Chase Cook

Also someone tell me how these are even different as examples.

Levi Evans
Levi Evans

Even though the words nothing alike and are diametrically opposed, in my mind I always mix up "Capitalism" and "Communism."

I always end up wanting to make communist jokes involving Recettear, but Recettear is about capitalism.

Ryder Russell
Ryder Russell

Rin. Take your disgusting capatalistic shit out of here.
We bleed red in this thread.

Kayden Jackson
Kayden Jackson

Squash, I'll have you know that my hive clusters work on a system of strict forced-voluntary contributions on part of all members of the brood.

Connor King
Connor King

Part 4. now people start doing multiple replies.

English user asserts AGAIN that there is nothing unifying the alt-right except that they're decidedly not mainstream conservatives
Squash says they do have deeper unifying traits (is he still talking about his Wikipedia definition?)

English user replies to Loco, asking for evidence that 'alt right' is a label people have gone by for "the better part of their history"
Loco says the label doesn't matter (suggesting that 'alt right' is totally connected with the old-fashioned forms of white nationalism)

English user says that semantics are important, and Squash is being sloppy and lazy by grouping groups where they shouldn't be
Squash says they're all just sub groups of each other, so all branches of ideologies, even if they differ, can be addressed as one big fat group

English user agrees with Loco that factions can have labels that an entire group identifies by, but that some labels are generic and vague, and trying to reconcile a generic and vague label with specifics leaves gaps

English user says Squash is defending that generalizations are okay, because its popular to incorrectly generalize
Squash suggests that semantics are irrelevant, and that popular generalizations are useful

Evan Barnes
Evan Barnes

i'm going to bed

Cameron Clark
Cameron Clark

oh, Loco was literally turning English user's words on its head, complete with incorrect spelling and odd use of 'temporal'.

nini.

Julian Morgan
Julian Morgan

Weren't you done with this annihilation stuff, Kanra?

Dominic Jackson
Dominic Jackson

Anilitical*

Julian Hill
Julian Hill

Fucking auto correct.

Jonathan Stewart
Jonathan Stewart

English user, you're right. Your definition has a higher resolution, and encompasses the varied and inconsistent use of the label 'alt right'.

Squash, your initial definition was too specific and had gaps. You said your reason was that they're all just sub-groups of each other, but if you actually made a bullet point list of what defines each ideology, you'd realize that some contradict, some are mutually exclusive, and only some are shared.

Literally no reason to boil them all down the way you defend doing.

gomen. I spotted my error.

Andrew Thomas
Andrew Thomas

I'm done with the psychoanalysis stuff. Analyzing arguments on animus is far better than whatever stupid entertainment I could be doing. Better practice for my brain, too.

Leo Fisher
Leo Fisher

That isn't what happened.

Samuel Bennett
Samuel Bennett

If you're going to do it at least try to be right when you do it.

Ryan Anderson
Ryan Anderson

fuck me i need to get out more

no, the term was adopted by people who saw fit to distinguish themselves from the mainstream rights rhetoric, it makes absolutely zero sense to invent a new fucking political term to catergorise a collection of people who already have a name for themselves, as you are implying was done.

wikipedia is meaningless when it comes to politics

pretty much

sleep well, fag

white nationalism is not a unifying trait of the alt-right, it is merely a trait present in part of the alt-right

Wyatt Taylor
Wyatt Taylor

I only now learned what Boxxie's name is.

Chase Rivera
Chase Rivera

And yet they did. And it happened.
That's what the current alt right is described as.

Wikipedia is pretty ok for a citation as you can fallow its citations as well. Discrediting it is just some shit teachers did so you couldn't just pull answers from it.

It's not some informational boogy man.

Jeremiah Harris
Jeremiah Harris

It's Boxxie.
Seemed kind of obvious.

Aiden Anderson
Aiden Anderson

Catherine Wayne.

Joseph Sullivan
Joseph Sullivan

Reported for DOX.

Julian Green
Julian Green

A gay British dude is arguing for right wing politics.
:thinking:

Nicholas Russell
Nicholas Russell

QT isn't gay.
Don't besmirch my darling.

Isaiah Sanchez
Isaiah Sanchez

Am I grim-tier yet?

Christian Diaz
Christian Diaz

And yet they did. And it happened.
prove it.

That's what the current alt right is described as.
by what authority?

