Working class support for Front National at all time high

> twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/846652348432822272

This is not supposed to happen Holla Forums. What are we supposed to do to ensure that we turn them away from the far right

Maybe stop supporting neoliberalism and immigration? People are voting for the FN because it has a social program and puts a stop to the ghettoization of the Banlieues.

It's simply self-interest. People don't want mass immigration, austerity and neoliberalism. Can you blame them for that?

Frenchmen should be buying guns instead of voting.

On which board do you think you are?

it's a shame we're so shit at making memes
i just can't be fucked tho

For a tankie, this is an excellent post. I couldn't agree more. Mass immigration in capitalism is not beneficial in any way.

Implying you think that FN program would actually stop the ghettoisation and social simplification of imigrant communities.

The point is that they are the only ones who at least suggest to do anything, which for many is already enough given that everyone else doesn't even address this issue.
Nobody is suggesting that they are great.

tankies once again prove they're the best posters

This. If I wasn't a ML and didn't have a political imprint of any form, hell, I'd vote for the FN as well.

Especially communists and materialists in general should be aware that self-interest is the driving force of history. Making people vote against their self-interest is impossible. We should be arguing based on this materialism and don't resort to moralizing the people who are voting for the FN, but rather adress their problems.

The moralizing is already done by the monstrous liberal media machine. It's not our job. Žižek speaks out a great deal about it, too.

They do it to themselves. No more kid gloves or pandering. Raid the islamist ghettos and disperse them. Let them know that if they want to be in France (or the UK, Germany, Sweden), they play by house rules. No sharia courts. No special legal protections. No more sexual segregation resulting in huge numbers of these women not even speaking that native language.

Unscientific fantasy which never worked

Actual truth

Let them experience its failures and see them enter a period of desperation where actual revolutionary politics are possible instead of merely alternating towards the left wing of capital a little.

Who woulda thunk it

That I would dispute. Specific case-studies like Scotland voting Labour in 2010 or the white working class slipping to the Conservatives in England in polls nowadays run contrary to that idea.
(Though obviously, making people vote against their perceived self-interest is quite another thing.)

People have been doing that for years

Fuck democracy. Upholding freedom of movement is more important than satisfying proles' false consciousness.

Spoken like a true Remoaner.

Ban mosques and gulag muslims :^)

Ignorant burgerstani here, are there any leftist frog politicians (even among the most marginal meme-tier ones) that go the final step against neoliberalism to oppose mass economic immigration?

...

Because the woman is good, she always promotes authority and eviscerates the media. Watch any BBC nonce try and do her and they always make her look better.

And she is not a neo-liberal.

Projects authority I should have said.

Swings to the left and to the right are to be expected in this historical period of capitalism's decline.

The political status quo has failed people once too many, the establishment is crumbling without any understanding of how to get itself out of the situation. The ruling class is divided and confused.

People are finding their political expression in all kinds of places, as they search for answers to the looming social crisis. People are latching on to the first "anti-establishment" movement they find. Society is polarizing, this political turbulence is the expression of a society in a pre-revolutionary turmoil of ideas.

Where a genuine, socialist political expression is provided as an alternative, people flock to it. In its absence in a region, people find their anti-establishment political expression in more reactionary places.

No, making them vote against PERCEIVED self-interest is impossible. Which explains

When the third world go shit they go socialist.

When the first world go shit they go fascist.

*blocks your path*

*throws you from the nearest available helicopter once it reaches 1,000 feet*

Yeah, some one example.

The point is, the first world's workers never go socialist.

Yep, fascism used leftist terminology to distract people from the crisis of capitalism. Hitler openly states in Mein Kampf how the right should appropriate left-wing terminology in order to gain the support of the working class.

Spook

Chile wasn't really third-world, they had very progressive classical librul govts throught the 20th century, one of the most stable democracies in Latin America.

meant 19th

He was an American puppet. There was nothing organic about his rise to power. He was arrested once he stopped being useful to the global capitalist class.

I don't see how she can win an election with only 43% worker support

Support for mass immigration is holding a lot of left wing parties back. The proles see it as instrumental to neoliberalism now and I would tend to agree with that assessment.

yes and look whose more successful in the long term