Wikipedia is pretty ok for a citation as you can fallow its citations as well. Discrediting it is just some shit teachers did so you couldn't just pull answers from it.
you are laughably full of shit. wikipedia is not suitable as a source in academia because it is not vetted, it is almost entirely open to the public for open editing and thus there is no standard of academic rigor to it. citing wikipedia is no different to citing studies from poorly reputed organisations.

as for this case, wikipedia is not suitable as this is a political topic, and thus wikipedia is in and of itself inherently unreliable as a source. if you want the truth on any matter of politics you have to do your own research, and approach all things with an open mind purely in the honest pursuit of understanding.

politically i am some variant of liberal, in the actual philosophical sense. i have no interest in progressive/conservative politics.

Connor Lopez
Connor Lopez

No. I actually like Grim.
You not so much.
Gomen.

There is currently a part called the alt right who are generally akin to Neo Nazi political views. That is what I can only assume Rin originally asked in reference of to begin with and that was what I was giving the description to.

You want to be a cunt about it then we can just not have this conversation. You haven't exactly given much proof of your side you know.

Kevin Myers
Kevin Myers

Challenge accepted!

your Wikipedia definition of alt-right
your simplified definition of alt-right

you saying you don't keep up with politics.
you saying that you still know what things are, even though you don't keep up with politics

you excusing your inaccuracies as 'summarizing'
you saying your apathy towards current events and knowing about them are mutually exclusive

you claiming that your definition was "the literal meaning of alt right"
you admitting you "literally took it off of Wikipedia."

you say your reason for grouping the alt right so specifically, is because you also group all forms of feminism. That labels are mutually exclsuive from their definitions. Insane!

you saying that feminism/right wing politics all fall under umbrellas, and despite "sharing different views", it's correct and normal to refer to the umbrella, the things under the umbrella being different

you say 'pro women movements' and 'movements under the label of feminism' are okay to mix together, since they're all sub groups of each other

you say a single label can be used to describe many things, even if they're different, which can be true, if the umbrella label is generic enough, but you argue for specific definitions of those umbrellas

ie. alt right is white nationalism, even though some alt right are not white or white nationalists

You also say that Nazi and Neo Nazi are the same thing, or can be considered the same, and that its pointless semantics to say otherwise. So you're saying Neo Nazis and the Third Reich are the same thing. Maddening!

Carson Fisher
Carson Fisher

And Wikipedia also gives links to citations, so you are free to go through and point out what ones are not credible.

Also for that last part see the top of my post. My description is for what the specific part of the group I am assuming Rin was asking about as it is the current meme.

Logan Butler
Logan Butler

Are you not doing the same thing as him and seeking out confirmation bias because you've cited nothing and the only thing you've presented is your opinion and insisted it is more factual than someone else's. By all means, present your academic sources since you're saying that he lacks any.

Jason Russell
Jason Russell

Did I misinterpret any of your posts?

Like, any of them?

Nolan Allen
Nolan Allen

I'll be honest.
I'm not even reading your posts.

Thomas Davis
Thomas Davis

That's the bitch way to win an argument.

Can't feel wrong if you avoid proof that you are!

Jeremiah Howard
Jeremiah Howard

You just read his post.

Lucas White
Lucas White

I don't read his posts that are longer than 30 words because I know he's just trying to be a part of it and flex some E-dick and he knows I don't enable that with him*

Levi Gomez
Levi Gomez

That's what I dislike about people who identify as "people that don't give fucks".

Because they still give fucks about things.

They just stop giving fucks about basic things, like being consistent.

Wyatt Gomez
Wyatt Gomez

Good luck with that

Levi Martinez
Levi Martinez

You're trying to force your way into the argument without actually adding anything to it.
Debating you on it doesn't seem like a good way to spend my time really.

Hudson Adams
Hudson Adams

It isn't like anyone is going to give to the other side.
At this point I'm just staying in it because if I don't then I lose.

Thomas Anderson
Thomas Anderson

Who cares ?

Luke Lopez
Luke Lopez

I mean, I don't think you have to care about something to take part in it. I don't care much about this as a topic, but I'm at least having some fun.

Christian Miller
Christian Miller

I've made you at odds with me. That was selfish, since I'd rather help you learn something important and useful.

I'd much rather you think about how and why you group different concepts. At first it may seem like I'm attacking you, but there's a good reason to be accurate about how you define and use different concepts.

Ryan Jenkins
Ryan Jenkins

You know I don't do this kind of thing with you for a reason.
It's been like that for like 3 years now.

Jayden Sanders
Jayden Sanders

exhilarating

Kevin Fisher
Kevin Fisher

Not like there's much going on right now anyhow.
Sup with you?

Justin Martinez
Justin Martinez

I wasn't an asshole til you accused me of being wrong.

And if you're gonna accuse me of that, at least have the decency to tell me how and where.

Don't be a punk.

Aaron Harris
Aaron Harris

But it's cute when you get uppity.

Gabriel Morgan
Gabriel Morgan

I'm about to cook while a bunch of high school kids try and be my friend.

Nicholas Sanchez
Nicholas Sanchez

Why are you around a bunch of high school kids?
Should the authorities be notified?

Charles Anderson
Charles Anderson

What?

Dominic Russell
Dominic Russell

I'm uppity about being misunderstood and written off, just because I tell people they think the wrong things.

Then they don't allow me the sweet release of them realizing I was right, or witnessing their confrontation with their own ignorance.

Mason Edwards
Mason Edwards

I am already embroiled in one argument.
I don't have the motivation to be in another.

Gavin Adams
Gavin Adams

I'm gonna say no

which part don't you understand ?

Aiden Robinson
Aiden Robinson

Why are you around high school kids?

Colton Reyes
Colton Reyes

Ban gettin' some sweet 16 y/o pootang

Elijah Allen
Elijah Allen

I want some sweet pootang.

Nolan Moore
Nolan Moore

Too bad I'm not 16 y/o.

Or a dog.

Lucas Gonzalez
Lucas Gonzalez

I wonder

John Roberts
John Roberts

16 is too old for a dog.

As do I.
That's why I ask.

Isaiah Diaz
Isaiah Diaz

Going to go play some games.
Later.

Andrew Roberts
Andrew Roberts

I believe you. I believe you don't want more of what I'm dishing out.

But that doesn't mean what I'm saying is wrong.

It's not good enough for me to think I'm right. Everyone thinks they're right. I either need proof, or for someone to admit they're wrong.

It's like being blue-balled.

Luke Hughes
Luke Hughes

I haven't had to drag anyone out of my house today at least.

Luis Sanchez
Luis Sanchez

There is currently a part called the alt right who are generally akin to Neo Nazi political views.
grossly misleading

You want to be a cunt about it then we can just not have this conversation.
if youre full of shit im going to tell you that you are full of shit, i mince my words for nobody.

You haven't exactly given much proof of your side you know.
i dont even need to, because you are apparently incapable of constructing an argument that isnt blatantly fallacious.

then you are the one playing with words on account of "memes", "its just a prank bro" doesnt cut it.

only thats not what im saying. what i am saying is that his appeal to the authority of wikipedia is fallacious on account of the topic in question being highly controversial, and wikipedia being publicly edited and thus not capable of providing a high quality assessment of anything.

secondly, squash has tried asserting that the popular understanding of the meaning of the given label trumps the reality of those who identify with said label. as this is a categorical claim, I only need cite one example of where this is not true to completely disprove it. see for example styxhexenhammer666 who has stated before that he identifies with the alt-right and also regularly mocks nazis, see also youtuber Rocking MrE, who also identifies with alt-right and considers both nazis and progressives to be basically the same kind of bullshit.

Dylan Adams
Dylan Adams

styxhexenhammer666 isn't a credible source.
*flippant hand wave*

Levi Jones
Levi Jones

give up

he's too cool and busy to defend his ideas

Jayden James
Jayden James

he doesnt need to be, he only needs to exist and espouse 2 positions: first, that he identifies with the label "alt-right". second, that he disdains white nationalism. that is literally all that is required to prove you wrong, because you made a categorical claim about a group of individuals you have no information on like a complete idiot.

Parker Adams
Parker Adams

I only need cite one example of where this is not true to completely disprove it
Except citing exceptions doesn't disprove a majority opinion, which is the entire purpose of language: a word means whatever is ascribed to it. Different groups can define things differently but the majority still describes it as such.

Landon Morris
Landon Morris

You can go read the wiki page that I liked and show me the info on there that is explicitly wrong then.

If you're going to argue my claims then provide credible sources like you're saying I have to.

And I already said that the alt right that I was describing that Rin asked about was the meme party that is in popular culture. I already said that so your argument isn't really holding up.

Not to mention your passion for this is rather concerning.

Christian Collins
Christian Collins

linked*

Josiah Thomas
Josiah Thomas

Also if you're going to be a a kid and name call I'm just going to stop responding.

"not mincing your words" is just an excuse to act like a kid honestly.
Either grow up and have a civil argument or I'm just not going to bother.

Thomas Stewart
Thomas Stewart

squash, you claimed a very specific definition for 'alt right'

you were giving a summary of a generalization

but it was literally untrue.

If what you've been saying all thread was true, it'd look like a circle COMPLETELY inside another circle

Luke Torres
Luke Torres

this is a categorical assertion about the opinions of a group of individuals, a single exception invalidates that assertion.

a word means whatever is ascribed to it.
if the world refuses to acknowledge that you are of the same species as us does that make them right?

You can go read the wiki page that I liked and show me the info on there that is explicitly wrong then.
i dont need to, there is literally nothing there that is at all relevant.

If you're going to argue my claims then provide credible sources like you're saying I have to.
i am not the one making any assertion as to what is here, because i do not need to. i need only point to aspects of your argument that are entirely fallacious, and combine them with anecdotal evidence for it to be immediately apparent that your argument is not correct.

And I already said that the alt right that I was describing that Rin asked about was the meme party that is in popular culture.
so youre talking out of your arse and not at all attempting to make an assertion that properly and completely reflects reality?

Not to mention your passion for this is rather concerning.
i really, really dislike dishonest attempts at ascribing beliefs to people.

youre blatantly pulling shit out of your arse with no regard as to what is and is not reflective of reality, i dislike people piss arsing me about and acting smug when its obvious for all to see that they are full of shit.

Adam Martin
Adam Martin

the best way to solve for the differences, is to either drop the generalization, or make the generalization vague enough to encompass all the variations

personally, it makes a lot of sense to treat the ideas on an indiviual, person by person basis

that's literally the best, but longest way to conclude anything about the 'alt right'

Henry Ward
Henry Ward

all I have to do is cherry pick while you must provide academic citations

Evan Butler
Evan Butler

i dont need to, there is literally nothing there that is at all relevant.
If you aren't going to check my citations then there is no reason to continue.

Alexander Lee
Alexander Lee

this is not academic! you don't need sourced papers!

this is literally a matter of logic!

Jaxon Wilson
Jaxon Wilson

this, do we literally have to explain set theory and how logic works to him?

except that is exactly the case, his argument is so weak that literally a single example counter to it breaks it, and in order to make any authoritative statement like he is trying to make he would actually have to engage in actual fucking research.

your citations do not matter, your very reasoning is incorrect

Matthew Powell
Matthew Powell

Also I don't care if you hate something.
If you aren't going to actually check my sources after asking for them then you're a fucking moron.

Bentley Cooper
Bentley Cooper

Considering language isn't definitive nor precise and varies entirely on speaker and receiver, you seem to intentionally be arguing against the concept of language itself if you're saying the majority's definition of a word make it inaccurate.

Brandon Garcia
Brandon Garcia

asks for citations and proof
proof is given
I don't have to read those they don't matter
Either find flaws in the actual citations and their content or piss off and don't ask for them.

James Diaz
James Diaz

You're still asking for sources for his definition while your definition is based on what you believe as though your definition requires no proof or support but his does.

Grayson Reed
Grayson Reed

He says my proof is not worth reading so it's like I have no proof at all.

Jeremiah Phillips
Jeremiah Phillips

your sources do not matter, you made a categorical claim to which a single incorrect classification is a complete invalidation of your claim.

he would need some pretty good research to claim what hes claiming, alternatively he could stop making categorical claims about groups and instead focus on what can be demonstrated to be applicable to any given individual within the group in question.

you havent given proof, to give actual proof you would need to sit down and perform a proper investigation into the philosophy underpinning every last distinguishable faction within the alt-right, or survey every last person within the alt-right.

your citations are IRRELEVANT because you have not made a statistical claim, you have made a categorical claim that can be debunked with next to no effort by fucking anyone, you complete and utter fucking retard.

my definition is literally that the alt-right is composed of individuals who identify as right wing, and do not identify with what they perceive as the prevailing set of right wing ideas. essentially, my definition of the alt-right is that it is whatever can be classified by the literal meaning of the label, thats so far encompassing you would need to go out and find a person who identifies as currently left-wing or identifies with the right wing establishment to prove me wrong. my argument is literally a tautology, limited only by my own poor phrasing as to what constitutes the inverse of "alt".

Andrew Thomas
Andrew Thomas

even using the words 'set theory' is enough to make people blank. not everyone is as jarred by an incorrect logical step.

the more words you use, the more they space out

can you explain your steps for why you think your definition is true?

do I follow you:

source A claims a definition
you trust source A

So here are your sources for the Wikipedia sentence:
VICE news article
The Forward article
BBC news article
Quilette article

All of them vaguely describe some members of a group, and assume others are part of the group, but none of them account for the contradictions and variations within 'alt right' individuals!

Lucas Watson
Lucas Watson

It's almost like every faction or group has member who do not have all the characteristics of the general collection of the group.

hmmm

Don't ask for sources if you're going to ignore them then. I got my proof from that page. You can go there and find where it's wrong, but we both know you're going to be a twat and just say you don't have to on the chance you're wrong.

Keep name calling, kiddo.

Leo Barnes
Leo Barnes

Here are your sources!

All of them vaguely group a bunch of people, where grouping isn't necessary!

None of them account for the accuracte view that 'alt right' people are varied, contradict, overlap, share, disagree, agree, and have personal definitions.

https://news.vice.com/story/part-of-canadas-so-called-alt-right-is-endorsing-kellie-leitch
http://forward.com/fast-forward/370870/white-nationalist-richard-spencer-makes-alt-right-expansion-in-sweden/
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39433483
http://quillette.com/2017/06/01/paranoid-paleoconservatives/

In order for the Wikipedia definition to be wrong, all it takes is ONE person to not fit that category. Seems tedious, but that's how logic works.

Easton Russell
Easton Russell

See the above post.

Joshua Evans
Joshua Evans

If you don't post actual sources for your definition then I'm going to just assume you're also pulling shit out of your ass and leave it at that.

Hunter Clark
Hunter Clark

Also, Kanra you would have to go through more links than just 4, but I do respect the fact you actually went through even one compared to QT not going through any if you actually did.

Austin Diaz
Austin Diaz

He has no proof either yet is still stating his definition has authority behind it because it's what he thinks.
Political ideologies and labels are not single issue broad statements that means anything can fall under it's umbrella. They're nebulous at worst, dogmatic at best. If there's enough reoccurring elements among a political group that it becomes it's public defining features, then the label means that, right or wrong.

Isaiah Sullivan
Isaiah Sullivan

If you'd like to actually discuss this on Steam we can, Kanra.

It's not really something that matters in the end. I'm just defending my stance the best I can, although I am bad at arguing my points in general. I'm not saying he's wrong, but just why I think I'm right.

Juan Sanders
Juan Sanders

If you'd like to actually discuss this on Steam we can, Kanra.

It's not really something that matters in the end. I'm just defending my stance the best I can, although I am bad at arguing my points in general. I'm not saying he's wrong, but just why I think I'm right.

Jackson Price
Jackson Price

Kiddo, read your own fucking sources.

Then maybe do the responsible thing and tell us how it relates to the Wikipedia sentence.

Explain. Your. Steps. Otherwise we'll assume there are only THREE steps to your position.

1) Sources say something
2) Wikipedia uses sources for definition
3) You use Wikipedia definition because it has sources

I can tell you what the sources say. They're news articles vaguely indicating the loose political movements of different groups of individuals in different countries, NONE of them suggest they're exclusively identified as 'white nationalists', but the Wikipedia article suggests they are.

At best, it's lazy. At worst, it's misleading.

Julian Collins
Julian Collins

its basic propositional logic, any student in a field where classical logic is even remotely relevant learns this within weeks of starting university, any first year student of comp sci could immediately see that i have no need of defending my own argument, as it is quite literally so general as to be incapable of being wrong.

look, i get that youre fucking about here, but you are making a categorical claim for which no amount of sources can save you from a single incorrect instance. your insistence on citations here has only shown that you are incapable of reasoning on par with a first year university undergraduate with a mediocre understanding of knowledge, as you were incapable of identifying a tautology. a tautology, just so you know, is a statement that can never be false, because it literally makes no argument.

here is precisely all the citations i need to support my assertion:
https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Logic-Propositional-Revised-3rd/dp/0130258490

Alexander Young
Alexander Young

The first part of the article is where I pulled my definition of the alt right.
If you actually went through the citations and found flaws I'm happy to change my outlook on it if you want to provide additional information that might aid in this from the articles.

Sorry, I don't have to read your citation.

Daniel Green
Daniel Green

Aha! The only source I need is a logic book because I'm clearly the only one using logic and I don't need to back up anything I say other than "I am the only person who uses logic" because it's a blanket defense!

Connor Hill
Connor Hill

Jesus Christ no wonder people stopped posting regularly here

Juan Morgan
Juan Morgan

i made a tautological claim, my sole position on this so far has been that P does in fact equal P. in that book somewhere should be a chapter telling you precisely what a tautology is, and why asking for citations to prove one is nonsense. alternatively just be lazy and read the wikipedia page on propositional logic, they should have a section on tautologies there.

Grayson Barnes
Grayson Barnes

It kind of sucks, but honestly I'm happy people are moving on.

Asher Morgan
Asher Morgan

According to the logic of the Wikipedia sentence:

either black 'alt right' members are white nationalists that reject mainstream conservatism, OR there are NO black alt right members
either mexican 'alt right' members are white nationalists that reject mainstream conservatism, OR there are NO mexican alt right members
either spanish 'alt right' members are white nationalists that reject mainstream conservatism, OR there are NO spanish alt right members
either mixed 'alt right' members are white nationalists that reject mainstream conservatism, OR there are NO mixed alt right members

All it takes is ONE example of ONE person that doesn't fit that criteria in order for it to be wrong.

In order to make it a better definition, you just need to remove the word 'white'. Or just add the words 'many of whom are white nationalists'. There are a lot of ways to capture the vagueness of the label, and I'd argue it's important to realize just how vague and generic its use has been in the media.

In fact, one of its biggest dangers is how people hide behind the vagueness of it, and how randomly its used.

Luis Foster
Luis Foster

to be fair, what is there to come here for besides talking to a dwindling number of people you know online?

Henry Price
Henry Price

But a political ideology that has two words in its name does not mean just those two words.
By that "logic", Labor Party means they are a group that only agrees on people working.

Brayden Rogers
Brayden Rogers

we should maybe pin a poll for going back to /b/ or something, all that can come from staying here is slow decline and eventual death

Tyler Morales
Tyler Morales

What if a person who claims to be something and isn't just simply isn't that thing.

If I claim to be black, but I'm white, that doesn't mean the definition of black is wrong. The individual could simply be identifying wrong.

Henry Campbell
Henry Campbell

I'm cool with /b/, but can we please be selective on who we bring back here?

Luis Walker
Luis Walker

Yup!

But what if twenty people identify wrong? Or a hundred? How many does it take for the definition to change?

Clearly a better definition would encompass these discrepencies, and not have to change constantly.

Bentley Gutierrez
Bentley Gutierrez

I feel like at that point you should just use a new term to distinguish the new groups because it isn't like the old group left.

Grayson Johnson
Grayson Johnson

It's not about 'who' we bring to /b/, but 'what' we're bringing.

If we're going to create another aimless, infinite chatroom, thats better there.

Christopher Richardson
Christopher Richardson

a tautology is not something that can ever be refuted, as it is not an argument, its literally saying that a thing is a thing. terms can have multiple meanings, but in this case you are talking about an organisation that calls itself the Labour Party, which is not the same as attempting to classify a group of people based on criteria.

in order to classify people by criteria, you either have to demonstrate that a set of given characteristics ALWAYS indicates that the individual belongs to the group, or you have to present a statistical argument, which requires research, and is a fundamentally different kind of claim to a logical one.

Luke Moore
Luke Moore

People working and partying.

Brayden Green
Brayden Green

What if grouping the reformed group with the outdated old group is part of an agenda to make them all seem bad?

Not like that ever happens.

Gavin Edwards
Gavin Edwards

We'd be bringing people back.

Then you're mixing groups.

Adrian Jones
Adrian Jones

im thinking basically the old anime circlejerks, but at this point i wonder if we can keep posts regular and frequent enough to keep threads from just sliding off page 15

Colton Harris
Colton Harris

What if someone calls themselves a Democrat but votes Republican?

Should we group them with Democrats that voted Democrat?

How about Democrats that don't vote?!

The answer isn't difficult. It's about using more words, and more accurate words to describe people.

Daniel Martin
Daniel Martin

4chan lets you just auto dump so we could easily bump our threads like that. Not to mention anons will come and bitch like the fur threads and such. I'm sure with a small base of people it wouldn't be hard.

Jeremiah Parker
Jeremiah Parker

If we're going back to /b/, let's bring a mentality.

We have enough random shitposting as it is.

That will bring us closer together, create a community identity, and new posters will want that sense of belonging, and want to join.

Juan Long
Juan Long

Nah. Let's be tsun as shit to new folk.

Tyler Morris
Tyler Morris

We can be that anywhere.

Bentley Jenkins
Bentley Jenkins

I'll post in both places. Just mark threads with the marker so I can find them.

William Phillips
William Phillips

we need our own tribalism

like the gfurs once had

or the pones

or the alicefags

or the gfur trolls

or ks/b/

We also need cool, interesting, sociable people to seduce new posters.

too bad we're all shit.

Easton Rivera
Easton Rivera

You're all shit.
I'm fly as hell.

Isaiah Mitchell
Isaiah Mitchell

old Squash was fly as hell. He made gfur posters come back to the threads week after week to see what was up. Perhaps he was soft, needy, a little sensitive, but really friendly. Now he's somehow grizzled and jaded, and not even 25.

Austin Watson
Austin Watson

I'm feeling 22.

Landon Rodriguez
Landon Rodriguez

you have the rest of your life to be grizzled.

maybe don't be so eager to be it now?

Bentley Ortiz
Bentley Ortiz

I'm nice when I feel like it.

Brandon Hill
Brandon Hill

it's less of a priority these years. ik.

Levi Wright
Levi Wright

I like far fewer people.

Jonathan Hernandez
Jonathan Hernandez

also, kanra
i read lockes second treatise cover to cover with no issues, so suck on these nuts

Kevin Reed
Kevin Reed

not saying you're not nice. just less 'old Squash' style nice

which was 'nice by default' and 'dick with a reason'

Oliver Lopez
Oliver Lopez

spicy stuff ITT

Zachary Hernandez
Zachary Hernandez

well, it was written in English

its another thing to succinctly put him in your own words

but I have no reason to doubt you can.

Henry Bell
Henry Bell

So many reasons to be a dick.

Lincoln Parker
Lincoln Parker

its honestly all about the writing style, locke is really quite to the point

Justin Mitchell
Justin Mitchell

so many ways to deal with negative thoughts that aren't being a dick

this undercuts your feat

why decide to read it in the first place?

Austin Anderson
Austin Anderson

None of them as fun.

Jose Garcia
Jose Garcia

They're definitely more advanced moves.

Thomas Gomez
Thomas Gomez

Effort is insufficient.

Adam Butler
Adam Butler

There are ways to make it feel effortless.

Repitition is a good one.

James Cooper
James Cooper

Pass.

Brandon Davis
Brandon Davis

The more you let yourself pass

the harder it gets

William Johnson
William Johnson

~I'm sailing away~

Kayden Edwards
Kayden Edwards

im interested in liberalism

Gabriel Barnes
Gabriel Barnes

hi

Ian Martinez
Ian Martinez

Literally anyone else.

Carter Adams
Carter Adams

hi

James Brooks
James Brooks

sup

Jordan Thompson
Jordan Thompson

Almost literally anyone else.

Nathan Wood
Nathan Wood

Just here to show Squash that things can always be worse~

Blake Martinez
Blake Martinez

It could still be better.

Kevin Scott
Kevin Scott

squash massages balls for a living so who cares what he thinks?

Josiah Gray
Josiah Gray

I massage brains for a living so who cares what I thinks

Charles Wilson
Charles Wilson

And I'm damn good at it.

Dylan Baker
Dylan Baker

reading the OG material is one way to go about it

following who it influenced then is important too

but does any of it compare to the vantage point of all the data and studies we have in 2017?

Juan Morgan
Juan Morgan

are you good at it?

Tyler Cook
Tyler Cook

I read On Liberty by John Stuart Mill for the exact same reason: curious about wtf liberal meant.

Pretty sure you can get a good sense of what 'liberal' became in America, England and France by reading others

Let me know how it goes. kindly.

John Clark
John Clark

I made someone cry at paintball. I felt so bad.

Matthew Edwards
Matthew Edwards

Oh, heck no.

Jaxson Jenkins
Jaxson Jenkins

was it a little kid?

Julian Sullivan
Julian Sullivan

what good are you then

Colton Clark
Colton Clark

I'm pretty shit tbhbbq fam bruh

Should probably just kms tbh

Ryder Campbell
Ryder Campbell

yeah you should lbgtq

Joseph Cruz
Joseph Cruz

Eromanga Sensei ended today too, why even live?

Austin Smith
Austin Smith

never seen it

Benjamin Nguyen
Benjamin Nguyen

Yes.
He didn't call his hits and kept running. It was like the second time I've ever played paintball but I figured if they don't say they're out, you can keep shooting them.

John Jackson
John Jackson

Yeah, that makes sense.

It's pedo bait, not furry bait.

Brody Cook
Brody Cook

i dunno what you mean i barely post furry stuff

Daniel Gray
Daniel Gray

im gonna have a hard time getting hold of robert hookers writings, but ill definately be reading hobbes soon

i dont think its comparable, the perspective of locke is different. reading locke was like having much of my own politics explained to me and justified without the need of my own personal moral framework.

Easton Rogers
Easton Rogers

You've been posting a furry at me the whole time.

Eli Lee
Eli Lee

what animal even is this

Elijah Bennett
Elijah Bennett

Looks like an owl to me.

Henry Foster
Henry Foster

June 24, 2017

https://mega.nz/#!L9JkCTqB!BkwUkJ0qclbUQlZOKofL8mv4ckeLSjMNDIx8V2NWV8o

Translated
Hana and Hina ch15
little by little
Mitsuboshi Colors - c028 (v03) [Katyusha]
Mochi Au Lait 7
Murcielago 49
Murcielago 50
Murcielago 51
Murcielago 52
[GiB] A Room for Two - Chapter 16 [Yukiko]
[kaori hero] Homuhomu Night Mission (Puella Magi Madoka Magica) [English]

Untranslated
(C63) [メルヘンBOX (よろず)] どれみパラダイス9 (おジャ魔女どれみ)
(成年コミック) [雑誌] COMIC BAVEL 2017年7月号 [DL版]
(東方合同祭事伍) [ムゲンダイ (フメイ)] マエリベリー・ハーンは甘えたい (東方Project)
[りんとねこ (くうねりん)] みれぃのミルクのむぷり (プリパラ) [DL版]
[メルヘンBOX (よろず)] どれみパラダイス1 (おジャ魔女どれみ)

Juan Thompson
Juan Thompson

idk she just fits and her voice is super cute

Jeremiah Williams
Jeremiah Williams

Yuzumori

Ryder Scott
Ryder Scott

lol gj teaching that dumb kid reality

Levi Diaz
Levi Diaz

she

That's where you're wrong, kiddo.

Jordan Sanchez
Jordan Sanchez

http://hellokitty.wikia.com/wiki/Kuromi

Bentley Martinez
Bentley Martinez

Species: Rabbit

Most definitely a furry.

Hunter Cox
Hunter Cox

Thanks, Luka 2.0.

Aaron Jackson
Aaron Jackson

i need a cat

Justin Rodriguez
Justin Rodriguez

Unfortunately, that's a rabbit.

Christian Ross
Christian Ross

you're a rabbit

Henry Gray
Henry Gray

Is that the order?

Easton Moore
Easton Moore

what?

Aiden Garcia
Aiden Garcia

Is the order a rabbit?

Josiah Sanchez
Josiah Sanchez

no bunnies are too cute to eat

Aiden Flores
Aiden Flores

Tfw no cute little sister to watch anime and play games with

Brody Jenkins
Brody Jenkins

same

Brandon Lopez
Brandon Lopez

why live

Cameron Martinez
Cameron Martinez

tfw only an older sister so it's just eww

Wyatt Miller
Wyatt Miller

tfw completely alone

Gavin Rodriguez
Gavin Rodriguez

lol

^_^

Christopher Green
Christopher Green

new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread
new thread

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page